National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: 5 The Impact of the DOE SBIR/STTR Programs: Innovation, Commercialization, and Employment
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Review of the SBIR and STTR Programs at the Department of Energy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25674.
×

References

Aldrich, H. E., and C. M. Fiol. 1994. Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Academy of Management Review 19(4): 645-670.

Armanios, D. E., and C. E. Eesley. 2016. Lowering barriers to entry or changing institutional infrastructure: What drives high-tech entrepreneurship in emerging economies? Working Paper.

Armanios, D. E., and C. E. Eesley. 2018. The institutional infrastructure for change: How does institutional change reduce knowledge barriers to entrepreneurship? Working paper.

Armanios, D. E., C. E. Eesley, J. Li, and K. M. Eisenhardt. 2017. How entrepreneurs leverage institutional intermediaries in emerging economies to acquire public resources. Strategic Management Journal 38(7): 1373-1390.

Armanios, D., L. Lanahan, and D. Yu. Varieties of local government experimentation. Working paper.

ARPA-E (Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy). 2010. 42 U.S.C. §§ 16538.

Arrow, K. J. 1962. The economic implications of learning by doing. Review of Economic Studies 29(3): 155-173.

Arthur, W. B. 2007. The structure of invention. Research Policy 36(2): 274-287.

ASEE (American Society for Engineering Education). 2016. Engineering by the numbers. Washington, DC. https://www.asee.org/documents/papers-and-publications/publications/college-profiles/16Profile-Front-Section.pdf.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Review of the SBIR and STTR Programs at the Department of Energy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25674.
×

Audretsch, D. B. 2003. Standing on the shoulders of midgets: The U.S. Small Business Innovation Research program (SBIR). Small Business Economics 20(2): 129-135.

Audretsch, D. B., and M. P. Feldman. 1996. R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. American Economic Review: 86(3): 630-640.

Audretsch, D. B., A. N. Link, and J. T. Scott. 2002. Public/private technology partnerships: evaluating SBIR-supported research. Research Policy 31(1): 145-158.

Auerswald, P. E., and L. M. Branscomb. 2003). Valleys of death and Darwinian seas: Financing the invention to innovation transition in the United States. Journal of Technology Transfer 28(3-4): 227-239.

Avnimelech, G., and M. P. Feldman. 2015. The stickiness of university spin-offs: A study of formal and informal spin-offs and their location from 124 U.S. academic institutions. International Journal of Technology Management 68(1-2): 122-149.

Beckman, C. M., & Burton, M. D. (2008). Founding the future: Path dependence in the evolution of top management teams from founding to IPO. Organization Science, 19(1), 3-24.

Beckman, C. M., Burton, M. D., & O’Reilly, C. (2007). Early teams: The impact of team demography on VC financing and going public. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(2), 147-173.

Biotechnology Industry Research Assistance Council (BIRAC). n.d. About us. https://birac.nic.in/desc_new.php?id=89.

Block, Fred. 2008. Swimming against the current: The rise of a hidden developmental state in the United States. Politics and Society 36(2): 169-206.

Bloom, N., M. Schankerman, and J. Van Reenen. 2013. Identifying technology spillovers and product market rivalry. Econometrica 81(4): 1347-1393.

Business.gov.nl. n.d. SBIR innovation competition. Utrecht, The Netherlands. https://business.gov.nl/subsidy/small-business-innovation-research/.

Catalini, C., Guzman, J., & Stern, S. (2019). Passive Versus Active Growth: Evidence from Founder Choices and Venture Capital Investment (No. w26073). National Bureau of Economic Research.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Review of the SBIR and STTR Programs at the Department of Energy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25674.
×

Cantoni, C. 2018a. DOE SBIR/STTR success: Silicon Audio, LLC. Washington, DC: Department of Energy, SBIR/STTR Programs Office. https://science.osti.gov/-/media/sbir/pdf/Success-Stories/Silicon-Audio_NNSA_2018.pdf?la=en&hash=65D64197E391AAC9C3B0791FDFCCCE6AABA70946.

Cantoni, C. 2018b. DOE SBIR/STTR success: Kitware. Washington, DC: Department of Energy, SBIR/STTR Programs Office. https://science.osti.gov//media/sbir/pdf/Success-Stories/Kitware_success-story_2018.pdf?la=en&hash=684EA113A08FD1119ABD1C463223656EF531B172.

Cerulli, G. 2010. Modelling and measuring the effect of public subsidies on business R&D: A critical review of the econometric literature. Economic Record 86(274): 421-449.

Chen, E. L., R. Katila, R. McDonald, and K. M. Eisenhardt. 2010. Life in the fast lane: Origins of competitive interaction in new vs. established markets. Strategic Management Journal 31(13): 1527-1547.

Chernenko, S., J. Lerner, and Y. Zeng. 2017. Mutual funds as venture capitalists? Evidence from unicorns. Working paper no. 23981. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. https://www.nber.org/papers/w23981.

Cockburn, I. M., S. Stern, and J. Zausner. 2011. Finding the endless frontier: Lessons from the life sciences innovation system for energy R&D. In Accelerating energy innovation: Insights from multiple sectors, edited by R. Henderson and R. Newell. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Pp. 113-157.

Colyvas, J. A., and W. W. Powell. 2009. Measures, metrics, and myopia: The challenges and ramifications of sustaining academic entrepreneurship. In Measuring the social value of innovation: A link in the university technology transfer and entrepreneurship equation, edited by G. Libecap, volume 19 of Advances in the Study of Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Economic Growth. Pp. 79-111. https://www.emerald.com/insight/publication/doi/10.1108/S1048-4736(2009)19.

Cook, L. D. 2012. Overcoming discrimination by consumers during the age of segregation: The example of Garrett Morgan. Business History Review 86(2): 211-234.

Cook, L. D. 2014. Violence and economic activity: Evidence from African American patents, 1870–1940. Journal of Economic Growth 19(2): 221-257.

Cooper, R. S. 2003. Purpose and performance of the Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) program. Small Business Economics, 20(2): 137-151.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Review of the SBIR and STTR Programs at the Department of Energy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25674.
×

David, P. A., B. H. Hall, and A. A. Toole. 2000. Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? A review of the econometric evidence. Research Policy 29(4-5): 497-529.

Decker, R. A., Haltiwanger, J., Jarmin, R. S., & Miranda, J. (2016). Where has all the skewness gone? The decline in high-growth (young) firms in the U.S. European Economic Review, 86, 4-23.

Decker, R., Haltiwanger, J., Jarmin, R., & Miranda, J. (2014). The role of entrepreneurship in U.S. job creation and economic dynamism. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(3), 3-24.

Diamond, S., and J. Kuan. 2012. The importance of institutional design: Evidence from the New York Stock Exchange IPO and Reg. NMS. (January 17, 2012). Available https://ssrn.com/abstract=1987275.

Djankov, S., C. McLiesh, and R. M. Ramalho. 2006. Regulation and growth. Economics Letters 92(3): 395-401.

DOE (Department of Energy). 2006. Budget execution: Funds distribution and control manual. DOE M 135.1-1A. Washington, DC. www.directives.doe.gov.

DOE (Department of Energy). 2015. The STTR Program at the Department of Energy. Presentation by Manny Oliver at the Workshop on the Small Business Technology Transfer Program. The National Academies. May 1.

DOE (Department of Energy). 2019. U.S. Department of Energy announces $4 million funding opportunity for the minority education, workforce, and training program. Washington, DC. https://www.energy.gov/diversity/articles/us-department-energy-announces-4-millionfunding-opportunity-minority-education.

DOE (Department of Energy). n.d.a. Mission of the Department of Energy. Washington, DC. Accessed February 26, 2020. https://www.energy.gov/mission.

DOE (Department of Energy). n.d.b. Commercialization Assistance Program. Washington, DC. Accessed February 26, 2020. https://science.osti.gov/sbir/Awardee-Resources/Commercialization-Assistance-Program.

DOE (Department of Energy). n.d.c. Tutorial 7: How are Phase I proposals evaluated? Accessed February 26, 2020. Washington, DC. https://science.osti.gov/SBIRLearning/FAQs/Tutorial-7.

DOE (Department of Energy). n.d.d. SBIR/STTR Phase III success stories. Washington, DC. https://science.osti.gov/sbir/SBIR-STTR-Success-Stories.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Review of the SBIR and STTR Programs at the Department of Energy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25674.
×

Dutt, N., O. Hawn, E. Vidal, A. Chatterji, A. McGahan, and W. Mitchell. 2016. How open system intermediaries address institutional failures: The case of business incubators in emerging-market countries. Academy of Management Journal 59(3): 818-840.

Dworkin, T. M., Maurer, V., & Schipani, C. A. (2012). Career mentoring for women: New horizons/expanded methods. Business Horizons, 55(4): 363-372.

Eberhart, R., C. E. Eesley, and K. M. Eisenhardt. 2016. Failure is an option: Bankruptcy reform and new firm performance. Working paper 111. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Rock Center for Corporate Governance. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1982819.

Edmondson, A. C., and J. F. Harvey. 2017. Cross-boundary teaming for innovation: Integrating research on teams and knowledge in organizations. Human Resource Management Review 28(4): 347–360.

Edmondson, A. C., and I. M. Nembhard. 2009. Product development and learning in project teams: The challenges are the benefits. Journal of Product Innovation Management 26(2): 123-138.

Eesley, C., D. Hsu, and E. B. Roberts. 2014. The contingent effects of top management teams on venture performance: Aligning founding team composition with innovation strategy and commercialization environment. Strategic Management Journal 35(12): 1798-1817.

Eesley, C., J. B. Li, and D. Yang. 2016. Does institutional change in universities influence high-tech entrepreneurship? Evidence from China’s project 985. Organization Science 27(2): 446-461.

European Commission. n.d. EIC Accelerator (SME Instrument). Brussels, Belgium. Accessed February 26, 2020. https://ec.europa.eu/easme/en/eic-accelerator-sme-instrument.

Farre-Mensa, J. D. Hegde, and A. Ljungqvist. 2019. What Is a Patent Worth? Evidence from the U.S. Patent ‘Lottery’. Journal of Finance. November 27.

Fealing, K. H., Y. Lai, and S. L. Myers Jr. 2015. Pathways vs. pipelines to broadening participation in the STEM workforce. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering 21(4): 271-293.

Feldman, M., T. Hadjimichael, L. Lanahan, and T. Kemeny. 2016. The logic of economic development: A definition and model for investment. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 34(1): 5-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263774X15614653.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Review of the SBIR and STTR Programs at the Department of Energy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25674.
×

Furman, J. L., and S. Stern. 2011. Climbing atop the shoulders of giants: The impact of institutions on cumulative research. American Economic Review 101(5): 1933-1963.

Furman J. L., M. E. Porter, and S. Stern. 2002. The determinants of national innovative capacity. Research Policy 31(6): 899-933.

Gaddy, B., V. Sivaram, and F. O’Sullivan. 2016. Venture capital and cleantech: The wrong model for clean energy innovation. Working Paper MITEI-WP-201606. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Energy Initiative. http://energy.mit.edu/publication/venture-capital-cleantech/.

Gans, J. S., & Stern, S. (2000). Incumbency and R&D incentives: Licensing the gale of creative destruction. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 9(4): 485-511.

Gans, J., and S. Stern. 2003. When does funding research by smaller firms bear fruit? Evidence from the SBIR program. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 12(4): 361-384.

GAO (Government Accountability Office). 1992. Small business innovation research shows success but can be strengthened. Report to U.S. Congressional Committees. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

GAO (Government Accountability Office). 1998. Observations on the small business innovation research program. Testimony before the Committee on Small Business. United States Senate. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Graebner, M. E., J. A. Martin, and P. T. Roundy. 2012. Qualitative data: Cooking without a recipe. Strategic Organization 10(3): 276-284.

Grandy, J., and S. R. Hiatt. 2017. State agency discretion and entrepreneurship in regulated markets. Available https://ssrn.com/abstract=3051316.

Griliches, Z. 1998. Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. In R&D and productivity: The econometric evidence, edited by Z. Griliches. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Pp. 287-343.

Haeussler, C., and J. A. Colyvas. 2011. Breaking the ivory tower: Academic entrepreneurship in the life sciences in UK and Germany. Research Policy, 40(1), 41-54.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Review of the SBIR and STTR Programs at the Department of Energy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25674.
×

Hall, B. H., and J. Lerner. 2010. The financing of R&D and innovation. In Handbook of the economics of innovation, volume 1, edited by B. Hall and N. Rosenberg. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North Holland. Pp. 609-639.

Hallen, B. L., and K. M. Eisenhardt. 2012. Catalyzing strategies and efficient tie formation: How entrepreneurial firms obtain investment ties. Academy of Management Journal 55(1): 35-70.

Haltiwanger, J., R. S. Jarmin, and J. Miranda. 2013. Who creates jobs? Small versus large versus young. Review of Economics and Statistics 95(2): 347-361.

Howell, S. T. 2015. Financing constraints as barriers to innovation: Evidence from R&D grants to energy startups. SSRN Electronic Journal.

Howell, S. T. 2017. Financing innovation: Evidence from R&D grants. American Economic Review 107(4): 1136-1164.

Howell, S. T. 2019. Analysis of the U.S. Department of Energy’s Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy and Fossil Energy SBIR programs. Prepared for the Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Washington, DC. https://www.energy.gov/eere/articles/benefits-eere-small-business-innovation-grants-confirmed-new-study.

Howell, S., and J. D. Brown. 2020. Do cash windfalls affect wages? Evidence from R&D grants to small firms. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3474633.

Hsu, D. H., and K. Lim. 2013. Knowledge brokering and organizational innovation: Founder imprinting effects. Organization Science 25(4): 1134-1153.

Hsu, D. H., and R. H. Ziedonis. 2008. Patents as quality signals for entrepreneurial ventures. In Academy of Management Proceedings 2008(1):1-6. Briarcliff Manor, NY: Academy of Management.

IES (Institute for Education Sciences). 2019. Fast facts: Race/ethnicity of college faculty. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=61.

Igami, M., and J. Subrahmanyam. 2015. Patent statistics as an innovation indicator? Evidence from the hard disk drive industry. Mimeograph.

Inoue, H., and E. Yamaguchi. 2017. Evaluation of the Small Business Innovation Research program in Japan. Sage Open 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244017690791.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Review of the SBIR and STTR Programs at the Department of Energy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25674.
×

Jaffe, A. B., M. Trajtenberg, and R. Henderson. 1993. Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics 108(3): 577-598.

Joshi, A. M., and A. Nerkar. 2011. When do strategic alliances inhibit innovation by firms? Evidence from patent pools in the global optical disc industry. Strategic Management Journal 32(11): 1139-1160.

Joshi, A. M., T. M. Inouye, and J. A. Robinson. 2018. How does agency workforce diversity influence federal R&D funding of minority and women technology entrepreneurs? An analysis of the SBIR and STTR programs, 2001–2011. Small Business Economics 50: 499-519.

Katila, R., J. D. Rosenberger, and K. M. Eisenhardt. 2008. Swimming with sharks: Technology ventures, defense mechanisms and corporate relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly 53(2): 295-332.

Keller, M. R., and F. Block. 2013. Explaining the transformation in the U.S. innovation system: the impact of a small government program. Socio-Economic Review, 11(4), 629–656.

Keller, S., S. Shipp, M. Orr, D. Higdon, G. Korkmaz, A. Schroeder, E. Molfino, B. Pires, K. Ziemer, and D. H. Weinberg. 2016. Leveraging external data sources to enhance official statistics and products. Report prepared for the U.S. Census Bureau. Washington, DC.

Kogan, L., D. Papanikolaou, A. Seru, and N. Stoffman. 2017. Technological innovation, resource allocation, and growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 132(2): 665-712.

Krosnick, J. A., S. Presser, K. H. Fealing, S. Ruggles, and D. L. Vannette. 2015. The future of survey research: Challenges and opportunities. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation Advisory Committee for the Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences Subcommittee on Advancing Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences (SBE) Survey Research.

Kuan, J., S. Rombe-Shulman, and E. Shittu. 2015. The political economy of technology adoption: The case of Saharan salt mining. The Extractive Industries and Society 2(2): 328-338.

Lanahan, L. 2016. Multilevel public funding for small business innovation: A review of U.S. state SBIR match programs. Journal of Technology Transfer 41(2): 220-249.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Review of the SBIR and STTR Programs at the Department of Energy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25674.
×

Lanahan, L., and D. Armanios. 2018. Does more certification always benefit a venture? Organization Science 29(5): 931-947.

Lanahan, L., and D. Armanios. 2019. Appropriateness penalty, desirability premium: What do ventures signal when they acquire more certifications? Working paper.

Lanahan, L., and M. P. Feldman. 2015. Multilevel innovation policy mix: A closer look at state policies that augment the federal SBIR program. Research Policy 44(7): 1387-1402.

Lanahan, L., and M. P. Feldman. 2018. Approximating exogenous variation in R&D: Evidence from the Kentucky and North Carolina SBIR state match programs. Review of Economics and Statistics 100(4): 740-752.

Lanahan, L., A.M. Joshi, and E. Johnson. 2019. Small business growth from public R&D funding: Evidence from a natural experiment of the SBIR/STTR program. Working paper.

Leatherbee, M., and C. Eesley. 2014. Boulevard of broken behaviors: Sociopsychological mechanisms of entrepreneurship policies. Available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=2488712.

Lerner, J. 2000. The government as venture capitalist: The long-run impact of the SBIR program. Journal of Private Equity 3(2): 55-78.

Link, A. N., and J. T. Scott. 2009. Private investor participation and commercialization rates for government-sponsored research and development: Would a prediction market improve the performance of the SBIR programme? Economica, New Series, 76(302): 264-281.

Link, A. N., and J. T. Scott. 2000. Estimates of the Social Returns to SBIR-Sponsored Projects. In National Research Council. The Small Business Innovation Research Program: An Assessment of the DOD Fast Track Initiative. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Pp. 275-290.

Link, A. N., and J. T. Scott. 2010. Government as entrepreneur: Evaluating the commercialization success of SBIR projects. Research Policy 39(5): 589-601.

Liu, G. 2014. Incentives for doing business in Taiwan: SBIR. Taiwan News, August 28. https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/2558902.

Lockett, A., and, M. Wright 2005. Resources, capabilities, risk capital and the creation of university spin-out companies. Research Policy 34(7): 1043-1057.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Review of the SBIR and STTR Programs at the Department of Energy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25674.
×

Lowe, N. J., and M. P. Feldman. 2017. Institutional life within an entrepreneurial region. Geography Compass 11(3).

Mair, J., I. Martí, and M. J. Ventresca. 2012. Building inclusive markets in rural Bangladesh: How intermediaries work institutional voids. Academy of Management Journal 55(4): 819-850.

Marx, M., J. S. Gans, and D. H. Hsu. 2014. Dynamic commercialization strategies for disruptive technologies: Evidence from the speech recognition industry. Management Science 60(12): 3103-3123.

Mazzucato, M. 2013. Financing innovation: Creative destruction vs. destructive creation. Industrial and Corporate Change 22(4): 851-867.

Mazzucato, M. 2015. The entrepreneurial state: Debunking public vs. private sector myths. London: Anthem Press.

McDermott, G. A., R. A. Corredoira, and G. Kruse. 2009. Public-private institutions as catalysts of upgrading in emerging market societies. Academy of Management Journal 52(6): 1270-1296.

Molfino, E., G. Korkmaz, S. A. Keller, A. Schroeder, S. Shipp, and D. H. Weinberg. 2017. Can administrative housing data replace survey data? Cityscape 19(1): 265.

Morehead Dworkin, T., V. Maurer, and C. A.Schipani. 2012. Career mentoring for women: New horizons/Expanded methods. Business Horizons 55(4): 363-372.

Myers, K. and L. Lanahan. 2020. Research subsidy spillovers, two ways. Working paper.

Nanda, R., and J. S. Sørensen. 2010. Workplace peers and entrepreneurship. Management Science 56(7): 1116-1126.

NAS/NAE/IOM (National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine). 2007. Beyond bias and barriers: Fulfilling the potential of women in academic science and engineering. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/11741.

NASEM (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine). 2016. SBIR/STTR at the Department of Energy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/23406.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Review of the SBIR and STTR Programs at the Department of Energy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25674.
×

NASEM (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine). 2017. An assessment of ARPA-E. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/24778.

National Laboratories. n.d. Diversity and inclusion. Accessed February 26, 2020. National Laboratory Directors’ Council. https://nationallabs.org/staff/diversity/.

Nelson, R. R. 1959. The simple economics of basic scientific research. Journal of Political Economy 67(3): 297-306.

Nelson, R. R. 1993. National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. New York and London: Oxford University Press.

Nemet, G. F. 2009. Demand pull, technology push, and government-led incentives for nonincremental technical change. Research Policy 38(5): 700-709.

Nemet, G. F., V. Zipperer, and M. Kraus. 2018. The valley of death, the technology pork barrel, and public support for large demonstration projects. Energy Policy 119: 154-167.

Neumark, D., B. Wall, and J. Zhang. 2011. Do small businesses create more jobs? New evidence for the United States from the National Establishment Time Series. Review of Economics and Statistics 93(1): 16-29.

NRC (National Research Council). 2008. An assessment of the SBIR program at the Department of Energy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/12052.

NRC (National Research Council). 2008. An assessment of the SBIR program at the National Science Foundation. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/11929.

NSF (National Science Foundation). 2019. Master government list of federally funded R&D centers. Washington, DC. https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/ffrdclist/#agency.

ORISE (Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education). n.d. What is ORISE? Accessed February 26, 2020. Oak Ridge, TN. https://orise.orau.gov/about/index.html.

Pahnke, E. C., R. Katila, and K. M. Eisenhardt. 2015. Who takes you to the dance? How partners’ institutional logics influence innovation in young firms. Administrative Science Quarterly 60(4): 596-633.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Review of the SBIR and STTR Programs at the Department of Energy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25674.
×

Palmintera, D., and D. Porter. 2016. Enhancing national laboratory partnership and commercialization opportunities. Prepared by Innovation Associates Inc. Lemont, IL: Argonne National Laboratory. https://www.nist.gov/system/files/documents/2016/10/13/argonne.ia_.enhancing_nat_lab_partnerships.final_.1.pdf.

Piezunka, H., and L. Dahlander. 2015. Distant search, narrow attention: How crowding alters organizations’ filtering of suggestions in crowdsourcing. Academy of Management Journal 58(3): 856-880.

Powell, W. W., J. Owen-Smith, and J. A. Colyvas. 2007. Innovation and emulation: Lessons from American universities in selling private rights to public knowledge. Minerva 45(2): 121-142.

Reich, E. S. 2013. U.S. research firms put under pressure to sell. Nature 499(7457): 137.

SBA (Small Business Administration). 1982. The state of small business: A report of the President transmitted to the Congress. Washington, DC.

SBA (Small Business Administration). 2016a. Collaborative development projects. Washington, DC. https://www.sbir.gov/sbirsearch/detail/1161297.

SBA (Small Business Administration). 2016b. SBA Office of Investment and Innovation. December. Accessed March 4, 2020. Washington, DC. https://www.sbir.gov/about/about-sbir.

SBA (Small Business Administration). 2016c. Who is economically disadvantaged? 13 CFR §124.104.

SBA (Small Business Administration). 2019. Policy directive: Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) program. Washington, DC. http://sbir.gov/sites/default/files/SBIR-STTR_Policy_Directive_2019.pdf.

SBA (Small Business Administration). 2020. Awards information. Washington, DC. https://www.sbir.gov/analytics-dashboard?view_by=Year.

SBA (Small Business Administration). n.d.a. Birth and history of the SBIR program. Accessed February 26, 2020. Washington, DC. https://www.sbir.gov/birth-and-history-of-the-sbir-program.

SBA (Small Business Administration). n.d.b. About SBIR. Accessed February 26, 2020. Washington, DC. https://www.sbir.gov/about/about-sbir.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Review of the SBIR and STTR Programs at the Department of Energy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25674.
×

SBA (Small Business Administration). n.d.c. About STTR. Accessed February 26, 2020. Washington, DC. https://www.sbir.gov/about/about-sttr.

SBA (Small Business Administration). n.d.d. Frequently asked questions: Eligibility requirements. Accessed February 26, 2020. Washington, DC. https://www.sbir.gov/faqs/eligibility-requirements.

SBA (Small Business Administration). n.d.e. About Tibbetts Awards and Hall of Fame. Accessed February 26, 2020. Washington, DC. https://www.sbir.gov/about-tibbetts-awards.

SBIR/STTR IPC (SBIR/STTR Interagency Policy Committee). 2014. The Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) program Interagency Policy Committee report to Congress.

Shane, S., and T. Stuart. 2002. Organizational endowments and the performance of university start-ups. Management Science 48(1): 154-170.

Sherwin, C. W., and R. S. Isenson. 1967. Project hindsight. Science 156(3782): 1571-1577.

Siegel, D. S., and C. Wessner. 2012. Universities and the success of entrepreneurial ventures: Evidence from the small business innovation research program. Journal of Technology Transfer 37(4): 404-415.

Siegel, D. S., D. Waldman, and A. Link. 2003. Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: An exploratory study. Research Policy 32(1): 27-48.

Sine, W. D., R. J. David, and H. Mitsuhashi. 2007. From plan to plant: Effects of certification on operational start-up in the emergent independent power sector. Organization Science 18(4): 578-594.

Sørensen, J. B., and T. E. Stuart. 2000. Aging, obsolescence, and organizational innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 45(1): 81-112.

Stiglitz, J. E., and S. J. Wallsten. 1999. Public-private technology partnerships: Promises and pitfalls. American Behavioral Scientist 43(1): 52-73.

Stuart, T., and W. Ding. 2006. When do scientists become entrepreneurs? The social structural antecedents of commercial activity in the academic life sciences. American Journal of Sociology 112: 97-144.

Tibbetts, R. 2011. Reauthorizing SBIR: The Critical Importance of SBIR and

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Review of the SBIR and STTR Programs at the Department of Energy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25674.
×

Small High Tech Firms in Stimulating and Strengthening the U.S. Economy. Appendix M of U.S. Congress, House Committee on Small Business, Hearing on Spurring Innovation and Job Creation: The SBIR Program. March 16. 112th Cong. 1st session. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

Tingle, A. 2016. Essays on the small business innovation research (SBIR) and small business technology transfer (STTR) program. Doctoral Dissertation, George Mason University.

Toole, A. A., and D. Czarnitzki. 2007. Biomedical academic entrepreneurship through the SBIR program. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 63(4): 716-738.

Toole, A. A., and D. Czarnitzki. 2009. Exploring the relationship between scientist human capital and firm performance: The case of biomedical academic entrepreneurs in the SBIR program. Management Science 55(1): 101-114.

Toole, A. A., and D. Czarnitzki. 2010. Commercializing science: Is there a university “brain drain” from academic entrepreneurship? Management Science 56(9): 1599-1614.

UK Government. 2020. SBRI: The Small Business Research Initiative. https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/sbri-the-small-business-research-initiative.

U.S. Code. 2019a. Research and development. 15 USC 638 note.

U.S. Code. 2019b. Small Business Act. Public Law 85-536, as amended.

U.S. Code of Federal Regulations. 2020. Title 13 (Business Credit and Assistance), Part 126 (BUBZONE Program), Subpart B (Requirements to be a Certified HUBZone Small Business Concern).

U.S. Congress. 1982. Small Business Research Development Act of 1982. 97th Congress. Pub. L. 97-219. July 22.

U.S. Congress. 1992. Small Business Research and Development Enhancement Act of 1992. 102nd Congress. Pub. L. 102-564. October 28.

U.S. Congress. 2000. Small Business Reauthorization Act of 2000. HR 5667. Pub. L. 106-554, Appendix I. December 21.

U.S. Congress. 2019. John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2019. 115th Congress. Pub. L. 115-232. August 13.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Review of the SBIR and STTR Programs at the Department of Energy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25674.
×

Wallsten, S. J. 2000. The effects of government-industry R&D programs on private R&D: The case of the Small Business Innovation Research program. RAND Journal of Economics 31(1): 82-100.

Wang, Y. B., J. Z. Li, and J. L. Furman. 2017. Firm performance and state innovation funding: Evidence from China’s innofund program. Research Policy 46(6): 1142-1161.

Wennerås, C., and A. Wold. 1997. Nepotism and sexism in peer review. Nature 387: 341-343.

Westphal, J. D., and M. E. Graebner. 2010. A matter of appearances: How corporate leaders manage the impressions of financial analysts about the conduct of their boards. Academy of Management Journal 53(1): 15-44.

Wood Brooks, A., L. Huang, S. Wood Kearney, and F. E. Murray. 2014. Investors prefer entrepreneurial ventures pitched by attractive men. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111(12): 4427-4431.

Zhao, B., and R. H. Ziedonis. 2012. State governments as financiers of technology startups: Implications for firm performance. SSRN Electronic Journal.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Review of the SBIR and STTR Programs at the Department of Energy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25674.
×

This page intentionally left blank.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Review of the SBIR and STTR Programs at the Department of Energy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25674.
×
Page 135
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Review of the SBIR and STTR Programs at the Department of Energy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25674.
×
Page 136
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Review of the SBIR and STTR Programs at the Department of Energy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25674.
×
Page 137
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Review of the SBIR and STTR Programs at the Department of Energy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25674.
×
Page 138
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Review of the SBIR and STTR Programs at the Department of Energy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25674.
×
Page 139
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Review of the SBIR and STTR Programs at the Department of Energy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25674.
×
Page 140
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Review of the SBIR and STTR Programs at the Department of Energy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25674.
×
Page 141
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Review of the SBIR and STTR Programs at the Department of Energy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25674.
×
Page 142
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Review of the SBIR and STTR Programs at the Department of Energy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25674.
×
Page 143
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Review of the SBIR and STTR Programs at the Department of Energy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25674.
×
Page 144
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Review of the SBIR and STTR Programs at the Department of Energy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25674.
×
Page 145
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Review of the SBIR and STTR Programs at the Department of Energy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25674.
×
Page 146
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Review of the SBIR and STTR Programs at the Department of Energy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25674.
×
Page 147
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Review of the SBIR and STTR Programs at the Department of Energy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25674.
×
Page 148
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Review of the SBIR and STTR Programs at the Department of Energy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25674.
×
Page 149
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Review of the SBIR and STTR Programs at the Department of Energy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25674.
×
Page 150
Next: Appendixes »
Review of the SBIR and STTR Programs at the Department of Energy Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $65.00 Buy Ebook | $54.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

Since its founding in 1982, the Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) program has become the largest and most comprehensive public research and development funding program of small business research in the United States. An underlying tenet of the SBIR program, and the related Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) program, is that small and young firms are an important source of new ideas that provide the underlying basis for technological innovation, productivity increases, and subsequent economic growth. By involving qualified small businesses in the nation's research and development efforts, SBIR/STTR grants stimulate the development of innovative technologies and help federal agencies achieve their missions and objectives.

At the request of the Department of Energy (DOE), this report examines the SBIR and STTR programs at DOE, focusing on the effectiveness of DOE's SBIR/STTR processes and procedures on topic and awardee selection; DOE outreach efforts to SBIR and STTR applicants; collaborations created between small businesses and research institutions on account of the programs; a range of direct economic and non-economic impacts to awardees; and the role of SBIR/STTR programs in stimulating technological innovation and contributing to DOE's research and development needs, whether directly from awardees or indirectly through spillovers from other firms.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!