National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: 6 Wrap-Up Discussion
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Improving Consent and Response in Longitudinal Studies of Aging: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26481.
×

References

Abramitzky, R., Boustan, L., Eriksson, K., Feigenbaum, J., and Pérez, S. (2021). Automated linking of historical data. Journal of Economic Literature, 59(3), 865–918. Available: https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20201599.

Biemer, P., Harris, K.M., Halpern, C., Burke, B., and Liao, D. (Forthcoming). Transitioning a panel survey from in-person to predominantly web data collection: Results and lessons learned. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, forthcoming special issue on The Future of Online Data Collection in Social Surveys.

Burton, J., Couper, M.P., Crossley, T.F., Jäckle, A., and Walzenbach, S. (2021). How Do Survey Respondents Decide Whether to Consent to Data Linkage? Understanding Society Working Paper 2021-05. Colchester: University of Essex. Available: https://www.understandingsociety.ac.uk/research/publications/547074.

Büttner, T.J.M., Sakshaug, J.W., and Vicari, B. 2021. Evaluating the utility of linked administrative data for nonresponse bias adjustment in a piggyback longitudinal survey. Journal of Official Statistics, 37(4), 837–864. https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2021-0037.

Grusky, D.B., Smeeding, T.M, and Snipp, C.M. (2015). A New Infrastructure for Monitoring Social Mobility in the United States. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 657(1): 63–82.

Grusky, D.B., Hout, M., Smeeding, T.M., & Snipp, C.M. (2019). The American Opportunity Study: A New Infrastructure for Monitoring Outcomes, Evaluating Policy, and Advancing Basic Science. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 5(2), 20–39. https://doi.org/10.7758/rsf.2019.5.2.02

Harris, K.M., Halpern, C.T., Biemer, P., Liao, D., and Dean, S.C. (2019). Sampling and mixed-mode survey design. Add Health Wave V Documentation. Available: https://addhealth.cpc.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/docs/user_guides/Add-Health-Wave-V-Sampling-andMixed-Mode-Survey-Design_doi.pdf.

Lidz, C.W., Appelbaum, P.S., and Meisel, A. (1988). Two models of implementing informed consent. Archives of Internal Medicine, 148(6), 1385–1389.

Miller, F.G., and Wertheimer, A. (2010). Preface to a theory of consent transactions: Beyond valid consent. The Ethics of Consent: Theory and Practice, 79–105.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Improving Consent and Response in Longitudinal Studies of Aging: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26481.
×

Peytchev, A., Pratt, D., and Duprey, M. (2022). Responsive and adaptive survey design: Use of bias propensity during data collection to reduce nonresponse bias. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, 10(1), 131–148.

Radler, B.T., and Ryff, C.D. (2010). Who participates? Accounting for longitudinal retention in the MIDUS national study of health and well-being. Journal of Aging and Health, 22, 307–331.

Sakshaug, J.W., and Huber, M. (2016). An evaluation of panel nonresponse and linkage consent bias in a survey of employees in Germany. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, 4(1), 71–93.

Sakshaug, J.W., and Kreuter, F. (2012). Assessing the Magnitude of Non-Consent Biases in Linked Survey and Administrative Data. Survey Research Methods, 6(2), 113–122.

Silverwood, R.J., Calderwood, L., Sakshaug, J.W., and Ploubidis, G.B. (2020). A Data Driven Approach to Understanding and Handling Non-Response in the Next Steps Cohort. CLS Working Paper 2020/5. London: UCL Centre for Longitudinal Studies. Available: https://cls.ucl.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/CLS-working-paper-2020-5-A-data-driven-approach-to-understanding-and-handling-non-response-in-the-Next-Steps-cohort.pdf.

Song, J., Radler, B.T., Lachman, M.E., Mailick, M.R., Yajuan, S., and Ryff, C.D. (2021). Who returns? Understanding varieties of longitudinal participation in MIDUS. Journal of Aging and Health, 33, 896–907. Available: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/08982643211018552.

Ward, Z. (2021). Intergenerational Mobility in American History: Accounting for Race and Measurement Error. NBER Working Paper Series. Available: https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w29256/w29256.pdf.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Improving Consent and Response in Longitudinal Studies of Aging: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26481.
×
Page 101
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Improving Consent and Response in Longitudinal Studies of Aging: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26481.
×
Page 102
Next: Appendix A: Public Meeting Agenda »
Improving Consent and Response in Longitudinal Studies of Aging: Proceedings of a Workshop Get This Book
×
 Improving Consent and Response in Longitudinal Studies of Aging: Proceedings of a Workshop
Buy Paperback | $25.00 Buy Ebook | $20.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

This Proceedings of a Workshop summarizes the presentations and discussions at the Workshop on Improving Consent and Response in Longitudinal Studies of Aging, which was held virtually and live-streamed on September 27-28, 2021. The workshop was convened by the Committee on National Statistics of the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine to assist the National Institute on Aging (NIA) with its methodological research agenda and inform the different longitudinal survey programs sponsored by NIA about practices and research to improve response and consent in other survey programs. The workshop was structured to bring together scientists and researchers from multiple disciplines and countries to share their research and insights on how to improve response and consent in large, representative longitudinal studies on aging.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!