National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: 7. Findings and Conclusions
Page 136
Suggested Citation:"8. References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. Improved Prediction Models for Crash Types and Crash Severities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26164.
×
Page 136
Page 137
Suggested Citation:"8. References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. Improved Prediction Models for Crash Types and Crash Severities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26164.
×
Page 137

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

120  8 REFERENCES Bahar G., E. Hauer. 2014. User’s Guide to Develop Highway Safety Manual Safety Performance Function  Calibration Factors. Final Report, NCHRP Project 20‐07, Task 332.  Cafiso S., G. Di Silvestro, B. Persaud, and M. Begum. 2010. Revisiting Variability of Dispersion Parameter  of  Safety  Performance  for  Two‐Lane  Rural  Roads.  Transportation  Research  Record:  Journal  of  the  Transportation  Research  Board,  No.  2148,  Transportation  Research  Board  of  the  National  Academies,  Washington, DC, pp. 38‐46.  Revisiting Variability of Dispersion Parameter of Safety Performance for Two‐Lane Rural Roads  Chang, L. and F. Mannering. 1999. Analysis of  injury severity and vehicle occupancy  in truck‐ and non‐ truck‐involved accidents. Accident Analysis and Prevention 31 No. 5, pp. 579‐592.  Dziak, J.J., Coffman, D.L., Lanza, S.T., and Li, R. 2012. Sensitivity and Specificity of Information Criteria, The  Methodology  Center,  Pennsylvania  State  University  –  College  of  Health  and  Human  Development,  Technical  Report  Series  #  12‐119,  State  College,  Pennsylvania  (http://methodology.psu.edu/media/techreports/12‐119.pdf).  Farid, A., M. Abdel‐Aty, J. Lee, N. Eluru and J.‐H. Wang. Exploring the transferability of safety performance  functions. Accident Analysis and Prevention 94, 2016, pp. 143‐152.  Golob T., W. Recker and  J. Leonard. 1987. An Analysis of  the Severity and  Incident Duration of Truck‐ Involved Freeway Accidents. Accident Analysis and Prevention 19, No. 5, pp. 375‐395.  Hauer, E. (2015 – in press), The Art of Regression Modeling in Road Safety, Springer.  Institute  for  Digital  Research  and  Education,  (IDE‐UCLA).  Accessed  December  18,  2014  at  <http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/sas/dae/negbinreg.htm>.  Ivan,  J.  2004.  New  Approach  for  Including  Traffic  Volumes  in  Crash  Rate  Analysis  and  Forecasting,”  Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1897, Transportation  Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC, pp. 134‐141.  Kockelman, K.M. and Y.J. Kweon. 2002. Driver  injury severity: an application of ordered probit models.  Accident Analysis and Prevention 34 (3), pp. 313‐321.  Lyon C., Persaud B., and F. Gross. 2016. The Calibrator—Calibrate, Critique, CURE. An SPF Calibration Tool.  FHWA DTFH61‐10‐D‐00022‐T‐13005.  Papke,  L.  E.,  and  Wooldridge,  J.  1993.  Econometric  methods  for  fractional  response  variables  with  an  application to 401 (k) plan participation rates.  SAS/STAT(R)  9.2  User's  Guide,  Second  Edition.  Accessed  December  18,  2014  at  <http://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/statug/63033/HTML/default/viewer.htm#statug_genm od_sect030.htm#statug.genmod.genmodoverdisp>. 

121  Srinivasan, R., M. Colety, G. Bahar, B. Crowther, and M. Farmen. 2016. Estimation of Calibration Functions  for Predicting Crashes on Rural Two‐Lane Roads  in Arizona. Transportation Research Record: Journal of  the Transportation Research Board, No. 2583, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC , pp. 17‐ 24.  Wang,  J.‐H., M.  Abdel‐Aty,  and  J.  Lee.  2017.  Evaluation  of  Safety  Performance  Functions  Based  on  Experimental Design Using  Cross‐Validation Method.  Transportation  Research  Record:  Journal  of  the  Transportation Research Board, No. 2636, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 2017.  Wang,  J.‐H., M. Abdel‐Aty, and  J.  Lee. 2016 Examination of  the Transferability of Safety Performance  Functions for Developing Crash Modification Factors: Using the Empirical Bayes Method. Transportation  Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, No. 2583, Transportation  Research Board, Washington, DC, pp. 73‐80.   Washington, S., Persaud, B., Lyon, C. and Oh,  J. 2005. Validation of Accident Models  for  Intersections.  Federal Highway Administration, United States Department of Transportation, Report No. FHWA‐RD‐03‐ 037.  Yasmin, S., N. Eluru, J. Lee, and M. Abdel‐Aty. 2016. Ordered Fractional Split Approach for Aggregate Injury  Severity Modeling. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No.  2583, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, pp. 119‐126.  Zhang, C., J. Ivan and T. Jonsson. 2007. Collision Type Categorization Based on Crash Causality and Severity  Analysis. Transportation Research Board 86th Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers, Paper No. 07‐ 2454, Washington, DC. 

Improved Prediction Models for Crash Types and Crash Severities Get This Book
×
 Improved Prediction Models for Crash Types and Crash Severities
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The release of the Highway Safety Manual (HSM) by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) in 2010 was a landmark event in the practice of road safety analysis. Before it, the United States had no central repository for information about quantitative road safety analysis methodology.

The TRB National Cooperative Highway Research Program's NCHRP Web-Only Document 295: Improved Prediction Models for Crash Types and Crash Severities describes efforts to develop improved crash prediction methods for crash type and severity for the three facility types covered in the HSM—specifically, two‐lane rural highways, multilane rural highways, and urban/suburban arterials.

Supplemental materials to the Web-Only Document include Appendices A, B, and C (Average Condition Models, Crash Severities – Ordered Probit Fractional Split Modeling Approach, and Draft Content for Highway Safety Manual, 2nd Edition).

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!