National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Chapter 8 - Conclusions and Application of Findings for Decision-Making
Page 77
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Bicyclist Facility Preferences and Effects on Increasing Bicycle Trips. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25792.
×
Page 77
Page 78
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Bicyclist Facility Preferences and Effects on Increasing Bicycle Trips. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25792.
×
Page 78
Page 79
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Bicyclist Facility Preferences and Effects on Increasing Bicycle Trips. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25792.
×
Page 79
Page 80
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Bicyclist Facility Preferences and Effects on Increasing Bicycle Trips. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25792.
×
Page 80

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

77 References Abadi, M. G., & Hurwitz, D. S. (2018). Bicyclist’s Perceived Level of Comfort in Dense Urban Environments: How Do Ambient Traffic, Engineering Treatments, and Bicyclist Characteristics Relate? Sustainable Cities and Society, 40, 101–109. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.04.003. Akar, G., & Clifton, K. J. (2009). Influence of Individual Perceptions and Bicycle Infrastructure on Decision to Bike. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2140, 165–172. http://doi.org/10.3141/2140-18. Aldred, R. (2013). Incompetent or Too Competent? Negotiating Everyday Cycling Identities in a Motor Dominated Society. Mobilities, 8, 2, 252–271. http://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2012.696342. Babbie, E. (2010). The Practice of Social Research. 12th Edition, Wadsworth, Belmont, CA. Bentler, P. M., and C. P. Chou. (1987). Practical Issues in Structural Modeling. Sociological Methods and Research, 16, 78–117. Blanc, B., & Figliozzi, M. (2016). Modeling the Impacts of Facility Type, Trip Characteristics, and Trip Stressors on Cyclists’ Comfort Levels Utilizing Crowdsourced Data. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2587, 100–108. http://doi.org/10.3141/2587-12. Broach, J., Gliebe, J., & Dill, J. (2010). Calibrated Labeling Method for Generating Bicyclist Route Choice Sets Incorporating Unbiased Attribute Variation. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2197, 89–97. http://doi.org/10.3141/2197-11. Buehler, R., & Pucher, J. (2012). Cycling to Work in 90 Large American Cities: New Evidence on the Role of Bike Paths and Lanes. Transportation, 39, 2, 409–432. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-011-9355-8. Burbidge, S. K., & Shea, M. S. (2018). Measuring Systemic Impacts of Bike Infrastructure Projects. Retrieved from http://www.udot.utah.gov/go/research. Cabral, L., Kim, A. M., & Parkins, J. R. (2018). Bicycle Ridership and Intention in a Northern, Low-Cycling City. Travel Behaviour and Society, 13, 165–173. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2018.08.005. Cervero, R., & Duncan, M. (2003). Walking, Bicycling, and Urban Landscapes: Evidence from the San Francisco Bay Area. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 9, 1478–1483. http://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.93.9.1478. Chatterjee, K., Sherwin, H., & Jain, J. (2013). Triggers for Changes in Cycling: The Role of Life Events and Modifications to the External Environment. Journal of Transport Geography, 30, 183–193. http://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.02.007. Cleaveland, F., & Douma, F. (2008). The Impact of Bicycling Facilities on Commute Mode Share. State and Local Policy Program, Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. Clifton, K., and Handy, S. (2003). Qualitative Methods in Travel Behaviour Research. In Transport Survey Quality and Innovation (Jones, P., and Stopher, P., eds.), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bradford, UK, pp. 283–302. https://doi.org/10.1108/9781786359551-016. Cole-Hunter, T., Donaire-Gonzalez, D., Curto, A., Ambros, A., Valentin, A., Garcia-Aymerich, J., Martinez, D., Braun, L. M., Mendez, M., Jerrett, M., Rodriguez, D., de Nazelle, A., & Nieuwenhuijsen, M. (2015). Objective Correlates and Determinants of Bicycle Commuting Propensity in an Urban Environment. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 40, 2, 132–143. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2015.07.004. Daley, M., & Rissel, C. (2011). Perspectives and Images of Cycling as a Barrier or Facilitator of Cycling. Transport Policy, 18, 1, 211–216. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.08.004. dell’Olio, L., Ibeas, A., Bordagaray, M., & Ortúzar, J. D. D. (2014). Modeling the Effects of Pro Bicycle Infrastruc- ture and Policies Toward Sustainable Urban Mobility. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 140, 2, 04014001. http://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000190. DiGioia, J., K. Watkins, X. Yanzhi, M. Rodgers, & R. Guensler. (2017). Safety Impacts of Bicycle Infrastructure: A Critical Review. Journal of Safety Research, 61, 105–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2017.02.015.

78 Bicyclist Facility Preferences and Effects on Increasing Bicycle Trips Dill, J. (2009). Bicycling for Transportation and Health: The Role of Infrastructure. Journal of Public Health Policy, 30 Suppl 1(1), S95–S110. http://doi.org/10.1057/jphp.2008.56. Dill, J., & Carr, T. (2003). Bicycle Commuting and Facilities in Major U.S. Cities: If You Build Them, Commuters Will Use Them. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1828(1), 116–123. http://doi.org/10.3141/1828-14. Dill, J., & Gliebe, J. (2008). Understanding and Measuring Bicycling Behavior: A Focus on Travel Time and Route Choice. Bicycling. Dill, J., & McNeil, N. (2013). Four Types of Cyclists?: Examination of Typology for Better Understanding of Bicycling Behavior and Potential. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2387, 129–138. http://doi.org/10.3141/2387-15. Dill, J., & Voros, K. (2007). Factors Affecting Bicycling Demand: Initial Survey Findings from the Portland, Oregon, Region. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2031, 9–17. http://doi.org/10.3141/2031-02. Dill, J., Mohr, C., & Ma, L. (2014). How Can Psychological Theory Help Cities Increase Walking and Bicycling? Journal of the American Planning Association, 80, 1, 36–51. Downward, P., & Rasciute, S. (2015). Assessing the Impact of the National Cycle Network and Physical Activity Lifestyle on Cycling Behaviour in England. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 78, 425–437. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.06.007. Emond, C. R., & Handy, S. L. (2012). Factors Associated with Bicycling to High School: Insights from Davis, CA. Journal of Transport Geography, 20, 1, 71–79. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.07.008. Emond, C., Tang, W., & Handy, S. (2009). Explaining Gender Difference in Bicycling Behavior. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2125, 16–25. http://doi.org/10.3141/2125-03. Félix, R., Moura, F., & Clifton, K. (2017). Typologies of Urban Cyclists: Review of Market Segmentation Methods for Planning Practice. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2662, 125–133. https://doi.org/10.3141/2F2662-14. Forsyth, A., Krizek, K. J., & Agrawal, A. W. (2010). Measuring Walking and Cycling Using the PABS (Pedestrian and Bicycling Survey) Approach?: a Low-Cost Survey Method for Local Communities. Retrieved from http:// ntl.bts.gov/lib/35000/35700/35702/2907_report.pdf. Ghekiere, A., Deforche, B., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., Clarys, P., Mertens, L., Cardon, G., de Geus, B., Nasar, J., & Van Cauwenberg, J. (2018). An Experimental Study Using Manipulated Photographs to Examine Inter- actions Between Micro-Scale Environmental Factors for Children’s Cycling for Transport. Journal of Trans- port Geography, 66, 30–34. http://doi.org/10.1016/J.JTRANGEO.2017.11.005. Gotschi, T. (2011). Costs and Benefits of Bicycling Investments in Portland, Oregon. Journal of Physical Activity & Health, 8 (Suppl 1), S49–S58. Griswold, J. B., Yu, M., Filingeri, V., Grembek, O., & Walker, J. L. (2018). A Behavioral Modeling Approach to Bicycle Level of Service. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 116, 166–177. http://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.tra.2018.06.006. Handy, S. L., & Xing, Y. (2011). Factors Correlated with Bicycle Commuting: A Study in Six Small U.S. Cities. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 5, 2, 91–110. http://doi.org/10.1080/15568310903514789. Handy, S. L., Xing, Y., & Buehler, T. J. (2010). Factors Associated with Bicycle Ownership and Use: A Study of Six Small U.S. Cities. Transportation, 37, 6, 967–985. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-010-9269-x. Handy, S., van Wee, B., & Kroesen, M. (2014). Promoting Cycling for Transport: Research Needs and Challenges. Transport Reviews, 34, 1, 4–24. http://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2013.860204. Hankey, S., Lindsey, G., Wang, X., Borah, J., Hoff, K., Utecht, B., & Xu, Z. (2012). Estimating Use of Non- Motorized Infrastructure: Models of Bicycle and Pedestrian Traffic in Minneapolis, MN. Landscape and Urban Planning, 107, 3, 307–316. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.06.005. Heesch, K. C., James, B., Washington, T. L., Zuniga, K., & Burke, M. (2016). Evaluation of the Veloway 1: A Natural Experiment of New Bicycle Infrastructure in Brisbane, Australia. Journal of Transport & Health, 3, 3, 366–376. http://doi.org/10.1016/J.JTH.2016.06.006. Heinen, E., Panter, J., Dalton, A., Jones, A., & Ogilvie, D. (2015). Sociospatial Patterning of the Use of New Transport Infrastructure: Walking, Cycling and Bus Travel on the Cambridgeshire Guided Busway. Journal of Transport & Health, 2, 2, 199–211. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2014.10.006. Holle, V. Van, Cauwenberg, J. Van, Deforche, B., Goubert, L., Maes, L., Nasar, J., Van de Weghe, N., Salmon, J., & De Bourdeaudhuij, I. (2014). Environmental Invitingness for Transport-Related Cycling in Middle-Aged Adults: A Proof of Concept Study Using Photographs. Transportation Research Part A, 69, 432–446. http:// doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2014.09.009. Hunt, J. D., & Abraham, J. E. (2007). Influences on Bicycle Use. Transportation, 34, 4, 453–470. http://doi.org/ 10.1007/s11116-006-9109-1. Jones, T. (2012). Getting the British Back on Bicycles: The Effects of Urban Traffic-Free Paths on Everyday Cycling. Transport Policy, 20, 138–149. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.01.014.

References 79 Kang, L., & Fricker, J. D. (2013). Bicyclist Commuters’ Choice of On-Street versus Off-Street Route Segments. Transportation, 40, 5, 887–902. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-013-9453-x. Klobucar, M. S., & Fricker, J. D. (2007). Network Evaluation Tool to Improve Real and Perceived Bicycle Safety. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2031, 25–33. http://doi.org/ 10.3141/2031-04. Krizek, K., & Johnson, P. J. (2006). Proximity to Trails and Retail: Effects on Urban Cycling and Walking. Journal of the American Planning Association, 72, 1, 33–42. http://doi.org/10.1080/01944360608976722. Krizek, K. J., Barnes, G., & Thompson, K. (2009a). Analyzing the Effect of Bicycle Facilities on Commute Mode Share over Time. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 135, 2, 66–73. http://doi.org/10.1061/ (ASCE)0733-9488(2009)135:2(66). Krizek, K. J., Handy, S. L., & Forsyth, A. (2009b). Explaining Changes in Walking and Bicycling Behavior: Challenges for Transportation Research. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 36, 4, 725–740. http://doi.org/10.1068/b34023. Ma, L., & Dill, J. (2015). Associations Between the Objective and Perceived Built Environment and Bicycling for Transportation. Journal of Transport & Health, 2, 2, 248–255. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2015.03.002. Marqués, R., Hernández-Herrador, V., Calvo-Salazar, M., & García-Cebrián, J. A. (2015). How Infrastructure Can Promote Cycling in Cities: Lessons from Seville. Research in Transportation Economics, 53, 31–44. http:// doi.org/10.1016/J.RETREC.2015.10.017. Mertens, L., Van Cauwenberg, J., Ghekiere, A., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., Deforche, B., Van De Weghe, N., & Dyck, D. Van. (2016). Differences in Environmental Preferences Towards Cycling for Transport Among Adults: A Latent Class Analysis. BMC Public Health, 16, 782. http://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3471-5. Mitra, R., Ziemba, R. A., & Hess, P. M. (2016). Mode Substitution Effect of Urban Cycle Tracks: Case Study of a Downtown. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 11, 4. http://doi.org/10.1080/15568318. 2016.1249443. Moudon, A. V., Lee, C., Cheadle, A. D., Collier, C. W., Johnson, D., Schmid, T. L., & Weather, R. D. (2005). Cycling and the Built Environment, a US Perspective. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 10, 3, 245–261. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2005.04.001. Nelson, A., & Allen, D. (1997). If You Build Them, Commuters Will Use Them: Association Between Bicycle Facilities and Bicycle Commuting. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1578, 79–83. http://doi.org/10.3141/1578-10. Nielsen, T. A. S., & Skov-Petersen, H. (2018). Bikeability—Urban Structures Supporting Cycling. Effects of Local, Urban and Regional Scale Urban Form Factors on Cycling from Home and Workplace Locations in Denmark. Journal of Transport Geography, 69, 36–44. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.04.015. Norman, G. (2010). Likert Scales, Levels of Measurement and the “Laws’’ of Statistics. Adv in Health Sci Educ, 15, 625–632. Oh, J. S., Kwigizile, V., Ro, K., Feizi, A., Kostich, B. W., Abdullah, R., & Alhomaidat, M. (2017). Effect of Cycling Skills on Bicycle Safety and Comfort Associated with Bicycle Infrastructure and Environment: Final Report. Retrieved from https://wmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u883/2017/TRCLC_RR_15-1_0.pdf. Parker, K. M., Rice, J., Gustat, J., Ruley, J., Spriggs, A., & Johnson, C. (2013). Effect of Bike Lane Infrastructure Improvements on Ridership in One New Orleans Neighborhood. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 45(SUPPL.1). http://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-012-9440-z. Parkin, J., Wardman, M., & Page, M. (2008). Estimation of the Determinants of Bicycle Mode Share for the Jour- ney to Work Using Census Data. Transportation, 35, 1, 93–109. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-007-9137-5. Piatkowski, D. P., Marshall, W., & Johnson, A. (2017). Identifying Behavioral Norms Among Bicyclists in Mixed- Traffic Conditions. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 46, 137–148. http:// doi.org/10.1016/J.TRF.2017.01.009. Pucher, J., & Buehler, R. (2006). Why Canadians Cycle More than Americans: A Comparative Analysis of Bicy- cling Trends and Policies. Transport Policy, 13, 3, 265–279. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2005.11.001. Pucher, J., & Buehler, R. (2008). Making Cycling Irresistible: Lessons from The Netherlands, Denmark and Germany. Transport Reviews, 28, 4, 495–528. http://doi.org/10.1080/01441640701806612. Pucher, J., Dill, J., & Handy, S. (2010). Infrastructure, Programs, and Policies to Increase Bicycling: An Inter- national Review. Preventive Medicine, 50(SUPPL.). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.07.028. Rissel, C., Greaves, S., Wen, L. M., Crane, M., & Standen, C. (2015). Use of and Short-Term Impacts of New Cycling Infrastructure in Inner-Sydney, Australia: a Quasi-Experimental Design. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 12, 1, 129. http://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-015-0294-1. Rossetti, T., Guevara, C. A., Galilea, P., & Hurtubia, R. (2018). Modeling Safety as a Perceptual Latent Variable to Assess Cycling Infrastructure. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 111, 252–265. http:// doi.org/10.1016/J.TRA.2018.03.019. Sahlqvist, S., Goodman, A., Jones, T., Powell, J., Song, Y., & Ogilvie, D. (2015). Mechanisms Underpinning Use of New Walking and Cycling Infrastructure in Different Contexts: Mixed-Method Analysis. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 12, 24. http://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-015-0185-5.

80 Bicyclist Facility Preferences and Effects on Increasing Bicycle Trips Sallis, J., Frank, L., Saelens, B., & Kraft, M. (2004). Active Transportation and Physical Activity: Opportunities for Collaboration on Transportation and Public Health Research. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 38, 249–268. Sanders, R. L. (2014). Roadway Design Preferences Among Drivers and Bicyclists in the Bay Area. Presented at the 93rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. Sanders, R. L., & Judelman, B. (2018). Perceived Safety and Separated Bike Lanes in the Midwest: Results from a Roadway Design Survey in Michigan. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2672(36), 1–11. http://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118758395. Schoner, J. E., & Levinson, D. M. (2014). The Missing Link: Bicycle Infrastructure Networks and Ridership in 74 US Cities. Transportation, 1187–1204. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-014-9538-1. Song, Y., Preston, J., & Ogilvie, D. (2017). New Walking and Cycling Infrastructure and Modal Shift in the UK: A Quasi-Experimental Panel Study. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 95, 320–333. http://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRA.2016.11.017. Spencer, P., Watts, R., Vivanco, L., & Flynn, B. (2013). The Effect of Environmental Factors on Bicycle Com- muters in Vermont: Influences of a Northern Climate. Journal of Transport Geography, 31, 11–17. http:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.05.003. Steinbach, R., Green, J., Datta, J., & Edwards, P. (2011). Cycling and the City: A Case Study of How Gendered, Ethnic and Class Identities Can Shape Healthy Transport Choices. Social Science & Medicine, 72, 1123–1130. Stinson, M. A., Porter, C. D., Proussalogou, K. E., Calix, R., & Chu, C. (2014). Modeling the Impacts of Bicycle Facilities on Work and Recreational Bike Trips in Los Angeles County, California. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2468, 84–91. http://doi.org/10.3141/2468-10. Teschke, K., Chinn, A., & Brauer, M. (2017). Proximity to Four Bikeway Types and Neighbourhood-Level Cycling Mode Share of Male and Female Commuters. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 10, 1, 695–713. https:// doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2017.943. Thakuriah, P. V., Metaxatos, P., Lin, J., & Jensen, E. (2012). An Examination of Factors Affecting Propensities to Use Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities in Suburban Locations. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 17, 4, 341–348. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2012.01.006. Thigpen, C. G., Driller, B. K., & Handy, S. L. (2015). Using a Stages of Change Approach to Explore Opportunities for Increasing Bicycle Commuting. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 39, 44–55. Thompson, J., Wijnands, J. S., Savino, G., Lawrence, B., & Stevenson, M. (2017). Estimating the Safety Benefit of Separated Cycling Infrastructure Adjusted for Behavioral Adaptation Among Drivers: An Application of Agent-Based Modelling. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 49, 18–28. http:// doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2017.05.006. Underwood, S. K., Handy, S. L., Paterniti, D. A., & Lee, A. E. (2014). Why Do Teens Abandon Bicycling? A Retro- spective Look at Attitudes and Behaviors. Journal of Transport and Health, 1, 17–24. Wang, K., & Akar, G. (2018). The Perceptions of Bicycling Intersection Safety by Four Types of Bicyclists. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 59, 67–80. http://doi.org/10.1016/ j.trf.2018.08.014. Xing, Y., & Handy, S. (2014). Online versus Phone Surveys: Comparison of Results for a Bicycling Survey. Transportation Planning and Technology, 37, 554–567. http://doi.org/10.1080/03081060.2014.921407. Xing, Y., Handy, S. L., & Mokhtarian, P. L. (2010). Factors Associated with Proportions and Miles of Bicycling for Transportation and Recreation in Six Small US Cities. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 15, 2, 73–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2009.09.004.

Next: Appendix A - Focus Group Presentation Materials »
Bicyclist Facility Preferences and Effects on Increasing Bicycle Trips Get This Book
×
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

Cyclists and noncyclists have a wide range of perceptions of on-street bicycling facility designs — including sharrows, bike lanes, and buffered bike lanes — along a variety of roadway types, with and without curbside automobile parking.

The TRB National Cooperative Highway Research Program's NCHRP Research Report 941: Bicyclist Facility Preferences and Effects on Increasing Bicycle Trips provides insights from communities where on-road cycling for transportation is less common, particularly in the Southeast U.S.

The report is accompanied by a poster presentation and a set of presentation slides that summarize the project.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!