National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: 7 Paths Forward: Recommendations
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Advancing Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility in the Leadership of Competed Space Missions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26385.
×

References

AAUW (American Association of University Women). 2008. “The STEM Gap: Women and Girls in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics.” Washington, DC. https://www.aauw.org/resources/research/the-stem-gap.

Abrica, E.J., T.B. Lane, S. Zobac, and E. Collins. 2020. “Sense of Belonging and Community Building within a STEM Intervention Program: A Focus on Latino Male Undergraduates’ Experiences.” Journal of Hispanic Higher Education 21(2):228-242. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1538192720974884.

Agresti, A. 2002. Categorical Data Analysis, 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

Aikens, M.L., M.M. Robertson, S. Sadselia, K. Watkins, M. Evans, C. R. Runyon, L.T. Eby, and E.L. Dolan. 2017. “Race and Gender Differences in Undergraduate Research Mentoring Structures and Research Outcomes.” CBE Life Sciences Education 16(2):ar34. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28550078.

AIR (American Institutes for Research). 2014. “The Role of Historically Black Colleges and Universities as Pathway Providers: Institutional Pathways to the STEM PhD Among Black Students.” Broadening Participation in STEM Graduate Education. https://www.air.org/sites/default/files/downloads/report/Role%20of%20HBCUs%20in%20STEM%20PhDs%20for%20Black%20Students.pdf.

American Academy of Arts & Sciences. 2020. The Perils of Complacency: America at a Tipping Point in Science & Engineering. Cambridge, MA. https://www.amacad.org/publication/perils-of-complacency.

Baker, V.L., M.J. Pifer, and K.A. Griffin. 2014. “Mentor-Protégé Fit: Identifying and Developing Effective Mentorship across Identities in Doctoral Education.” International Journal for Researcher Development 5(2):83-98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJRD-04-2014-0003.

Barbier, L., C. Wilson, and A. Kc. 2021. “SMD Summary Demographic Data.” Presentation to the National Academies Committee on Increasing Diversity and Inclusion in the Leadership of Competed Missions. https://www.nationalacademies.org/event/08-12-2021/docs/DF47BBCCD1A00AB26A99C2D42FD76C00646CDF1F6033.

Batchelor, R.L., H. Ali, K.G. Gardner-Vandy, A.U. Gold, J.A. MacKinnon, and P.M. Asher. 2021. “Reimagining STEM Workforce Development as a Braided River.” Eos 102. https://eos.org/opinions/reimagining-stem-workforce-development-as-a-braided-river.

Beasley, M.A. 2011. Opting Out: Losing the Potential of America’s Young Black Elite. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.

Bell, S.T., A.J. Villado, M.A. Lukasik, L. Belau, and A.L. Briggs. 2011. “Getting Specific About Demographic Diversity Variable and Team Performance Relationships: A Meta-Analysis.” Journal of Management 37(3):709-743. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0149206310365001.

Bernard, H.R. 2000. Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, 2nd ed. Sage Publishing, Los Angeles, CA.

Bernard, R.E., and E.H.G. Cooperdock. 2018. “No Progress on Diversity in 40 Years.” Nature Geoscience 11:292-295. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41561-018-0116-6.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Advancing Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility in the Leadership of Competed Space Missions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26385.
×

Bertrand, M., and S. Mullainathan. 2004. “Are Emily and Greg More Employable Than Lakisha and Jamal? A Field Experiment on Labor Market Discrimination.” American Economic Review 94(4):991-1013. https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/0002828042002561.

Bielby, W.T. 2000. “Minimizing Workplace Gender and Racial Bias.” Contemporary Sociology 29(1):120-129. https://doi.org/10.2307/2654937.

Blair-Loy, M., and E.A. Cech. 2022. Misconceiving Merit: Paradoxes of Excellence and Devotion in Academic Science and Engineering. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.

Blyth, C.R. 1972. “On Simpson’s Paradox and the Sure-Thing Principle.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 67(338):364-366. https://doi.org/10.2307/2284382.

Bronfenbrenner, U. 1974. “Developmental Research, Public Policy, and the Ecology of Childhood.” Child Development 45(1):1-5. https://doi.org/10.2307/1127743.

Bronfenbrenner, U. 1995. “Developmental Ecology Through Space and Time: A Future Perspective.” Pp. 619-647 in Examining Lives in Context: Perspectives on the Ecology of Human Development (P. Moen, G.H. Elder, Jr., and K. Lüscher, eds.). American Psychological Association, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.1037/10176-018.

Byars-Winston, A.M., J. Branchaw, C. Pfund, P. Leverett, and J. Newton. 2015. “Culturally Diverse Undergraduate Researchers’ Academic Outcomes and Perceptions of Their Research Mentoring Relationships.” International Journal of Science Education 37(15):2533-2554. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1085133.

Cain, C.L., and E. Leahy. 2014. “Cultural Correlates of Gender Integration in Science.” Gender Work and Organization 21(6):516-530. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12052.

Calabrese Barton, A., H. Kang, E. Tan, T. O’Neill, and C. Brecklin. 2013. “Crafting a Future in Science: Tracing Middle School Girls’ Identity Work Over Time and Space.” American Education Research Journal 50(1):37-75. https://doi.org/10.3102%2F0002831212458142.

Campbell, L., S. Mehtani, M. Dozier, and J. Rinehart. 2013. “Gender-Heterogeneous Working Groups Produce Higher Quality Science.” PLOS ONE 8(10):e79147. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0079147.

Cannady, M.A., E. Greenwald, and K.N. Harris. 2014. “Problematizing the STEM Pipeline Metaphor: Is the STEM Pipeline Metaphor Serving Our Students and the STEM Workforce? Science Education 98(3):443-460. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21108.

Carlone, H.B. 2004. “The Cultural Production of Science in Reform-Based Physics: Girls’ Access, Participation, and Resistance.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 41(4):392-414. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20006.

Cech, E.A., and M. Blair-Loy. 2019. “The Changing Career Trajectories of New Parents in STEM.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116(10):4182-4187. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1810862116.

Cech, E.A., and L.T. O’Connor. 2018. “Like Second-Hand Smoke: The Toxic Effect of Workplace Flexibility Bias for Workers’ Health.” Community, Work & Family 20(5):543-572. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2017.1371673.

Cech, E.A., and T.J. Waidzunas. 2021. “Systemic Inequalities for LGBTQ Professionals in STEM.” Science Advances 7(3):eabe0933. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.abe0933.

Centrella, J., M. New, and M. Thompson. 2019. “Leadership and Participation in NASA’s Explorer-Class Missions.” White paper submitted to Astro2020: Decadal Survey on Astronomy and Astrophysics. https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.10314.

CEOSE (Committee on Equal Opportunities in Science and Engineering). 2013. 2011-2012 Biennial Report to Congress: Broadening Participation in America’s STEM Workforce. National Science Foundation, Alexandria, VA. https://www.nsf.gov/od/oia/activities/ceose/reports/2011-2012-ceose-biennial-report-508.pdf.

CEOSE. 2017. 2015-2016 Biennial Report to Congress: Broadening Participation in America’s STEM Workforce. National Science Foundation, Alexandria, VA. https://www.nsf.gov/od/oia/activities/ceose/reports/2015-2016-ceose-biennial-report-508.pdf.

CEOSE. 2019. 2017-2018 Biennial Report to Congress: Investing in Diverse Community Voices. National Science Foundation, Alexandria, VA. https://www.nsf.gov/od/oia/activities/ceose/reports/2017-2018-ceose-biennial-report-508.pdf.

Chakraverty, D. 2019. “Impostor Phenomenon in STEM: Occurrence, Attribution, and Identity.” Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education 10(1):2-20. https://doi.org/10.1108/SGPE-D-18-00014.

Cheng, H., G. Potvin, R. Khatri, L.H. Kramer, R.M. Lock, and Z. Hazari. 2018. “Examining Physics Identity Development Through Two High School Interventions.” Paper presented at the Physics Education Research Conference, Washington, DC. http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/perc.2018.pr.Cheng.

Clance, P.R. 1985. The Impostor Phenomenon: Overcoming The Fear That Haunts Your Success. Peachtree Publishers, Atlanta, GA.

Cohen, J.J., B.A. Gabriel, and C. Terrell. 2002. “The Case for Diversity in the Health Care Workforce.” Health Affairs 21(5):90-102. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.21.5.90.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Advancing Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility in the Leadership of Competed Space Missions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26385.
×

Cole, E.R. 2021. “Intersectionality Framework and Its Importance in DEIA Work.” Presentation to the National Academies Committee on Increasing Diversity and Inclusion in the Leadership of Competed Space Missions. https://www.nationalacademies.org/event/02-08-2021/docs/D3B1990EE01654A1446998C1A6A744682768622D21D0.

Cooper, B. 2015. “Intersectionality.” Pp. 385-406 in Oxford Handbook of Feminist Theory (L. Disch and M. Hawkesworth, eds.). Oxford University Press, New York.

Correll, S.J. 2004. “Constraints into Preferences: Gender, Status, and Emerging Career Aspirations.” American Sociological Review 69(1):93-113. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F000312240406900106.

Cosgrove, B. 2019. “NSF Policies on Harassment and Discrimination in NSF-Funded Awardee Programs.” High Energy Physics Advisory Panel Presentation, National Science Foundation. https://science.osti.gov/-/media/hep/hepap/pdf/201905/Cosgrove-NSF_Diversity_Program_HEPAP201905.pdf.

Denizen, N.K., and Y.S. Lincoln. 2005. “Introduction: The Discipline and Practice of Qualitative Research.” In The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (N.K. Denizen and Y.S. Lincoln, eds.). Sage Publications, Los Angeles, CA.

Diaz-Garcia, C., A. Gonzalez-Moreno, and F.J. Saez-Martinez. 2013. “Gender Diversity Within R&D Teams: Its Impact on Radicalness of Innovation.” Innovation 15(2):149-160. https://doi.org/10.5172/impp.2013.15.2.149.

Diverse. 2021. “Top 100 Degree Producers.” Diverse: Issues in Higher Education 38(13). https://top100.diverseeducation.com.

DoD (Department of Defense). 2020. “DoD Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education Programs and Activities” DoDI 1025.11. Washington, DC. https://irp.fas.org/doddir/dod/i1025_11.pdf.

Douglass, J.A. 2000. “A Certain Future: Sputnik, American Higher Education, and the Survival of a Nation.” Pp. 327-363 in Reconsidering Sputnik: Forty Years Since the Soviet Satellite (R.D. Launius, J.M. Logsdon, and R.W. Smith, eds.). Routledge, New York.

Duhigg, C. 2016. “What Google Learned from Its Quest to Build the Perfect Team.” The New York Times Magazine, February 25. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/28/magazine/what-google-learned-from-its-quest-to-build-the-perfect-team.html.

Eaton, A.A., J.F. Saunders, R.K. Jacobson, and K .West. 2019. “How Gender and Race Stereotypes Impact the Advancement of Scholars in STEM: Professors’ Biased Evaluations of Physics and Biology Post-Doctoral Candidates.” Sex Roles 82:127-141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-01052-w.

Ecklund, E.H., A.E. Lincoln, and T. Cassandra. 2012. “Gender Segregation in Elite Academic Science.” Gender & Society 26(5):693-717. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0891243212451904.

Edmondson, A. 1999. Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams.” Administrative Science Quarterly 44(2):350-383. https://doi.org/10.2307%2F2666999.

Edmondson, A.C. 2004. “Psychological Safety, Trust, and Learning in Organizations: A Group-Level Lens.” Pp. 239-272 in Trust and Distrust in Organizations: Dilemmas and Approaches (R.M. Kramer and K.S. Cook, eds.). Russell Sage Foundation, New York.

EOP (Executive Office of the President). 2019. “Executive Order 13872: Economic Empowerment of Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders” 84 FR 22321. Federal Register 84(95):22321-22325. https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2019-10398.

EOP. 2016. “Presidential Memorandum—Promoting Diversity and Inclusion in the National Security Workforce.” https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2016/10/05/presidential-memorandum-promoting-diversity-and-inclusion-national.

EOP. 2021. Best Practices for Diversity and Inclusion in STEM Education and Research: A Guide for and by Federal Agencies. A report by the Interagency Working Group on Inclusion in STEM, the Federal Coordination in STEM Education Subcommittee, and the Committee on STEM Education of the National Science and Technology Council. Washington, DC. https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/091621-Best-Practices-for-Diversity-Inclusion-in-STEM.pdf.

EOP and OPM (Office of Personnel Management). 2016. Reducing the Impact of Bias in the STEM Workforce: Strengthening Excellence and Innovation. A report of the Interagency Policy Group on Increasing Diversity in the STEM Workforce by Reducing the Impact of Bias. Washington, DC. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/ostp-opm_bias_mitigation_report__20161129.pdf.

Erosheva, E.A., S. Grant, M.C. Chen, M.D. Lindner, R.K. Nakamura, and C.J. Lee. 2020. “NIH Peer Review: Criterion Scores Completely Account for Racial Disparities in Overall Impact Scores.” Science Advances 6(23):eaaz4868. https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/sciadv.aaz4868.

Estrada, M., M. Burnett, A.G. Campbell, P.B. Campbell, W.F Denetclaw, C.G. Gutiérrez, S. Hurtado, et al. 2016. “Improving Underrepresented Minority Student Persistence in STEM.” CBE-Life Sciences Education 15(3):1-10. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-01-0038.

Estrada, M., A. Woodcock, P.R. Hernandez, and P.W. Schultz. 2011. “Toward a Model of Social Influence That Explains Minority Student Integration into the Scientific Community.” Journal of Educational Psychology 103(1):206-222. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0020743.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Advancing Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility in the Leadership of Competed Space Missions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26385.
×

FCA (Family Caregiver Alliance). 2012. Selected Caregiver Statistics (Fact Sheet). https://www.caregiver.org/selected-caregiver-statistics.

Feldman, M.P., L. Lanahan, and I.V. Lendel. 2014. “Experiments in the Laboratories of Democracy: State Scientific Capacity Building.” Economic Development Quarterly 28(2):107-131. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0891242413490018.

Fiore, S.M., D.R. Carter, and R. Asencio. 2015. “Conflict, Trust, and Cohesion: Examining Affective and Attitudinal Factors in Science Teams.” Pp. 271-301 in Team Cohesion: Advances in Psychological Theory, Methods and Practice (E. Salas, W.B. Vessey, and A.X. Estrada, eds.). Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, United Kingdom.

Fisher, A.J., R. Mendoza-Denton, C. Patt, I. Young, A. Eppig, R.L. Garrell, D.C. Rees, T.W. Nelson, and M.A. Richards. 2019. “Structure and Belonging: Pathways to Success for Underrepresented Minority and Women PhD Students in STEM Fields.” PLOS ONE 14(1):e0209279. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209279.

Fiske, S.T., A.J.D. Cuddy, P. Glick, and J. Xu. 2002. “A Model of (Often Mixed) Stereotype Content: Competence and Warmth Respectively Follow from Perceived Status and Competition.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 82(6):878-902. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878.

Freeman, R.B., and W. Huang. 2014a. “Collaboration: Strength in Diversity.” Nature 513(305). https://www.nature.com/articles/513305a.

Freeman, R.B., and W. Huang. 2014b. “Collaborating with People Like Me: Ethnic Co-Authorship Within the US.” NBER Working Paper Series 19905. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA. https://www.nber.org/papers/w19905.

Gammie, A. 2021. “Overview of NIGMS Diversity Programs.” Presentation to the National Academies Committee on Increasing Diversity and Inclusion in the Leadership of Competed Space Missions on April 27. https://www.nationalacademies.org/event/04-27-2021/docs/DD5FBE84CDB8E77306EA881BDA579C7E17ABEFEBA5B4.

Gasman, M., B. Baez, N. Drezner, K. Sedgwick, and C. Tudico. 2007. “Historically Black Colleges and Universities: Recent Trends.” American Association of University Professors. Washington, DC. https://www.aaup.org/report/historically-black-colleges-and-universities-recent-trends.

Gazley, J.L., R. Remich, M.E. Naffziger-Hirsch, J. Keller, P.B. Campbell, and R. McGee. 2014. “Beyond Preparation: Identity, Cultural Capital, and Readiness for Graduate School in the Biomedical Sciences.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 51:1021-1048. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21164.

Ginther, D.K., W.T. Schaffer, J. Schnell, B. Masimore, F. Liu, L.L. Haak, and R. Kington. 2011. “Race, Ethnicity, and NIH Research Awards.” Science 333(6045):1015-1019. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1196783.

Goldin, C., and C. Rouse. 2000. “Orchestrating Impartiality: The Impact of ‘Blind’ Auditions on Female Musicians.” American Economic Review 90(4):715-741. https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/aer.90.4.715.

Goulden, M., M.A. Mason, and K. Frasch. 2011. “Keeping Women in the Science Pipeline.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 638(1):141-162. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0002716211416925.

Graham, M.J., J. Frederick, A. Byars-Winston, A. Hunter, and J. Handelsman. 2013. “Increasing Persistence of College Students in STEM.” Science 341(6153):1455-1456. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1240487.

Griffin, K.A. 2018. “Addressing STEM Culture and Climate to Increase Diversity in STEM Disciplines.” Higher Education Today. Blog. American Council on Education. https://www.higheredtoday.org/2018/04/23/addressing-stem-culture-climate-increase-diversity-stem-disciplines.

Guba, E.G., and Y.S. Lincoln. 1994. “Competing Paradigms in Qualitative Research.” Pp. 105-117 in Handbook of Qualitative Research (N.K. Denizen and Y.S. Lincoln, eds.). Sage Publishing, Los Angeles, CA.

Hall, K.L., D. Stokols, R.P. Moser, B.K. Taylor, M.D. Thornquist, L.C. Nebeling, C.C. Ehret, et al. 2008. “The Collaboration Readiness of Transdisciplinary Research Teams and Centers: Findings from the National Cancer Institute’s TREC Year-One Evaluation Study.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine 35(2):S161-S172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2008.03.035.

Hall, K.L., A.L. Vogel, G.C. Huang, K.J. Serrano, E.L. Rice, S.P. Tsakraklides, and S.M. Fiore. 2018. “The Science of Team Science: A Review of the Empirical Evidence and Research Gaps on Collaboration in Science.” American Psychologist 73(4):532-548. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/amp0000319.

Hamden, E., N. Cabrera-Salazar, E. Gertsen, and M. New. 2019. “Launchpad.” PI Launchpad, Tucson, AZ. https://science.nasa.gov/science-pink/s3fs-public/atoms/files/PI%20Workbook%20-%20FINAL.pdf.

Helba, C., A.M. Porter, S. Nicholson, and R. Ivie. 2019. “Women Among Physics and Astronomy Faculty: Results from the 2018 Academic Workforce Survey.” AIP Focus On Report. American Institute of Physics Statistical Research Center, College Park, MD. https://www.aip.org/statistics/reports/women-among-physics-and-astronomy-faculty.

Hofstra, B., V.V. Kulkarni, S.M. Galvez, B. He, D. Jurafsky, and D.A. McFarland. 2020. “The Diversity-Innovation Paradox in Science.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117(17):9284-9291. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1915378117.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Advancing Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility in the Leadership of Competed Space Missions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26385.
×

Holgersson, C., and L. Romani. 2020. “Tokenism Revisited: When Organizational Culture Challenges Masculine Norms, the Experience of Token Is Transformed.” European Management Review 17:649-661. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12385.

Hong, S., and S.E. Page. 2004. “Groups of Diverse Problem Solvers Can Outperform Groups of High-Ability Problem Solvers.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101(46):16385-16389. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0403723101.

Hoppe, T.A., A. Litovitz, K.A. Willis, R.A. Meseroll, M.J. Perkins, B.I. Hutchins, A.F. Davis, M.S. Lauer, H.A. Valantine, J.M. Anderson, and G.M. Santangelo. 2019. “Topic Choice Contributes to the Lower Rate of NIH Awards to African-American/Black Scientists.” ScienceAdvances 5(10). https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.aaw7238.

Hubbard, S.M., and F.K. Stage. 2010. “Identifying Comprehensive Public Institutions That Develop Minority Scientists.” New Directions for Institutional Research 2010(148):53-62. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.361.

Hurtado, S., J.F. Milem, A. Clayton-Pedersen, and W.R. Allen. 1998. “Enhancing Campus Climates for Racial/Ethnic Diversity: Educational Policy and Practice.” The Review of Higher Education 21(3):279-302. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.1998.0003.

Ivie, R., G. Anderson, and S. White. 2014. African Americans & Hispanics Among Physics and Astronomy Faculty: Results from the 2012 Survey of Physics & Astronomy Degree-Granting Departments. AIP Focus On Report February 2010. American Institute of Physics Statistical Research Center, College Park, MD. https://www.aip.org/statistics/reports/african-americans-hispanics-among-physics-astronomy-faculty-0.

Ivie, R., and F. Bagenal. 2011. “Survey of the Planetary Science Workforce.” American Institute of Physics Statistical Research Center, College Park, MD. https://lasp.colorado.edu/home/mop/files/2015/08/PlanetSciSurvey.pdf.

Ivie, R., A. Ephraim, and S. White. 2010. African Americans & Hispanics Among Physics and Astronomy Faculty: Results from the 2008 Survey of Physics & Astronomy Degree-Granting Departments. AIP Focus On Report February 2010. American Institute of Physics Statistical Research Center, College Park, MD. https://www.aip.org/statistics/reports/african-americans-hispanics-among-physics-astronomy-faculty.

Ivie, R., and K. Nies. 2005. Women in Physics and Astronomy, 2005 AIP Report R-430.02. American Institute of Physics Statistical Research Center, College Park, MD. https://www.aip.org/sites/default/files/statistics/women/women-pa-05.pdf.

Ivie, R., and S. White. 2020. Measuring and Analyzing the Gender Gap in Science Through the Global Survey of Scientists. AIP Focus On Report January 2020. American Institute of Physics Statistical Research Center, College Park, MD. https://www.aip.org/sites/default/files/2022-02/Measuregendrgap.pdf.

Jensen, H., and L. Pappas. 2021. “Explore Solar System & Beyond: NASA Announcement of Opportunity Science Team Demographics.” Presentation to the Committee on Increasing Diversity and Inclusion in the Leadership of Competed Space Missions. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC. https://www.nationalacademies.org/event/06-162021/docs/DE434EB902FF6358FD08B572058EF5F4D85D88E56979.

Jones, S. 2021. “Mathematical and Physical Sciences at the National Science Foundation.” Presentation to the National Academies Committee on Increasing Diversity and Inclusion in the Leadership of Competed Space Missions on April 27.

Joshi, A. 2014. “By Whom and When Is Women’s Expertise Recognized? The Interactive Effects of Gender and Education in Science and Engineering Teams.” Administrative Science Quarterly 59(2):202-239. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0001839214528331.

Kachchaf, R., L. Ko, A. Hodari, and M. Ong. 2015. “Career-Life Balance for Women of Color: Experiences in Science and Engineering Academia.” Journal of Diversity in Higher Education 8(3):175-191. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0039068.

Kafafi, Z.H. “NSF 08-062.” National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA. https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2008/nsf08062/nsf08062.pdf.

Kanter, R.M. 1977a. Men and Women of the Corporation. Basic Books, New York.

Kanter, R.M. 1977b. “Some Effects of Proportions on Group Life.” Pp. 53-78 in The Gender Gap in Psychotherapy. Springer, Boston, MA.

Khanna, G. 2021. “How Higher Education Became an Important US Export.” Issues in Science and Technology 38(1):30-33. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine and Arizona State University. https://issues.org/international-students-us-higher-education-statistics.

Koch, L. 2021. “Increasing Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility at NOAA.” Presentation to the National Academies Committee on Increasing Diversity and Inclusion in the Leadership of Competed Space Missions on June 8.

Kuh, G.D. 2008. High Impact Educational Practices: What They Are, Who Has Access to Them, and Why They Matter. American Association for Colleges & Universities, Washington, DC.

Lamont, M., and A. Swidler. 2014. “Methodological Pluralism and the Possibilities and Limits of Interviewing.” Qualitative Sociology 37(2):153-171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-014-9274-z.

Landivar, L.C. 2013. The Relationship Between Science and Engineering Education and Employment in STEM Occupations. American Community Survey Reports, ACS-23. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC. https://www2.census.gov/library/publications/2013/acs/acs-23.pdf.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Advancing Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility in the Leadership of Competed Space Missions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26385.
×

Larose, S., C.F. Ratelle, F. Guay, C. Senécal, and M. Harvey. 2006. “Trajectories of Science Self-Efficacy Beliefs During the College Transition and Academic and Vocational Adjustment in Science and Technology Programs.” Educational Research and Evaluation 12(4):373-393. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803610600765836.

Lebaron, M., and V. Pillay. 2006. Conflict Across Cultures: A Unique Experience of Bridging Differences. Intercultural Press, Boston, MA.

Lee, C.J., S. Grant, and E.A. Erosheva. 2020. “Alternative Grant Models Might Perpetuate Black-White Funding Gaps.” Lancet 396(10256):955-956. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32018-3.

Leslie, S.-J., A. Cimpian, M. Meyer, and E. Freeland. 2015. “Expectations of Brilliance Underlie Gender Distributions Across Academic Disciplines.” Science 347(6219):262-265. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1261375.

Lewis, K.L., J.G. Stout, N.D. Finkelstein, S.J. Pollock, A. Miyake, G.L. Cohen, and T.A. Ito. 2017. “Fitting in to Move Forward: Belonging, Gender, and Persistence in the Physical Sciences, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (pSTEM).” Psychology of Women Quarterly 41(4):420-436. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684317720186.

Lipsy, S. 2021. “PI-Led Mission Proposal Process.” Presentation to the National Academies Committee on Increasing Diversity and Inclusion in the Leadership of Competed Missions on February 8.

Lonsdale, C., F.R. Schwab, and G. Hunt. 2016. Gender-Related Systematics in NRAO and ALMA Proposal Review Processes. National Radio Astronomy Observatory, Charlottesville, VA. https://science.nrao.edu/science/reports/gender-systematics-in/gender-related-systematics-in-the-nrao-and-alma-proposal-review-processes.

López, C.M., C. Margherio, L.M. Abraham-Hilaire, and C. Feghali-Bostwick. 2018. “Gender Disparities in Faculty Rank: Factors That Affect Advancement of Women Scientists at Academic Medical Centers.” Social Sciences 7(4):62. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci7040062.

Majer, J.M. 2009. “Self-Efficacy and Academic Success Among Ethnically Diverse First-Generation Community College Students.” Journal of Diversity in Higher Education 2(4):243-250. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017852.

Malcom-Piqueux, L. 2020. “Transformation in the U.S. Higher Education System: Implications for Racial Equity. Paper commissioned by the National Academies for the Symposium on Imagining the Future of Undergraduate STEM Education.” https://www.nationalacademies.org/event/10-21-2020/docs/DC5839F575628FD0BF22011A332693AFB8D99D306381.

McCrary, V. 2021. “NSB Vision 2030: Priorities for STEM: A Vision for American’s S&E Enterprise.” Presentation to the National Academies Committee on Increasing Diversity and Inclusion in the Leadership of Competed Space Missions, National Science Board, Alexandria, VA. https://www.nationalacademies.org/event/06-08-2021/docs/DFEF7DD190113474FC06B3DAB1C9BF0EE35116AE483E.

McIlwee, J.S., and J.G. Robinson. 1992. Women in Engineering: Gender, Power, and Workplace Culture. State University of New York Press, Albany.

Mehta, C.R., and N.R. Patel. 1983. “A Network Algorithm for Performing Fisher’s Exact Test in r× c Contingency Tables.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 78(382):427-434. https://doi.org/10.2307/2288652.

Melkers, J., and Y. Wu. 2009. “Evaluating the Improved Research Capacity of EPSCoR States: R&D Funding and Collaborative Networks in the NSF EPSCoR Program.” Review of Policy Research 26(6):761-782. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2009.00415.x.

Mijid, N. 2014. “Why Are Female Small Business Owners in the United States Less Likely to Apply for Bank Loans Than Their Male Counterparts?” Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship 27(2):229-249. https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2015.1012937.

Moss-Racusin, C.A., J.F. Dovidio, V.L. Brescoll, M.J. Graham, and J. Handelsman. 2012. “Science Faculty’s Subtle Gender Biases Favor Male Students.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109(41):16474-16479. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1211286109.

Moss-Racusin, C.A., and L.A. Rudman. 2010. “Disruptions in Women’s Self-Promotion: The Backlash Avoidance Model.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 34(2):186-202. https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1471-6402.2010.01561.x.

Mulvey, P.J., S. Nicholson, and J. Pold. 2021. Trends in Physics PhDs: Results from the 2019 Survey of Enrollments and Degrees and the Degree Recipient Follow-Up Survey for the Classes of 2017 and 2018. AIP Focus On Report February 2021. American Institute of Physics Statistical Research Center, College Park, MD. https://www.aip.org/statistics/reports/trends-physics-phds-171819.

Nakamura, R., L.S. Mann, M.D. Lindner, J. Braithwaite, M.C. Chen, A. Vancea, N. Byrnes, V. Durrant, and B. Reed. 2021. “An Experimental Test of the Effects of Redacting Grant Applicant Identifiers on Peer Review Outcomes.” eLife 10:e71368. https://elifesciences.org/articles/71368.

NAS, NAE, and IOM (National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine). 2007. Beyond Bias and Barriers: Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.17226/11741.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Advancing Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility in the Leadership of Competed Space Missions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26385.
×

NAS, NAE, and IOM. 2011. Expanding Underrepresented Minority Participation: America’s Science and Technology Talent at the Crossroads. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.17226/12984.

NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration). 2007. “SMEX 2007 Announcement of Opportunity.” https://explorers.larc.nasa.gov/CommAnnouncementFAQ.html.

NASA. 2008. National Aeronautics and Space Act of 1958, as Amended. Washington, DC. https://history.nasa.gov/spaceact-legishistory.pdf.

NASA. 2010. “Standard PI-Led Mission Template: Guidelines and Criteria for the Phase A Concept Study.” Science Mission Directorate. https://soma.larc.nasa.gov/StandardAO/sao_templates.html.

NASA. 2012. “Technology Readiness Levels.” https://www.nasa.gov/directorates/heo/scan/engineering/technology/technology_readiness_level.

NASA. 2015a. “Criteria and Factors.” Section 1872.402 in NASA Federal Acquisitions Regulation Supplement. Washington, DC. https://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/procurement/regs/NFS.pdf.

NASA. 2015b. Promising Practices for Equal Opportunity, Diversity, and Equity. Office of Diversity and Equal Opportunity. Washington, DC. https://odeo.hq.nasa.gov/documents/PromPract_8-20-15_TAGGED.pdf.

NASA. 2016. NASA 2016 Diversity and Inclusion Strategic Implementation Plan. Washington, DC. https://odeo.hq.nasa.gov/documents/FINAL_DI_Plan_8-15-16_TAGGED.pdf.

NASA. 2018. “Standard AO information.” https://soma.larc.nasa.gov/StandardAO/sao_templates.html.

NASA. 2019. “NASA Program/Project Life Cycle.” Section 3.0 in Systems Engineering Handbook. Washington, DC. https://www.nasa.gov/seh/3-project-life-cycle.

NASA. 2020a. “Earth Venture Mission-3 (EVM-3) Earth System Science Pathfinder Program.” NNH21ZDA002O. NASA Solicitation and Proposal Integrated Review and Evaluation System. https://nspires.nasaprs.com.

NASA. 2020b. Science 2020-2024: A Vision for Scientific Excellence. NASA Headquarters, Washington, DC. https://science.nasa.gov/science-red/s3fs-public/atoms/files/2020-2024_Science.pdf.

NASA. 2021a. “2019 Heliophysics Explorers Program (HP) Medium-Class Explorer (MIDEX) Concept Study Report (CSR) Evaluation Plan.” Announcement of Opportunity NNH19ZDA0130. https://explorers.larc.nasa.gov/HPMIDEX/pdf_files/HPMIDEX19_DS_Eval_Plan_20210804.pdf.

NASA. 2021b. Guidebook for Proposers Responding to a NASA Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO), Revised as of April 28, 2021. Washington, DC._https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/may_2021_ed._nasa_guidebook_for_proposers.pdf.

NASA. 2021d. NASA Space Flight Program and Project Management Requirements. NPR 7120.5F. Washington, DC. https://nodis3.gsfc.nasa.gov/displayDIR.cfm?t=NPR&c=7120&s=5F.

NASA. 2021e. “National Aeronautics and Space Administration Policy Statement on Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility for NASA’s Workforce and Workplaces.” https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/2021_administrator_policy_statement_on_deia_at_nasa_9-28-21_tagged.pdf.

NASA. 2021f. “Request for Information on Advancing Racial Equity and Support for Underserved Communities in NASA Programs, Contracts and Grants Process.” Federal Register 86(113):31735-31738. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2021-06-15/pdf/2021-12668.pdf.

NASA. 2021g. “Request for Information: Adding Inclusion, Diversity, Equity, and Accessibility (IDEA) Requirements to NASA Announcements of Opportunity.” NNH21ZDA019L. https://nspires.nasaprs.com.

NASA. 2021h. “Request for Information: Proposed New Language on Inclusion, Diversity, Equity, and Accessibility for Science Mission Directorate Announcements of Opportunity” NNH21XDA019L. http://nspires.nasaprs.com.

NASA. 2021i. “Writing Successful Mission Proposals.” New Principal Investigator (PI) Resources. https://science.nasa.gov/researchers/new-pi-resources.

NASEM (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine). 2016. Barriers and Opportunities for 2-Year and 4-Year STEM Degrees: Systemic Change to Support Students’ Diverse Pathways. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.17226/21739.

NASEM. 2017a. Powering Science—NASA’s Large Strategic Science Missions. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.17226/24857.

NASEM. 2017b. Undergraduate Research Experiences for STEM Students: Successes, Challenges, and Opportunities. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.17226/24622.

NASEM. 2019a. Minority Serving Institutions: America’s Underutilized Resource for Strengthening the STEM Workforce. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.17226/25257.

NASEM. 2019b. The Science of Effective Mentorship in STEMM. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.17226/25568.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Advancing Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility in the Leadership of Competed Space Missions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26385.
×

NASEM. 2020a. The Impacts of Racism and Bias on Black People Pursuing Careers in Science, Engineering, and Medicine: Proceedings of a Workshop. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.17226/25849.

NASEM. 2020b. NASA’s Science Activation Program: Achievements and Opportunities. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.17226/25569.

NASEM. 2021. Pathways to Discovery in Astronomy and Astrophysics for the 2020s. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.17226/26141.

NCES (National Center for Education Statistics). 2021. “Finance Section of IPEDS Survey Components.” In Integrated Post-secondary Education Data System (IPEDS). https://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/use-the-data.

Newman, C.B., and M.B. Jackson. 2013. “Collaborative Partnerships in Engineering Between Historically Black Colleges and Universities and Predominantly White Institutions.” Pp. 181-191 in Fostering Success of Ethnic and Racial Minorities in STEM: The Role of Minority Serving Institutions (R.T. Palmer, D.C. Maramba, and M. Gasman, eds.). Routledge, New York.

Nielsen, M.W., S. Alegria, L. Börjeson, H. Etzkowitz, H.J. Falk-Krzesinski, A. Joshi, and L. Schiebinger. 2017. “Opinion: Gender Diversity Leads to Better Science.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114(8):1740-1742. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1700616114.

NIH (National Institutes of Health). 2019a. “NIH Workplace Climate and Harassment Survey.” https://diversity.nih.gov/building-evidence/harassment-survey.

NIH. 2019b. “Supporting a Safe and Respectful Workplace: NIH Actions and Oversight to Address Harassment.” https://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/harassment/actions-oversight.htm.

NIH. 2020. “NIH Process for Handling Allegations of Harassment on an NIH-Funded Project at a Recipient Institution.” https://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/harassment/actions-oversight/allegation-process.htm.

NIH. 2021a. “NIH Grants Policy Statement.” Revised. Office of Extramural Research. https://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/nihgps/HTML5/section_4/4.1.2_civil_rights_protections.htm#Educatio.

NIH. 2021b. “NIH Workforce Profile.” https://www.edi.nih.gov/people/resources/advancing-racial-equity/nih-workforce-profile-fy21q02.

NRC (National Research Council). 2006. Principal-Investigator-Led Missions in the Space Sciences. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.17226/11530.

NRC. 2014. Solar and Space Physics: A Science for a Technological Society: An Overview. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.17226/18974.

NRC. 2015. Enhancing the Effectiveness of Team Science. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.17226/19007.

NSB (National Science Board). 2022. “The State of US Science and Engineering 2022.” https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20221.

NSF (National Science Foundation). 1997. “NSF to Adopt New Merit Review Criteria.” https://www.nsf.gov/news/news_summ.jsp?cntn_id=102789.

NSF. 2011. “Balancing the Scale: NSF’s Career-Life Balance Initiative.” https://www.nsf.gov/career-life-balance/brochure.pdf.

NSF. 2018. Doctorate Recipients from U.S. Universities: 2016. Report NSF 18-304. National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, Alexandria, VA. https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2018/nsf18304.

NSF. 2019. Doctorate Recipients from U.S. Universities: 2019. Report NSF 21-308. National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. Alexandria, VA. https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf21308.

NSF. 2020. The National Science Foundation’s Merit Review Process: Fiscal Year 2019 Digest. Alexandria, VA. https://www.nsf.gov/nsb/publications/2020/merit_review/FY-2019/nsb202038.pdf.

NSF. 2021a. “FAQs Regarding NSF’s Award Term and Condition Entitled, Notification Requirements Regarding Sexual Harassment, Other Forms of Harassment, or Sexual Assault.” https://www.nsf.gov/od/oecr/docs/Sexual_Harassment_FAQs.pdf.

NSF. 2021b. “Higher Education and Research Development Survey (HERD): FY2020.” Data tables. NSF 22-311. National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf22311.

NSF. 2021c. “Survey of Federal Funds for Research and Development.” NSF 21-32. National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/srvyfedfunds.

NSF. 2021d. Women, Minorities and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2021. Special Report NSF 21-321. Alexandria, VA. https://ncses.nsf.gov/wmpd.

Ochoa, E., and V.R. McCrary. 2021. “Cultivating America’s STEM Talent Must Begin at Home.” Issues in Science and Technology, November 30. https://issues.org/cultivating-stem-talent-begins-at-home-ochoa-mccrary/#.Ynq0NcqeF7c.link.

Olson, M.A., and R.H. Fazio. 2003. “Relations Between Implicit Measures of Prejudice: What Are We Measuring?” Psychological Science 14(6):636-639. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0956-7976.2003.psci_1477.x.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Advancing Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility in the Leadership of Competed Space Missions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26385.
×

Ong, M., C. Wright, L. Espinosa, and G. Orfield. 2011. “A Synthesis of Empirical Research on Undergraduate and Graduate Women of Color in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics.” Harvard Educational Review 81(2):172-209. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.81.2.t022245n7x4752v2.

Page, S. 2007. The Difference: How the Power of Diversity Creates Better Groups, Firms, Schools, and Societies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

Page, S.E. 2017. The Diversity Bonus How Great Teams Pay Off in the Knowledge Economy. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

Patat, F. 2016. “Gender Systematics in Telescope Time Allocation at ESO.” The Messenger 165:2-9. https://www.eso.org/sci/publications/messenger/archive/no.165-sep16/messenger-no165-2-9.pdf.

Pinquart, M., and S. Sörensen. 2005. “Ethnic Differences in Stressors, Resources, and Psychological Outcomes of Family Caregiving: A Meta-Analysis.” The Gerontologist 45:90-106. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/45.1.90.

Pohlhaus, J.R., J. Jiang, R.M. Wagner, W.T. Schaffer, and V.W. Pinn. 2011. “Sex Differences in Application, Success, and Funding Rates for NIH Extramural Programs.” Academic Medicine 86(6):759-767. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31821836ff.

Pold, J., and R. Ivie. 2018. Workforce Survey of 2018 US AAS Members: Summary Results. American Institute of Physics Statistical Research Center, College Park, MD. https://aas.org/sites/default/files/2019-10/AAS-Members-Workforce-Survey-final.pdf.

Porter, A.M. 2019. Physics PhDs Ten Years Later: Success Factors and Barriers in Career Paths: Results from the PhD Plus 10 Study. AIP Focus On Report December 2019. American Institute of Physics Statistical Research Center, College Park, MD. https://www.aip.org/statistics/reports/physics-phds-ten-years-later-success-factors-and-barriers-career-paths.

Porter, AM., and R. Ivie. 2019. Women in Physics and Astronomy, 2019. Focus On Report March 2019. American Institute of Physics Statistical Research Center, College Park, MD. https://www.aip.org/statistics/reports/women-physics-and-astronomy-2019.

Porter, A.M., S. White, and J. Dollison. 2020. 2020 Survey of the Planetary Science Workforce. American Institute of Physics Statistical Research Center, College Park, MD. https://dps.aas.org/sites/dps.aas.org/files/reports/2020/Results_from_the_2020_Survey_of_the_Planetary_Science_Workforce.pdf.

Posselt, J.R. 2020. Equity in Science: Representation, Culture, and the Dynamic of Change in Graduate Education. Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, CA. https://www.sup.org/books/title/?id=31068.

Rainey, K., M. Dancy, R. Mickelson, E. Stearns, and S. Moller. 2018. “Race and Gender Differences in How Sense of Belonging Influences Decisions to Major in STEM.” International Journal of STEM Education 5(1):10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0115-6.

Rankin, S.R., and R.D. Reason. 2005. “Differing Perceptions: How Students of Color and White Students Perceive Campus Climate for Underrepresented Groups.” Journal of College Student Development 46(1):43-61. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2005.0008.

Rathbun, J.A., S. Diniega, L.C. Quick, D.H. Grinspoon, S.M. Hörst, E.S. Lakdawalla, K.E. Mandt, et al. 2018. “The Planetary Science Workforce: Who Is Missing?” LPI Contrib. No. 2083 for the 49th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference 2018. https://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2018/pdf/2668.pdf.

Remich, R., M.E. Naffziger-Hirsch, J.L. Gazley, and R. McGee. 2016. “Scientific Growth and Identity Development During a Postbaccalaureate Program: Results from a Multisite Qualitative Study.” CBE Life Sciences Education 15(3):ar25. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-01-0035.

Reskin, B.F. 2003. “Including Mechanisms in Our Models of Ascriptive Inequality: 2002 Presidential Address.” American Sociological Review 68(1):1-21. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088900.

Risman, B.J. 2004. “Gender as a Social Structure: Theory Wrestling with Activism.” Gender & Society 18(4):429-450. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243204265349.

Rittmayer, A.D., and M.E. Beier. 2009. “Overview: Self-Efficacy in STEM.” In Applying Research to Practice (ARP) Resources (B. Bogue and E. Cady, eds.). http://aweonline.org/arp_selfefficacy_overview_122208.pdf.

Rivera-Valentín, E.G., J. Rathbun, J.T. Keane, K.L. Lynch, C. Richey, S. Diniega, and J. Vertesi. 2020. “Who Is Missing in Planetary Science?: A Demographic Study of the Planetary Science Workforce.” White paper submitted to the Planetary Science and Astrobiology Decadal Survey 2023-2032. Bulletin of the AAS 53(4). https://doi.org/10.3847/25c2cfeb.968ed505.

Rock, D., and H. Grant. 2016. “Why Diverse Teams Are Smarter.” Harvard Business Review 4(4):2-5.

Roth, L.M. 2004. “The Social Psychology of Tokenism: Status and Homophily Processes on Wall Street.” Sociological Perspectives 47(2):189-214. https://doi.org/10.1525%2Fsop.2004.47.2.189.

Rudman, L.A., and Glick, P. 2001. “Prescriptive Gender Stereotypes and Backlash Toward Agentic Women.” Journal of Social Issues 57(4):743-762. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00239.

Rudolph, A.L. 2019. “Cal-Bridge: Creating Pathways to the PhD for Underrepresented Students in Physics and Astronomy.” Physics Today 72(10):50-57. https://physicstoday.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/PT.3.4319.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Advancing Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility in the Leadership of Competed Space Missions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26385.
×

Sakimoto, P.J., and J.D. Rosenthal. 2005. “Obliterating Myths About Minority Institutions.” Physics Today 58(9):49-53. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2117823.

Sakulku, J. 2011. “The Impostor Phenomenon.” International Journal of Behavior Science 6(1):75-97. https://doi.org/10.14456/ijbs.2011.6.

Salazar, M.R., T. K. Lant, S.M. Fiore, and E. Salas. 2012. “Facilitating Innovation in Diverse Science Teams Through Integrative Capacity.” Small Group Research 43(5):527-558. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1046496412453622.

Sato, S., P.M. Gygax, J. Randall, and M. Schmid Mast. 2021. “The Leaky Pipeline in Research Grant Peer Review and Funding Decisions: Challenges and Future Directions.” Higher Education 82(1):145-162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00626-y.

Schutz, W. 1994. The Human Element: Productivity, Self-Esteem and the Bottom. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.

Seymour, E.S., and N.M. Hewitt. 1997. Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences. Westview Press, Boulder, CO.

Shapin, S. 2008. The Scientific Life: A Moral History of a Late Modern Vocation. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.

Sheltzer, J.M., and J.C. Smith. 2014. “Elite Male Faculty in the Life Sciences Employ Fewer Women.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111(28):10107-10112. http://www.pnas.org/content/111/28/10107.full.pdf.

Slaton, A.E. 2010. Race, Rigor, and Selectivity in U.S. Engineering: The History of an Occupational Color Line. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

Smith, J.L., K.L. Lewis, L. Hawthorne, and S.D. Hodges. 2013. “When Trying Hard Isn’t Natural: Women’s Belonging with and Motivation for Male-Dominated STEM Fields as a Function of Effort Expenditure Concerns.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 39:3-15. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0146167212468332.

Sommers, S.R. 2006. “On Racial Diversity and Group Decision Making: Identifying Multiple Effects of Racial Composition on Jury Deliberations.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 90(4):597-612. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.90.4.597.

Stainback, K., D. Tomaskovic-Devey, and S. Skaggs. 2010. “Organizational Approaches to Inequality: Inertia, Relative Power, and Environments.” Annual Review of Sociology 36:225-247. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-120014.

Stassun, K.G., S. Sturm, K. Holley-Bockelmann, A. Burger, D. Ernst, and D. Webb. 2011. “The Fisk-Vanderbilt Master’s-toPh.D. Bridge Program: Recognizing, Enlisting, and Cultivating Unrealized or Unrecognized Potential in Underrepresented Minority Students.” American Journal of Physics 79:374. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.3546069.

Stets, J., P. Brenner, P. Burke, and R. Serpe. 2016. “The Science Identity and Entering a Science Occupation.” Social Science Research 64:1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.10.016.

Stokols, D., S. Misra, R.P. Moser, K.L. Hall, and B.K. Taylor. 2008. “The Ecology of Team Science—Understanding Contextual Influences on Transdisciplinary Collaboration.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine 35(2):S96-S115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.003.

Strolger, L., and N. Natarajan. 2019. “Doling Out Hubble Time with Dual-Anonymous Evaluation.” Physics Today. https://physicstoday.scitation.org/do/10.1063/PT.6.3.20190301a/full.

Tan, E., H. Kang, T. O’Neill, and A. Calabrese Barton. 2013. “Desiring a Career in STEM-Related Fields: How Middle School Girls Articulate and Negotiate Identities-in-Practice in Science.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 50(10):1143-1179. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21123.

Tao, K.W., and A.M. Gloria. 2019. “Should I Stay or Should I Go? The Role of Impostorism in STEM Persistence.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 43(2):151-164. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0361684318802333.

Thiry, H., T.J. Weston, R.P. Harper, D.G. Holland, A.K. Koch, and B.M. Drake. 2019. Talking About Leaving Revisited. Springer, Boston, MA.

Ting-Toomey, S., and J.G. Oetzel. 2001. Managing Intercultural Conflict Effectively. Sage Publishing, Los Angeles, CA.

Urban, W.J. 2010. More Than Science and Sputnik: The National Defense Education Act of 1958. The University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, AL.

Valantine, H.A., and F.S. Collins. 2015. “National Institutes of Health Addresses the Science of Diversity.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112(40):12240-12242. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1515612112.

Vertesi, J. 2020. Shaping Science: Organizations, Decisions, and Culture of NASA’s Teams. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.

Vertesi, J. 2021. “Shaping Science: Organizations, Decisions, and Culture on NASA’s Teams.” Presentation to the National Academies Committee on Increasing Diversity and Inclusion in the Leadership of Competed Space Missions on April 27.

Vincent-Ruz, P., and C.D. Schunn. 2018. “The Nature of Science Identity and Its Role as the Driver of the Student Choices.” International Journal of STEM Education 5(48).

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Advancing Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility in the Leadership of Competed Space Missions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26385.
×

Waisbren, S.E., H. Bowles, T. Hasan, K.H. Zou, S.J. Emans, C. Goldberg, Sandra Gould, et al. 2008. “Gender Differences in Research Grant Applications and Funding Outcomes for Medical School Faculty.” Journal of Women’s Health 17(2):207-214. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2007.0412.

Wessen, R., C.S. Borden, J.K. Ziemer, R.C. Moeller, J. Ervin, and J. Lang. 2013. “Space Mission Concept Development Using Concept Maturity Levels.” Meeting paper for the AIAA SPACE 2013 Conference and Exposition. California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA. https://trs.jpl.nasa.gov/bitstream/handle/2014/44299/13-3547_A1b.pdf?sequence=1.

White, A.M., J.T. DeCuir-Gunby, and S. Kim. 2019. “A Mixed Methods Exploration of the Relationships Between the Racial Identity, Science Identity, Science Self-Efficacy, and Science Achievement of African American Students at HBCUs.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 57:54-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.11.006.

White, S., G. Anderson, and R. Ivie. 2011a. Results from the 2011 Survey of Solar, Space & Upper Atmospheric Physicists. American Institute of Physics, Statistical Research Center, College Park, MD. http://dx.doi.org/10.7302/25.

White, S., R.Y. Chu, and R. Ivie. 2011b. 2011 Survey of the Planetary Science Workforce. American Institute of Physics, Statistical Research Center, College Park, MD. https://lasp.colorado.edu/home/mop/resources/planetary-science-workforce-survey/2011-planetary-science-survey.

Wu, Y. 2010. “Tackling Undue Concentration of Federal Research Funding: An Empirical Assessment on NSF’s Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research (EPSCoR).” Research Policy 39(6):835-841. https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/respol/v39y2010i6p835-841.html.

Xu, C., and R.E. Lastrapes. 2021. “Impact of STEM Sense of Belonging on Career Interest: The Role of STEM Attitudes.” Journal of Career Development (July). https://doi.org/10.1177%2F08948453211033025.

Zurbuchen, T.H. 2019. “Writing Successful Proposals: Observations from NASA.” Presentation to the National Academies Committee on Increasing Diversity and Inclusion in the Leadership of Competed Space Missions on June 5. NASA Science Mission Directorate. https://smd-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/science-red/s3fs-public/atoms/files/06-05-2019_Zurbuchen_Writing%20Successful%20Proposals_FINAL.pdf.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Advancing Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility in the Leadership of Competed Space Missions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26385.
×

This page intentionally left blank.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Advancing Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility in the Leadership of Competed Space Missions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26385.
×
Page 121
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Advancing Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility in the Leadership of Competed Space Missions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26385.
×
Page 122
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Advancing Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility in the Leadership of Competed Space Missions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26385.
×
Page 123
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Advancing Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility in the Leadership of Competed Space Missions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26385.
×
Page 124
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Advancing Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility in the Leadership of Competed Space Missions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26385.
×
Page 125
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Advancing Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility in the Leadership of Competed Space Missions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26385.
×
Page 126
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Advancing Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility in the Leadership of Competed Space Missions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26385.
×
Page 127
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Advancing Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility in the Leadership of Competed Space Missions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26385.
×
Page 128
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Advancing Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility in the Leadership of Competed Space Missions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26385.
×
Page 129
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Advancing Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility in the Leadership of Competed Space Missions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26385.
×
Page 130
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Advancing Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility in the Leadership of Competed Space Missions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26385.
×
Page 131
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Advancing Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility in the Leadership of Competed Space Missions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26385.
×
Page 132
Next: Appendixes »
Advancing Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility in the Leadership of Competed Space Missions Get This Book
×
 Advancing Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility in the Leadership of Competed Space Missions
Buy Paperback | $35.00 Buy Ebook | $28.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

Fostering diverse and inclusive teams that are highly skilled, innovative, and productive is critical for maintaining U.S. leadership in space exploration. In recent years, NASA has taken steps to advance diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility (DEIA) in their workforce by releasing its equity action plan, emphasizing how diverse and inclusive teams help maximize scientific returns, and requiring DEIA plans as part of announcements of opportunities. To further its efforts to advance DEIA, the Agency requested the National Academies undertake a study to evaluate ways NASA can address the lack of diversity in space mission leadership.

Advancing Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility in the Leadership of Competed Space Missions outlines near and long-term actions NASA can take to make opportunities for leadership and involvement in competed space missions more accessible, inclusive, and equitable. Report recommendations range from changes to the mission proposal process to investments in STEM education and career pathways. This report makes 15 recommendations for advancing DEIA within NASA's Science Mission Directorate divisions that support competed space mission programs. However, many of the report's recommendations could also be applied broadly to research at NASA and other federal agencies and institutions, leading to a more diverse research workforce.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!