National Academies Press: OpenBook
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1965. Report on the U.S. Program for the International Geophysical Year: July 1, 1957 - December 31, 1958. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26118.
×
Page R1
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1965. Report on the U.S. Program for the International Geophysical Year: July 1, 1957 - December 31, 1958. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26118.
×
Page R2
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1965. Report on the U.S. Program for the International Geophysical Year: July 1, 1957 - December 31, 1958. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26118.
×
Page R3
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1965. Report on the U.S. Program for the International Geophysical Year: July 1, 1957 - December 31, 1958. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26118.
×
Page R4
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1965. Report on the U.S. Program for the International Geophysical Year: July 1, 1957 - December 31, 1958. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26118.
×
Page R5
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1965. Report on the U.S. Program for the International Geophysical Year: July 1, 1957 - December 31, 1958. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26118.
×
Page R6
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1965. Report on the U.S. Program for the International Geophysical Year: July 1, 1957 - December 31, 1958. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26118.
×
Page R7
Page viii Cite
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1965. Report on the U.S. Program for the International Geophysical Year: July 1, 1957 - December 31, 1958. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26118.
×
Page R8
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1965. Report on the U.S. Program for the International Geophysical Year: July 1, 1957 - December 31, 1958. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26118.
×
Page R9
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1965. Report on the U.S. Program for the International Geophysical Year: July 1, 1957 - December 31, 1958. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26118.
×
Page R10
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1965. Report on the U.S. Program for the International Geophysical Year: July 1, 1957 - December 31, 1958. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26118.
×
Page R11
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1965. Report on the U.S. Program for the International Geophysical Year: July 1, 1957 - December 31, 1958. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26118.
×
Page R12
Page xiii Cite
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1965. Report on the U.S. Program for the International Geophysical Year: July 1, 1957 - December 31, 1958. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26118.
×
Page R13
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1965. Report on the U.S. Program for the International Geophysical Year: July 1, 1957 - December 31, 1958. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26118.
×
Page R14
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1965. Report on the U.S. Program for the International Geophysical Year: July 1, 1957 - December 31, 1958. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26118.
×
Page R15
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1965. Report on the U.S. Program for the International Geophysical Year: July 1, 1957 - December 31, 1958. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26118.
×
Page R16
Page xvii Cite
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1965. Report on the U.S. Program for the International Geophysical Year: July 1, 1957 - December 31, 1958. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26118.
×
Page R17
Page xviii Cite
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1965. Report on the U.S. Program for the International Geophysical Year: July 1, 1957 - December 31, 1958. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26118.
×
Page R18
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1965. Report on the U.S. Program for the International Geophysical Year: July 1, 1957 - December 31, 1958. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26118.
×
Page R19
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1965. Report on the U.S. Program for the International Geophysical Year: July 1, 1957 - December 31, 1958. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26118.
×
Page R20
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1965. Report on the U.S. Program for the International Geophysical Year: July 1, 1957 - December 31, 1958. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26118.
×
Page R21
Page xxii Cite
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1965. Report on the U.S. Program for the International Geophysical Year: July 1, 1957 - December 31, 1958. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26118.
×
Page R22
Page xxiii Cite
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1965. Report on the U.S. Program for the International Geophysical Year: July 1, 1957 - December 31, 1958. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26118.
×
Page R23
Page xxiv Cite
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1965. Report on the U.S. Program for the International Geophysical Year: July 1, 1957 - December 31, 1958. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26118.
×
Page R24
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1965. Report on the U.S. Program for the International Geophysical Year: July 1, 1957 - December 31, 1958. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26118.
×
Page R25
Page xxvi Cite
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1965. Report on the U.S. Program for the International Geophysical Year: July 1, 1957 - December 31, 1958. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26118.
×
Page R26
Page xxvii Cite
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1965. Report on the U.S. Program for the International Geophysical Year: July 1, 1957 - December 31, 1958. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26118.
×
Page R27
Page xxviii Cite
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1965. Report on the U.S. Program for the International Geophysical Year: July 1, 1957 - December 31, 1958. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26118.
×
Page R28
Page xxix Cite
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1965. Report on the U.S. Program for the International Geophysical Year: July 1, 1957 - December 31, 1958. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26118.
×
Page R29
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1965. Report on the U.S. Program for the International Geophysical Year: July 1, 1957 - December 31, 1958. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26118.
×
Page R30
Page xxxi Cite
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1965. Report on the U.S. Program for the International Geophysical Year: July 1, 1957 - December 31, 1958. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26118.
×
Page R31
Page xxxii Cite
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1965. Report on the U.S. Program for the International Geophysical Year: July 1, 1957 - December 31, 1958. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26118.
×
Page R32

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

IGY General Report Number 21 November 1965 R E P O R T O N T H E U.S. PROGRAM FOR T H E I N T E R N A T I O N A L GEOPHYSICAL Y E A R July 1, 1957 — December 31, 1958 NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES — NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL Washington, D. C. November 1965

Q C 8 0 I 3 R46 1965 c I Report on the U S program for the Int'l GeophysicalYveai Julv 1 1957-December3r 1958 r n V -. . . . J I T h i s r e p o r t was prepared under Task Order Number 2 of Con t r a c t NSF C-310 with the N a t i o n a l S c i e n c e Foundation

FOREWORD The s p e c i a l p r o j e c t s undertaken i n the United S t a t e s for the IGY were supported by funds granted by the Congress of the United S t a t e s to the N a t i o n a l Science Founda- t i o n . Moreover, the support of the Foundation has made the pr e p a r a t i o n of t h i s termi- n a l r e port p o s s i b l e . I n a d d i t i o n , there a r e included s e v e r a l p r o j e c t s which were financed from funds made a v a i l a b l e by the Ford Foundation. T h i s r e p o r t o u t l i n e s b r i e f l y the work of the IGY c a r r i e d out under these p r o j e c t s , i n c l u d i n g an i n t e r i m summary of the s c i e n t i f i c r e s u l t s as of about e a r l y 1964 The primary purpose i s to present the p r o j e c t work, area by area and to t h i s end, t h e r e f o r e , the bulk of the r e p o r t (Chapters 1 through 20) i s devoted I n a d d i t i o n . Chapter 21 attempts to sketch the work of the Committee and i t s subcommittees and panels. For t h i s r e p o r t , information was gathered by the Academy's s t a f f from the progress r e p o r t of each p r o j e c t , personal communications and s c i e n t i f i c p u b l i c a t i o n s . P r o j e c t numbers a r e r e t a i n e d here a s a convenience S e v e r a l words of c a u t i o n a r e n e c e s s a r y , however, i n connection with t h i s r e p o r t . I n no case can i t be considered as complete or f i n a l , i n part because space and time precluded anything but a s e l e c t i o n of the r e - s u l t s of each p r o j e c t and a r a t h e r b r i e f summary of these s e l e c t e d a s p e c t s . Moreover, i t does not appear p o s s i b l e to prepare a " f i n a l " r eport because the IGY work merged with l a t e r s t u d i e s i n the g r e a t l y expanded geophysical a c t i v i t y f ollowing the IGY. F i n a l l y , many r e s e a r c h groups have support from s e v e r a l sources and i t i s not p r a c t i - c a l to t r y to separate i n an unequivocal way the p r o j e c t s or portions of p r o j e c t s a t - t r i b u t a b l e to a p a r t i c u l a r grant -- most of the work c a r r i e d out i n geophysics, espe- c i a l l y by the l a r g e r groups, i s u s u a l l y r e l a t e d I n t e r n a l l y . An attempt was made i n t h i s document to cover r e s u l t s that could reasonably be a t t r i b u t e d wholly, p a r t i a l l y , or even i n d i r e c t l y , to the s p e c i f i c IGY p r o j e c t i n question. Another aspect of t h i s r e p o r t warrants a note of c a u t i o n . Compilation of t h i s m a t e r i a l has taken somewhat over four y e a r s -- some s e c t i o n s completed e a r l y i n the compilation are n e c e s s a r i l y l e s s complete than s e c t i o n s f i n i s h e d s h o r t l y before p u b l i c a t i o n . I n a l l c a s e s , i t i s recommended t h a t f o r exact d e t a i l s the reader t u r n to the s c i e n t i f i c l i t e r a t u r e c i t e d i n the b i b l i o g r a p h i c s e c t i o n s of each report or c o n s u l t with the p r i n c i p a l s c i e n t i s t s involved. T h i s report could not have been compiled without the f u l l support of the hundreds of s c i e n t i s t s a s s o c i a t e d with the program. To them we a r e most g r a t e f u l for t h e i r many r e p o r t s and t h e i r review of the present m a t e r i a l . P a r t i c u l a r acknowledgement i s due to Mr. Stanley Ruttenberg and Mr. Thomas Gikas of the Academy's s t a f f , who c a r r i e d almost the f u l l burden of gathering and preparing the m a t e r i a l , and to Mr, Richard Y. Dow, who e d i t e d the m a t e r i a l and saw i t through p u b l i c a t i o n . We a r e a l s o indebted to many of our s t a f f s e c r e t a r i e s , who over the y e a r s typed v a r i o u s d r a f t s of the m a t e r i a l - - i n p a r t i c u l a r , Barbara Born, L o i s Heirman, C a r o l Hough, E l i n o r e K r e l l , Annemarie O'Quinlivan, and A l i s o n Wilson. M. A. Tuve, Chairman Geophysics Research Board Joseph Kaplan, Chairman U.S. National Committee for IGY Hugh Odishaw, E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r U.S. National Committee for IGY i i i

INTRODUCTION I n t e r n a t i o n a l cooperation i n the study of our p h y s i c a l environment i s not new. The importance of geophysical data — gathered over r e l a t i v e l y remote a r e a s of the ea r t h -- was recognized i n the l a s t century i n the conduct of the F i r s t I n t e r n a t i o n a l P o l a r Year i n 1882-83, when mete o r o l o g i c a l , magnetic, and a u r o r a l s t a t i o n s were f i r s t e s t a b l i s h e d i n the a r c t i c r e g i o n s . I n v e s t i g a t i o n s a t t h a t time d i s c l o s e d how northern auroras were d i s t r i b u t e d i n a band of maximum a u r o r a l a c t i v i t y some 23° wide, centered approximately a t the geomagnetic pole, and the geomagnetic data obtained a t that time remains u s e f u l to t h i s day I n the s t u d i e s of the e a r t h ' s magnetism. A Second I n t e r - n a t i o n a l P o l a r Year was held i n 1932-33, f i f t y y e a r s l a t e r . Again, many nations c o l - laborated i n making geophysical measurements i n the north polar regions. Probably the most important r e s u l t of t h i s e f f o r t was an in c r e a s e d knowledge of the ionosphere, ob- tained by u t i l i z i n g the r a d i o sounding techniques developed a few years e a r l i e r by Tuve and B r e i t . T h i s knowledge g r e a t l y advanced the s c i e n c e of r a d i o communications 1 I n i t i a l o r g a n i z a t i o n of the IGY. With these precedents of demonstrated s c i e n t i f i c v a l u e , though l i m i t e d to a s i n g l e region and to but s e v e r a l geophysical d i s c i p l i n e s , s c i e n t i s t s were emboldened to undertake a more complete study of our geophysical en- vironment encompassing the whole of the ea r t h . I n 1950, based on i n i t i a l ideas of L. V Berkner, the matter was d i s c u s s e d a t the meeting of the J o i n t Commission on the Ionosphere i n B r u s s e l s , and a r e s o l u t i o n was presented to the Ex e c u t i v e Board of the I n t e r n a t i o n a l C o u n c i l of S c i e n t i f i c Unions (ICSU), urging that a t h i r d i n t e r n a t i o n a l e f f o r t i n geophysics be undertaken i n 1957-58. A c t i n g upon t h i s recommendation and s i m i l a r recommendations from v a r i o u s i n t e r n a t i o n a l s c i e n t i f i c unions, the Executive Board of ICSU i n 1951 appointed a s p e c i a l committee, the Comittf S p e c i a l de 1'Ann^e G^ophysique I n t e r n a t i o n a l e (CSAGI), to coordinate the s c i e n t i f i c planning of a world- wide cooperative program of geophysical observations. The period of J u l y 1, 1957 to December 31, 1958 was designated f or the I n t e r n a t i o n a l Geophysical Year. The membership of CSAGI was composed of r e p r e s e n t a t i v e s of the I n t e r n a t i o n a l C o u n c i l of S c i e n t i f i c Unions, the I n t e r n a t i o n a l Astronomical Union, the I n t e r n a t i o n a l Union of Geodesy and Geophysics, the I n t e r n a t i o n a l Union of Pure and Applied P h y s i c s , the I n t e r n a t i o n a l Union of Geography, the I n t e r n a t i o n a l Union of B i o l o g i c a l S c i e n c e s , the J o i n t Commission of the Ionosphere, the J o i n t Commission on S o l a r and T e r r e s t r i a l R e l a t i o n s h i p s , the World Meteorological Organization and the I n t e r n a t i o n a l Radio Con- s u l t a t i v e Committee Reporters were designated for each IGY d i s c i p l i n e ; each Reporter was supported by an a d v i s o r y committee organized i n the p a r t i c u l a r union or a s s o c i a t i o n cognizant of the d i s c i p l i n e . CSAGI a l s o had finance and p u b l i c a t i o n committees, and A d j o i n t S e c r e t a r i e s for the A n t a r c t i c , A r c t i c , Western Hemisphere, E a s t e r n Europe and Southern A f r i c a . 2. CSAGI I n t e r n a t i o n a l Assemblies. D i s c i p l i n e Meetings. Regional Assemblies. The CSAGI he l d a p r o v i s i o n a l meeting i n October 1952 and asked a l l nations to form n a t i o n a l committees for the I n t e r n a t i o n a l Geophysical Year (IGY) and to t r a n s m i t t h e i r recom- mendations as to the content of the program to be Included i n the IGY. The f i r s t p lenary s e s s i o n s of the CSAGI were held i n B r u s s e l s i n J u l y 1953. Here the program proposals of twenty-six c o l l a b o r a t i n g n a t i o n s were considered. T h i s meeting l e d to the establishment of c r i t e r i a f o r and the t e n t a t i v e o u t l i n i n g of the b a s i c IGY program. The n a t i o n a l committees then turned to the d e t a i l e d geographical, as w e l l as geophy- s i c a l a s p e c t s of the p r o j e c t s t h a t would make up those p a r t s of the program for which they were to be r e s p o n s i b l e .

By 1954, t h i r t y - e i g h t n a t i o n s had prepared d e t a i l e d programs. These nations came together a t the CSAGI meeting i n Rome i n l a t e September and e a r l y October 1954, to d i s c u s s and i n t e g r a t e t h e i r p l a n s . I t was decided a t t h i s meeting to i n c l u d e oceano- graphy, seismology and g r a v i t y i n the IGY; a r e s o l u t i o n was a l s o adopted c a l l i n g f or the study of the p o s s i b i l i t y of o r b i t i n g s c i e n t i f i c payloads around the e a r t h for the IGY. The meeting l e d to the development of a b a s i c plan for IGY operations which was adopted by a l l the d e l e g a t i o n s a t the meeting, and for e x p l i c i t c r i t e r i a as guidance to the n a t i o n a l committees for the s e l e c t i o n of programs: a. The programs of the IGY should be s e l e c t e d with a view to s o l v i n g s p e c i f i c p l a n e t a r y problems of the e a r t h . To achieve such s o l u t i o n s i t was recognized t h a t during the IGY the r e g u l a r s c i e n t i f i c f a c i l i t i e s of the world must be supplemented by a d d i t i o n a l observations s u i t a b l y d i s t r i b u t e d i n space and time, as needed for the s o l u t i o n of s e l e c t e d problems. b. Problems r e q u i r i n g s p e c i a l a t t e n t i o n during the IGY should be s e l e c t e d according to the following c r i t e r i a : ( i ) Problems r e q u i r i n g concurrent synoptic observations a t many poi n t s i n v o l v i n g cooperative observations by many n a t i o n s . ( i i ) Problems of branches of geophysical s c i e n c e s whose s o l u t i o n s w i l l be aided by the a v a i l a b i l i t y of synoptic or other con- ce n t r a t e d work during the IGY i n other geophysical s c i e n c e s . ( i i i ) Observations of a l l major geophysical phenomena i n r e l a t i v e l y i n a c c e s s i b l e regions of the e a r t h that can be occupied during the IGY because of the e x t r a o r d i n a r y e f f o r t during that i n t e r - v a l , i n order to augment our b a s i c knowledge of the e a r t h and of the s o l a r and other i n f l u e n c e s a c t i n g upon i t . ( i v ) Epochal observations of slowly v a r y i n g t e r r e s t r i a l pheno- mena, to e s t a b l i s h b a s i c information f o r subsequent com- pa r i s o n a t l a t e r epochs. c. Where questions of p r i o r i t y a r i s e , p r i o r i t y should be given to programs under sub-paragraph b ( i ) . At the t h i r d plenary s e s s i o n s of the CSAGI i n B r u s s e l s September 8-14, 1955, about t h i r t y - e i g h t n a t i o n s a g a i n presented n a t i o n a l r e p o r t s . At the end of the B r u s s e l s meeting the i n t e r n a t i o n a l IGY program was w e l l I n t e g r a t e d w i t h about f o r t y c o u n t r i e s f o r m a l l y making plans to p a r t i c i p a t e . The formal period of the IGY was decided to be 0000 UT, 1 J u l y 1957 and 2400 UT 31 December 1958. The IGY symbol was a l s o s e l e c t e d a t t h i s meeting. At the f o u r t h plenary s e s s i o n s o f the CSAGI I n Barcelona, September 10-15, 1956, twenty-nine committees were represented and f i f t y - o n e c o u n t r i e s had made plans for p a r t i c i p a t i o n . There was a formal d i s c u s s i o n of the proposed e a r t h s a t e l l i t e program by U.S. and USSR s c i e n t i s t s . The question of data storage and r e t r i e v a l was d i s c u s s e d , a s w e l l a s the matter of exchange of IGY data, and the concept of the IGY World Data Centers was incorporated i n t o the program. The f i f t h and f i n a l plenary s e s s i o n s of the CSAGI took p l a c e i n Moscow, J u l y 29- August 9, 1958. T h i r t y - s i x p a r t i c i p a t i n g committees were represented. Among the h i g h l i g h t s of the meeting were the symposium on rocket and e a r t h s a t e l l i t e r e s u l t s , symposia on p r e l i m i n a r y r e s u l t s i n the other d i s c i p l i n e s , f i n a l formulation of the guide to exchange of data, and the recommendation t h a t the IGY should continue for a year, a t l e a s t i n f o r m a l l y , under the name I n t e r n a t i o n a l Geophysical Cooperation 1959. v i

A s e r i e s of conferences on s p e c i a l r e g i o n s was inaugurated w i t h the F i r s t Ant- a r c t i c Conference, P a r i s , J u l y 6-10, 1955, followed by the Second A n t a r c t i c Conference a t B r u s s e l s , September 8-14, 1955. I n 1956 there were the CSAGI Regional Conference on the A r c t i c a t Stockholm, May 22-25; the CSAGI Regional Conference i n the Western Hemisphere a t R i o de J a n e i r o , J u l y 16-25; the T h i r d A n t a r c t i c Conference a t P a r i s , J u l y 30-August 4; and the CSAGI E a s t e r n European Regional Conference, Moscow, August 20- 25. I n 1957, there were held the J o i n t CSAGl/CSA meeting of Coordination f or the IGY i n A f r i c a South of the Sahara, Bukavu, February 11-15; the CSAGI Western P a c i f i c Regional Conference, Tokyo, February 25-March 2; and the E u r a s i a n Regional Conference on World Days and Communications, Moscow, May 7-8. CSAGI d i s c i p l i n e conferences were h e l d i n oceanography (Goteborg, January 15-17, 1957); n u c l e a r r a d i a t i o n ( U t r e c h t , January 22-26, 1957), World Data Centers ( U c c l e , A p r i l 1-4, 1957) and Rockets and S a t e l l i t e s (Washington, September 30-October 5, 1957). During the f i f t h Assembly of CSAGI (Moscow, J u l y 30-August 9, 1958) a r e s o l u t i o n was adopted (and l a t e r accepted by the ICSU) that i n t e r n a t i o n a l cooperation i n geo- p h y s i c a l programs should continue. I t was r e s o l v e d that each p a r t i c i p a t i n g committee should endeavor to continue such programs as were f e a s i b l e for 1959, and the name " I n t e r n a t i o n a l Geophysical Cooperation-1959" (IGC-1959) was given to t h i s program. 3. The i n t e r n a t i o n a l program. The p r i n c i p a l f i e l d s of study during the IGY were aurora and airglow, cosmic r a y s , geomagnetism, g l a c i o l o g y , g r a v i t y , ionospheric p h y s i c s , longitudes and l a t i t u d e s , meteorology, oceanography, seismology, s o l a r a c t i v i t y , upper atmosphere s t u d i e s u s i n g r o c k e t s and s a t e l l i t e v e h i c l e s , and n u c l e a r r a d i a t i o n . I n - h e r e n t l y these f i e l d s were c h a r a c t e r i z e d by t h e i r g l o b a l nature, and thus the labora- tory of the g e o p h y s l c i s t I s the e a r t h i t s e l f where the experiments a re performed by nature. The g e o p h y s l c i s t must observe these n a t u r a l phenomena on the glob a l b a s i s i f he i s to secure s o l u t i o n s and to develop adequate t h e o r e t i c a l explanations. T h i s was one of the compelling reasons f o r the world-wide scope of the IGY I n 1957-58: to observe geophysical phenomena and to secure data from a l l p a r t s of the world; to con- duct t h i s e f f o r t on a coordinated b a s i s by f i e l d s , and i n space and time, so t h a t r e - s u l t s could be c o l l a t e d i n a meaningful manner. The proposal that 1957-58 be the time f or t h i s major i n t e r n a t i o n a l e f f o r t was based i n p a r t upon the f a c t t h a t these y e a r s would correspond with a period of maximum s o l a r a c t i v i t y . I t was planned to take advantage of t h i s expected Increased a c t i v i t y by a s e r i e s of A l e r t s and of S p e c i a l World I n t e r v a l s , c a l l e d on occasions when i t was pre- d i c t e d t h a t unusual magnetic, i o n o s p h e r i c , or a u r o r a l a c t i v i t y might occur. Other s p e c i a l i n t e r v a l s were planned f o r days of new moon, s o l a r e c l i p s e s , and unustjal meteor showers. S p e c i a l e f f o r t s on a world-wide s c a l e were made during these times to record the many phenomena which r e a c t so ronarkably to the complex a c t i v i t i e s of the sun. The p r e d i c t i o n was most s u c c e s s f u l : the peak o f the pr e s e n t c y c l e of s o l a r a c t i v i t y occurred i n e a r l y 1958. By a fortunate coincidence, t h i s was a l s o the g r e a t e s t peak ever observed s i n c e s c i e n t i s t s began to study sunspot f l u c t u a t i o n s i n the 18th century. The IGY program was to a l a r g e extent based on e x i s t i n g geophysical s t a t i o n s and networks. I n a d d i t i o n , new IGY s t a t i o n s were e s t a b l i s h e d i n geographical r e g i o n s , such as the A r c t i c , A n t a r c t i c , oceanic r e g i o n s , e t c . , where there had been l i t t l e or no geophysical a c t i v i t y . T h i s spread was of grea t v a l u e f o r those programs with syno- p t i c a s p e c t s on a world-wide b a s i s . The p o l a r regions were covered by broad bands of s t a t i o n s both w i t h i n and o u t s i d e the zones o f maximum a u r o r a l occurrence. S t a t i o n s i n a broad b e l t around the e a r t h i n the e q u a t o r i a l and temperate regions focussed a t t e n t i o n on the continuous observations o f the sun and, i n the v i c i n i t y of the geo- magnetic equator, observations i n geomagnetism and ionospheric p h y s i c s . O r b i t s of ea r t h s a t e l l i t e s covering regions 50° N to 50''S l a t i t u d e completed the coverage of the middle l a t i t u d e s . v i i

Three major pole-to-pole (and the two meridional l i n e s ) networks w i t h the three r i n g s of coverage i n the a r c t i c , e q u a t o r i a l , and a n t a r c t i c regions c o n s t i t u t e d a ki n d of coordinate system by which the movement of atmospheric d i s t u r b a n c e s and the develop- ment of other t r a n s i e n t geophysical phenomena can be observed and mapped. 4. The U.S. program. The i n s t i t u t i o n t hat represented the United S t a t e s on the I n t e r n a t i o n a l C o u n c i l of S c i e n t i f i c Unions (ICSU), the parent i n t e r n a t i o n a l body of the IGY, was the National Academy o f S c i e n c e s . The Academy organized the U.S. Natio n a l Committee for the I n t e r n a t i o n a l Geophysical Year (USNC-IGY) to p l a n , d i r e c t , and execute the U.S. program. I n order to secure the f i s c a l support, the USNC made i t s request f o r s p e c i a l funds t o the Congress through the N a t i o n a l S c i e n c e Foundation. I n a d d i t i o n , the Committee made arrangements for e x t e n s i v e program and l o g i s t i c con- t r i b u t i o n s from many p u b l i c and p r i v a t e i n s t i t u t i o n s . The U.S. program for the IGY, as presented i n t h i s r e p o r t , was developed by the Academy's IGY Committee i n cooperation with many s c i e n t i s t s from p u b l i c and p r i v a t e i n s t i t u t i o n s . T e c h n i c a l Panels (membership of panels i s given i n the t e x t under each d i s c i p l i n e ) were e s t a b l i s h e d f o r the v a r i o u s s c i e n t i f i c d i s c i p l i n e s which c o n s t i t u t e the t e c h n i c a l program. The panels were r e s p o n s i b l e f or planning the b a s i c program i n each d i s c i p l i n e and for recommending s p e c i f i c r e s e a r c h p r o j e c t s f or execution by v a r i o u s groups o f s c i e n t i s t s . I n a d d i t i o n , some s p e c i a l committees were e s t a b l i s h e d . The IGY s t a f f of the Academy, working with the USNC-IGY, i t s subcommittees and panels, had the task of o v e r a l l program and budget planning, of c o o r d i n a t i n g a c t i v i t i e s among p r o j e c t s and r e l a t e d s c i e n t i f i c f i e l d s , of a s s i s t i n g i n the t e c h n i c a l d i r e c t i o n of the U.S. program, and of preparing t e c h n i c a l and general information a r t i c l e s on the operations and r e s u l t s . Observations i n a l l d i s c i p l i n e s were incorporated i n t o the U.S. program, which was b u i l t around s e v e r a l networks of pre-IGY geophysical s t a t i o n s . These included the upper-air s t a t i o n s of the U.S. Weather Bureau, v e r t i c a l - i n c i d e n c e i o n o s p h e r i c p h y s i c s s t a t i o n s of the C e n t r a l Radio Propagation Laboratory of the N a t i o n a l Bureau of Standards, and geomagnetic o b s e r v a t o r i e s and t i d e gauge s t a t i o n s of the U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey. S e v e r a l new sjmoptic networks were e s t a b l i s h e d for the IGY, many of which remain i n opera t i o n to t h i s day, modified according to new d i s c o v e r i e s and i n s t r u m e n t a l advances. I n a d d i t i o n to synoptic network s t u d i e s , s p e c i a l e x p e r i - ments were inaugurated i n many of the d i s c i p l i n e s ; experiments u s i n g the techniques o f high a l t i t u d e sounding r o c k e t s and a r t i f i c i a l e a r t h s a t e l l i t e s and deep space probes c o n t r i b u t e d s p e c i a l observations i n many of the d i s c i p l i n e s . A s p e c i a l e f f o r t was made to f i l l i n the pole-to-pole c h a i n of s t a t i o n s a t yO-SO'W; s e v e r a l s c i e n t i f i c s t a t i o n s were e s t a b l i s h e d and operated i n A n t a r c t i c a ; and U.S. s c i e n t i s t s worked a t two s t a t i o n s i n the A r c t i c Ocean, one on pack i c e , the other on a l a r g e s e c t i o n of ta b u l a r i c e . I c e I s l a n d T-3 ( F l e t c h e r ' s I c e I s l a n d ) . The United S t a t e s was assigned r e s p o n s i b i l i t y for the o r g a n i z a t i o n of the World Warning Agency (operated by the Natio n a l Bureau of Standards) and the A n t a r c t i c Weather C e n t r a l (operated a t the L i t t l e America S t a t i o n ) , A f t e r d i s c u s s i o n s of the problems of storage, exchange and a v a i l a b i l i t y o f data a t the fourth meeting of CSAGI a t Barcelona, the United S t a t e s o f f e r e d to organize and operate a world data c e n t e r ( c a l l e d World Data Center A) covering a l l d i s c i p l i n e s . The USSR a l s o o f f e r e d to organize and operate a s i m i l a r world data c e n t e r (World Data Center B) and s e v e r a l other c o u n t r i e s o f f e r e d to e s t a b l i s h data c e n t e r s i n one or s e v e r a l of the d i s c i p l i n e s ( c o l l e c t i v e l y known as World Data Center C) . The data center i n the United S t a t e s was organized on a d i s c i p l i n e b a s i s a t s e v e r a l of the r e s e a r c h i n s t i t u t i o n s involved i n the o b s e r v a t i o n a l program. V l l l

Mindful, however, that the o r g a n i z a t i o n of exp e d i t i o n s , observing programs, r e - duction and t a b u l a t i o n of data, the exchange of t h i s data between data c e n t e r s , and the p r o v i s i o n s f o r making the data a v a i l a b l e to s c i e n t i s t s , was only the f i r s t , how- ever e s s e n t i a l , step towards answering some of the great g l o b a l problems i n geophysics that prompted the IGY, the U.S. Nati o n a l Committee a l s o took steps to inaugurate an i n i t i a l program for a n a l y s i s and r e s e a r c h u s i n g the IGY data. The IGY c o l l e c t i o n of data has remained an important source of m a t e r i a l f o r r e s e a r c h and long-range programs w i l l be requ i r e d to e l u c i d a t e most of the important s p e c i f i c geophysical q u e s t i o n s . I t was recognized, i n the shor t time a v a i l a b l e to the Committee, that only a s t a r t could be made i n the study of the many e x c i t i n g p o s s i b i l i t i e s a fforded by the IGY data, and i t was decided to s t r e s s , i n t h i s p r e l i m i n a r y work, problems that crossed s e v e r a l or, i n some c a s e s , many of the IGY d i s c i p l i n e s . I n sh o r t , emphasis was placed on i n t e r d i s c i p l i n a r y r e s e a r c h . S c i e n t i s t s i n many r e s e a r c h i n s t i t u t i o n s engaged i n studying IGY data, attempting to apply t h i s data to problems i n three general a r e a s : a. The ea r t h i t s e l f as a s t r u c t u r e b. Atmospheric and oceanic c i r c u l a t i o n and heat and water budget of the e a r t h c. Upper atmosphere p h y s i c s and s o l a r - t e r r e s t r i a l r e l a t i o n s h i p s . As p a r t of t h i s g eneral program of study of IGY data, many d i s t i n g u i s h e d s c i e n - t i s t s from other c o u n t r i e s v i s i t e d t h e i r c o l l e a g u e s i n the United S t a t e s , d i s c u s s i n g problems of i n t e r p r e t a t i o n and i n v e s t i g a t i n g f r u i t f u l avenues of approach to those g r e a t geophysical problems which s c i e n t i s t s the world over a r e attempting to under- stand. 5. Dissemination of r e s u l t s . I n order to provide prompt n o t i f i c a t i o n and dissemina- t i o n of r e s u l t s of IGY experiments and programs, and of other m a t e r i a l of IGY i n t e r e s t , the U.S. Nati o n a l Committee e s t a b l i s h e d a monthly IGY B u l l e t i n , the f i r s t number was published i n J u l y 1957. The B u l l e t i n was a l s o included with the T r a n s a c t i o n s of the American Geophysical Union. IGY World Data Center A for Rockets and S a t e l l i t e s p u b l i - shed the S a t e l l i t e Report S e r i e s and the Rocket Report S e r i e s , to make a v a i l a b l e data and important papers i n these d i s c i p l i n e s . M a t e r i a l of general i n t e r e s t was published by WDC-A i n the General Report S e r i e s . These p u b l i c a t i o n s a r e a v a i l a b l e from the Academy's P u b l i c a t i o n O f f i c e . Other sub-centers of WDC-A published catalogues of IGY data and a l s o some general r e p o r t s of p r e l i m i n a r y r e s u l t s of processed data. For example, WDC-A for G l a c i o l o g y published s i x volumes of papers d i s c u s s i n g r e s u l t s of i n v e s t i g a t i o n s i n g l a c i o l o g y i n the A r c t i c and A n t a r c t i c ; WDC-A f o r S o l a r A c t i v i t y published twenty-two r e p o r t s con- t a i n i n g t a b u l a t i o n s of s o l a r observations and data, three r e p o r t s on riometer data were published by WDC-A for Aurora ( I n s t r u m e n t a l ) ; four r e p o r t s were published by WDC-A f o r Oceanography. To e f f e c t s t a n d a r d i z a t i o n of o b s e r v a t i o n a l techniques and a l s o to a f f o r d a f o c a l point f or matters d e a l i n g with the IGY, a s p e c i a l s e r i e s of p u b l i c a t i o n s was i n s t i t u t e d i n t e r n a t i o n a l l y . T h i s s e r i e s , the Annals of the I n t e r n a t i o n a l Geophysical Year, i s published by Pergamon P r e s s ; the m a t e r i a l was supplied by the CSAGI and CSAGI Repor- t e r s for each d i s c i p l i n e and was supervised a f t e r the IGY by the CSAGI's successor committee, the I n t e r n a t i o n a l Geophysical Committee ( C I G ) . I n s t r u c t i o n manuals i n s e v e r a l d i s c i p l i n e s were published f i r s t , so that workers a l l over the world could s t a n d a r d i z e t h e i r observing and r e p o r t i n g techniques i n those d i s c i p l i n e s where t h i s was necessary. H i s t o r i c a l m a t e r i a l i n the f i r s t and second I n t e r n a t i o n a l P o l a r Y e a r s , o r g a n i z a t i o n of the IGY, and re p o r t s on IGY meetings and conferences were published m

other volumes. F i n a l l y , under the s u p e r v i s i o n of the CSAGI Reporters and i n coopera- t i o n with the v a r i o u s World Data C e n t e r s , s e l e c t e d processed data and r^sum^s of IGY programs i n the Annals have been published. The p r i n c i p a l r e s e a r c h f i n d i n g s during the IGY have been and a r e being published i n the customary s c i e n t i f i c j o u r n a l s . 6. E d u c a t i o n a l programs. The Congress of the United S t a t e s , a f t e r s e v e r a l hearings on plans for the IGY, requested the Academy to devote some e f f o r t to c a p i t a l i z e on the widespread p u b l i c i n t e r e s t i n t h i s e n t e r p r i s e and use the IGY as a means of i n t r o - ducing information on geophysics to students and the general p u b l i c . A c t i n g upon t h i s s t i m u l u s , the Academy secured non-government funds and undertook s e v e r a l pro- grams, i n c l u d i n g the p u b l i c a t i o n of the IGY B u l l e t i n , mentioned above, and i t s d i s t r i - bution to schools and i n t e r e s t e d p a r t i e s . A second e d u c a t i o n a l program d e a l t with s i x l a r g e , f u l l - c o l o r " P lanet E a r t h " p o s t e r s , c h a r a c t e r i z i n g s e v e r a l a s p e c t s of the IGY: the poles, oceanography, meteoro- logy, the sun, the s o l i d e a r t h , and space. These were accompanied by a f o r t y - t h r e e page student brochure d i s c u s s i n g i n some d e t a i l the IGY s c i e n c e s , and a k i t for t e a c h e r s . These posters and brochures were d i s t r i b u t e d a t nominal c o s t to approxi- mately s i x thousand schools i n the United S t a t e s ; i n a d d i t i o n , l a r g e numbers of the poster s e t s and brochures were made a v a i l a b l e to school systems i n other c o u n t r i e s . T h i s a c t i o n was supported by the Ford Foundation. The t h i r d e ducational program undertaken under the a u s p i c e s of the U.S. Committee for IGY was the production of t h i r t e e n half-hour c o l o r f i l m s on each of the IGY d i s c i p l i n e s , the "Planet E a r t h " f i l m s e r i e s : the f i l m s were Intended l a r g e l y f o r the secondary school l e v e l , but many of them were s u c c e s s f u l l y used i n grade schools as w e l l as i n graduate seminars i n u n i v e r s i t i e s , i n which case they served as departures for d i s c u s s i o n of the i n t e r - r e l a t l o n s h i p s between the IGY d i s c i p l i n e s . The " P l a n e t E a r t h " f i l m s have been d i s t r i b u t e d through McGraw-Hill Text F i l m D i v i s i o n to many thousands of schools and r e n t a l l i b r a r i e s ; they have been shown on commercial and e d u c a t i o n a l t e l e v i s i o n throughout the United S t a t e s and i n many other c o u n t r i e s ; they were t r a n s l a t e d i n t o Spanish, Portugese and A r a b i c and shown over t e l e v i s i o n networks i n c o u n t r i e s where these languages were dominant. The f i l m s e r i e s was made p o s s i b l e by a grant from the Ford Foundation. 7. Post-IGY programs. The success of the IGY was instrumental i n the o r g a n i z a t i o n , under the I n t e r n a t i o n a l C o u n c i l of S c i e n t i f i c Unions, of s e v e r a l c o n t i n u i n g programs i n geophysics f o r which s p e c i a l new committees were e s t a b l i s h e d by ICSU. The f i r s t to be organized and implemented was the continuing s c i e n t i f i c work i n the A n t a r c t i c under the cognizance of the S c i e n t i f i c Committee for A n t a r c t i c Research (SCAR); an i n t e r n a t i o n a l program i n oceanography i s being continued under the S c i e n t i f i c Commit- tee f o r Oceanographic Research (SCOR); the i n t e r n a t i o n a l cooperation i n space s c i e n c e s i s organized under the Committee on Space Research (COSPAR); the program for the IQSY (1964-65) was organized under the S p e c i a l Committee for the Y e a r s of the Quiet Sun (SC-IQSY); the Upper Mantle e f f o r t under an i n t e r - u n i o n committee administered by the lUGG. Many of these a c t i v i t i e s had t h e i r beginnings i n the Comit^ I n t e r n a t i o n a l e de Geophysique ( C I G ) , which succeeded the CSAGI and which i s charged with such tasks as completion of IGY p u b l i c a t i o n s i n the Annals s e r i e s , the conduct of the World Data Centers for geophysics, and a s s i s t a n c e to the lUWDS.

CONTENTS Page FOREWORD Hi INTRODUCTION V I AURORA AND AIRGLOW PROGRAM 1 I I COSMIC RAYS PROGRAM 55 I I I GEOMAGNETISM PROGRAM 125 IV GLACIOLOGY PROGRAM 143 V GRAVITY PROGRAM 235 VI IONOSPHERIC PHYSICS PROGRAM 253 V I I LONGITUDES AND LATITUDES PROGRAM 315 V I I I METEOROLOGY PROGRAM 321 I X OCEANOGRAPHY PROGRAM 353 X ROCKETRY PROGRAM 419 XI SEISMOLOGY PROGRAM 461 X I I SOLAR ACTIVITY PROGRAM 499 X I I I WORLD DAYS AND COMMUNICATIONS PROGRAM 533 XIV NUCLEAR RADIATION PROGRAM 541 XV EARTH SATELLITE PROGRAM 551 XVI INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH PROGRAM 663 XVII DATA PROCESSING AND WORLD DATA CENTER PROGRAM 781 X V I I I SPECIAL RESEARCH PROGRAM 813 XIX ARCTIC RESEARCH PROGRAM 835 XX ANTARCTIC RESEARCH PROGRAM 851 XXI ACTIVITIES OF THE U.S. NATIONAL COMMITTEE AND ITS SUBCOMMITTEES 869 APPENDIXES 901 x i

AURORA AND AIRGLOW PROGRAM Aurora at College, Alaska, 1957

AURORA AND AIRGLOW PROGRAM Page A. Organization of T e c h n i c a l Panel on Aurora and Airglow 3 B. Summary of Panel Actions 4 C. P r o j e c t O b j e c t i v e s and R e s u l t s 9 1.1 A l l - s k y Camera C o n s t r u c t i o n 10 1.2 V i s u a l Aurora Observations 12 1.3 Photometer Procurement 14 1.4 P a t r o l Spectrograph - Prototype Development 15 1.5 P a t r o l Spectrograph - Procurement 16 1.6 Scanning Spectrograph - Procurement 17 1.7 Auro r a l Radar - Procurement 18 1.9 Aurora Data A c q u i s i t i o n and P r o c e s s i n g 19 1.10 Data Reduction - Airglow 20 1.12 Airglow Headquarters 23 1.13 A l l - S k y Camera, U.S. Headquarters & I t h a c a Operation 30 1.14 Aurora and Airglow Operations i n Al a s k a 32 1.15 Radar A u r o r a l Observations - I t h a c a 37 1.16 A u r o r a l Radar Operations - Western U.S 38 1.17 A l l - S k y Camera Operations, S i x U.S. S t a t i o n s 38 1.18 A n t a r c t i c Aurora and Airglow Network 39 1.20 Aurora and Airglow Operations a t Sacramento Peak, T o n a n z i n t l a , Huancayo, and San Juan 43 1.24 Aurora And Airglow Observations a t Thule 44 1.25 Aurora and Airglow Operations a t Bedford, Saskatoon, Shingleton and Williams Bay 45 1.34 A u r o r a l Operations i n New Zealand 47 1.38 Meteor Radar i n the A n t a r c t i c 48 1.42 A u r o r a l Observations, A r c t i c B a s i n , D r i f t i n g S t a t i o n 49 1.43 Ionospheric Absorption of Cosmic Noise, A l a s k a 50 1.44 Ionospheric Absorption of Cosmic Noise, West 54 1.45 Studies of N o c t i l u c e n t Clouds 54

AURORA AND AIRGLOW PROGRAM A. Organization of T e c h n i c a l Panel on Aurora and Airglow 1. Establishment of Panel. L e t t e r s were w r i t t e n i n December 1954 - January 1955 reque s t i n g a u r o r a l s c i e n t i s t s to become members of the panel: Dr. Joseph Kaplan was named as convenor of the f i r s t meeting. L a t e r , a t the request of the panel, s e v e r a l new members were added and other s c i e n t i s t s were i n v i t e d to serve as c o n s u l t a n t s . Dr. Kaplan was e l e c t e d chairman a t the f i r s t meeting, but developments of the IGY so i n - creased h i s commitments that he resigned from the panel. C.T. E l v e y was e l e c t e d as chairman, with N.J. O l i v e r , vice-chairman for aurora, and F.E. Roach, vice-chairman for airglow. Dr. Meinel resigned from the panel because of new d u t i e s he assumed a t the National Astronomical Observatory; Dr. Chamberlain, who was h i s a l t e r n a t e , was then made a f u l l member and Dr. Meinel continued h i s a s s o c i a t i o n with the panel as a con s u l t a n t . The Department of Defense appointed l i a i s o n members from the three s e r - v i c e s . 2. Composition of the Panel. ( A f f i l i a t i o n a t time of appointment.) a. Panel Members J.W. Chamberlain (to J u l y 1955) Sydney Chapman C.T. E l v e y , Chairman C. W. G a r t l e i n E. R. Manring (to Dec. 1957) A.B. Meinel ( t o Dec. 1957) D. H. Menzel N.J. O l i v e r , J r . , Vice-Chm., Aurora A.M. Peterson F. E. Roach, Vice-Chm., Airglow Richard Tousey J.A. Van A l l e n ( to Dec. 1957) E. H. V e s t i n e Yerkes Observatory, Univ. of Chicago Geophysical I n s t . , U. of Alaska Geophysical I n s t . , U. of Alaska C o r n e l l U n i v e r s i t y Geophysics Research D i r e c t o r a t e , AFCRL Yerkes Obs., Univ. of Chicago Harvard U n i v e r s i t y Observatory Geophysics Research D i r e c t o r a t e , AFCRL Stanford U n i v e r s i t y C e n t r a l Radio Propagation Lab., NBS Naval Research Laboratory S t a t e U n i v e r s i t y of Iowa Dept. T e r r e s t r i a l Magnetism, Carnegie I n s t i t u t i o n of Washington Consultants D.K. Berkey B. W. C u r r i e C. G. L i t t l e A.B. Meinel Peter M. Millman F.K. I s a k s o n W.S. McAffee, J r . Colgate U n i v e r s i t y U n i v e r s i t y of Saskatchewan, Canada Geophysical I n s t i t u t e , U. of Alaska N a t ' l . Astronomical Obs., K i t t Peak N a t ' l . Research Council of Canada O f f i c e of Naval Research U.S. Army S i g n a l Res. & Dev. Lab. S e c r e t a r i a t (IGY S t a f f ) G.F. S c h i l l i n g ( t o Feb. 1956) D.A. Curry (Feb. 1956 - J u l y 1957) P.W. Mange ( J u l y 1957 - Feb. 1959) S. Ruttenberg (from Feb. 1959)

AURORA AND AIRGLOW 3. Panel Meetings. There were eight meetings of the panel. F i r s t Meeting Second Meeting T h i r d Meeting Fourth Meeting F i f t h Meeting S i x t h Meeting Seventh Meeting E i g h t h Meeting January 16-17, 1955 March 8-9, 1955 May 7, 1955 J u l y 15-16, 1955 February 8, 1956 November 2-3, 1956 December 9, 1957 May 5, 1958 Boulder, Colorado Washington, D.C. Washington, D.C. Boulder, Colorado Washington, D.C. Boston, Massachusetts Boulder, Colorado Washington, D.C. B. Summary of Panel Actions 1. O r i g i n a l Program. The aurora and a i r g l o w program was developed i n the i n i t i a l stages of the CSAGI planning by the I n t e r n a t i o n a l Reporter for Aurora and Airglow, Sydney Chapman, m c o n s u l t a t i o n with h i s c o l l e a g u e s around the world. At the time the T e c h n i c a l Panel on Aurora and Airglow was organized, the U.S. N a t i o n a l Committee had drawn up a t e n t a t i v e U.S. program based on informal d i s c u s s i o n s with U.S. workers i n t h i s a r e a . a. V i s u a l Observations. I t was recognized that v i s u a l observations would be an important element o f U.S. p a r t i c i p a t i o n inasmuch as the a u r o r a l zone dips s h a r p l y southward over northeastern North America. I t was planned to c o l l a b o r a t e with Cana- dian a u r o r a l s c i e n t i s t s i n working out a scheme of recording v i s u a l o b s ervations. D i f f e r e n t standards of observation were s e t according to whether the l o c a t i o n was s o u t h e r l y (where auroras would not occur frequently) or whether the s t a t i o n would be n o r t h e r l y (where auroras would be very f r e q u e n t ) . b. Photographic Observations. I t was planned to u t i l i z e a camera which would photograph the e n t i r e overhead hemisphere so that wide synoptic coverage could be obtained of a u r o r a l i n c i d e n t s and development. I t was a n t i c i p a t e d a t t h i s time that photographs would be taken a t one-minute i n t e r v a l s and read a t 15-minute i n t e r v a l s for synoptic observations, i t was a l s o thought that a l l except a few key s t a t i o n s would observe only on World Days. c. Radar Observations. I n s p i t e of problems of i n t e r p r e t i n g radar echoes and d i s t i n g u i s h i n g a u r o r a l echoes from echoes from other ionospheric phenomena, i t was decided to provide a l o n g i t u d i n a l chain of s t a t i o n s a t approximate geomagnetic l a t i - tude 60° along with two t r a n s - a u r o r a l networks, one i n A l a s k a and the other i n mid- United S t a t e s connecting with s t a t i o n s m Canada. d. Comugate Point Observations. I t was thought p o s s i b l e to i n s t i t u t e coordin- ated obsei-vations a t the ends of magnetic f i e l d l i n e s i n cooperation with s c i e n t i s t s of A u s t r a l i a and New Zealand. These would include v i s u a l , photographic, photometric, radar and s p e c t r o s c o p i c observations. e. Spectroscopic Observations. I n order to provide information on the d i s t r i b u - t i o n of incoming s o l a r p a r t i c l e s thought to be r e s p o n s i b l e for the auroras, i t was planned to s e t up a network of s t a t i o n s using a Memel p a t r o l spectrograph. T h i s i n - strument would focus a 165° a r c of the sky on the s l i t of the spectrograph. The cam- er a , o r i e n t e d i n the magnetic meridian, could thus provide a d i s t r i b u t i o n along that meridian of r a d i a t i o n and from that could be deducted the d i s t r i b u t i o n of the bombar- ding protons.

AURORA AND AIRGLOW f. Spectrophotometnc Studies. The same spectrographs mentioned above could be used with proper c a l i b r a t i o n to observe r a t i o s of i n t e n s i t i e s of c e r t a i n l i n e and band systems which a r e r e l a t e d to the p h y s i c a l processes involved m a u r o r a l e x c i t a t i o n . g. S c i n t i l l a t i o n of Radio S t a r s . I t was thought that observations of s c i n t i l l a - t i o n of r a d i o s t a r s , using a t r i p a r t i t e observing network, would give information on the s i z e and v e l o c i t y of patches of i o n i z a t i o n that might be connected with the auro- r a l d i s p l a y . h. Absorption of E x t r a - T e r r e s t r i a l Radio S i g n a l s . I n i t i a l experiments a t the Geophysical I n s t i t u t e i n Alaska i n d i c a t e d the u s e f u l n e s s of observing the v a r i a t i o n s i n the g a l a c t i c n o i s e r e c e i v e d a t the ground. The v a r i a t i o n s come about as a r e s u l t of changing absorption i n the ionosphere and a r e r e l a t e d to polar blackouts, geomag- n e t i c and ionospheric storms, and a u r o r a l a c t i v i t y . I t was thought that a frequency of about 30 megacycles would be u s e f u l . 1. Radio Noise A s s o c i a t e d with A u r o r a l D i s p l a y s . There had been some i n d i c a t i o n of 3000 megacycle r a d i o n o i s e emitted by a u r o r a l d i s p l a y s . T h i s general question was under study a t the Geophysical I n s t i t u t e i n Alaska and i t was expected that i f i t looked promising s e v e r a l s t a t i o n s should be s e t up to monitor t h i s phenomenon. J . Airglow S t u d i e s . I t was expected to i n s t i t u t e a chain of synoptic s t a t i o n s to monitor the s e v e r a l emissions of the airglow with p h o t o e l e c t r i c photometers. A meridional chain would be s e t up through North America connecting to s t a t i o n s i n South America. 2. Planning f o r A n t a r c t i c Observations. One of the f i r s t tasks of the panel, m a d d i t i o n to d i s c u s s i n g the merits of the i n d i v i d u a l observations mentioned above, was to prepare s p e c i f i c recommendations for the program envisioned for the s e v e r a l s t a - t i o n s planned for A n t a r c t i c a . Plans for the c o n s t r u c t i o n and operation of the s t a - t i o n s were being formulated by the Navy, which had been assigned as the r e s p o n s i b l e agency for l o g i s t i c support, m c o n s u l t a t i o n with the U.S. Nati o n a l Committee and va r i o u s c o n s u l t a n t s and experienced polar workers. Drs. Elv e y and Meinel studied the design of the a u r o r a l tower. They agreed with the t e n t a t i v e planning that such a tower should be constructed so as to minimize the accumulation of wind-driven snow. Up to four p l a s t i c hemispheres, four f e e t m diameter, might be mounted on the roof of the tower for v i s u a l and instrumental observations. Dry heated a i r would be sup- p l i e d to the i n s i d e of these domes to prevent f r o s t formation. Care would have to be taken so that the horizon along the magnetic meridian should not be obscured and the domes i n s t a l l e d on the tower to minimize the i n t e r f e r e n c e between the f i e l d s of view of the v a r i o u s instruments. Drs. O l i v e r and Roach studied the question of the a u r o r a l laboratory for the s t a t i o n and made recommendations about the type of f a c i l i t i e s that would be required for the s e r v i c i n g of equipment and handling of the f i l m . Drs. G a r t l e i n and V e s t i n e made suggestions for a u r o r a l programs a t s u b s i d i a r y a n t a r c t i c s t a t i o n s . The problem of i n t e r f e r e n c e with a r t i f i c i a l l i g h t s was di s c u s s e d . I t was recommended that any l i g h t s that be kept burning o u t s i d e be of the continuous r a d i a - t i o n types ( i . e . , i n c andescent). I t was g e n e r a l l y f e l t that with reasonable precau- t i o n s t h i s should not become a problem. a. Meteor Observations. Dr. Fred Whipple wrote to the panel and r a i s e d the ques- t i o n of v i s u a l observations of meteors inasmuch as i n an e a r l i e r expedition (Byrd, 1930) Dr. Thomas C. Po u l t e r had reported anomalously high incidence of f a i n t meteors. Dr. Whipple recommended that an attempt should be made to repeat Dr. P o u l t e r ' s v i s - ual o bservations. A f t e r some study, i t was decided that a simple radar observation program might y i e l d more information and the panel approved a small p r o j e c t a t Stan- ford U n i v e r s i t y for a low-power radar to be supplied and operated during the f i r s t season a t A n t a r c t i c a . Should the observations support the e a r l i e r f i n d i n g s , then a more elaborate program might be i n s t i t u t e d .

AURORA AND AIRGLOW b. A n t a r c t i c Whiteout. Dr. Sigmund F r i t z of the Weather Bureau r a i s e d the ques- t i o n with the panel of whether the Roach photometer might be u s e f u l i n studying the whiteout phenomena. The panel questioned whether the photometer could be used for t h i s purpose and requested Dr. Tousey to c o l l a b o r a t e with Dr. F r i t z i n designing some observations i n the A n t a r c t i c that would help m understanding t h i s phenomenon. c. F i n a l A n t a r c t i c Synoptic Program. As the USNC developed i t s p l a n s , seven s t a - t i o n s were e s t a b l i s h e d i n the A n t a r c t i c , a l l of which were f u l l - s c a l e o b s e r v a t o r i e s . Hence, i t was decided by the Panel that a f u l l - s c a l e a u r o r a l program should be c a r r i e d out a t each s t a t i o n with the exception that only one scanning spectrograph (see d i s - c u s s i o n below) was recommended for i n s t a l l a t i o n ( a t L i t t l e America). d. A n t a r c t i c Personnel. The a n t a r c t i c a u r o r a l program was assigned to the Geo- p h y s i c s Research D i r e c t o r a t e for t e c h n i c a l s u p e r v i s i o n . The A r c t i c I n s t i t u t e of North America was designated as the agency to h i r e temporary personnel for t h i s pro- j e c t . Candidates for observers were screened by N.J. O l i v e r and h i s s t a f f and were t r a i n e d a t GRD and a l s o a t Yerkes Observatory under the s u p e r v i s i o n of J.W. Chamber- l a i n . An i n s t r u c t i o n memorandum was d r a f t e d for the observers to guide them i n s e r - v i c i n g instruments, developing f i l m , and making r e g u l a r and s p e c i a l o b s e r v a t i o n s . T h i s memo was d i s c u s s e d and suggestions for m o d i f i c a t i o n were made by the panel. I n - s t r u c t i o n s and s u p p l i e s for v i s u a l observations were supplied to the a n t a r c t i c obser- v e r s by C.W. G a r t l e i n . e. S p e c i a l Experiments. Two of the a n t a r c t i c observers were i n t e r e s t e d m some s p e c i a l o b s ervations, the equipment for which was furnished by GRD. The Panel en- dorsed these programs and was g r a t i f i e d that the observers were i n t e r e s t e d i n under- taking t h i s personal r e s e a r c h . One program involved the use of the p a t r o l spectro- graph a t the South Pole S t a t i o n i n conjunction with a 24-hour r o t a t i n g t u r n t a b l e to obtain t w i l i g h t s p e c t r a . The other experiment involved a spectrograph a t E l l s w o r t h for observation of hydrogen-beta emission. 3. Scanning Spectrometer. N.J. O l i v e r introduced the suggestion that s e v e r a l scan- ning spectrometers be included i n the program a t c e r t a i n key l o c a t i o n s . T h i s i n s t r u - ment was developed by Dr. D.H. Hunten, U n i v e r s i t y of Saskatchewan, and i t was f e l t that I t would c o n t r i b u t e to the study of a u r o r a l mechanisms. T h i s proposal was accepted by the Panel and d i s t r i b u t i o n of the instruments was l e f t to l a t e r d i s c u s - s i o n and recommendations from GRD. 4. L i a i s o n . a. Rocket Program. The Panel studied the document prepared by the T e c h n i c a l Panel on Rocketry which requested from appropriate panels information to a s s i s t i n the planning of the rocket program and the launching f a c i l i t y p r o j e c t e d for F o r t C h u r c h i l l , Canada. The major item of concern to the Panel was the need for informa- t i o n on ground s c i e n t i f i c support. I t was decided t h a t , inasmuch as the main launch- ing be located i n Canada, l i a i s o n should be e s t a b l i s h e d with Canadian s c i e n t i s t s . I t was r e a l i z e d that many of the members of the Panel had working r e l a t i o n s h i p s with t h e i r counterparts i n Canada and i t was recommended that t h i s informal l i a i s o n be con- tinued and that such information as could be obtained by supplied to the Rocket Panel. b. World Days and Communications. To represent the requirements of the A u r o r a l Program, the Aurora Panel recommended that A.M. Peterson be designated as l i a i s o n to the World Days and Communications Panel. T h i s Panel had been e s t a b l i s h e d to coordin- a t e the c o l l e c t i o n of information on s o l a r disturbances and d i s s e m i n a t i o n of warnings as p a r t of the i n t e r n a t i o n a l program. T h i s Panel a l s o attempted to a s s e s s the needs i n the United S t a t e s of s c i e n t i s t s who would r e q u i r e r a p i d communication with the c e n t r a l agency to r e c e i v e information on s o l a r t e r r e s t r i a l phenomena.

AURORA AND AIRGLOW 5. V i s u a l A u r o r a l Observations. I n d i s c u s s i n g how information might be obtained over a widespread a r e a , i t was decided that the commercial a i r l i n e s and the A i r Force be i n v i t e d to p a r t i c i p a t e by having p i l o t s r e p o r t on auroras that might be sighted. I t was a l s o recommended that the U.S. Weather Bureau be approached so that a u r o r a l obser- v a t i o n s could be taken a t many of t h e i r o b s e r v a t o r i e s , p a r t i c u l a r l y i n the northern a r e a s . C.W. G a r t l e i n was designated to develop these contacts and look i n t o the kinds of r e p o r t i n g schemes t h a t might be u t i l i z e d . Drs. E l v e y and G a r t l e i n studied the sug- g e s t i o n that punchcards be used for recording and p r o c e s s i n g v i s u a l data and to make recommendations for s t a n d a r d i z i n g nomenclature of a u r o r a l f e a t u r e s and to develop sug- gestions for programs a t s t a t i o n s where there was to be no a l l - s k y camera. Drs. Chap- man and G a r t l e i n studied the problem of i n t e r n a t i o n a l coordination. I t was apparent that c o ordination with Canadian observers would be most important. Dr. B.W. C u r r i e of the U n i v e r s i t y of Saskatchewan was i n v i t e d to attend one of the e a r l y meetings and l a t e r was asked to be a s p e c i a l c o n s u l t a n t to the Panel. Dr. Peter Millman of Canada was a l s o asked to be a c o n s u l t a n t . T h i s a c t i o n , along with Dr. G a r t l e i n ' s own long- e s t a b l i s h e d r e l a t i o n s h i p with these workers, led to the most u s e f u l coordination of the North American Program. The Panel recommended that C.W. G a r t l e i n be appointed the A u r o r a l Reporter for the United S t a t e s . 6. Stormertron. The Panel was informed of the development by Dr. W.H. Bennett, Naval Research Laboratory, of an instrument to study the paths of charged p a r t i c l e s under the i n f l u e n c e of a magnetized sphere and i t s p o t e n t i a l u s e f u l n e s s i n t h e o r e t i - c a l s t u d i e s r e l a t i n g to a u r o r a l occurrence and development. The Panel expressed i n t e r e s t i n t h i s equipment and hoped that Dr. Bennett could apply t h i s instrument to the study of a u r o r a l theory. 7. N o c t i l u c e n t Cloud Observations. N.J. O l i v e r informed the panel that GRD had a s p e c i a l spectrograph a v a i l a b l e and suggested that t h i s instrument be loaned to Dr. Paton, U n i v e r s i t y of Edinburgh, Scotland, for observations of n o c t i l u c e n t clouds and that t h i s be included <is a p r o j e c t of the A u r o r a l Panel a t no c o s t to the USNC. I t was agreed that t h i s was a worthwhile undertaking and was accepted. 8. Airglow Program. At an e a r l y meeting of the Panel, Dr. Roach explained the r e - cent developments by Dunn and Manring of Sacramento Peak whereby the astronomical background was eliminated from the a i r g l o w photometer, thus g r e a t l y enhancing the u s e f u l n e s s of the data. The Panel d i s c u s s e d the p o s s i b l e program i n airglow and accepted Dr. Roach's suggestions that s e v e r a l new automatic scanning airglow photo- meters be constructed. These would be of 4 - b a r r e l type observations a t 3 wavelengths, plus p r o v i s i o n for c a l i b r a t i o n . A number of older s i n g l e channel instruments would be modified for l o c a t i o n a t l e s s important s t a t i o n s . 9. A r c t i c Operations. I n view of the importance of observations i n the a r c t i c a r e a , the panel recommended that the m i l i t a r y s e r v i c e s provide l o g i s t i c support for supply f l i g h t s and v i s i t s to remote l o c a t i o n s i n the A r c t i c and expressed the hope that the A i r Force could a s s i s t i n manning some of the s c i e n t i f i c s t a t i o n s i n that a r e a . 10. Data Reduction and Exchange. S e v e r a l suggestions were d i s c u s s e d by the Panel as to how the v a s t amount of a u r o r a l data expected could be reduced and exchanged on a reasonable b a s i s . I t was thought that perhaps synoptic maps could be prepared for every 15 minutes and that Indexes of a u r o r a l a c t i v i t y might be prepared showing r e l a - t i o n s h i p s to other upper atmosphere phenomena. The use of punchcards, as mentioned e a r l i e r , was a l s o d i s c u s s e d as a means of handling data. The i n t e r n a t i o n a l exchange of data involved the question of the treatment of o r i - g i n a l f i l m . I t was recommended that o r i g i n a l f i l m be copied for exchange and that the i n v e s t i g a t o r should have the opportunity of r e t a i n i n g the o r i g i n a l f i l m for h i s own s t u d i e s . The Panel a l s o r a i s e d the question as to whether packages might be r o u t i n e l y X-rayed or inspected i n such a way, i n the course of i n t e r n a t i o n a l exchange, that might damage f i l m . The Academy's IGY s t a f f was asked to check with appropriate

AURORA AND AIRGLOW government agencies to see whether such a s i t u a t i o n might e x i s t with r e s p e c t to the United S t a t e s . Assurances were obtained and transmitted to the Panel that packages not r o u t i n e l y inspected i n any way that would damage exposed but undeveloped f i l m . a. A u r o r a l Data Center. E a r l y i n the i n t e r n a t i o n a l planning, d i s c u s s i o n s were held concerning the c o l l e c t i o n and interchange of IGY data. I t was thought, for example, that the Carnegie I n s t i t u t i o n of Washington might be i n t e r e s t e d i n undertaking to serve as a world data center for aurora and r e l a t e d upper atmosphere data. Drs. E l v e y , G a r t l e i n and V e s t i n e d i s c u s s e d t h i s p o s s i b i l i t y . Dr. V e s t i n e reported that the Carnegie I n s t i t u t i o n would only be i n t e r e s t e d i n t h i s undertaking provided that i t were a t r u l y i n t e r d i s c i p l i n a r y upper atmosphere center, and even then i t was not sure that the I n s t i t u t i o n could undertake t h i s r e s p o n s i b i l i t y . b. P r o t e c t i o n of the I n t e r e s t s of the O r i g i n a l I n v e s t i g a t o r . The T e c h n i c a l Panel on Cosmic Rays had posed the question of the d e s i r a b i l i t y of a s s u r i n g that the c o l l e c t o r of data would have a reasonable opportunity to work on h i s data and p u b l i s h h i s r e s u l t s i n view of the r a p i d time t a b l e of exchange of data proposed by the CSAGI. The Aurora Panel f e l t t h at t h i s was not a s e r i o u s problem i n the f i e l d of aurora and airglow, where i n d i v i d u a l observations or observations from only part of a network of s t a t i o n s would not be very u s e f u l i n terms of s c i e n t i f i c r e s e a r c h . The Panel saw no need to recommend a m p l i f i c a t i o n of CSAGI r e g u l a t i o n s toward t h i s purpose but did sug- gest that the proposed three-month i n t e r v a l of exchange of data might be extended to s i x months, 11. P u b l i c a t i o n P l a n s . Dr. Sydney Chapman d i s c u s s e d with the Panel the question of p u b l i c a t i o n i n the "Annals of the IGY" of v a r i o u s types of a u r o r a l data, i n c l u d i n g maps, i n d i c e s , c a t a l o g s of a l l - s k y camera o b s e r v a t i o n s , s t a t i o n d e s c r i p t i o n s and per- haps s p e c t r o s c o p i c data. The question was a l s o d i s c u s s e d of what form the a u r o r a l c o n t r i b u t i o n might take to the IGY calendar record of geophysical events which was designated to be prepared by the CSAGI Reporter for World Days, A.H. Shapley. 12. Post-IGY P o l a r Research. The Panel was informed t h a t , m view of the success of the IGY program i n the A n t a r c t i c and the l a r g e investment i n the f a c i l i t i e s there, I t had been agreed to continue a n t a r c t i c observations a f t e r the IGY. The Panel noted t h a t four of i t s members a l s o served on the Upper Atmosphere Panel of the Academy's newly c o n s t i t u t e d P o l a r Research Committee and i t was f e l t t h at consequently most of the Panel's views on a u r o r a l r e s e a r c h m polar regions would be adequately represented m planning the continued program.

AURORA AND AIRGLOW C. P r o j e c t O b j e c t i v e s and R e s u l t s 1. Summary of Program. The aurora program c o n s i s t e d of o b s e r v a t i o n a l networks based on the a l l - s k y camera, v i s u a l o b s e r v a t i o n s , spectrographs, radar and cosmic n o i s e r e - cord e r s . Some p r o j e c t s were e s t a b l i s h e d for area operations and reduction of data. The a i r g l o w program was based on the automatic photometer. 2. Order of P r o i e c t D e s c r i p t i o n . The p r o j e c t s that a r e described i n the fol l o w i n g pages a r e i n numerical order to correspond with the o r i g i n a l formulation of the pro- gram. For convenience, the p r o j e c t s a r e grouped below to r e f l e c t s i m i l a r i t y of pur- pose. A l l - s k y camera V i s u a l observations P a t r o l spectrograph Scanning spectrograph High D i s p e r s i o n Spectrograph Radar Absorption Alaska Operations Thule GRD/Yerkes New Zealand Operations A r c t i c B a s i n A n t a r c t i c Airglow 13, 9 5, 1 .15, L.44 1.1, 1. 1.2, 1. 1.4, 1. 1.6 1.45 1.7, 1.43, 1.14 1.24 1.25 1.34 1.42 1.18, 1.38 1.3, 1.10, 1.17 11 1.16, 1,38 1,12, 1,20 3. C a n c e l l e d P r o i e c t s . Former p r o j e c t s bearing the following numbers were e l i m i n - ated from the program or combined with other p r o j e c t s : 1.19, 1,21 to 1.23, 1.26 to 1.33, 1.35 to 1.39 and 1.41.

AURORA AND AIRGLOW P r o j e c t 1.1 - A l l - S k y Camera C o n s t r u c t i o n 1. O b j e c t i v e s . T h i s p r o j e c t provided for the development and c o n s t r u c t i o n of a cam- era to photograph the complete overhead hemisphere (hence the term " a l l - s k y camera") for use a t U.S. aurora s t a t i o n s and a t c e r t a i n s t a t i o n s operated i n cooperation with other c o u n t r i e s . 2. Operations. A prototype design was made i n 1955j of s e v e r a l cameras b u i l t then, three continued to operate s u c c e s s f u l l y i n Alaska during the IGY, supplementing the more ela b o r a t e camera constructed under t h i s p r o j e c t . For the f i n a l design, the prototype was modified to conform with an instrument constructed by the Swedish s c i e n - t i s t , W. Stoffregen, I n which a folded o p t i c a l system r e s u l t e d i n a more compact design. Twenty-nine cameras of t h i s improved design were cons t r u c t e d under c o n t r a c t by Photomechanlsms, I n c . F i g . 1 i s a photograph of the camera assembly; F i g . 2 i s a schematic diagram of the o p t i c a l system ( f o r a complete d i s c u s s i o n see r e f e r e n c e c i t e d i n b i b l i o g r a p h y ) . Photographic t e s t s l e d to the adoption of EK T r i - X f i l m , developed i n D-19 f o r 7 minutes a t 68°F. P l a s t i c h emispherical domes were supplied f or each of the instruments except f or those i n the A n t a r c t i c , where the domes were a p a r t of the c o n s t r u c t i o n program there. I n s u l a t e d wooden housings were constructed f o r the cam- eras operated i n Alaska and heating systems provided a c i r c u l a t i o n of hot a i r around the base of the domes to i n h i b i t f r o s t formation. Programing mechanisms were provided to f i x exposure time and r e p e t i t i o n r a t e . Each frame contained information on s t a t i o n , time and date. Cameras were supplied to v a r i o u s i n s t i t u t i o n s r e s p o n s i b l e f or operation of f i e l d s t a t i o n s , as follows: Geophysical I n s t . Alaskan Network 5 GRD/AFCRC A n t a r c t i c a and New Zealand 9 GRD/AFCRC A r c t i c B a s i n 2 C o r n e l l U.S. Network, E a s t e r n Canada 8 Stanford Pullman, Wash. S t a t i o n 1 CRPL-NBS, Boulder F r i t z Peak, Rapid C i t y 2 Yerkes Observatory Williams Bay, Shingleton 2 29 As noted above, three prototype instruments were a l s o used i n A l a s k a . 3. Personnel. The p r o j e c t was under the s u p e r v i s i o n of C.T. E l v e y , D i r e c t o r , Geo- p h y s i c a l I n s t i t u t e . A. Belon and T.N. Davis were a s s o c i a t e d with the work. 4. Bibliography. C.T. E l v e y , A. Belon: " D e s c r i p t i o n of the A l l - S k y Camera, I t s Method of Operation, An Instrument (Ascagraph) for Measuring the F i l m . " S c i e n t i f i c Report No. 1, 1957, IGY P r o j e c t 1.1, Geophysical I n s t i t u t e , U n i v e r s i t y of A l a s k a . T.N. Davis, C.T. Elvey: "Construction of an A l l - S k y Camera." Geophysical Research Report No. 2, 1955, Geophysical I n s t i t u t e , U n i v e r s i t y of A l a s k a . C.T. E l v e y , W. Stoffregen, A. Belon, S. Chapman, N. Herlofson: "Aurora and Airglow - Aur o r a l Photography by A l l - S k y Camera." Annals of the I n t e r - n a t i o n a l Geophysical Year, V ol. 5, P a r t 2, 1957. 10

AURORA AND AIRGLOW F i g u r e 1. The A l l - S k y Camera: A - s p h e r i c a l m i r r o r ; B-plane m i r r o r ; C - s t a t i o n , d a t e c o d i n g lamps; D-quarter hour lamp; E - z e n i t h d i s t a n c e lamps; F-geomagnetic l a t i t u d e lamps. LANE MIRROR C A M E R A S U P P O R T LASTIC DOME SPHERICAL MIRROR •ST^e" Ê TA-'R '^:.'ur^.S - S O L E N O I D DRIVE MECHANISM F i g u r e 2, O p t i c a l System o f t h e A l l - S k y Camera. 11

AURORA AND AIRGLOW P r o j e c t 1.2 - V i s u a l Aurora Observations 1. O b j e c t i v e s . T h i s p r o j e c t a t C o r n e l l U n i v e r s i t y provided for systematic s y n o p t i c v i s u a l observations of the aurora i n the United S t a t e s , Alaska and the A n t a r c t i c , and assured the coordination of observations both I n the United S t a t e s and Canada. 2. Operations. During the IGY there were about 700 volunteer observers of whom about 350 p a r t i c i p a t e d a c t i v e l y . Through the cooperation of the U.S. Weather Bureau, r e - ports were a l s o r e c e i v e d from about 120 weather s t a t i o n s . The USWB used cards (mark sense) which reported on aurora over 5° of l a t i t u d e . A system of graphic r e p o r t i n g was developed by C.W. G a r t l e i n and D.S. Kim b a l l of USA and P.M. Millman of Canada for use by vol u n t e e r s i n the United S t a t e s and a l l observers i n Canada. T h i s graphic report allows r e p o r t i n g of the e n t i r e sky. The report form i s divided i n t o spaces to make for easy coding of data. On the a n t a r c t i c continent the programs began using a l i d a d e and mark sense cards of the type used i n the United S t a t e s i n 1955-56 i n a program sponsored by the USIA. Gradually t h i s program changed to Incorporate use of the graphic report form. The US vol u n t e e r s were supplied with simple i n c l i n o m e t e r s to enable e l e v a t i o n angles to be marked on the back of the cards. These c o s t approximately f o r t y cents each ( f o r a l o t of about 400). F i l t e r s of s t a i n e d g e l a t i n e on heavy p l a s t i c were obtained from Eastman Kodak Company. They were mounted i n g l a s s by Evaporated Metal F i l m s Company of I t h a c a . I n a d d i t i o n to supplying a l l US observers, i n c l u d i n g those i n the A n t a r c t i c , over 400 were sent to Canada i n exchange for aurora p l o t t i n g maps prepared t h e r e , and quan- t i t i e s of f i l t e r m a t e r i a l were supplied to A u s t r a l i a , New Zealand, Great B r i t a i n , Denmark, Sweden, R u s s i a , and Argentina. A data processing system was s e t up a t headquarters, C o r n e l l , to handle the r e - p o r t s . T h i s allowed an i n c r e a s e i n handling e f f i c i e n c y of about one hundred times over previous v i s u a l programs. T h i s i s described i n d e t a i l under P r o j e c t 1.9. 3. Personnel. T h i s work was under the s u p e r v i s i o n of C.W. G a r t l e i n and Gale Sprague, C o r n e l l U n i v e r s i t y . 4. Data. A l l observations were put on punch cards, which were used to p r i n t o f f l i s t s of data for compact storage. Data were p l o t t e d from the o r i g i n a l observations on p l o t t i n g maps showing a u r o r a l form, i n t e n s i t y and d i s t r i b u t i o n (see P r o j e c t 1.9). 5. R e s u l t s . Newsletters were sent to a l l observers and about 50 other i n t e r e s t e d persons from the beginning of the IGY to date. The l e t t e r s contain a d d i t i o n a l h i n t s on observing, r e s u l t s of observations and p r e l i m i n a r y a n a l y s e s . P r e l i m i n a r y a n a l y s i s c a r r i e d out on P r o j e c t 1.9 shows a c l o s e r e l a t i o n between the magnetic K-lndex and l o c a t i o n of the overhead zone of aurora. I t a l s o shows a d i u r n a l e f f e c t causing auroras to be f a r t h e s t south a t midnight. 12

AURORA AND AIRGLOW 6. Bibliography. Newsletters No. 1 through 38. (Continued a f t e r the IGY under support from the National Science Foundation.) C.W. G a r t l e i n , Gale Sprague ( e d i t o r s ) - "IGY V i s u a l A u r o r a l Observations." IGY World Data Center-A General Report No. 12, November 1960, National Academy of Sc i e n c e s . " V i s u a l A u r o r a l Observations", IGY Annals. Vol. 4, pa r t I I , pp. 41-103. "Auroral Photography", IGY Annals. Vol. 4, part I I I , pp. 104-109. "Handbook for Reporting Auroras", C o r n e l l U n i v e r s i t y , p. 25, 1957. "The V i s u a l A u r o r a l Program", IGY B u l l e t i n . No. 12, pp. 6-11, June 1958. "Auroral Observations a t the South Pole", IGY B u l l e t i n . No. 26, pp. 4-7, August 1959. "R e l a t i o n s h i p s between Auroras i n the Northern and Southern Hemispheres", IGY B u l l e t i n . No. 44, pp. 7-14, February 1961. " C o r r e l a t i o n of V i s u a l and Subvisual Arcs with Changes i n the Outer Van A l l e n R a d i a t i o n Zone", Jou r n a l Geophysical Res.. Vol. 65, pp. 2759-2766, September 1960. (IGY B u l l e t i n No. 45, pp. 1-6, March 1961) ( S t a t e Univer- s i t y of Iowa Report SUI-60-9.) "41 Mc/s IGY Auro r a l Radar a t I t h a c a , N.Y.", Jour n a l Geophysical Res.. Vol. 65, pp. 2255-2259, August 1960. "Auroral Absorption of Radar S i g n a l s " , J o u r n a l Geophysical Research. Vol. 67, pp. 3393-3396, August 1962. " V i s o p l o t s " , Annals of IGY. Volume 29. "Polar P l o t s of S e l e c t e d Northern Hemisphere Auroras", IGY Annals ( I n p r e s s ) , C.W. G a r t l e i n , D.S. K i m b a l l , Gale Sprague: "The O r i g i n and Morphology of the Aurora." P h y s i c s Department, C o r n e l l U n i v e r s i t y , 1965. 13

AURORA AND AIRGLOW P r o j e c t 1.3 - Photometer Procurement 1. O b j e c t i v e s . T h i s p r o j e c t a t the C e n t r a l Radio Propagation Laboratory (CRPL), Boulder L a b o r a t o r i e s of the Nati o n a l Bureau of Standards, was organized i n order to co n s t r u c t photometers f o r air g l o w and aurora observations. 2. Operations. Two photometers were developed: (a) a b i r e f r i n g e n t f i l t e r u n i t f o l l o w i n g a design by Richar d Dunn, (b) a c a l i b r a t i o n photometer using i n t e r f e r e n c e f i l t e r s . S i x of the former and seven of the l a t t e r have been completed. The b a s i c p r i n c i p l e s of the b i r e f r i n g e n t f i l t e r a r e described i n a paper by Dunn and Manring. A modified Lyot f i l t e r i s o l a t e s the s p e c t r a l l i n e s [01] 5577, [01] 6300 and Nal 5890-96. Sky background l i g h t i s el i m i n a t e d i n s t r u m e n t a l l y . The mount per- mits scanning the sky i n e i t h e r v e r t i c a l c i r c l e s or almucantars. A complete survey o f the sky i n one c o l o r i s made i n f i v e minutes. The c a l i b r a t i n g photometer i s f i x e d i n p o s i t i o n and four s u c c e s s i v e f i l t e r s i n conju n c t i o n with a s i n g l e t e l e s c o p e give readings on four c o l o r s every f i v e minutes. Instruments were provided to operating agencies f or d i s t r i b u t i o n as fol l o w s : B i r e f r i n g e n t F i l t e r Photometers Geophysical I n s t . , U. of Al a s k a CRPL, NBS CRPL, NBS GRD, AFCRC A u s t r a l i a I n s t . Geophys. de Huancayo C o l l e g e , A l a s k a F r i t z Peak, Colorado Rapid C i t y , South Dakota Sacramento Peak Obs., New Mexico Camden, A u s t r a l i a Huancayo, Peru C a l i b r a t i o n Photometers GRD, AFCRC GRD, AFCRC GRD, AFCRC NBS (Boulder) NBS (Boulder) U n i v e r s i t y of Hawaii Thule, Greenland A n t a r c t i c a ( H a l l e t t ) Sacramento Peak F r i t z Peak (2 instruments) Laboratory Maui 3. Personnel. The p r o j e c t was tinder the s u p e r v i s i o n of F.E. Roach, CRPL. The i n - struments were constructed i n the NBS shops by A. Borgesson and R.C. Darr under the s u p e r v i s i o n of L.R. M e g l l l and CM. Purdy. 4. Bibliography. Ric h a r d Dunn and E.R. Manring: "J.O.S.A.". V o l . 46, no. 573, 1956. 14

AURORA AND AIRGLOW P r o j e c t 1.4 - P a t r o l Spectrograph - Prototype Development 1. O b j e c t i v e s . T h i s p r o j e c t a t Yerkes Observatory, U n i v e r s i t y of Chicago, was i n i - t i a t e d to provide for the development of a p a t r o l spfectrograph with automatic opera- t i o n that could then be manufactured under c o n t r a c t for the U.S. s t a t i o n network. 2. Operations. The design of the spectrograph was c a r r i e d out a t Yerkes and a proto- type was developed. S p e c i f i c a t i o n s were prepared for the manufacture of a number of Instruments and a r e as f o l l o w s : C o l l i m a t o r , P e t z v a l , Two Separated Doublets F o c a l Length, 24 inch Working Aperture, f/8 Transmission G r a t i n g , 600 lines/mm, blazed for 1 s t order a t 5100 A Camera, Semi-Solid Schmidt Aperture, 3-inch, f/0.625 D i s p e r s i o n , 1 s t order, 350 A/mm T e s t i n g of the prototype was done a t Yerkes. Observers for the A n t a r c t i c were t r a i n e d a t Yerkes i n the use of the spectrograph. 3. Personnel. The p r o j e c t was organized under the d i r e c t i o n of A.B. Melnel a t Yerkes Observatory and N.J. O l i v e r a t the A i r Force Cambridge Research Center. J.W. Chamber- l a i n r e placed Dr. Melnel when the l a t t e r moved to K l t t Peak Na t i o n a l Observatory i n Tucson. 15

AURORA AND AIRGLOW P r o j e c t 1.5 - P a t r o l Spectrograph - Procurement 1. O b j e c t i v e s . T h i s p r o j e c t was organized by the Geophysics Research D i r e c t o r a t e , A i r Force Cambridge Research L a b o r a t o r i e s (AFCRL) to s u p e r v i s e the manufacture by Perkin-Elmer Corp. and procurement of the P a t r o l Spectrograph developed under P r o j e c t 1.4. The program was developed with the following o b j e c t i v e s : a. A p r o f i l e of s p e c t r a l f e a t u r e s of the aurora along a l o n g i t u d i n a l l i n e would be obtained. T h i s p r o f i l e was expected to y i e l d information on the production of a u r o r a l luminosity i n the E a r t h ' s atmosphere by primary protons (and perhaps other p a r t i c l e s ) and by r e s u l t a n t secondary p r o c e s s e s . b. A study of the behavior of the a u r o r a l hydrogen spectrum and the c h a r a c t e r of I t s components was expected to be of p a r t i c u l a r importance, e s p e c i a l l y as a f u n c t i o n of l a t i t u d e , type and height. I t was hoped t h a t t h i s study would prove very v a l u a b l e for the i n t e r p r e t a t i o n of a u r o r a l processes and a s s i s t i n the e v a l u a t i o n and develop- ment of var i o u s t h e o r i e s of a u r o r a l formation. c. A d d i t i o n a l information would be provided on the i n t e n s i t i e s of atomic l i n e s and bands, and t h e i r v a r i a t i o n s with a u r o r a l height and type a s a fun c t i o n of l a t i t u d e , time of day, magnetic and s o l a r c o n d i t i o n s . d. Data from w i t h i n , on, and ou t s i d e the southern zone of maximum a u r o r a l occur- rence a t IGY s t a t i o n s were to be gained. E s s e n t i a l l y no spectrographic data on the aurora a u s t r a l i s were i n e x i s t e n c e . These data alone were expected to be extremely v a l u a b l e i n themselves; moreover, c o r r e l a t i o n s t u d i e s of simultaneous events o c c u r r i n g i n both polar regions would be i n v a l u a b l e for a b e t t e r understanding of the t h e o r i e s of a u r o r a l formation and the behavior of charged p a r t i c l e s i n the E a r t h ' s magnetic f i e l d . 2. Operations. S i x t e e n instruments were covered by t h i s p r o j e c t and two instruments were provided by GRD. Seven spectrographs were shipped to D a v i s v i l l p f o r t r a n s p o r t to a n t a r c t i c s t a t i o n s ; the remainder to GRD and a c t u a l s t a t i o n l o c a t i o n s , which were: A r c t i c D r i f t i n g S t a t i o n A Co l l e g e , A l a s k a Bedford, Massachusetts F r i t z Peak, Colorado I t h a c a , New York Rapid C i t y , South Dakota Sacramento Peak, New Mexico Shingleton, Michigan Williams Bay, Wisconsin Amundsen-Scott (South P o l e ) , A n t a r c t i c a Byrd S t a t i o n , A n t a r c t i c a E l l s w o r t h S t a t i o n , A n t a r c t i c a L i t t l e America S t a t i o n , A n t a r c t i c a (plus spare) Wilkes S t a t i o n , A n t a r c t i c a H a l l e t t S t a t i o n , A n t a r c t i c a (coop, with New Zealand) Thule, Greenland Awarua, New Zealand (coop, w i t h New Zealand) 3. Personnel. T h i s p r o j e c t was under the d i r e c t i o n of N.J. O l i v e r , GRD. 4. Data. Spectra were processed and examined with a microdensitometer, and logs prepared. For d e t a i l s see p r o j e c t 1.11. 5. R e s u l t s . P a t r o l spectrographs were operated as a p a r t of a u r o r a l programs of s e v e r a l agencies. For example, see p r o j e c t 1.14 for a d e s c r i p t i o n of some spectro- s c o p i c observations of the Feb. 10-11, 1958 aurora. 16

AURORA AND AIRGLOW P r o j e c t 1.6 - Scanning Spectrometer - Procurement 1. O b j e c t i v e s . T h i s p r o j e c t a t the Geophysics Research D i r e c t o r a t e , A i r Force Cambridge Research L a b o r a t o r i e s (AFCRL) was organized to procure two scanning spectro- meters, based on the design of D.M. Hunten, for the U.S. program. AFCRL supplied two a d d i t i o n a l instruments. The scanning spectrometer program was designed to provide information on the r a - pid changes of a u r o r a l s p e c t r a during periods of high geomagnetic a c t i v i t y such as were expected during the period of IGY. The l a t i t u d e v a r i a t i o n of short l i v e d auro- r a l s p e c t r a l f e a t u r e s , e s p e c i a l l y the O2 bands, would provide much u s e f u l information on the c o n s t i t u e n t - a l t i t u d e p r o f i l e where records could be c o r r e l a t e d with height mea- surements. Studies of r a p i d v a r i a t i o n s of sodium and other atomic l i n e s would y i e l d new information, i n c l u d i n g probable energies involved, on e x c i t a t i o n p r o c e s s e s . Placement of these instruments a t d i f f e r e n t geomagnetic l a t i t u d e s . I n c l u d i n g Antarc- t i c a , would provide adequate geographical coverage f or t h i s p r o j e c t . During periods of no a u r o r a l a c t i v i t y and during t w i l i g h t i n the po l a r r e g i o n s , much data on the behavior and height of the sodium emissions could be obtained. 2. Operations. AFCRL and D.M. Hunten supervised the c o n s t r u c t i o n of Instruments and shipment to s t a t i o n s . The instruments under t h i s p r o j e c t were i n s t a l l e d a t C o l l e g e , A l a s k a ; Williams Bay, Wisconsin; Bedford, Massachusetts; and L i t t l e America ( i n 1958), A n t a r c t i c a . P r o j e c t 1.7 - Auro r a l Radar - Procurement 1. O b j e c t i v e s . T h i s p r o j e c t , a t the Geophysical I n s t i t u t e , U n i v e r s i t y of A l a s k a , was o r i g i n a t e d to design and c o n s t r u c t , or have constructed under c o n t r a c t , ten radars f o r a u r o r a l observation. The a u r o r a l radar echoes a r e not n e c e s s a r i l y c o i n c i d e n t with the o p t i c a l auroras as the s i g n a l i s returned from e l e c t r o n s a s s o c i a t e d with the auro- r a . Research i n A l a s k a using pulsed s i g n a l s has demonstrated that echoes from auro- r a l i o n i z a t i o n a r e fr e q u e n t l y c l o s e l y a s s o c i a t e d with the v i s u a l a u r o r a l forms. 2. Operations. A prototype radar was constructed a t the Geophysical I n s t i t u t e . A c o n t r a c t to b u i l d nine a d d i t i o n a l u n i t s was awarded to L e v i n t h a l E l e c t r o n i c s Products, I n c . , Palo A l t o . The Instruments were I n s t a l l e d a t : C o l l e g e , Kotzebue, F a r e w e l l , King Salmon, Unalaska, and Barrow, A l a s k a . Three were shipped to the U.S. f o r i n s t a l l m e n t a t Pullman, Washington; Rapid C i t y , South Dakota; and I t h a c a , New York. An instrument was a l s o I n s t a l l e d i n cooperation with A u s t r a l i a , a t McQuarle I s l a n d , approximately the magnetic conjugate point to Kotzebue, A l a s k a . Arrangements were made with the C i v i l Aeronautics A d m i n i s t r a t i o n to provide housing and e l e c t r i c a l power for the equipment a t King Salmon, F a r e w e l l , and Kotze- bue, A l a s k a . The A r c t i c Research Laboratory supplied housing and e l e c t r i c a l power for the s t a t i o n a t Barrow, Al a s k a . Operation of the s t a t i o n a t Unalaska was made p o s s i b l e through the cooperation of the U.S. Navy. 3. Personnel. The p r o j e c t was under the d i r e c t i o n of C.T. E l v e y , D i r e c t o r , Geophy- s i c a l I n s t i t u t e , who was a s s i s t e d by R.S, Leonard of the r e s e a r c h s t a f f , T. N e l l Davis, coordinator of f i e l d o perations, made the necessary f i e l d arrangements. 4. Bibliography. R.S. Leonard: "A Low Power VHF Radar for A u r o r a l Research". Proc. I.R.E, Vol. 47, No. 2, February 1959, p. 320. 17

AURORA AND AIRGLOW P r o j e c t 1.9 - Aurora Data A c q u i s i t i o n and Pr o c e s s i n g 1. O b j e c t i v e s . T h i s p r o j e c t a t C o r n e l l U n i v e r s i t y was s e t up to reduce to punch card form data from a l l - s k y cameras and v i s u a l o b s e r v e r s , prepare synoptic maps and s t a t i s - t i c a l t a b l e s , and d i s t r i b u t e l a r g e numbers of m u l t l l l t h c o p ies. 2. Operations. V i s u a l observations were sent to C o r n e l l i n diagram form and a l s o i n mark-sense form. Where data were not supplied I n mark-sense form, punch cards were made and processed. L i s t s of data were run o f f the punch cards and submitted to WDC-A: Aurora ( V i s u a l ) f o r tr a n s m i s s i o n to other WDC's. O r i g i n a l r e p o r t s from v o l u n t e e r s and l i s t s of data from the USW6 cards were prepared f or p l o t t i n g the US po r t i o n of the aurora d i s t r i b u t i o n map made by WDC-A: Aurora ( V i s u a l ) . The USWB cards for a l l the s t a t i o n s f or each n i g h t were used by the IBM 407 accounting machine to p r i n t a u t o m a t i c a l l y the bri g h t n e s s and form of aurora i n l a t i - tude-longitude a r r a y . These sheets were used to p l o t the Weather Bureau data on the f i n a l maps. A d d i t i o n a l s e t s of the sheets were given to World Data Center-A f or t r a n s - m i t t a l to WDC-B and WDC-C. T h i s p r o j e c t , i n e f f e c t , supplied the raw m a t e r i a l s f or the Auro r a l Data Center where they were f u r t h e r processed and analyzed. 3. Personnel. T h i s work was under the s u p e r v i s i o n of C.W. G a r t l e i n and Gale Sprague, C o r n e l l , and c a r r i e d out by Mrs. Mary De Long, Mrs. Lorena Jump and Miss Marcia Van Dusen. 4. Data. IGY IGC-59 O r i g i n a l Volunteer Data O r i g i n a l USWB Cards A n t a r c t i c Weather Bureau P l o t t e d Data US Maps US V i s o p l o t s - aurora p o s i t i o n and form versus UT hours 30,000 p o s i t i v e 120,000 negative 100,000 53,000 mark-sense and a l i d a d e plus o r i g i n a l notebooks 3,900 sheets 3,400 420 sheets 10,000 p o s i t i v e r e p o r t s only 50,000 25,000 3,000 pages 1,400 5. R e s u l t s and Bibliography. (See P r o j e c t 1.2) 18

AURORA AND AIRGLOW P r o j e c t 1.10 - Data Reduction - Airglow 1. O b j e c t i v e s . T h i s p r o j e c t was s e t up a t the C e n t r a l Radio Propagation Laboratory, of the National Bureau of Standards, for the r e d u c t i o n of data from the r a p i d - scanning quadruple-telescope photometers d e s c r i b e d I n P r o j e c t 1.3. 2. Operations. The data reduction was c a r r i e d out I n two steps: (a) the r o u t i n e determination of the a b s o l u t e z e n i t h i n t e n s i t y f o r each hour of o b s e r v a t i o n , (b) the systematic determination of i n t e n s i t i e s over the e n t i r e sky for 80 points plus the z e n i t h . I n both c a s e s , the o r i g i n a l records were d i g i t i z e d and the readings put on punched cards with a Benson-Lehner u n i t . The z e n i t h readings a r e included I n the "Annals of the IGY" volume of a i r g l o w o b s e r v a t i o n s . The more e x t e n s i v e m a t e r i a l covering the observations over the sky was used i n v a r i o u s r e s e a r c h s t u d i e s . The l a r g e problem of mass data p r o c e s s i n g was f a c i l i t a t e d by the use of an IBM 650 e l e c t r o n i c computer. The complete work included not only the IGY-IGC data from F r i t z Peak and Rapid C i t y but a l s o s e v e r a l y e a r s of data from Cactus Peak ( C a l i f o r n i a ) . The e n t i r e i n t e r n a t i o n a l m a t e r i a l f o r the a i r g l o w volume of the Annals was put on cards from which the book was d i r e c t l y p r i n t e d . 3. Personnel. T h i s work was under the d i r e c t i o n of F.E. Roach; J.M, McCaulley and E. Marovich a s s i s t e d . 4. Bibliography. F.E. Roach: "Manual for Photometric Observations of the Airglow During the I n t e r n a t i o n a l Geophysical Year". NBS Report 5006, 1956. F.E. Roach: "IGY Airglow Data". Annals of the IGY. V o l . 25. 19

AURORA AND AIRGLOW Th i s information was published i n the Annals f o r the IGY and d i s t r i b u t e d to the IGY World Data C e n t e r s . The o r i g i n a l f i l m s a r e stored a t WDC-A: Aurora ( I n s t r u m e n t a l ) , Geophysical I n s t i t u t e , U n i v e r s i t y of A l a s k a . 3. Personnel. T h i s work was supervised by N.J. O l i v e r and Ann L. C a r r l g a n , GRD; the photometric a n a l y s i s was c a r r i e d out under the s u p e r v i s i o n of Rev. F r . D e v l i n , S.J., Boston C o l l e g e . 4. Bibliography. F r a n c i s D e v l i n , S.J., N.J. O l i v e r , Ann L. C a r r l g a n : "Auroral Spectro- graph Data", Annals of the IGY. Vol. 25, 1964. 22

AURORA AND AIRGLOW Pro j e c t 1,12 - Airglow Headquarters 1, Oblectlves. This p r o j e c t a t Central Radio Propagation Laboratory (CRPL), National Bareaa of Standards, provided f o r coordination of IGY photometer observations, supply of the airglow network, and operation of s t a t i o n s a t Rapid C i t y , S, D,; F r i t z Peak, Colorado; and cooperative work a t Hoancayo Geophysical Observatory, Peru, 2, Operations, Headquarters operations a t Boulder included the making of arrange- ments f o r f i e l d operations and the supervision of f i e l d a c t i v i t i e s , which were as f o l l o w s : a. The undertaking a t F r i t z Peak, Colorado, of a major aurora and air g l o w obser- v a t i o n a l program i n c l u d i n g t e s t i n g and operation of the f i r s t IGY scanning photoelec- t r i c photometer and operation of an a l l - s k y camera, and a p a t r o l spectrograph, b. Operation of an aurora and airglow s t a t i o n a t Rapid C i t y , South Dakota—a po i n t between F r i t z Peak and the Canadian s t a t i o n a t Saskatoon. I n a d d i t i o n t o an a l l - s k y camera and p a t r o l spectrograph, an a u r o r a l radar experiment was i n s t a l l e d i n cooperation w i t h Stanford U n i v e r s i t y (see P r o j e c t 1,16), c. A t the permanent geopt^rsical observatory a t Huancayo, Peru, a recording a i r - glow photometer was operated during IGY. NBS re t a i n e d the a d m i n i s t r a t i v e responsi- b i l i t y ; the s c i e n t i f i c supervision was by E. R. Manring o f the Geophysics Research D i r e c t o r a t e , AFCRL. Personnel under t h i s p r o j e c t also v i s i t e d the A u s t r a l i a n i n s t a l l a t i o n and assisted i n i n s t a l l a t i o n and preparation f o r the IGY observations. F, E. Roach v i s i t e d a irglow i n s t a l l a t i o n s i n A u s t r a l i a , Japan, I n d i a , USSR and France t o i n t e r c a l l b r a t e i n s t r u - ments. Dr. Roach also acted as co-chairman of a working group (under CSAGI and CIG) on airglow data t o prepare and e d i t the data f o r p u b l i c a t i o n i n the "Annals of the IGY" 3, Personnel. This work was under the supervision of F, E. Roach, CRPL. Also en- gaged p r o f e s s i o n a l l y i n the p r o j e c t were Manfred Rees, Lawrence R. M e g l l l , Edward Marovich, J. W. McCaulley and C M , Purdy, 4, Data, Data from the IGY have been processed and submitted t o the IGY World Data Centers. 5, Results. a. S t a t i s t i c a l . I n a series of papers [ 2 , 3, 4, 5] the d i s t r i b u t i o n of z e n i t h i n t e n s i t i e s of the airglow r a d i a t i o n 5577 of atomic oxygen has been studied. As a r e s u l t of these studies the hypothesis has been advanced t h a t the 5577 airglow and the 5577 aurora have a common physical o r i g i n . I l l u s t r a t i o n s of the k i n d of informa- t i o n used i n the argument are shown i n Figures 3 and 4 (4 s t a t i o n histograms). I t i s seen t h a t there I s a steady gradation of d i s t r i b u t i o n s from the sub-anroral zone (FP and RC), t o the gecmagnetic pole (Thule) and t o the a u r o r a l zone (College). Farther- more, there i s no evidence o f a bl-modal d i s t r i b u t i o n of i n t e n s i t i e s as might be ex- pected f o r two d i s t i n c t and separate modes of e x c i t a t i o n . b. Synoptic. An i n t e r p r e t a t i o n of our F r i t z Peak observations i s t h a t the o p t i - c a l l y observed s t r u c t u r e of 5577 i n the nlghtglow i s due t o the existence of " c e l l s " of size about 2500 km [ l l ] located a t a height of about 100 km. Evidence has been brought out suggesting t h a t these c e l l s move i n a s i m i l a r fashion as do cy c l o n i c storms a t the Earth's surface, w i t h speeds of about 100 meters/second [ 1 2 ] , A series of drawings o f such c e l l s made a t one hour i n t e r v a l s during a n i g h t I s shown i n Figure 5. 23

AURORA AND AIRGLOW 2 3 4 LOG Q IN RAYLEIGHS Figure 3. Relative Occurrence o£ 5577 Radiation f o r Rapid C i t y , S.D.; F r i t z Peak, Colorado; Thule, Greenland; and College, Alaska. J" 1 \ THULE o 20 AURORAm AURORA I AURORA! FRrrZ PEAK RAPID CITY 3 4 LOO 0 IN RAVLEIOHS Figure 4. Percent Occurrences of 5577 Radiation. Aurora I , I I , I I I represent increasing i n t e n s i t i e s of auroral displays. 24

Next: Cosmic Rays Program »
Report on the U.S. Program for the International Geophysical Year: July 1, 1957 - December 31, 1958 Get This Book
×
 Report on the U.S. Program for the International Geophysical Year: July 1, 1957 - December 31, 1958
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!