REFERENCES

American Association for Public Opinion Research. (2015). AAPOR Code of Professional Ethics and Practices. Revised 11/30/2015. Oakbrook Terrace, IL.

American Statistical Association. (2018). Ethical Guidelines for Statistical Practice. Available: https://www.amstat.org/ASA/Your-Career/Ethical-Guidelines-for-Statistical-Practice.aspx.

Anderson, M.J. (2015). The American Census: A Social History (3rd ed.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Biemer, P., Trewin, D., Bergdahl, H., and Lilli, J. (2014). A system for managing the quality of official statistics. Journal of Official Statistics, 30(3), 381–442. Available: https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2014-0022.

Brackstone, G. (1999). Managing data quality in a statistical agency. Survey Methodology, 25(2), 139–149. Available: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/dnss/docViewer.aspx?docID=194.

Bradburn, N.M., and C.J.E. Fuqua. (2010). Indicators and the federal statistical system: An essential but fraught partnership. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 630, 89–108.

Brick, J.M., and Williams, D. (2013). Explaining rising nonresponse rates in cross sectional surveys. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 645(1), 36–59. Available: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0002716212456834.

Bureau of Transportation Statistics. (2005). BTS Statistical Standards Manual. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation. Available: https://www.rita.dot.gov/bts/sites/rita.dot.gov.bts/files/subject_areas/statistical_policy_and_research/bts_statistical_standards_manual/index.html.

Chakrabarty, R., and Torres, G. (1996). The American Housing Survey—A Quality Profile. Current Housing Reports No. H121/95-1. Office of Policy Development and Research, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development; U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Available: https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/programs-surveys/ahs/publications/h12195-1.pdf.

Chetty, R., Hendren, N., Kline, P., Saez, E., and Turner, N. (2014). Is the United States still a land of opportunity? Recent trends in inter-generational mobility. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 104(5), 141–147. Available: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.5.141; National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper version available: https://doi.org/10.3386/w19844.

Childs, J.H., King, R., and Fobia, A.C. (2015). Confidence in U.S. federal statistical agencies. Survey Practice, 8(4). Available: http://www.surveypractice.org/index.php/SurveyPractice/article/view/314/html38.

Citro, C.F. (2014a). From multiple modes for surveys to multiple data sources for estimates. Survey Methodology 40(2), 137–161. Available: http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/12001x/2014002/article/14128-eng.htm.

______. (2014b). Principles and practices for a federal statistical agency: Why, what, and to what effect. Statistics and Public Policy, 1(1), 51–59. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2330443X.2014.912953.

______. (2016). The US federal statistical system’s past, present, and future. Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application, 3(1), 347–373. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-statistics-041715-033405.

Commission on Evidence-Based Policymaking. (2017). The Promise of Evidence-Based Policymaking: The Report of the Commission on Evidence-Based Policymaking. Available: https://cep.gov/cep-finalreport.html.

Czajka, J. (2009). SIPP data quality. In Reengineering the Survey of Income and Program Participation (pp. 157–178), by the Panel on the Census Bureau’s Reengineered Survey of Income and Program Participation, edited by C.F. Citro and J.K. Scholz. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/12715.

Czajka, J., and Strange, M. (2018). Transparency in the Reporting of Quality for Integrated Data: A Review of International Standards and Guidelines. Available: https://www.mathematica.org/our-publications-and-findings/publications/transparency-in-the-reporting-of-quality-for-int0egrated-data-a-review-of-international-standards.

Daas, P.J.H., Ossen, S.J.L., Tennekes, M., and Burger, J.M.S. (2012). Evaluation and Visualization of the Quality of Administrative Records Used for Statistics. Paper prepared for the European Conference on Quality in Official Statistics, Athens, Greece. The Hague: Statistics Netherlands. Available: http://www.pietdaas.nl/beta/pubs/pubs/Q2012_Session23_paper.pdf.

de Leeuw, E., and de Heer, W. (2002). Trends in household survey nonresponse: A longitudinal and international comparison. Pages 41–54 in Survey Nonresponse, edited by R.M. Groves, D.A. Dillman, J.L. Eltinge, and R.J.A. Little. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/44161946_Trends_in_Household_Survey_Nonresponse_A_Longitudinal_and_International_Comparison.

Doyle, P., Lane, J., Theeuwes, J., and Zayatz, L. (2001). Confidentiality, Disclosure, and Data Access: Theory and Practical Applications for Statistical Agencies. North Holland, Netherlands: Elsevier Science.

Duncan, J.W., and Shelton, W.C. (1978). Revolution in United States Statistics, 1926–1976. Office of Federal Statistical Policy and Standards, U.S. Department of Commerce. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Available: https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/007886111/Home.

Eberstadt, N., Nunn, R., Schanzenbach, D.W., and Strain, M.R. (2017). “In Order That They Might Rest Their Arguments on Facts”: The Vital Role of Government-Collected Data. Washington, DC: The Hamilton Project (Brookings Institution) and American Enterprise Institute.

Economic Classification Policy Committee of the United States. (2003). Overview of NAPCS Objectives, Guidance, And Implementation Strategy and Goals: A United States Perspective. NAPCS discussion paper prepared for the Trilateral Steering Group Meeting, Washington, DC, May 5–9, 2003. Available: http://www.census.gov/eos/www/napcs/papers/overviewobj.pdf.

Economics and Statistics Administration. (2014). Fostering Innovation, Creating Jobs, Driving Better Decisions: The Value of Government Data. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.

Energy Information Administration. (1996). Residential Energy Consumption Survey Quality Profile. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy. Available: https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc666723/.

European Statistical System Committee. (2011). European Statistics Code of Practice for the National and Community Statistical Authorities. Luxembourg: Eurostat.

Eurostat. (2000). Assessment of the Quality in Statistics. Working Group on Assessment of Quality in Statistics, Luxembourg, April 4–5, 2000. Doc.Eurostat/A4/Quality/00/General/Standard. Luxembourg: Eurostat.

Federal Committee on Statistical Methodology (2001). Measuring and Reporting Sources of Error in Surveys. Statistical Policy Working Paper 31 (NTISPB2001104329). Subcommittee on Measuring and Reporting the Quality of Survey Data. Washington, DC: U.S. Office of Management and Budget. Available: https://nces.ed.gov/FCSM/pdf/spwp31.pdf.

______. (2005). Report on Statistical Disclosure Limitation Methodology. Statistical Policy Working Paper 22. Originally prepared in 1994 by Subcommittee on Disclosure Limitation Methodology. Revised by the Confidentiality and Data Access Committee. Washington, DC: U.S. Office of Management and Budget. Available: https://nces.ed.gov/FCSM/pdf/spwp22.pdf.

______. (2009). Profiles in Success of Statistical Uses of Administrative Data. Statistical Policy Working Paper 45. Subcommittee on Statistical Uses of Administrative Records. Washington, DC: U.S. Office of Management and Budget. Available: https://nces.ed.gov/FCSM/pdf/StatisticalUsesofARData.pdf.

______. (2013). Data Quality Assessment Tool for Administrative Data. Statistical Policy Working Paper 46. Subcommittee on Statistical Uses of Administrative Records. Washington, DC: U.S. Office of Management and Budget. Available: https://nces.ed.gov/FCSM/pdf/DataQualityAssessmentTool.pdf

______. (2019). Transparent Reporting for Integrated Data Quality: Practices of Seven Federal Statistical Agencies. Available: https://nces.ed.gov/fcsm/pdf/Transparent_Reporting_FCSM_19_01_092719.pdf.

______. (2020). A Framework for Data Quality. Available: https://nces.ed.gov/fcsm/pdf/FCSM.20.04_A_Framework_for_Data_Quality.pdf

Federal Interagency Forum on Aging-Related Statistics. (2016). Older Americans 2016: Key Indicators of Well-Being. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Available: https://agingstats.gov/docs/LatestReport/Older-Americans-2016-Key-Indicators-of-WellBeing.pdf.

Federal Interagency Forum on Child and Family Statistics. (2020). America’s Children in Brief: Key National Indicators of Well-Being, 2020. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Available: https://www.childstats.gov/pubs/.

Gates, G.W. (2012). Confidentiality. Pages 93–95 in Encyclopedia of the U.S. Census: From the Constitution to the American Community Survey (ACS) (2nd edition), edited by M.J. Anderson, C.F. Citro, and J.J. Salvo. Washington, DC: CQ Press.

Gillingham, R., and Lane, W. (1982). Changing the treatment of shelter costs for homeowners in the CPI. Monthly Labor Review, 105(6), 9–14. Available: https://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/1982/06/art2full.pdf.

Goerge, R. (2018). Barriers to accessing state data and approaches to addressing them. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 675, 122-137.

Gravelle, H., and Rees, R. (2004). Microeconomics (3rd ed.). Essex, UK: Pearson Education Limited.

Groves, R.M. (2011). Three eras of survey research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75(5), 861–871. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfr057.

Habermann, H., and Louis, T.A. (2020). Can the fundamental principles of official statistics and the political process co-exist? Statistical Journal of the IAOS, 36, 347-353.

Hartman, K., Habermann, H., Harris-Kojetin, B., Jones, C., and Louis, T. (2014). Strength under pressure. Significance, 11(4), 44–47.

Hendriks, C. (2012). Input data quality in register based statistics: The Norwegian experience. Pages 1472–1480 in Proceedings of the 2012 Joint Statistical Meetings (San Diego, CA). Alexandria, VA, American Statistical Association.

Hillygus, D.S., Nie, N.H., Prewitt, K., and Pals, H. (2006). The Hard Count: The Political and Social Challenges of Census Mobilization. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7758/9781610442886.

Hughes-Cromwick, E., and Coronado, J. (2019). The value of US government data to US business decisions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33(1), 131–146.

Interagency Technical Working Group on Developing a Supplemental Poverty Measure. (2010). Observations from the Interagency Technical Working Group on Developing a Supplemental Poverty Measure. Available: https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/topics/income/supplemental-poverty-measure/spm-twgobservations.pdf.

International Statistical Institute. (2010). Declaration on Professional Ethics. Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Statistical Institute.

Kalton, G., Winglee, M., Krawchuk, S., and Levine, D. (2000). Quality Profile for SASS Rounds 1–3: 1987–1995, Aspects of the Quality of Data in the Schools and Staffing Surveys (SASS). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education. Available: https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2000308.

Latham & Watkins. (2016). What you need to know about the Cybersecurity Act of 2015. Client Alert Commentary, no. 1927 (February 18). Available: https://www.lw.com/thoughtLeadership/lw-Cybersecurity-Act-of-2015.

Lohr, S., and Raghunathan, T. (2017). Combining survey data with other data sources. Statistical Science, 32(3), 293–312. Available: https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.ss/1494489817.

Manski, C.F. (2015). Communicating uncertainty in official economic statistics: An appraisal fifty years after Morgenstern. Journal of Economic Literature, 53(3), 631–653.

Martin, M.E. (1981). Statistical practice in bureaucracies. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 76(373), 1–8. Available: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01621459.1981.10477593.

McMillen, D. (2012). Apportionment and districting. Pages 49–58 in Encyclopedia of the U.S. Census: From the Constitution to the American Community Survey (ACS) (2nd edition), edited by M.J. Anderson, C.F. Citro, and J.J. Salvo. Washington, DC: CQ Press.

Muth, M.K., Sweitzer, M., Brown, D., Capogrossi, K., Karns, S., Levin, D., Okrent, A., Siegel, P., and Zhen, C. (2016). Understanding IRI Household-Based and Store-Based Scanner Data. Technical Bulletin no. TB-1942. Washington, DC: Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. Available: https://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/pub-details/?pubid=47636.

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM). (2016a). Rationalizing Rural Area Classifications for the Economic Research Service: Workshop Summary. G.S. Wunderlich, rapporteur. Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available: https://www.nap.edu/catalog/21843/rationalizing-rural-area-classifications-for-the-economic-research-service-a. doi:10.17226/21843.

______. (2016b). Reducing Respondent Burden in the American Community Survey: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/23639.

______. (2017a). Advancing Concepts and Models for Measuring Innovation: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/23640.

______. (2017b). Federal Statistics, Multiple Data Sources, and Privacy Protection: Next Steps. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/24893.

______. (2017c). Improving Crop Estimates by Integrating Multiple Data Sources. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/24892.

______. (2017d). Innovations in Federal Statistics Using New Data Sources While Respecting Privacy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/24652.

______. (2017e). Principles and Practices for a Federal Statistical Agency: Sixth Edition. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/24810.

______. (2017f). Principles and Practices for Federal Program Evaluation: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/24831.

______. (2018a). Measuring the 21st Century Science and Engineering Workforce Population: Evolving Needs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/24968.

______. (2018b). Modernizing Crime Statistics: Report 2: New Systems for Measuring Crime. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/25035.

______. (2018c). Reengineering the Census Bureau’s Annual Economic Surveys. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/25098.

______. (2018d). The 2014 Redesign of the Survey of Income and Program Participation: An Assessment. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/24864.

______. (2019a) Improving the American Community Survey: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/25387.

______. (2019b). Improving Data Collection and Measurement of Complex Farms. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/25260.

______. (2019c). Methods to Foster Transparency and Reproducibility of Federal Statistics: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/25305.

______. (2019d). Using Models to Estimate Hog and Pig Inventories: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/25526.

______. (2020a). A Consumer Food Data System for 2030 and Beyond (Prepublication). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/25657.

National Center for Education Statistics. (2012). Statistical Standards of the National Center for Education Statistics. First issued in 1987, revised in 1992 and 2002, and updated in 2012. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Available: https://nces.ed.gov/statprog/2012/.

National Institute of Statistical Sciences. (2017). Integrity, Independence and Innovation: The Future of NCES. Report of an Expert Panel. Washington, DC: National Institute of Statistical Sciences. Available: https://niss.org/news/niss-panelreport-released-integrity-independence-and-innovation-future-nces.

National Research Council (NRC). (1976). Setting Statistical Priorities. Panel on Methodology for Statistical Priorities, Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Available from the Committee on National Statistics.

______. (1979). Privacy and Confidentiality as Factors in Survey Nonresponse. Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/19845.

______. (1984). Cognitive Aspects of Survey Methodology: Build a Bridge Between Disciplines. Report of the Advanced Research Seminar on Cognitive Aspects of Survey Methodology, T.B. Jabine, M.L. Straf, J.M. Tanur, and R. Tourangeau, eds. Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/930.

______. (1986). Creating a Center for Education Statistics: A Time for Action. Panel to Evaluate the National Center for Education Statistics. D.B. Levine, ed. Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/19230.

______. (1991a). Improving Information for Social Policy Decisions: The Uses of Microsimulation. Volume I: Review and Recommendations. Panel to Evaluate Microsimulation Models for Social Welfare Programs, C.F. Citro and E.A. Hanushek, eds. Committee on National

Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/1835.

______. (1991b). Improving Information for Social Policy Decisions: The Uses of Microsimulation. Volume II: Technical Papers. Panel to Evaluate Microsimulation Models for Social Welfare Programs, C.F. Citro and E.A. Hanushek, eds. Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/1853.

______. (1993a). The Future of the Survey of Income and Program Participation. Panel to Evaluate the Survey of Income and Program Participation, C.F. Citro and G. Kalton, eds. Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/2072.

______. (1993b). Private Lives and Public Policies: Confidentiality and Accessibility of Government Statistics. Panel on Confidentiality and Data Access, G.T. Duncan, T.B. Jabine, and V.A. de Wolf, eds. Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/2122.

______. (1995a). Modernizing the U.S. Census. Panel on Census Requirements in the Year 2000 Census and Beyond. B. Edmonston and C. Schultze, eds. Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/4805.

______. (1995b). Measuring Poverty—A New Approach. Panel on Poverty and Family Assistance, C.F. Citro and R.T. Michael, eds. Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/4759.

______. (1997a). Assessing Policies for Retirement Income: Needs for Data, Research, and Models. Panel on Retirement Income Modeling, C.F. Citro and E.A. Hanushek, eds. Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/5420.

______. (1997b). The Bureau of Transportation Statistics: Priorities for the Future. Panel on Statistical Programs and Practices of the Bureau of Transportation Statistics, C.F. Citro and J.L. Norwood, eds. Committee on National Statistics and Transportation Research Board. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/5809.

______. (1999). Sowing Seeds of Change: Informing Public Policy in the Economic Research Service of USDA. Panel to Study the Research

Program of the Economic Research Service, J.F. Geweke, J.T. Bonnen, A.A. White, and J.J. Koshel, eds. Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/6320.

______. (2000a). Improving Access to and Confidentiality of Research Data: Report of a Workshop. C.M. Mackie and N. Bradburn, eds. Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/9958.

______. (2000b). Measuring the Science and Engineering Enterprise: Priorities for the Division of Science Resource Studies. Committee to Assess the Portfolio of the Division of Science Resources Studies of NSF, Committee on National Statistics and Office of Scientific and Engineering Personnel. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/9775.

______. (2000c). Small-Area Estimates of School-Age Children in Poverty: Evaluation of Current Methodology. Panel on Estimates of Poverty for Small Geographic Areas, C.F. Citro and G. Kalton, eds. Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/6427.

______. (2000d). Small-Area Income and Poverty Estimates: Priorities for 2000 and Beyond. Panel on Estimates of Poverty for Small Geographic Areas, C.F. Citro and G. Kalton, eds. Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/9957.

______. (2001). Evaluating Welfare Reform in an Era of Transition. Panel on Data and Methods for Measuring the Effects of Changes in Social Welfare Programs, R.A. Moffitt and M. Ver Ploeg, eds. Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/10020.

______. (2001a). Cells and Surveys: Should Biological Measures Be Included in Social Science Research? C.E. Finch, J.W. Vaupel, and K. Kinsella, eds. Committee on Population. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/9995.

______. (2002). At What Price? Conceptualizing and Measuring Cost-of-Living and Price Indexes. Panel on Conceptual, Measurement, and Other Statistical Issues in Developing Cost-of-Living Indexes, C. Schultze and C.M. Mackie, eds. Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/10131.

______. (2003a). Estimating Eligibility and Participation for the WIC Program: Final Report. Panel to Evaluate the USDA’s Methodology for Estimating Eligibility and Participation for the WIC Program, M. Ver Ploeg and D.M. Betson, eds. Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/10804.

______. (2003b). Protecting Participants and Facilitating Social and Behavioral Sciences Research. Panel on Institutional Review Boards, Surveys, and Social Science Research, C.F. Citro, D.R. Ilgen, and C.B. Marrett, eds. Committee on National Statistics and Board on Behavioral, Cognitive, and Sensory Sciences. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/10638.

______. (2003c). Survey Automation: Report and Workshop Proceedings. Oversight Committee for the Workshop on Survey Automation, D.L. Cork, M.L. Cohen, R.M. Groves, and W. Kalsbeek, eds. Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/10695.

______. (2004a). The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity. Panel to Review the 2000 Census, C.F. Citro, D.L. Cork, and J.L. Norwood, eds. Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/10907.

______. (2004b). Eliminating Health Disparities: Measurement and Data Needs. Panel on DHHS Collection of Race and Ethnic Data, M. Ver Ploeg and E. Perrin, eds. Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/10979.

______. (2004c). Measuring Research and Development Expenditures in the U.S. Economy. Panel on Research and Development Statistics at the National Science Foundation, L.D. Brown, T.J. Plewes, and M.A. Gerstein, eds. Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/11111.

______. (2004d). Reengineering the 2010 Census: Risks and Challenges. Panel on Research on Future Census Methods, D.L. Cork, M.L. Cohen, and B.F. King, eds. Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/10959.

______. (2005a). Beyond the Market: Designing Nonmarket Accounts for the United States. Panel to Study the Design of Nonmarket Accounts, K.G. Abraham and C.M. Mackie, eds. Committee on National Sta-

tistics. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/11181.

______. (2005b). Expanding Access to Research Data: Reconciling Risks and Opportunities. Panel on Data Access for Research Purposes, Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/11434.

______. (2005c). Experimental Poverty Measures: Summary of a Workshop. J. Iceland, rapporteur. Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/11166.

______. (2005d). Expanding Access to Research Data: Reconciling Risks and Opportunities. Panel on Data Access for Research Purposes, Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/11434.

______. (2006a). Food Insecurity and Hunger in the United States: An Assessment of the Measure. Panel to Review USDA’s Measurement of Food Insecurity and Hunger, G.S. Wunderlich and J.L. Norwood, eds. Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/11578.

______. (2006b). Improving Business Statistics Through Interagency Data Sharing: Summary of a Workshop. C. Kuebler and C.M. Mackie, rapporteurs. Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/11738.

______. (2006c). Once, Only Once, and in the Right Place: Residence Rules in the Decennial Census. Panel on Residence Rules in the Decennial Census, D.L. Cork and P.R. Voss, eds. Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/11727.

______. (2007a). State and Local Government Statistics at a Crossroads. Panel on Research and Development Priorities for the U.S. Census Bureau’s State and Local Government Statistics Program. Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/12000.

______. (2007b). Using the American Community Survey: Benefits and Challenges. Panel on the Functionality and Usability of Data from the American Community Survey, C.F. Citro and G. Kalton, eds. Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/11901.

______. (2007c). Understanding Business Dynamics: An Integrated Data System for America’s Future. Panel on Measuring Business Formation, Dynamics, and Performance, J. Haltiwanger, L.M. Lynch, and C.M. Mackie, eds. Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/11844.

______. (2008a). Protecting Individual Privacy in the Struggle Against Terrorists—A Framework for Program Assessment. Committee on Technical and Privacy Dimensions of Information for Terrorism Prevention and Other National Goals, Committee on Law and Justice, Committee on National Statistics, and Computer Science and Telecommunications Board. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/12452.

______. (2008b). Using the American Community Survey for the National Science Foundation’s Science and Engineering Workforce Statistics Program. Panel on Assessing the Benefits of the American Community Survey for the NSF Division of Science Resources Statistics, Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/12244.

______. (2008c). Rebuilding the Research Capacity at HUD. Committee to Evaluate the Research Plan of the Department of Housing and Urban Development, Center for Governance, Economic, and International Studies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/12468.

______. (2009a). Ensuring the Quality, Credibility, and Relevance of U.S. Justice Statistics. Panel to Review the Programs of the Bureau of Justice Statistics, R.M. Groves and D.L. Cork, eds. Committee on National Statistics and Committee on Law and Justice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/12671.

______. (2009b). Improving the Measurement of Late-Life Disability in Population Surveys: Beyond ADLs and IADLs, Summary of a Workshop. G.S. Wunderlich, rapporteur. Committee on National Statistics and Committee on Population. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available: https//doi.org/10.17226/12740.

______. (2009c). Principles and Practices for a Federal Statistical Agency, Fourth Edition. Committee on National Statistics, C.F. Citro, M.E. Martin, and M.L. Straf, eds. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/12564.

______. (2009d). Protecting Student Records and Facilitating Education Research: A Workshop Summary. M. Hilton, rapporteur. Committee on National Statistics and Center for Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/12514.

______. (2009e). Reengineering the Survey of Income and Program Participation. Panel on the Census Bureau’s Reengineered Survey of Income and Program Participation, C.F. Citro and J.K. Scholz, eds. Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/12715.

______. (2010a). Data on Federal Research and Development Investments: A Pathway to Modernization. Panel on Modernizing the Infrastructure of the National Science Foundation Federal Funds Survey, Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/12772.

______. (2010b). Improving Health Care Cost Projections for the Medical Population: Summary of a Workshop. G. Wunderlich, rapporteur. Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/12985.

______. (2010c). Accounting for Health and Health Care: Approaches to Measuring the Sources and Costs of Their Improvement. Panel to Advance a Research Program on the Design of National Health Accounts, Committee on Principles and Practices for a Federal Statistical Agency: Sixth Edition. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/12938.

______. (2010d). Conducting Biosocial Surveys: Collecting, Storing, Accessing, and Protecting Biospecimens and Biodata. Panel on Collecting, Storing, Accessing, and Protecting Biological Specimens and Biodata in Social Surveys, R.M. Hauser, M. Weinstein, R. Pool, and B. Cohen, eds. Committee on National Statistics and Committee on Population. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/12942.

______. (2010e). Envisioning the 2020 Census. Panel on the Design of the 2010 Census Program of Evaluations and Experiments, L.D. Brown, M.L. Cohen, D.L. Cork, and C.F. Citro, eds. Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/12865.

______. (2010f). Improving Health Care Cost Projections for the Medical Population: Summary of a Workshop. G. Wunderlich, rapporteur. Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/12985.

______. (2010g). The Prevention and Treatment of Missing Data in Clinical Trials. Panel on Handling Missing Data in Clinical Trials, Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/12955.

______. (2010h). Protecting and Accessing Data from the Survey of Earned Doctorates: A Workshop Summary. T.J. Plewes, rapporteur. Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/12797.

______. (2012). Effective Tracking of Building Energy Use: Improving the Commercial Buildings and Residential Energy Consumption Surveys. Panel on Redesigning the Commercial Buildings and Residential Energy Consumption Surveys of the Energy Information Administration, W.F. Eddy and K. Marton, eds. Committee on National Statistics and Board on Energy and Environmental Systems. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/13360.

______. (2013a). Benefits, Burdens, and Prospects of the American Community Survey: Summary of a Workshop. D.L. Cork, rapporteur. Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/18259.

______. (2013b). Principles and Practices for a Federal Statistical Agency, Fifth Edition. Committee on National Statistics, C.F. Citro and M.L. Straf, eds. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/18318.

______. (2013c). Nonresponse in Social Science Surveys: A Research Agenda. Panel on a Research Agenda for the Future of Social Science Data Collection, R. Tourangeau and T. J. Plewes, eds. Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/18293.

______. (2013d). Subjective Well Being: Measuring Happiness, Suffering, and Other Dimensions of Experience. Panel on Measuring Subjective Well-Being in a Policy-Relevant Framework, A.A. Stone and C.M. Mackie, eds. Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/18548.

______. (2014a). Capturing Change in Science, Technology, and Innovation: Improving Indicators to Inform Policy. Panel on Developing Science, Technology, and Innovation Indicators for the Future, R.E. Litan, A.W. Wyckoff, and K.H. Fealing, eds. Committee on National Statistics and Board on Science, Technology, and Economic Policy.

Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/18606.

______. (2014b). Civic Engagement and Social Cohesion: Measuring Dimensions of Social Capital to Inform Policy. Panel on Measuring Social and Civic Engagement and Social Cohesion in Surveys, K. Prewitt, C.D. Mackie, and H. Habermann, eds. Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/18831.

______. (2014c). Proposed Revisions to the Common Rule for the Protection of Human Subjects in the Behavioral and Social Sciences. Committee on Revisions to the Common Rule for the Protection of Human Subjects in Research in the Behavioral and Social Sciences, Board on Behavioral, Cognitive, and Sensory Sciences, Committee on National Statistics, and Committee on Population. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/18614.

______. (2015). The Bicentennial Census: New Directions for Methodology in 1990: 30th Anniversary Edition. Panel on Decennial Census Methodology, C.F. Citro and M.L. Cohen, eds. Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available: https://www.nap.edu/catalog/21728/the-bicentennial-census-new-directions-for-methodology-in-1990-30th.

National Research Council and Institute of Medicine. (2012). Medical Care Economic Risk: Measuring Financial Vulnerability from Spending on Medical Care. Panel on Measuring Medical Care Risk in Conjunction with the New Supplemental Poverty Income Measure, M.J. O’Grady and G.S. Wunderlich, eds. Committee on National Statistics and Board on Health Care Services. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/13525.

Norwood, J.L. (1975). Should those who produce statistics analyze them? How far should analysis go? An American view. Bulletin of the International Statistical Institute [Proceedings of the 40th Session] 46, 420–432.

______. (1995). Organizing to Count: Change in the Federal Statistical System. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.

______. (2016). Politics and federal statistics. Statistics and Public Policy, 3(1), 1–8. American Statistical Association Distinguished Statistician Lecture, 2000. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2330443X.2016.1241061.

Prewitt, K. (Ed.) (2010, September). The Federal Statistical System: Its Vulnerability Matters More Than You Think. Volume 631 of The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. Available: http://journals.sagepub.com/toc/anna/631/1.

Privacy Protection Study Commission. (1977). Personal Privacy in an Information Society: The Report of The Privacy Protection Study Commission. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Available: https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/000293901.

Reamer, A.D. (2014). Stumbling into the Great Recession: How and Why GDP Estimates Kept Economists and Policymakers in the Dark. Available: https://gwipp.gwu.edu/sites/g/files/zaxdzs2181/f/downloads/Reamer_GDP_Research_Note_04-25-14.pdf.

Ryten, J. (1990). Statistical organization criteria for inter-country comparisons and their application to Canada. Journal of Official Statistics, 6(3), 319–332. Available: http://www.jos.nu/Articles/abstract.asp?article=63319.

Singer, E. (2016). Reflections on surveys’ past and future. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, 4(4), 463–475.

Spencer, B.D. (Ed.) (1997). Statistics and Public Policy. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.

Statistics Canada. (2009). Statistics Canada Quality Guidelines (5th ed.). Ottawa: Statistics Canada. Available: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/dnss/docs-nqaf/Canada-12-539-x2009001-eng.pdf.

Triplett, J. (1991). The federal statistical system’s response to emerging data needs. Journal of Economic and Social Measurement, 17(3–4), 155–201. Available: http://content.iosPress.com/articles/journal-of-economic-andsocial-measurement/jem17-3-4-03.

United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. (2018). Recommendations for Promoting, Measuring and Communicating the Value of Official Statistics. Report of the task force to the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, Conference of European Statisticians. Geneva: United Nations. Available: https://www.unece.org/statistics/statstos/task-force-onthe-value-of-official-statistics.html.

United Kingdom Office for National Statistics. (2007). Guidelines for Measuring Statistical Quality. London: Office for National Statistics. Available: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/dnss/docs-nqaf/UK-Guidelines_Subject.pdf.

United Nations Statistical Commission. (2014, March 3). Fundamental Principles of Official Statistics. New York: United Nations. Endorsed

by the General Assembly as Resolution A/RES/68/261.Available: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/dnss/gp/FP-New-E.pdf.

U.S. Department of Commerce. (1978). Statistical Policy Handbook. Washington, DC.

______. (2014). Fostering Innovation, Creating Jobs, Driving Better Decisions: The Value of Government Data. Available: https://www.bea.gov/sites/default/files/2018-02/fostering-innovation-creating-jobs-driving-better-decisionsthe-value-of-government-data714.pdf.

U.S. General Accounting Office. (1995). Statistical Agencies: Adherence to Guidelines and Coordination of Budgets. Report No. GGD-95-65. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Available: http://www.gao.gov/products/GGD-95-65.

U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2007). Bureau of Justice Statistics: Quality Guidelines Generally Followed for Police-Public Contact Surveys, but Opportunities Exist to Help Assure Agency Independence. Report No. GAO-07-340.Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Available: http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-07-340.

______. (2012). Federal Statistical System: Agencies Can Make Greater Use of Existing Data, but Continued Progress Is Needed on Access and Quality Issues. Report No. GAO-12-54. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Available: http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-12-54.

U.S. Office of Management and Budget. (1985). Statistical Policy Directive No. 3: Compilation, release, and evaluation of principal federal economic indicators. 50 Federal Register 38932 (September 25, 1985). Available: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/omb/assets/omb/inforeg/statpolicy/dir_3_fr_09251985.pdf.

______. (2001). Statistical Programs of the United States Government: Fiscal Year 2002. Statistical and Science Policy Office, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Available: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/omb/inforeg/02statprog.pdf.

______. (2005). Final information quality bulletin for peer review. 70 Federal Register 2664 (January 14, 2005). Available: https://www.federalregister.gov/d/05-769.

______. (2006). Statistical Policy Directive No. 2: Standards and guidelines for statistical surveys. 71 Federal Register 55522 (September 22, 2006). Available: https://www.federalregister.gov/d/06-8044.

______. (2007). Implementation guidance for Title V of the E- Government Act, Confidential Information Protection and Statistical Efficiency Act of 2002 (CIPSEA). 72 Federal Register 33362 (June 15, 2007). Available: https://www.federalregister.gov/d/E7-11542.

______. (2008). Statistical Policy Directive No. 4: Release and dissemination of statistical products produced by federal statistical agencies. 73 Federal Register 12625 (March 7, 2008). Available: https://www.federalregister.gov/d/E8-4570.

______. (2014a). Guidance for providing and using administrative data for statistical purposes. OMB Memorandum M-14-06. Available: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/omb/memoranda/2014/m-14-06.pdf.

______. (2014b). Statistical Policy Directive No. 1: Fundamental responsibilities of federal statistical agencies and recognized statistical units. 79 Federal Register 71609 (December 2, 2014). Available: https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2014-28326.

______. (2015). Improving statistical activities through interagency collaboration. OMB Memorandum M-15-15. Available: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/omb/memoranda/2015/m-15-15.pdf.

______. (2016a). Questions and Answers When Designing Surveys for Information Collections. Available: https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/whitehouse.gov/files/omb/assets/OMB/inforeg/pmc_survey_guidance_2006.pdf.

______. (2016b). Statistical Policy Directive No. 2: Standards and guidelines for statistical surveys; Addendum: Standards and guidelines for cognitive interviews. 81 Federal Register 70586 (October 12, 2016). Available: https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2016-24607.

______. (2016c). Statistical Policy Directive No. 4 Addendum: Release and dissemination of statistical products produced by federal statistical agencies and recognized statistical units [adding section 10, performance review]. 81 Federal Register 71538 (October 17, 2016). Available: https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2016-25049.

______. (2016d, May 4). Supplemental guidance on the implementation of M-15-14 “Management and oversight of federal information technology”—Applying FITARA common baseline to statistical agencies and units. Memorandum from Tony Scott, Federal Chief Information Officer, and Howard Shelanski, Administrator, Office of Regulatory Affairs. Available: https://management.cio.gov/assets/docs/FITARA_Guidance_Statistical_Agencies_and_Units_OMB.pdf.

______. (2016e). Analytical Perspectives, Budget of the U.S. Government, Fiscal Year 2017. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Available: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/BUDGET2017-PER/pdf/BUDGET-2017-PER.pdf.

______. (2020). Statistical Programs of the United States Government: Fiscal Years 2019/2020. Statistical and Science Policy Office, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Available: https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/statistical-programs-20192020.pdf.

Young, L.J. (2019). Agricultural crop forecasting for large geographic areas. Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application 6, 173–196.