National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Front Matter
Suggested Citation:"Summary." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Peer Review of a Report Commissioned by the Social Security Administration on Selected Occupational Requirements. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25964.
×

Summary

The Social Security Administration (SSA) requested that the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (the National Academies) form an ad hoc committee to conduct a peer review of a commissioned report by Abt Associates on selected occupational requirements. SSA asked Abt to assemble information on the levels of social interaction and adaption required to perform tasks in these occupations for a given specific vocational preparation (SVP) range. In response, the National Academies convened a committee of subject-matter experts with experience in epidemiology/biostatistics, economics, occupational psychology, and vocational rehabilitation. This committee carried out its peer review over the course of four months. The committee was asked specifically to consider the suitability of the databases used, the soundness of the methodology used to connect occupational tasks to social interactive and adaptive functional capacities, the appropriateness of the expertise gathered to perform the analysis, and its overall confidence in the report. The committee concluded that Abt’s use of the Department of Labor’s Occupational Information Network (O*NET) as the primary data source was appropriate to identify core tasks and informing its ratings. In addition, the committee concluded that the methodology and meeting process utilized by Abt were appropriate and sound, although it found a need to revisit the report multiple times and create a diagram of Abt’s processes in order to better understand its approach. The committee found that inclusion of additional details in Abt’s report would have been useful to its review. For example, Abt could have provided details on why it made specific methodological choices (e.g., creating a latent model that is not utilized later in the process). In addition, a glossary, a visualization of the five project phases, and detailed lists of resources exchanged among SSA, Abt, and the expert work group would have been useful to the committee’s review.

Suggested Citation:"Summary." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Peer Review of a Report Commissioned by the Social Security Administration on Selected Occupational Requirements. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25964.
×

This page intentionally left blank.

Suggested Citation:"Summary." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Peer Review of a Report Commissioned by the Social Security Administration on Selected Occupational Requirements. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25964.
×
Page1
Suggested Citation:"Summary." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Peer Review of a Report Commissioned by the Social Security Administration on Selected Occupational Requirements. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25964.
×
Page2
Next: Introduction »
Peer Review of a Report Commissioned by the Social Security Administration on Selected Occupational Requirements Get This Book
×
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

At the request of the Social Security Administration (SSA), this publication reviews a commissioned report by Abt Associates on selected occupational requirements. SSA asked Abt to assemble information on the levels of social interaction and adaption required to perform tasks in these occupations for a given specific vocational preparation range. This review examines the suitability of the databases used, the soundness of the methodology used to connect occupational tasks to social interactive and adaptive functional capacities, and the appropriateness of the expertise gathered to perform the analysis.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!