Appendix B
Summary Tables of CSAT GPRA Data
This appendix presents the summary tables, created by the committee, that summarize data reports generated from the Center for Substance Abuse Treatment (CSAT) Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) tool.
GPRA TABLES FOR THE PPW-PLT PROGRAM
TABLE PPW-PLT-1 Intake Versus Follow-Up Statistics (to Assess for Retention Bias)
Metrica | Intake Results for All Intake Interviews (n = 839)b |
Intake Results for Those with a Discharge Interview (n = 203) |
Intake Results for Those with a 6-Month Follow-Up Interview (n = 374) |
Intake Results for Those with ONLY an Intake Interview (“Non-Completers”) (n = 335)c |
Intake Results for Those with a Discharge and/or 6-Month FollowUp Interview (“Completers”) (n = 403)d |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Drug and Alcohol Use at Time of Intake | 27.2% (222) used illegal drugs in past 30 dayse | 23.3% (49) used illegal drugs in the past 30 daysj | 24.3% (98) used illegal drugs in the past 30 days | 30.9% (101) used any drugs in the past 30 days | 25.4% (102) used any drugs in the past 30 days |
18.0% (148) used alcohol in past 30 daysf | 21.7% (46) used alcohol in past 30 days | 16.3% (66) used alcohol in past 30 days | 20.8% (67) used alcohol in past 30 days | 16.5% (66) used alcohol in past 30 days | |
17.7% (161) of clients have an opioid-related disorderg | (data only available in aggregate) | (data only available in aggregate) | |||
Drugs used in past 30 days (not mutually exclusive)h
|
Drugs used in past 30 days (not mutually exclusive)
|
Drugs used in past 30 days (not mutually exclusive)
|
Drugs used in past 30 days (not mutually exclusive)
|
Drugs used in past 30 days (not mutually exclusive)
|
___________________
a All data in the first three columns come from Public Access File (PAF) Items 47 and 49. The specific reports will be noted in footnotes.
b In assessing each of these metrics, it is important to note that the first column’s n includes the n of the 2nd/3rd columns (i.e., this is not a 1:1 comparison of clients who were retained versus clients who dropped out).
c All data included in the two right-most columns come from PAF Item 58.
d It should be noted that the n’s of “Completers” and “Non-Completers” do not sum to the total number of intake interviews completed, as would be expected. It appears that the second data set sent by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA; PAF Item 58) included 101 fewer clients than the first set of GPRA data. As such, these data should not be regarded as a new breakdown of exactly the same client pool. Also, note that several of the metrics analyzed in the first report were not included in the second. Data provided where available.
e B1 Report; For all data in this table, the first column comes from the intake report for the corresponding report (e.g., B1), the second column from the intake matched with discharge report, and the final from the intake matched with 6-month report. Note that the n’s on the B1 Report are distinct from the others (n = 214 for those with discharge interview; n = 409 for those with 6-month follow-up). It is unclear to the committee why this is the case.
f B1 Report.
g ICD 10 Report—data only available at aggregate for intake; note that the n of this report is unclear.
h B2 Report.
i B3 Report.
j For each metric, a number of clients are missing data; the percentages presented in all tables included in this appendix are calculated using the valid responses only (i.e., the denominator is not always the n at the top of the corresponding column).
Metrica | Intake Results for All Intake Interviews (n = 839)b |
Intake Results for Those with a Discharge Interview (n = 203) |
Intake Results for Those with a 6-Month Follow-Up Interview (n = 374) |
Intake Results for Those with ONLY an Intake Interview (“Non-Completers”) (n = 335)c |
Intake Results for Those with a Discharge and/or 6-Month FollowUp Interview (“Completers”) (n = 403)d |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Intake Substance Use Treatment in the Past 30 Days | 12.5% (103) had received at least 1 day of inpatient treatment for AUD or SUDk | 10.4% (21) had received at least 1 day of inpatient treatment for AUD or SUD | 9.4% (37) had received at least 1 day of inpatient treatment for AUD or SUD | ||
67.5% (554) had received at least 1 day of outpatient treatment for AUD or SUDl | 71.4% (145) had received at least 1 day of outpatient treatment for AUD or SUD | 71.9% (279) had received at least 1 day of outpatient treatment for AUD or SUD | |||
71.6% (386) of the group receiving outpatient treatment had between 1–10 contacts; 17.3% (93) had between 11–20 contacts; 10.0% (54) had between 21–30 contacts | 73.0% (103) of the group receiving outpatient treatment had between 1–10 contacts; 19.1% (27) received treatment for between 11–20 contacts; 6.4% (9) had between 21–30 contacts | 69.1% (188) of the group receiving outpatient treatment had between 1–10 contacts; 19.1% (52) had between 11–20 contacts; 10.7% (29) had between 21–30 contacts |
___________________
k F1 Report.
l F2 Report.
Metrica | Intake Results for All Intake Interviews (n = 839)b |
Intake Results for Those with a Discharge Interview (n = 203) |
Intake Results for Those with a 6-Month Follow-Up Interview (n = 374) |
Intake Results for Those with ONLY an Intake Interview (“Non-Completers”) (n = 335)c |
Intake Results for Those with a Discharge and/or 6-Month FollowUp Interview (“Completers”) (n = 403)d |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Past 30-Day Psychosocial Factors | 21.7% (177) said that their drug use had caused them to give up or reduce important activities somewhat, considerably, or extremelym | 14.6% (29) said that their drug use had caused them to give up or reduce important activities somewhat, considerably, or extremely | 15.0% (58) said that their drug use had caused them to give up or reduce important activities somewhat, considerably, or extremely | 28.9% (94) said that their drug use had caused them to give up or reduce important activities somewhat, considerably, or extremely | 16.7% (66) said that their drug use had caused them to give up or reduce important activities somewhat, considerably, or extremely |
32.2% (264) said that their drug use had caused emotional problems somewhat, considerably, or extremelyn | 24.0% (48) said that their drug use had caused emotional problems somewhat, considerably, or extremely | 25.4% (99) said that their drug use had caused emotional problems somewhat, considerably, or extremely | 39.4% (127) said that their drug use had caused emotional problems somewhat, considerably, or extremely | 26.4% (105) said that their drug use had caused emotional problems somewhat, considerably, or extremely | |
39.8% (327) attended a voluntary self-help group for recoveryo | 42.1% (85) attended a voluntary self-help group for recovery | 39.9% (157) attended a voluntary self-help group for recovery | |||
18.4% (151) attended a religious/faith affiliated recovery self-help groupp | 16.3% (33) attended a religious/faith affiliated recovery self-help group | 18.3% (72) attended a religious/faith affiliated recovery self-help group | |||
89.3% (728) had interactions with family/friends who are supportive of their recoveryq | 91.0% (182) had interactions with family/friends who are supportive of their recovery | 90.7% (352) had interactions with family/friends who are supportive of their recovery | |||
49.6% (406) are satisfied with their personal relationships, and 19.0% (156) are very satisfiedr | 48.0% (96) are satisfied with their personal relationships, and 20.0% (40) are very satisfied | 45.5% (177) are satisfied with their personal relationships, and 19.5% (76) are very satisfied |
___________________
m C1 Report.
n C1 Report.
o G1 Report.
p G1 Report.
q G1 Report.
r G1 Report.
Metrica | Intake Results for All Intake Interviews (n = 839)b |
Intake Results for Those with a Discharge Interview (n = 203) |
Intake Results for Those with a 6-Month Follow-Up Interview (n = 374) |
Intake Results for Those with ONLY an Intake Interview (“Non-Completers”) (n = 335)c |
Intake Results for Those with a Discharge and/or 6-Month FollowUp Interview (“Completers”) (n = 403)d |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Past 30-Day Criminal Justice Involvements | 92.7% (765) had not been arrested | 93.6% (189) had not been arrested | 93.3% (364) had not been arrested | Data not available | 98.2% (375) had not been arrested |
35.1% (20) of those who had been arrested were arrested for drug-related offenses | 25.0% (3) of those who had been arrested were arrested for drug-related offenses | 26.1% (6) of those who had been arrested were arrested for drug-related offenses | |||
92.3% (751) had spent no nights in jail or prison | 94.0% (187) had spent no nights in jail or prison | 93.5% (359) had spent no nights in jail or prison | |||
76.9% (619) had committed no crimes | 80.3% (159) had committed no crimes | 80.1% (306) had committed no crimes | |||
24.5% (203) were awaiting trial, charges, or sentencing | 25.2% (51) were awaiting trial, charges, or sentencing | 23.9% (93) were awaiting trial, charges, or sentencing | |||
37.0% (306) were on parole or probation | 44.6% (90) were on parole or probation | 36.0% (140) were on parole or probation |
___________________
s E1 Report.
Metrica | Intake Results for All Intake Interviews (n = 839)b |
Intake Results for Those with a Discharge Interview (n = 203) |
Intake Results for Those with a 6-Month Follow-Up Interview (n = 374) |
Intake Results for Those with ONLY an Intake Interview (“Non-Completers”) (n = 335)c |
Intake Results for Those with a Discharge and/or 6-Month FollowUp Interview (“Completers”) (n = 403)d |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Past 30-Day Housingt | 83.3% (694) were living in a house most of the time | 91.6% (186) were living in a house most of the time | 87.0% (341) were living in a house most of the time | 79.4% (262) were living in a house most of the time | 87.1% (350) were living in a house most of the time |
44.8% (309) were living in a room, home, or apartment that they owned or rented; 41.0% (283) were living in someone else’s room home, or apartment; 8.7% (60) were in residential treatment | 42.9% (79) were living in a room, home, or apartment that they owned or rented; 42.4% (78) were living in, someone else’s room, home, or apartment; 10.3% (19) were in residential treatment | 45.6% (154) were living in a room, home, or apartment that they owned or rented; 42.3% (143) were living in someone else’s room, home, or apartment; 8.0% (27) were in residential treatment | 44.1% (115) were living in a room, home, or apartment that they owned or rented; 38.7% (101) were living in someone else’s room, home, or apartment; 10.7% (28) were in residential treatment | 46.7% (162) were living in a room, home, or apartment that they owned or rented; 41.8% (145) were living in someone else’s room, home, or apartment; 7.8% (27) were in residential treatment | |
37.1% (303) were satisfied with their living conditions, an 22.8% (186) were very satisfied | 36.5% (73) were satisfied with their d living conditions, and 23.5% (47) were very satisfied | 38.3% (149) were satisfied with their living conditions, and 22.1% (86) were very satisfied | 35.0% (113) were satisfied with their living conditions, and 22.3% (72) were very satisfied | 37.0% (146) were satisfied with their living conditions, and 22.3% (88) were very satisfied |
___________________
t C1 Report.
Metrica | Intake Results for All Intake Interviews (n = 839)b |
Intake Results for Those with a Discharge Interview (n = 203) |
Intake Results for Those with a 6-Month Follow-Up Interview (n = 374) |
Intake Results for Those with ONLY an Intake Interview (“Non-Completers”) (n = 335)c |
Intake Results for Those with a Discharge and/or 6-Month FollowUp Interview (“Completers”) (n = 403)d |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Employment and Educationu | 93.8% (783) were not enrolled in a school or job training program in the past 30 days | 92.1% (186) were not enrolled in a school or job training program in the past 30 days | 93.1% (364) were not enrolled in a school or job training program in the past 30 days | ||
72.4% (605) had completed high school or the equivalent | 71.3% (144) had completed high school or the equivalent | 72.1% (282) had completed high school or the equivalent | 74.5% (248) had completed high school or the equivalent | 71.3% (286) had completed high school or the equivalent | |
11.7% (97) were employed full time, and 10.9% (90) were employed part time in the past 30 days | 14.8% (30) were employed full time, and 14.3% (29) were employed part time in the past 30 days | 11.5% (45) were employed full time, and 12.8% (50) were employed part time in the past 30 days | 11.5% (37) were employed full time, and 7.8% (25) were employed part time i the past 30 days | 13.1% (51) were employed full time, and 13.4% (52) were n employed part time in the past 30 days | |
30.2% (250) were unemployed and looking for work, 37.6% (312) were unemployed and not looking for work in the past 30 days, 6.6% (55) were unemployed and disabled | 24.6% (50) were unemployed and looking for work, 35.0% (71) were unemployed and not looking for work in the past 30 days, 6.9% (14) were unemployed and disabled | 25.8% (101) were unemployed and looking for work, 38.9% (152) were unemployed and not looking for work in the past 30 days, 7.2% (28) were unemployed and disabled | 80.7% (259) were unemployed (detailed breakdown unavailable) | 73.45% (285) were unemployed (detailed breakdown unavailable) | |
78.1% (613) received $0 in the past 30 days from wages; 21.8% (171) received between $1 and $4,999 from wages | 71.1% (140) received $0 in the past 30 days from wages; 28.9% (57) received between $1 and $4,999 from wages | 77.3% (293) received $0 in the past 30 days from wages; 22.7% (86) received between $1 and $4,999 from wages | 25.3% (76) received $0 in the past 30 days from wages; 73.4% (221) received between $1 and $4,999 from wages | 17.3% (68) received $0 in the past 30 days from wages; 82.5% (325) received between $1 and $4,999 from wages | |
53.8% (421) received $0 in the past 30 days from public assistance; 46.2% (361) received between $1 and $4,999 from public assistance | 54.4% (106) received $0 in the past 30 days from public assistance; 45.6% (89) received between $1 and $4,999 from public assistance | 53.2% (201) received $0 in the past 30 days from public assistance; 46.8% (177) received between $1 and $4,999 from public assistance | |||
39.4% (324) did not have enough money to meet their needs; 26.1% (215) had enough money to mostly or completely meet their needs in the past 30 days | 40.1% (81) did not have enough money to meet their needs; 24.2% (49) had enough money to mostly or completely meet their needs in the past 30 days | 37.0% (144) did not have enough money to meet their needs; 26.0% (101) had enough money to mostly or completely meet their needs in the past 30 days |
___________________
u D1 Report.
Metrica | Intake Results for All Intake Interviews (n = 839)b |
Intake Results for Those with a Discharge Interview (n = 203) |
Intake Results for Those with a 6-Month Follow-Up Interview (n = 374) |
Intake Results for Those with ONLY an Intake Interview (“Non-Completers”) (n = 335)c |
Intake Results for Those with a Discharge and/or 6-Month FollowUp Interview (“Completers”) (n = 403)d |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Health | 17.5% (145) rate their own health as very good, and 8.0% (66) rate their own health as excellentv | 20.3% (41) rate their own health as very good, and 6.9% (14) rate their own health as excellent | 18.1% (71) rate their own health as very good, and 8.2% (32) rate their own health as excellent | ||
4.3% (35) received inpatient treatment for mental or emotional difficulties in the past 30 daysw | 3.5% (7) received inpatient treatment for mental or emotional difficulties in the past 30 days | 3.1% (12) received inpatient treatment for mental or emotional difficulties in the past 30 days | |||
38.6% (315) received outpatient treatment for mental or emotional difficulties in the past 30 daysx | 38.5% (77) received outpatient treatment for mental or emotional difficulties in the past 30 days | 43.5% (167) received outpatient treatment for mental or emotional difficulties in the past 30 days | |||
57.4% (463) experienced at least 1 day of serious depression not due to alcohol or drug use in the past 30 daysy | 63.4% (128) experienced at least 1 day of serious depression not due to alcohol or drug use in the past 30 days | 59.5% (229) experienced at least 1 day of serious depression not due to alcohol or drug use in the past 30 days | |||
72.6% (586) experienced at least 1 day of serious anxiety or tension not due to alcohol or drug use in the past 30 daysz | 77.5% (155) experienced at least 1 day of serious anxiety or tension not due to alcohol or drug use in the past 30 days | 74.8% (288) experienced at least 1 day of serious anxiety or tension not due to alcohol or drug use in the past 30 days | |||
35.2% (287) were prescribed medication for a psychological/emotional problem not due to alcohol or drug use in the past 30 daysaa | 34.7% (70) were prescribed medication for a psychological/emotional problem not due to alcohol or drug use in the past 30 days | 36.5% (141) were prescribed medication for a psychological/emotional problem not due to alcohol or drug use in the past 30 days |
___________________
v F1 Report.
w F1 Report.
x F1 Report.
y F4 Report; the n of the F4 Report for those with a 6-month follow-up is distinct from that of the other reports. In this report, n = 393. It is unclear to the committee why this is the case, or why the n’s of the other two groups are the same while this one is not.
z F4 Report.
aa F4 Report.
Metrica | Intake Results for All Intake Interviews (n = 839)b |
Intake Results for Those with a Discharge Interview (n = 203) |
Intake Results for Those with a 6-Month Follow-Up Interview (n = 374) |
Intake Results for Those with ONLY an Intake Interview (“Non-Completers”) (n = 335)c |
Intake Results for Those with a Discharge and/or 6-Month FollowUp Interview (“Completers”) (n = 403)d |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
84.1% (333) of those who had sexual contact had at least one unprotected sexual contact in the past 30 daysab | 85.7% (90) of those who had sexual contact had at least one unprotected sexual contact in the past 30 days | 84.4% (162) of those who had sexual contact had at least one unprotected sexual contact in the past 30 days | |||
13.1% (46) of those who had sexual contact had at least one unprotected sexual contact in the past 30 days with a person who has injected or is currently injecting drugsac | 6.1% (6) of those who had sexual contact had at least one unprotected sexual contact in the past 30 days with a person who has injected or is currently injecting drugs | 13.1% (23) of those who had sexual contact had at least one unprotected sexual contact in the past 30 days with a person who has injected or is currently injecting drugs | |||
92.0% (749) have ever been tested for HIV, and 95.8% (711) of that group know the results of their HIV testingad | 92.1% (186) have ever been tested for HIV, and 95.1% (176) of that group know the results of their HIV testing | 91.5% (356) have ever been tested for HIV, and 95.8% (338) of that group know the results of their HIV testing | |||
78.9% (645) have ever experienced violence or trauma in any settingae | 81.1% (163) have ever experienced violence or trauma in any setting | 77.0% (298) have ever experienced violence or trauma in any setting |
___________________
ab F3 Report.
ac F3 Report.
ad F3 Report.
ae F5 Report.
Metrica | Intake Results for All Intake Interviews (n = 839)b |
Intake Results for Those with a Discharge Interview (n = 203) |
Intake Results for Those with a 6-Month Follow-Up Interview (n = 374) |
Intake Results for Those with ONLY an Intake Interview (“Non-Completers”) (n = 335)c |
Intake Results for Those with a Discharge and/or 6-Month FollowUp Interview (“Completers”) (n = 403)d |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Basic Demographicsaf | 99.6% female, 0.1% male, 0.2% transgender | Data not available | Data not available | 99.7% female, 0.3% transgender | 99.7% female, 0.3% transgender |
9.6% Hispanic or Latino; 22.7% Black or African American, 56.4% White, 3.6% American Indian, 1.2% were multiracial, and 15.4% were none of the above | 11.4% Hispanic or Latino; 29.1% Black or African American, 63.6% White, 5.1% American Indian, and 1.8% multiracial | 7.75% Hispanic or Latino; 24.1% Black or African American, 69.1% White, 4.5% American Indian, and 1.5% multiracial | |||
20.5% were 18–24 years old, 59.8% were 25–34, and 18.4% were 35–44 | 17.8% were 18–24 years old, 60.2% were 25–34, and 19.9% were 35–44 | 23.0% were between 18–24 years old, 58.3% were 25–34, and 17.8% were 35–44 |
___________________
af A1 Report.
TABLE PPW-PLT-2 Discharge and 6-Month Follow-Up Statistics
Overall Statistics | Follow-Ups Due Versus Received | Actual Versus Target Follow-Up Rates | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Percentage of Clients with 6-Month FollowUpa | Program follow-up rates range between 37.1–67.8% | 6-month follow-ups due = 621 | 6-month follow-up target rate = 80.0% | |
6-month follow-ups received = 374 | 6-month follow-up actual rate = 60.2% | |||
Discharge Statusb,c | Overall Statistics Total number of unique discharged clients = 456 |
TOTAL: Did not complete but did make progress (26.7% of terminations; 72) | TOTAL: Did not complete and did not make progress (63.3% of terminations; 171) | TOTAL: Other (10% of terminations; 27) Death = 0.7% (2) |
Completion/Graduate = 40.8% (186) Termination = 59.2% (270) |
Left on own against staff advice with satisfactory progress = 6.7% (18) Referred to another program or other services with satisfactory progress = 14.8% (40) Incarcerated due to old warrant or charged from before entering treatment with satisfactory progress = 3.0% (8) Incarcerated due to offense committed while in treatment with satisfactory progress = 2.2% (6) |
Left on own against staff advice without satisfactory progress = 23.3% (63) Involuntarily discharged due to non-participation = 25.2% (68) Involuntarily discharged due to violation of rules = 4.1% (11) Referred to another program or other services with unsatisfactory progress = 5.6% (15) Incarcerated due to offense committed while in treatment with unsatisfactory progress = 2.2% (6) Incarcerated due to old warrant or charged from before entering treatment with unsatisfactory progress = 3.0% (8) |
Other = 9.3% (25) | |
Length of Stay (days)d | Mean = 187.3 Median = 181.0 Std. Dev. = 105.8 |
___________________
a All data in this row come from PAF, Items 47 and 49; 6-month Report.
b Discharge J-K matched Report.
c Grantees are advised to apply their own definitions and policies around discharge when entering data in GPRA. As such, discharge status may not be similarly applied across grantees. If a grantee does not have a discharge policy, SAMHSA recommends that a client be discharged if they have not had contact with the program in the past 30 days. Discharge interviews must be conducted in person on the day of discharge where possible, or within 14 days. If the interview is not conducted by day 15, the grantee will conduct an administrative discharge (see PAF item 58).
d This reflects the length of stay for the 502 participants included in the second data set sent by SAMHSA. Another 236 clients included in this data set were missing length-of-stay data. Overlap of n’s between these clients and the clients included in the two rows below (from the first data set received) is unclear (SAMHSA Responses: Treatment).
TABLE PPW-PLT-3a Program Goal: Reduce the Abuse of Alcohol and Other Drugs (Outcomes Sorted by Interview Type)a
Program Goal b | Reporting Tool | Metric | Discharge Versus Intake (203 Valid Discharge Interviews)c | 6-Month Versus Intake (393 Valid 6-Month Follow-Up Interviews) | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Reduce the Abuse of Alcohol and Other Drugs | Intake Reportsd | Did not use alcohol or illegal drugs in past 30 daysf | 79.1% at discharge versus 62.7% at intake (26.2% increase; 201 valid discharge cases) | 79.7% at 6-month versus 66.7% at intake (19.5% increase; 369 valid 6-month follow-up cases) | To view these outcomes organized chronologically (by first and second follow-up), click hereh |
Report C1 | Experienced past 30-day emotional problems (somewhat, considerably, or extremely) due to alcohol or drug use | 11.8% at discharge versus 23.6% at intake (50% decrease; 203 valid discharge cases) | 9.9% at 6-month versus 25.2% at intake (60.7% decrease; 393 valid 6-month follow-up cases) 94.0% at 6-month versus 87.1% at intake (7.9% increase; 365 valid 6-month follow-up cases) |
To view related outcomes organized chronologically (by first and second follow-up), click here | |
Intake Reportse | Did not experience any alcohol/drug related health, behavioral, or social consequences in past 30 days | 92.0% at discharge versus 86.5% at intake (6.4% increase; 200 valid discharge cases) | |||
Report B3 | Injected drugs in past 30 days | 1.4% at discharge versus 3.7% at Intake (62.2% decrease; 214 valid discharge cases)g | 1.2% at 6-month versus 4.6% at intake (73.9% decrease; 409 valid 6-month follow-up cases) | To view related results organized chronologically (by first and second follow-up), click here | |
Report E1 | Past 30-day arrests for drug related offenses | Of those who had been arrested in the past 30 days at discharge (5), 80.0% (4) had been arrested for drug-related offenses; of those who had been arrested in the past 30 days at intake (13), 25.0% (3) had been arrested for drug-related offenses (203 valid discharge cases) | Of those who had been arrested in the past 30 days at 6-months (6), 33.3% (2) had been arrested for drug-related offenses; of those who had been arrested in the past 30 days at intake (26), 26.1% (6) had been arrested for drug-related offenses (393 valid 6-month follow-up cases) |
___________________
b All data in this table come from PAF, Items 47 and 49. Where rates and valid rates differed in these reports, the regular rate was used in this table in order to reflect the fact that the questions were “not applicable” to some clients, and that some clients declined to answer questions.
c The GPRA data output is relatively detailed for certain questions (e.g., the exact number of individuals who consumed alcohol for 1 day, 2 days, 3 days, and so on). Instead of listing the results in their full granularity, broad patterns/summaries of results are provided for ease of interpretation.
d Intake 6-Month Report; Intake-Discharge Report.
e Intake 6-month Report.
f Statistics are available on a drug-by-drug basis—including many non-opioid drugs—in the GPRA tool; summaries are provided in this table.
g Several PDF data documents provided to the National Academies from SAMHSA include data through May 1, 2020—a later time point—hence the number of valid cases is larger.
h In some cases, a discharge interview occurred before a 6-month follow-up, and in other cases, the reverse was true. To adjust for this fact, the committee asked that the outcomes data also be tabulated according to the chronological order of interviews (comparing baseline to first interview, and comparing baseline to second interview). The resultant data are captured in Table PPW-PLT-3b. However, the outcome metrics included in this analysis are not, in all cases, the same metrics analyzed when participants were divided by type of interview.
TABLE PPW-PLT-3b Program Goal: Reduce the Misuse of Alcohol and Other Drugs (Outcomes Sorted by Chronological Order of Interviews)a
Program Goal | Metricb | First Follow-Up Versus Intake (n = 382) |
Second Follow-Up Versus Intake (n = 281) |
Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Reduce the Abuse of Alcohol and Other Drugs | Did not use alcohol or illegal drugs | 78.2% at first versus 65.3% at intake (19.9% increase; 377 valid first follow-up cases) | 78.6% at second versus 64.3% at intake (22.2% increase; 182 valid second follow-up cases) | To return to Table PPW-PLT-3a (outcomes sorted by interview type), click here |
Had no past 30-day arrests (of any kind) | 98.7% at first versus 93.3% at intake (5.7% increase; 375 valid first follow-up cases) | 97.8% at second versus 93.4% at intake (4.7% increase; 183 valid second follow-up cases) | ||
No social consequences | 93.8% at first versus 85.6% at intake (9.5% increase; 369 valid first follow-up cases) | 93.3% at second versus 89.4% at intake (4.4% increase; 179 valid second follow-up cases) | ||
Were socially connected | 92.0% at first versus 93.3% at intake (1.4% decrease; 374 valid first follow-up cases) | 88.0% at second versus 94.6% at intake (6.9% decrease; 184 valid second follow-up cases) |
___________________
b All data in this table come from PAF, Item 58.
TABLE PPW-PLT-3c Additional Outcomes Sorted by Chronological Order of Interviews
Program Goal | Metrica | First Follow-Up Versus Intake (n = 382) |
Second Follow-Up Versus Intake (n = 281) |
Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
N/A | Were currently employed or attending school | 39.3% at first versus 30.3% at intake (29.6% increase; 379 valid first follow-up cases) | 49.2% at second versus 34.6% at intake (42.2% increase; 185 valid second follow-up cases) | These metrics were not included in the original analysis |
Had a permanent place to live in the community | 52.1% at first versus 41.3% at intake (26.1% increase; 380 valid first follow-up cases) | 54.6% at second versus 40.0% at intake (36.5% increase; 185 valid second follow-up cases) |
TABLE PPW-PLT-4 Program Goal: Increase Engagement in Treatment Servicesb
Program Goalc | Outcome | Metric | Target Intake Versus Actual | Target Rate Versus Actual | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Increase Engagement in Treatment Servicesd | Progress toward recruitment goalse | Target intake versus actual intake | Target client intake to date = 1,645f | Target client intake coverage rate = 80.0% | Three programs have rates lower than 30%; one program has a rate of 65.9%; two programs have rates greater than 95% |
Client intake received to date = 839 | Client intake coverage rate = 51.0% |
___________________
a All data in this table come from PAF, Item 58.
c All data in this table come from PAF, Items 47 and 49.
d In grant applications, grantees must “Describe how you will identify, recruit, and retain the population(s) of focus, and how this approach will take into consideration the language, beliefs, norms, values, and socioeconomic factors of this/these population(s). Include specific strategies for identifying and engaging women early in their pregnancies for maximum benefit of the mothers and infants (e.g., the first trimester).”
e Intake Report.
f In grant applications, grantees must: “Clearly state: 1) the unduplicated number of women; 2) the estimated number of children; and 3) the estimated number of other family members you propose to serve (annually and over the entire project period) with grant funds, including the types and numbers of services to be provided and anticipated outcomes.”
TABLE PPW-PLT-5 Program Goal: Increase Retention in the Appropriate Level and Duration of Servicesa
Program Goal | Reporting Tool | Metric | Discharge Versus Intake (203 Valid Discharge Interviews) | 6-Month Versus Intake (393 Valid 6-Month Follow-Up Interviews) | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Increase Retention in the Appropriate Level and Duration of Servicesb | Report F2c | Past 30-day outpatient AUD/SUD treatment engagement | 41.4% (84) had received at least 1 day of outpatient treatment for AUD or SUD at discharge, versus 71.4% (145) at intake (42.0% decrease; 203 valid discharge cases)d | 54.2% (213) had received at least 1 day of outpatient treatment for AUD or SUD at 6-months, versus 71.0% (279) at intake (23.7% decrease; 393 valid 6-month follow-up cases) | The majority of clients at intake were already receiving treatment in the past 30 days (data in Table PPW-PLT-1 above); suggests, perhaps, that clients were recruited from existing treatment programs |
74.0% (60) of the grou receiving treatment had received treatment for between 1–10 days in the past 30 days, compared to 73.0% (103) at intake (1.4% decrease; 203 valid discharge cases) | p 66.7% (134) of the group receiving treatment had received treatment for between 1–10 days in the past 30 days, compared to 69.1% (188) at intake (3.5% decrease; 393 valid 6-month follow-up cases) |
___________________
a See “Purpose” in Table 2-1 of this report.
b The committee cannot comment on “appropriate level” without access to client-specific data.
c All data in this table come from PAF, Items 47 and 49.
d The regular rate, rather than the valid rate, is used for the percentages of clients that received at least 1 day of outpatient treatment, in order to reflect that some clients refused.
Increase Access to the Use of Medications Approved by the Food and Drug Administration in Combination with Counseling for the Treatment of Drug Addictiona | J-K Report (discharge interview data, 456 unique clients with a discharge form) | Services received over the course of client involvement in grantee program | 2.0% (9) received methadone | Unclear whether services listed refer to MOUD (except for methadone, most likely do not) |
36.6% (167) received Referral to Treatment—a process for facilitating client/consumer access to specialized treatments and services through linkage with, or directing clients/consumers to, agencies that can meet their needs | ||||
5.0% (23) received Pharmacological Interventions—the use of any pharmacological agent to affect the treatment outcomes of substance-abusing clients. For example, the use of phenytoin in alcohol withdrawal and the use of buprenorphine in opioid treatment | ||||
28.5% (130) received Relapse Prevention—identifying each client’s current stage of recovery and establishing a recovery plan to identify and manage the relapse warning signs | ||||
57.9% (264) received Substance Abuse Education—a program of instruction designed to assist individuals in drug prevention, relapse, and/or treatment | ||||
37.7% (172) received Information and Referral—services involving the provision of resources to a client promoting health behavior and/or direction of a client to other sources for help or information |
___________________
a All data in this table come from PAF, Items 47 and 49. All definitions of services come from SAMHSA, 2013.
TABLE PPW-PLT-7 Additional Program Goalsa
Enhance Flexibility in the Use of Funds Designed to Support Family-Based Services for Pregnant and Postpartum Women with a Primary Diagnosis of a Substance Use Disorder, Including Opioid Use Disordersb | J-K Report (discharge interview data, 456 unique clients with a discharge form) | Services received over the course of client involvement in grantee program | 2.9% (13) received Family/Marriage Counseling—a type of psychotherapy for a married couple or family for the purpose of resolving problems in the relationship |
43.6% (199) received Family Services—resources provided by the state to assist in the well-being and safety of children, families, and the community | |||
16.0% (73) received Child Care—care provided to children for a period of time | |||
Enhance Flexibility in the Use of Funds Designed to Help State Substance Abuse Agencies Address the Continuum of Care, Including Services Provided to Women in Nonresidential-Based Settings | F2 Report | Past 30-day outpatient AUD/SUD treatment engagement | Discharge Versus Intake |
41.4% (84) had received at least 1 day of outpatient treatment for AUD or SUD at discharge, versus 71.4% (145) at intake (42.0% decrease; 203 valid discharge cases) | |||
74.0% (60) of the group receiving treatment had received treatment for between 1–10 days in the past 30 days, compared to 73.0% (103) at intake (1.4% decrease; 203 valid discharge cases) | |||
6-Month Follow-Up Versus Intake | |||
54.2% (213) had received at least 1 day of outpatient treatment for AUD or SUD at 6-months, versus 71.0% (279) at intake (23.7% decrease; 393 valid 6-month followup cases) | |||
66.7% (134) of the group receiving treatment had received treatment for between 1–10 days in the past 30 days, compared to 69.1% (188) at intake (3.5% decrease; 393 valid 6-month follow-up cases) | |||
43.0% (196) received Screening—a gathering and sorting of information used to determine if an individual has a problem with alcohol or other drug abuse, and if so, whether a detailed clinical assessment is appropriate; screening is a process that identifies people at risk for the “disease” or disorder |
___________________
a As outlined under “Purpose” in Table 2-1.
b All data in this table come from PAF, Items 47 and 49.
J-K Report (discharge interview data, 456 unique clients with a discharge form) | Services received over the course of client involvement in grantee program | 21.7% (99) received Brief Intervention—those practices that aim to investigate a potential problem and motivate an individual to begin to do something about his/her substance abuse, either by natural, client-directed means or by seeking additional substance abuse treatment | |
19.7% (90) received Brief Treatment—a systematic, focused process that relies on assessment, client engagement, and rapid implementation of change strategies. Brief therapies usually consist of more (as well as longer) sessions than brief interventions. The duration of brief therapies is reported to be anywhere from 1 session to 40 sessions, with the typical therapy lasting between 6 and 20 sessions | |||
36.6% (167) received Referral to Treatment—a process for facilitating client/consumer access to specialized treatments and services through linkage with, or directing clients/consumers to, agencies that can meet their needs | |||
Enhance Flexibility in the Use of Funds Designed to Promote a Coordinated, Effective, and Efficient State System Managed by State Substance Abuse Agencies by Encouraging New Approaches and Models of Service Delivery | No metrics in reporting tools that address this goal |
GPRA TABLES FOR THE BCOR PROGRAM
TABLE BCOR-1 Intake Versus Follow-Up Statistics (to Assess for Retention Bias)
Metrica | Intake Results for All Intake Interviews (n = 2,022)b |
Intake Results for Those with a Discharge Interview (n = 212) |
Intake Results for Those with a 6-Month Follow-Up Interview (n = 1,025) |
Intake Results for Those with ONLY an Intake Interview (“Non-Completers”) (n = 635)c |
Intake Results for Those with a Discharge and/or 6-Month FollowUp Interview (“Completers”) n = 1,051)d |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Drug and Alcohol Use at Time of Intake | 21.0% (386) used illegal drugs in past 30 dayse | 21.1% (48) used illegal drugs in past 30 daysj | 21.1% (197) used illegal drugs in past 30 days | 23.0% (138) used any drugs in the past 30 days | 20.9% (190) used any drugs in the past 30 days |
16.7% (309) used alcohol in past 30 daysf | 20.3% (46) used alcohol in past 30 days | 17.2% (168) used alcohol in past 30 days | 16.7% (100) used alcohol in past 30 days | 17.5% (158) used alcohol in past 30 days | |
13.9% (232) of clients have an opioid-related disorderg | (data only available in aggregate) | (data only available in aggregate) | |||
Drugs used in past 30 days (not mutually exclusive)h
|
Drugs used in past 30 days (not mutually exclusive)
|
Drugs used in past 30 days (not mutually exclusive)
|
Drugs used in past 30 days (not mutually exclusive)
|
Drugs used in past 30 days (not mutually exclusive)
|
___________________
a In assessing each of these metrics, it is important to note that first column n includes the n of the 2nd/3rd columns (i.e., this is not a 1:1 comparison of clients who were retained versus clients who dropped out).
b All data in the first three columns come from PAF Items 47 and 49. The specific reports will be noted in footnotes.
c All data included in the two rightmost columns come from PAF, Item 58.
d It should be noted that the n’s of “Completers” and “Non-Completers” do not sum up the total number of intake interviews completed, as would be expected. It appears that the second data set sent by SAMHSA (PAF, Item 58) included 336 fewer clients than the first set of GPRA data. As such, these data should not be regarded as a new breakdown of exactly the same client pool. Also note that several of the metrics analyzed in the first report were not included in the second. Data provided where available.
e B1 Report; for all data in this table, the first column comes from the intake report for the corresponding report (e.g., B1), the second column from the intake matched with the discharge report, and the final from the intake matched with the 6-month report. Note that the n’s on the B1 Report are distinct from the others (n = 2,034 for all intake interviews; n = 229 for those with discharge interview; n = 1,127 for those with 6-month follow-up). It is unclear to the committee why this is the case.
f B1 Report.
g ICD 10 Report—only available in aggregate at intake; note that the n of this report is unclear.
h B2 Report.
i B3 Report.
j For each metric, a number of clients are missing data; the percentages presented in all tables included in this appendix are calculated using the valid responses only (i.e., the denominator is not always the n at the top of the corresponding column).
Metrica | Intake Results for All Intake Interviews (n = 2,022)b |
Intake Results for Those with a Discharge Interview (n = 212) |
Intake Results for Those with a 6-Month Follow-Up Interview (n = 1,025) |
Intake Results for Those with ONLY an Intake Interview (“Non-Completers”) (n = 635)c |
Intake Results for Those with a Discharge and/or 6-Month FollowUp Interview (“Completers”) n = 1,051)d |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Intake Substance Use Treatment in the Past 30 Days | 33.7% (671) had received at least 1 day of inpatient treatment for AUD or SUDk | 27.8% (59) had received at least 1 day of inpatient treatment for AUD or SUD | 40.0% (413) had received at least 1 day of inpatient treatment for AUD or SUD | ||
22.9% (421) had received at least 1 day of outpatient treatment for AUD or SUDl | 30.7% (65) had received at least 1 day of outpatient treatment for AUD or SUD | 23.8% (216) had received at least 1 day of outpatient treatment for AUD or SUD | |||
65.2% (266) of the group receiving outpatient treatment had between 1–10 contacts; 20.3% (83) had between 11–20 contacts; 14.2% (58) had between 21–30 contactsm | 53.1% (34) of the group receiving outpatient treatment had between 1–10 contacts; 34.4% (22) had between 11–20 contacts; 12.5% (8) had between 21–30 contacts | 66.2% (141) of the group receiving outpatient treatment had 1–10 contacts; 18.3% (39) had between 11–20 contacts; 15.5% (33) had between 21–30 contacts |
___________________
k F1 Report.
l F2 Report.
m F2 Report.
Metrica | Intake Results for All Intake Interviews (n = 2,022)b |
Intake Results for Those with a Discharge Interview (n = 212) |
Intake Results for Those with a 6-Month Follow-Up Interview (n = 1,025) |
Intake Results for Those with ONLY an Intake Interview (“Non-Completers”) (n = 635)c |
Intake Results for Those with a Discharge and/or 6-Month FollowUp Interview (“Completers”) n = 1,051)d |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Past 30-Day Psychosocial Factors | 36.8% (725) said that their drug use had caused them to give up or reduce important activities somewhat, considerably, or extremelyn 38.9% (767) said that their drug use had caused emotiona problems somewhat, considerably, or extremelyo 72.3% (1,286) attended a voluntary self-help group for recoveryp 34.6% (617) attended a religious/faith affiliated recovery self-help groupq 84.5% (1,498) had interactions with family/friends that are supportive of their recoveryr 42.7% (794) are satisfied with their personal relationships, and 18.8% (350) are very satisfieds |
25.6% (54) said that their drug use had caused them to give up or reduce important activities somewhat, considerably, or extremely 27.5% (58) said that their drug use had caused emotional problems somewhat, considerably, or extremely 72.2% (153) attended a voluntary self-help group for recovery 35.4% (75) attended a religious/faith affiliated recovery self-help group 88.1% (185) had interactions with family/friends that are supportive of their recovery 53.1% (110) are satisfied with their personal relationships, and 18.8% (39) are very satisfied |
38.4% (391) said that their drug use had caused them to give up or reduce important activities somewhat, considerably, or extremely 39.4% (399) said that their drug use had caused emotional problems somewhat, considerably, or extremely 76.6% (692) attended a voluntary self-help group for recovery 34.0% (308) attended a religious/faith affiliated recovery self-help group 86.7% (781) had interactions with family/friends that are supportive of their recovery 41.1% (416) are satisfied with their personal relationships, and 17.9% (181) are very satisfied |
34.4% (207) said that their drug use had caused them to give up or reduce important activities somewhat, considerably, or extremely 39.2% (238) said that their drug use had caused emotional problems somewhat, considerably, or extremely |
38.0% (392) said that their drug use had caused them to give up or reduce important activities somewhat, considerably, or extremely 38.8% (398) said that their drug use had caused emotional problems somewhat, considerably, or extremely |
___________________
n C1 Report.
o C1 Report.
p G1 Report.
q G1 Report.
r G1 Report.
s G1 Report.
Metrica | Intake Results for All Intake Interviews (n = 2,022)b |
Intake Results for Those with a Discharge Interview (n = 212) |
Intake Results for Those with a 6-Month Follow-Up Interview (n = 1,025) |
Intake Results for Those with ONLY an Intake Interview (“Non-Completers”) (n = 635)c |
Intake Results for Those with a Discharge and/or 6-Month FollowUp Interview (“Completers”) n = 1,051)d |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Past 30-Day Criminal Justice Involvementt | 95.6% (1,820) had not been arrested | 96.2% (204) had not been arrested | 97.2% (929) had not been arrested | Data not available | 97.1% (942) had not been arrested |
52.4% (44) of those that had been arrested were arrested for drug-related offenses | 37.5% (3) of those that had been arrested were arrested for drug-related offenses | 46.4% (13) of those that had been arrested were arrested for drug-related offenses | |||
86.5% (1,638) had spent no nights in jail or prison | 85.8% (182) had spent no nights in jail or prison | 92.7% (881) had spent no nights in jail or prison | |||
78.7% (1,485) had committed no crimes | 72.5% (153) had committed no crimes | 79.7% (755) had committed no crimes | |||
17.4% (331) were awaiting trial, charges, or sentencing | 17.9% (38) were awaiting trial, charges, or sentencing | 12.7% (122) were awaiting trial, charges, or sentencing | |||
33.7% (648) were on parole or probation | 42.9% (91) were on parole or probation | 30.2% (297) were on parole or probation |
___________________
t E1 Report.
Metrica | Intake Results for All Intake Interviews (n = 2,022)b |
Intake Results for Those with a Discharge Interview (n = 212) |
Intake Results for Those with a 6-Month Follow-Up Interview (n = 1,025) |
Intake Results for Those with ONLY an Intake Interview (“Non-Completers”) (n = 635)c |
Intake Results for Those with a Discharge and/or 6-Month FollowUp Interview (“Completers”) n = 1,051)d |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Past 30-Day Housingu | 68.2% (1,346) were living in a house most of the time | 62.6% (132) were living in a house most of the time | 70.0% (704) were living in a house most of the time | 66.1% (411) were living in a house most of the time | 70.9% (720) were living in a house most of the time |
35.3% (473) were living in a room, home, or apartment that they owned or rented; 22.1% (296) were living in someone else’s room, home, or apartment; 22.1% (297) were in residential treatment; 7.8% (105) were living in a halfway house | 16.7% (22) were living in a room, home, or apartment that they owned or rented; 18.2% (24) were living in someone else’s room, home, or apartment; 27.3% (36) were in residential treatment; 24.2% (32) were living in a halfway house | 31.9% (223) were living in a room, home, or apartment that they owned or rented; 22.4% (157) were living in someone else’s room, home, or apartment; 20.6% (144) were in residential treatment; 10.7% (75) were living in a halfway house | 38.3% (157) were living in a room, home, or apartment that they owned or rented; 21.0% (86) were living in someone else’s room, home, or apartment; 25.4% (104) were in residential treatment; 2.9% (12) were living in a halfway house | 31.2% (223) were living in a room, home, or apartment that they owned or rented; 22.1% (158) were living in someone else’s room, home, or apartment; 20.3% (145) were in residential treatment; 12.3% (88) were living in a halfway house | |
36.2% (700) were satisfied with their living conditions, and 24.0% (464) were very satisfied | 53.4% (110) were satisfied with their living conditions, and 18.9% (39) were very satisfied | 36.4% (369) were satisfied with their living conditions, and 23.6% (239) were very satisfied | 35.8% (207) were satisfied with their living conditions, and 22.8% (132) were very satisfied | 36.8% (376) were satisfied with their living conditions, and 23.6% (241) were very satisfied |
___________________
u C1 Report.
Metrica | Intake Results for All Intake Interviews (n = 2,022)b |
Intake Results for Those with a Discharge Interview (n = 212) |
Intake Results for Those with a 6-Month Follow-Up Interview (n = 1,025) |
Intake Results for Those with ONLY an Intake Interview (“Non-Completers”) (n = 635)c |
Intake Results for Those with a Discharge and/or 6-Month FollowUp Interview (“Completers”) n = 1,051)d |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Employment and Educationv | 89.0% (1,772) were not enrolled in a school or job training program in the past 30 days | 89.2% (189) were not enrolled in a school or job training program in the past 30 days | 90.8% (933) were not enrolled in a school or job training program in the past 30 days | ||
77.5% (1,500) had completed high school or equivalent | 73.6% (156) had completed high school or equivalent | 79.3% (780) had completed high school or equivalent | 75.1% (461) had completed high school or equivalent | 79.8% (790) had completed high school or equivalent | |
17.0% (339) were employed full time, and 11.3% (225) were employed part time in the past 30 days | 14.6% (31) were employed full time, and 16.0% (34) were employed part time in the past 30 days | 17.2% (178) were employed full time, and 11.4% (118) were employed part time in the past 30 days | 18.4% (113) were employed full time, and 9.1% (56) were employed part time in the past 30 days | 17.6% (180) were employed full time, and 12.3% (126) were employed part time in the past 30 days | |
45.3% (904) were unemployed and looking for work; 12.6% (251) were unemployed and not looking for work in the past 30 days | 42.0% (89) were unemployed and looking for work; 17.5% (37) were unemployed and not looking for work in the past 30 days | 47.1% (487) were unemployed and looking for work; 10.1% (104) were unemployed and not looking for work in the past 30 days | 72.5% (446) were unemployed (detailed breakdown unavailable) | 70.1% (718) were unemployed (detailed breakdown unavailable) | |
75.4% (1,294) received $0 in the past 30 days from wages; 23.4% (401) received between $1 and $4,999 from wages | 77.1% (158) received $0 in the past 30 days from wages; 22.9% (47) received between $1 and $4,999 from wages | 73.0% (623) received $0 in the past 30 days from wages; 25.6% (219) received between $1 and $4,999 from wages | 43.7% (247) received $0 in the past 30 days from wages; 54.0% (305) received between $1 and $4,999 from wages | 43.2% (382) received $0 in the past 30 days from wages; 55.0% (486) received between $1 and $4,999 from wages | |
80.6% (1,376) received $0 in the past 30 days from public assistance; 19.4% (332) received between $1 and $4,999 from public assistance | 75.6% (158) received $0 in the past 30 days from public assistance; 24.4% (51) received between $1 and $4,999 from public assistance | 79.3% (663) received $0 in the past 30 days from public assistance; 20.7% (173) received between $1 and $4,999 from public assistance | |||
54.7% (1,054) did not have enough money to meet their needs; 20.4% (393) had enough money to mostly or completely meet their needs in the past 30 days | 62.5% (130) did not have enough money to meet their needs; 14.4% (30) had enough money to mostly or completely meet their needs in the past 30 days | 54.0% (547) did not have enough money to meet their needs; 19.2% (195) had enough money to mostly or completely meet their needs in the past 30 days |
___________________
v D1 Report.
Metrica | Intake Results for All Intake Interviews (n = 2,022)b |
Intake Results for Those with a Discharge Interview (n = 212) |
Intake Results for Those with a 6-Month Follow-Up Interview (n = 1,025) |
Intake Results for Those with ONLY an Intake Interview (“Non-Completers”) (n = 635)c |
Intake Results for Those with a Discharge and/or 6-Month FollowUp Interview (“Completers”) n = 1,051)d |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Health | 19.7% (392) rate their own health as very good, and 10.0% (199) rate their own health as excellentw | 20.3% (43) rate their own health as very good, and 8.0% (17) rate their own health as excellent | 19.8% (204) rate their own health as very good, and 9.0% (93) rate their own health as excellent | ||
9.2% (170) received inpatient treatment for mental or emotional difficulties in the past 30 daysx | 9.4% (20) received inpatient treatment for mental or emotional difficulties in the past 30 days | 9.0% (82) received inpatient treatment for mental or emotional difficulties in the past 30 days | |||
19.5% (360) received outpatient treatment for mental or emotional difficulties in the past 30 daysy | 27.4% (58) received outpatient treatment for mental or emotional difficulties in the past 30 days | 19.5% (177) received outpatient treatment for mental or emotional difficulties in the past 30 days | |||
48.8% (863) experienced at least 1 day of serious depression not due to alcohol or drug use in the past 30 daysz | 54.7% (116) experienced at least 1 day of serious depression not due to alcohol or drug use in the past 30 days | 45.5% (406) experienced at least 1 day of serious depression not due to alcohol or drug use in the past 30 days | |||
62.8% (1,108) experienced at least 1 day of serious anxiety or tension not due to alcohol or drug use in the past 30 daysaa | 71.7% (152) experienced at least 1 day of serious anxiety or tension not due to alcohol or drug use in the past 30 days | 61.2% (545) experienced at least 1 day of serious anxiety or tension not due to alcohol or drug use in the past 30 days | |||
30.5% (539) were prescribed medication for a psychological/emotional problem not due to alcohol or drug use in the past 30 daysab | 36.8% (78) were prescribed medication for a psychological/emotional problem not due to alcohol or drug use in the past 30 days | 30.2% (269) were prescribed medication for a psychological/emotional problem not due to alcohol or drug use in the past 30 days |
___________________
w F1 Report.
x F1 Report.
y F1 Report.
z F4 Report; note that the n of the F4 Report for those with a 6-month follow-up is distinct from that of the other reports. In this report, n = 1,044. It is unclear to the committee why this is the case, or why the n’s of the other two groups are not different in this report.
aa F4 Report.
ab F4 Report.
Metrica | Intake Results for All Intake Interviews (n = 2,022)b |
Intake Results for Those with a Discharge Interview (n = 212) |
Intake Results for Those with a 6-Month Follow-Up Interview (n = 1,025) |
Intake Results for Those with ONLY an Intake Interview (“Non-Completers”) (n = 635)c |
Intake Results for Those with a Discharge and/or 6-Month FollowUp Interview (“Completers”) n = 1,051)d |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
73.8% (344) of those who had sexual contact had at least one unprotected sexual contact in the past 30 daysac | 73.0% (35) of those who had sexual contact had at least one unprotected sexual contact in the past 30 days | 77.0% (157) of those who had sexual contact had at least one unprotected sexual contact in the past 30 days | |||
22.9% (81) of those who had sexual contact had at least one unprotected sexual contact in the past 30 days with a person who has injected or is currently injecting drugsad | 20.6% (7) of those who had sexual contact had at least one unprotected sexual contact in the past 30 days with a person who has injected or is currentl injecting drugs | 19.2% (31) of those who had sexual contact had at least one unprotected sexual contact in the past 30 days with a person who y has injected or is currently injecting drugs | |||
80.7% (1,451) have ever been tested for HIV, and 97.5% (1,402) of that group know the results of their HIV testingae | 80.5% (169) have eve been tested for HIV, and 98.8% (166) of that group know the results of their HIV testing | r 81.3% (715) have ever been tested for HIV, and 97.6% (696) of that group know the results of their HIV testing | |||
65.8% (1,173) have ever experienced violence or trauma in any settingaf | 59.2% (125) have eve experienced violence or trauma in any setting | r 62.5% (563) have ever experienced violence or trauma in any setting |
___________________
ac F3 Report.
ad F3 Report.
ae F3 Report.
af F5 Report.
Metrica | Intake Results for All Intake Interviews (n = 2,022)b |
Intake Results for Those with a Discharge Interview (n = 212) |
Intake Results for Those with a 6-Month Follow-Up Interview (n = 1,025) |
Intake Results for Those with ONLY an Intake Interview (“Non-Completers”) (n = 635)c |
Intake Results for Those with a Discharge and/or 6-Month FollowUp Interview (“Completers”) n = 1,051)d |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Basic Demographicsag | 41.4% female, 58.3% male, 0.3% transgender | Data not available | Data not available | 56.4% male, 43.0% female, 0.5% transgender | 56.8% male, 43.1% female, 0.1% transgender |
19.0% Hispanic or Latino, 12.8% Black or African American, 54.8% White, 1.9% American Indian, 0.6% multi-racial, and 29.3% were none of the above | 18.0% Hispanic or Latino, 17.4% Black or African American, 77.5% White, 2.8% American Indian, and 0.8% multi-racial | 20.2% Hispanic or Latino, 19.4% Black or African American, 77.0% White, 1.7% American Indian, and 1.0% multi-racial | |||
3.2% were between 13–17 years old, 10.4% between 18–24, 33.0% between 25–34, 26.4% between 35–44, 16.4% between 45–54, and 9.8% between 55–65 | 4.6% were between 13–17 years old, 12.9% between 18–24, 32.4% between 25–34 years old, 25.6% between 35–44, 16.3% between 45–54, and 7.7% between 55–65 | 2.7% were between 13–17 years old, 9.5% between 18–24, 31.3% between 25–34 years old, 26.5% between 35–44, 17.1% between 45–54, and 11.8% between 55–65 |
___________________
ag A1 Report.
TABLE BCOR-2 Intake, Discharge, and 6-Month Follow-Up Statistics
Overall Statistics | Intakes Due Versus Received | Actual Versus Target Intake Rates | Notes | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intake Statisticsa | Program intake rates range between 0.0–152.5%b | Intake target = 2,791 Intake received = 2,022 |
Intake target rate = 80.0% Intake actual rate = 72.4% |
5 grantees are below 50%; 12 grantees are between 50–90%; 4 grantees are above 90% |
Overall Statistics | Follow-Ups Due Versus Received | Actual Versus Target Follow-Up Rates | Notes | |
Percentage of Clients with 6-Month Follow-Upc | Program follow-up rates range between 0.0–105.0% | 6-month follow-ups due = 1,534 6-month follow-ups received = 1,109 |
6-month follow-up target rate = 80.0% 6-month follow-up actual rate = 72.3% |
4 grantees are below 50%; 12 grantees are between 50–90%; 2 grantees are above 90% |
___________________
a All data in this table come from PAF, Items 47 and 49.
b All data in this row come from Intake Report.
c All data in this row come from Follow-up Rate by Grantee Report (data as of June 11, 2020—hence, number of follow-up cases is larger than for other data presented in this document). Note that this set of data only included 18 of the 21 grantees that are included in the rest of the data reports.
Overall Statistics | Intakes Due Versus Received | Actual Versus Target Intake Rates | Notes | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Discharge Statusd,e | Total number of unique discharged clients = 589 Completion/Graduate = 33.6% (198) |
TOTAL: Did not Complete but Did Make Progress (10.0% of Terminations; 39) | TOTAL: Did not Complete and Did Not Make Progress (84.9% of Terminations; 332) | TOTAL: Other (10% of Terminations; 27) |
Termination = 66.4% (391) | Left on own against staff advice with satisfactory progress = 7.2% (28 Referred to another program or other services with satisfactory progress = 1.5% (6) Incarcerated due to old warrant or charged from before entering treatment with satisfactory progress = 0.5% (2) Incarcerated due to offense committed while in treatment with satisfactory progress = 0.8% (3) |
Left on own against staff advice without satisfactory progress = 62.9% (246) Involuntarily discharged due to non-participation = 7.4% (29) Involuntarily discharged due to violation of rules = 11.0% (43) Referred to another program or other services with unsatisfactory progress = 1.8% (7) Incarcerated due to offense committed while in treatment with unsatisfactory progress = 0.8% (3) Incarcerated due to old warrant or charged from before entering treatment with unsatisfactory progress = 1.0% (4) |
Death = 0.5% (2) Other = 3.3% (13) |
|
Length of Stay (days)f | Mean = 130.5 Median = 145.5 Std. Dev. = 93.0 |
d All data in this row come from BCOR discharge J-K matched Report. Rates displayed are valid rates.
e Grantees are advised to apply their own definitions and policies around discharge when entering data in GPRA. As such, discharge status may not be similarly applied across grantees. If a grantee does not have a discharge policy, SAMHSA recommends that a client be discharged if they have not had contact with the program in the past 30 days. Discharge interviews must be conducted in person on the day of discharge where possible, or within 14 days. If the interview is not conducted by day 15, the grantee will conduct an administrative discharge (PAF, Item 58).
f This reflects the length of stay for the 568 participants included in the second data set sent by SAMHSA. Another 1,118 clients included in this data set were missing length of stay data. Overlap of n’s between these clients and the clients included in the two rows above (from the first data set received) is unclear (see PAF, Item 58).
Develop, Expand, and Enhance Community and Statewide Recovery Support Services (RSS), Including Non-Clinical Services That Directly Assist Individuals and Families to Recover from Alcohol or Drug Problemsa | GPRA, K (discharge interview data, 589 unique clients with a discharge form) | Social support Linkage to allied service providers (i.e. TANF, Medicaid) Housing linkages Child care Vocational services Educational services Legal services Transportation services |
91.0% (536) received Case Management—defining, initiating, and monitoring the medical, drug treatment, psychosocial, and, social services provided for the client and the client’s family 12.2% (72) received After Care—treatment given for a limited time after the client has completed his/her primary treatment program, but is still connected to the treatment provider 78.8% (464) received Recovery Support—support from peers, family, friends, and health professionals during recovery. Includes any of the following: assistance in housing, educational, and employment opportunities; building constructive family and other personal relationships; stress management assistance; alcohol- and drug-free social and recreational activities; recovery coaching or mentoring to help manage the process of obtaining services from multiple systems, including primary and mental health care, child welfare, and criminal justice systems 11.0% (65) received Referral to Treatment—a process for facilitating client/consumer access to specialized treatments and services through linkage with, or directing clients/consumers to, agencies that can meet their needs 67.2% (396) received Treatment/Recovery Planning—a program or method worked out beforehand to administer or apply remedies to a patient for illness, disease or injury 15.6% (92) received Individual Counseling—professional guidance of an individual by utilizing psychological methods 65.5% (386) received Group Counseling—professional guidance of a group of people gathered together utilizing psychological methods 57.4% (338) received Co-Occurring Treatment/Recovery Services—assistance and resources provided to clients who suffer from both mental illness disorder(s) and substance use disorder(s) |
No baseline with which to compare |
___________________
a All data in this table come from PAF, Items 47 and 49. Discharge J-K Report. All definitions of services come from SAMHSA, 2013.
4.6% (27) received Family Services—resources provided by the state to assist in the well-being and safety of children, families, and the community 0.3% (2) received Child Care—care provided to children for a period of time 14.6% (86) received Pre-Employment—services provided to clients prior to employment, which can include background checks, drug tests, and assessments. These services allow employers to “check out” prospective employees before hiring them 71.1% (419) received Employment Coaching—provides tools and strategies to clients to assist in gaining employment. These strategies include implementing new skills, changes, and actions to ensure that clients achieve their targeted results 68.3% (402) received Transportation—providing a means of transport for clients to travel from one location to another 22.1% (130) received Supportive Transitional Drug-Free Housing Services—provides rental assistance for families and individuals who are seeking to be drug-free who can be housed for up to 2 years while receiving intensive support services from the agency staff 14.8% (87) received Continuing Care—providing health care for extended periods of time 41.6% (245) received Recovery Coaching—guidance involving a combination of counseling, support, and various forms of mediation treatments to find solutions to deal with breaking the habit of substance abuse 25.6% (151) received Self-Help and Support Groups—helping or improving oneself without assistance from others; and/or an assemblage of persons who have similar experiences and assist in encouraging and keeping individuals from failing |
26.1% (154) received Peer Coaching or Mentoring—services involving a trusted counselor or teacher to another person of equal standing or others in support of a client’s recovery 18.2% (107) received Housing Support—providing assistance for living arrangements to clients 86.8% (511) received Alcohol- and Drug-Free Social Activities—an action, event, or gathering attended by a group of people that promotes abstinence from alcohol and other drugs 31.9% (188) received Information and Referral—services involving the provision of resources to a client that promote health behavior and/or directing a client to other sources for help or information 7.8% (46) received Other Peer-to-Peer recovery support services—other peer-to-peer recovery services that the client received that are not listed above |
Develop, Expand, and Enhance Community and Statewide Recovery Support Services (RSS), Including Peer Recovery Support Services, Designed and Delivered by People Who Have Experienced Both Drug/Alcohol Addiction and Recoverya | GPRA, K (discharge interview data, 589 unique clients with a discharge form) | Clients receiving recovery support services | 78.8% (464) received Recovery Support—support from peers, family, friends and health professionals during recovery 67.2% (396) received Treatment/Recovery Planning—a program or method worked out beforehand to administer or apply remedies to a patient for illness, disease or injury 57.4% (338) received Co-Occurring Treatment/Recovery Services—assistance and resources provided to clients who suffer from both mental illness disorder(s) and substance use disorder(s) 41.6% (245) received Recovery Coaching—guidance involving a combination of counseling, support, and various forms of mediation treatments to find solutions to deal with breaking the habit of substance abuse 26.1% (154) received Peer Coaching or Mentoring—services involving a trusted counselor or teacher to another person of equal standing or others in support of a client’s recovery 7.8% (46) received Other Peer-to-Peer Recovery Support Services—other peer-to-peer recovery services the client received that are not listed above |
No baseline with which to compare |
a All data in this table come from PAF, Items 47 and 49. Discharge J-K Report. All definitions of services come from SAMHSA, 2013.
Build Connections Between Recovery Networks, Between Recovery Community Organizations (RCOs), and with Other Recovery Support Services (RSS) | No data in the CSAT GPRA reporting tool address this goal |
TABLE BCOR-6 Allowable Activity 2: Reduce the Stigma Associated with Drug/Alcohol Addiction
Reduce the Stigma Associated with Drug/Alcohol Addiction | No data in the CSAT GPRA reporting tool address this goal |
Conduct Public Education and Outreach on Issues Relating to Drug/Alcohol Addiction and Recovery | No data in the CSAT GPRA reporting tool address this goal |
TABLE BCOR-8a Reduction in the Abuse of Alcohol and Other Drugs (Outcomes Sorted by Interview Type)
Program Goala | Reporting Tool | Metric | Discharge Versus Intake (212 Valid Discharge Interviews)b | 6-Month Versus Intake (1,025 Valid 6-Month Follow-Up Interviews) | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
N/A | Intake Reportsc | Did not use alcohol or illegal drugs in past 30 dayse | 79.8% at Discharge versus 72.1% at Intake (10.7% increase; 208 valid discharge cases) | 83.5% at 6-month versus 70.7% at intake (18.1% increase; 881 valid 6-month follow-up cases) | To view these outcomes organized chronologically (by first and second follow-up), click here |
C1 Report | Experienced past 30-day emotional problems (somewhat, considerably, or extremely) due to alcohol or drug use | 18.4% at discharge versus 27.4% at intake (32.8% decrease; 212 valid discharge cases) | 19.5% at 6-month versus 38.4% at intake (49.2% decrease; 1,040 valid 6-month follow-up cases) | ||
Intake Reportsd | Did not experience any alcohol/drug related health, behavioral, or social consequences in past 30 days | 82.4% at discharge versus 74.8% at intake (10.2% increase; 210 valid discharge cases) | 82.2% at 6-month versus 64.2% at intake (28.0% increase; 990 valid 6-month follow-up cases) | To view related outcomes organized chronologically (by first and second follow-up), click here | |
B3 Report | Injected drugs in past 30 days | 5.7% at discharge versu 6.6% at intake (13.6% decrease; 229 valid discharge cases)f | 4.0% at 6-month versus 5.4% at intake (25.9% decrease; 1,127 valid 6-month follow-up cases) | ||
E1 Report | Past 30-day arrests for drug related offenses | Of those who had been arrested in the past 30 days at discharge (10), 40.0% (4) had been arrested for drug-related offenses; of those who had been arrested in the past 30 days at intake (8), 3 had been arrested for drug-related offenses (212 valid Discharge cases) | Of those who had been arrested in the past 30 days at 6-months (20), 9 answered that they had been arrested for drug-related offenses. Of those who had been arrested in the past 30 days at intake (27), 13 answered that they had been arrested for drug-related offenses (1044 valid 6-month follow-up cases). Several clients declined to answer or did not know | To view related results organized chronologically (by first and second follow-up), click here |
___________________
a All data in this table come from PAF, Items 47 and 49. Where rates and valid rates differed in these reports, the regular rate was used in this table in order to reflect the fact that the questions were “not applicable” to some clients, and that some clients declined to answer questions.
b The GPRA data output is relatively detailed for certain questions (e.g., the exact number of individuals who consumed alcohol for 1 day, for 2 days, for 3 days, and so on). Instead of listing the results in their full granularity, broad patterns/summaries of results are provided for ease-of-interpretation.
c Intake 6-Month Report; Intake-Discharge Report.
d Intake 6-Month Report; Intake-Discharge Report.
e Statistics are available on a drug-by-drug basis—including many non-opioid drugs—in the GPRA tool; summaries are provided in this table.
f Several PDF data documents provided to the National Academies from SAMHSA include data through May 1, 2020—a later time point—hence the number of valid cases is larger.
TABLE BCOR-8b Reduction in the Abuse of Alcohol and Other Drugs (Outcomes Sorted by Interview Type)a
Program Goal | Metric | First Follow-Up Versus Intake (n = 1,035) |
Second Follow-Up Versus Intake (n = 460) |
Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
N/A | Did not use alcohol or illegal drugs | 83.5% at first versus 71.2% at intake (17.4% increase; 891 valid first follow-up cases) | 79.8% at second versus 68.6% at intake (16.3% increase; 188 valid second follow-up cases) | To return to Table BCOR-8a (outcomes sorted by interview type), click here |
Had no past 30-day arrests (of any kind) | 97.7% at first versus 97.1% at intake (0.5% increase; 942 valid first follow-up cases) | 95.8% at second versus 96.4% at intake (0.5% decrease; 192 valid second follow-up cases) | ||
No social consequences | 82.3% at first versus 64.7% at intake (27.2% increase; 1,000 vali first follow-up cases) | 83.2% at second versus 72.1% at intake (15.3% increase; 190 valid second follow-up cases) | ||
Were socially connected | 88.9% at first versus 93.9% at intake (5.3% decrease; 900 valid first follow-up cases) | 91.1% at second versus 92.7% at intake (1.7% decrease; 192 valid second follow-up cases) |
TABLE BCOR-9 Additional Outcomes Sorted by Chronological Order of Interviewsb
Program Goal | Metric | First Follow-Up Versus Intake (n = 1,035) |
Second Follow-Up Versus Intake (n = 460) |
Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
N/A | Were currently employed or attending school | 60.7% at first versus 34.0% at intake (78.6% increase; 1,018 valid first follow-up cases) | 61.5% at second versus 30.2% at intake (103.4% increase; 192 valid second follow-up cases) | |
Had a permanent place to live in the community | 42.6% at first versus 24.8% at intake (71.5% increase; 990 valid first follow-up cases) | 28.9% at second versus 12.1% at intake (139.1% increase; 190 valid second follow-up cases) |
___________________
a All data in this table come from PAF, Item 58.
b All data in this table come from PAF, Item 58.