National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Appendix E - Transforming Quantified to Monetized Benefits
Page 73
Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Guidelines for Quantifying Benefits of Traffic Incident Management Strategies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26486.
×
Page 73
Page 74
Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Guidelines for Quantifying Benefits of Traffic Incident Management Strategies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26486.
×
Page 74
Page 75
Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Guidelines for Quantifying Benefits of Traffic Incident Management Strategies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26486.
×
Page 75
Page 76
Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Guidelines for Quantifying Benefits of Traffic Incident Management Strategies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26486.
×
Page 76
Page 77
Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Guidelines for Quantifying Benefits of Traffic Incident Management Strategies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26486.
×
Page 77

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

73   Bibliography Ardenkani, S., E. Hauer, and J. Bahram. 1975; revised 1992. Revised Monograph on Traffic Flow Theory, Chapter 7. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/operations/tft/. Accessed March 15, 2016. Arizona Department of Transportation. An Overview of Our Traffic Incident Management Initiative, an unpub- lished PowerPoint presentation, June 4, 2012. Battelle Memorial Institute. 2002. Regional Emergency Action Coordination Team (REACT) Evaluation. Maricopa County Department of Transportation, Phoenix, AZ. Beaty, C., M. Burris, and T. Geiselbrecht. 2013. Executive Report: Toll Roads, Toll Rates, and Driver Behavior. Final Report, Report 0-6737-1. Texas A&M Transportation Institute, College Station, TX Blincoe, L. J., T. R. Miller, E. Zaloshnja, and B. A. Lawrence. 2015. The Economic and Societal Impact of Motor Vehicle Crashes, 2010. (Revised). Report No. DOT HS 812 013. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC. Cambridge Systematics. 1990. Incident Management. Trucking Research Institute, Alexandria, VA. Carson, J. L. S. 2010. Report FHWA-HOP-10-050: Best Practices in Traffic Incident Management. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC. https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/fhwahop10050/fhwahop10050.pdf. Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority. 2011. IH35 HERO Program Performance Report to CAMPO. http://www.mobilityauthority.com/IH35%20HERO%20PROGRAM_CAMPO_FINAL%20WITH%20 ATTACHMENTS.pdf. Accessed May 2016. Chang, G., and E. Igbinosun. 2015. Performance Evaluation and Benefit Analysis for CHART in Year 2014. University of Maryland and Office of CHART and ITS Division, State Highway Administration. http://chartinput.umd. edu/reports/CHART_2014_final.pdf. Chang, G. L., and E. Igbinosun. 2015. Draft Report Performance Evaluation and Benefits Analysis for CHART in Year 2015. Office of CHART and ITS Development, State Highway Administration of Maryland. http:// chartinput.umd.edu/reports/CHART_2014_final.pdf. Accessed September 2021. Chang, G. L., W. Kim, and E. Igbinosun. 2013. Performance Evaluation and Benefit Analysis for CHART. Coordinated Highways Action Response Team, Maryland Department of Transportation. Chang, G. L., and J. Y. Point-du-Jour. 2003. Performance Evaluation of CHART—The Real Time Incident Manage- ment System in Year 2002, Final Report. University of Maryland, College Park, MD. Chang, G. L., and M. Raqib. 2013. Performance Evaluation and Benefit Analysis for CHART in Year 2012. Maryland State Highway Administration, Baltimore, MD. Chang, G., and S. Rochon. 2003. Performance Evaluation and Benefit Analysis for CHART in Year 2002. University of Maryland, College Park, MD. Chou, C. S. 2010. Understanding the Impact of Incidents and the Incident Management Programs on Freeway Mobility and Safety. PhD dissertation. University of Maryland, College Park, MD. Chowdhury, M., R. Fries, Y. Ma, A. Dunning, C. Hamlin, K. Ozbay, J. Ogle, and W. Sarasua. 2007. Benefit-Cost Analysis of Accelerated Incident Clearance. Prepared for South Carolina Department of Transportation. Clemson University, Clemson, SC. Conklin, C. A., S. J. Bahler, K. L. Belmore, M. Hallenbeck, J. Ishimura, G. M. Schnell, J. E. Clark, C. E. Curley, R. Kandarpa, D. Hill, and A. But. 2013. Final Report, FHWA-JPO-13-062: Transportation Management Center Data Capture for Performance and Mobility Measures Guidebook. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC. Delcan, 2010. Traffic Incident Management Teams Best Practice Report, I-95 Corridor Coalition. https://tetcoalition. org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/TIMTeamBestPracticesFINALREPORT.pdf. Dougald, L. E. 2007. A Return on Investment Study of the Hampton Roads Safety Service Patrol Program. Virginia Transportation Research Council, Charlottesville, VA.

74 Guidelines for Quantifying Benefits of Traffic Incident Management Strategies Dougald, L. E., and M. J. Demetsky. 2008. Assessing Return on Investment of Freeway Safety Service Patrol Programs. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board No. 2047, pp. 19–27. Farradyne, P. B. 2000. Traffic Incident Management Handbook. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Office of Travel Management, Washington, DC. Federal Bureau of Investigation. 2015. Law Enforcement Officers Killed and Assaulted, [in] 2014. https://ucr.fbi. gov/leoka/2014. Accessed September 21, 2021. Federal Highway Administration, Office of Asset Management. 2003. FHWA Economic Analysis Primer. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC. Federal Highway Administration. 2004. Traffic Incident Management http://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/aboutus/one_pagers/ tim.htm Accessed March 15, 2016. Federal Highway Administration. 2009a. 2009 National Household Transportation Survey. http://nhts.ornl.gov/. Accessed March 10, 2015. Federal Highway Administration. 2009b. Traffic Incident Management Self-Assessment. http://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/ eto_tim_pse/preparedness/tim/self.htm. Accessed March 16, 2015. Federal Highway Administration. 2010. Best Practices in Traffic Incident Management. http://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/ publications/fhwahop10050/ch2.htm. Accessed March 31, 2015. Federal Highway Administration. 2012. Operations Benefit/Cost Analysis Desk Reference. http://www.ops.fhwa. dot.gov/publications/fhwahop12028/index.htm. Accessed March 26, 2015. Federal Highway Administration. 2013a. MAP-21—Fact Sheets—Performance Measurement. https://www.fhwa. dot.gov/map21/factsheets/pm.cfm. Accessed August 14, 2015. Federal Highway Administration. 2013b. Guide for Highway Capacity and Operations Analysis of Active Transportation and Demand Management Strategies, Appendix B, Tables 37–39. http://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/ publications/fhwahop13042/fhwahop13042.pdf. Accessed March 10, 2016. Federal Highway Administration. n.d.(a). Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Chapter 6I.01. http:// mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/HTM/2003r1/part6/part6i.htm. Accessed May 15, 2015. Federal Highway Administration. n.d.(b). Traffic Incident Management—Emergency Transportation Operations. http://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/eto_tim_pse/about/tim.htm. Accessed May 2, 2014. Federal Highway Administration. n.d.(c). FHWA Traffic Incident Management Outreach Toolkit. http://ops. fhwa.dot.gov/eto_tim_pse/timtoolbox/index.htm. Accessed May 15, 2015. Federal Highway Administration. n.d.(e). Work Zone and Traffic Analysis Tools. http://www.ops.fhwa.dot.gov/ wz/traffic_analysis/tools.htm. Accessed March 25, 2015. Federal Highway Administration. n.d.(f). Performance Measurement Fundamentals. Operations Performance Measurement Program. http://www.ops.fhwa.dot.gov/perf_measurement/fundamentals/. Accessed March 15, 2014. Groot, A. D. de. 1969. Methodology: Foundations of Inference and Research in the Behavioral Sciences. Mouton, The Hague. Groves, R. M., F. J. Fowler, M. P. Couper, J. M. Lepkowski, E. Singer, and R. Tourangeau. 2009. Survey Methodology, 2nd ed. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ. Guin, A., C. Porter, B. Smith, and C. Holmes. 2007. Benefits Analysis for Incident Management Program Integrated with Intelligent Transportation System Operations: Case Study. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board No. 2000, pp. 78-87. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3141/2000-10. Haas, K. 2006. Example Strategies for Building Stronger State Traffic Incident Management Programs. National Traffic Incident Management Coalition. http://timnetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/InstitutionalModels.pdf. Hagen, L., Z. Huaguo, and H. Singh. 2005. Road Ranger Benefit-Cost Analysis. Center for Urban Transportation Research and Development, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL. Haghani, A., D. Iliescu, M. Hamedi, and S. Yang. 2006. Methodology for Quantifying the Cost Effectiveness of Freeway Service Patrol Programs: A Case Study. University of Maryland, College Park, MD. Henk, et al. 1997. Before-and-After Analysis of the San Antonio TransGuide System. Presented at 76th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC. Hirunyanitiwattana, W., and S. P. Mattingly. 2006. Identifying Secondary Crash Characteristics for the California Highway System. Presented at 85th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC. Highway Capacity Manual 2010. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC. Institute of Transportation Engineers. n.d. Traffic Management Data Dictionary (TMDD) and Message Sets for External Traffic Management Center Communications (MS/ETMCC) Website. http://www.ite.org/tmdd. Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Carbon. 2013. Technical Update of the Social Costs of Carbon for Regulatory Impact Analysis—Under Executive Order 12866. Technical Document. https://www.epa.gov/ sites/default/files/2016-12/documents/sc_co2_tsd_august_2016.pdf. Accessed September 22, 2021. Jin, X., S. Hossan, A. Gin, and D. Chen. 2014. Comprehensive Framework for Planning and Assessment of Traffic Incident Management. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2470, pp. 1–12.

Bibliography 75   Kabengele, M. 1994. Secondary Incidents: Queue Monitoring and Protection. Maryland State Highway Adminis- tration, Annapolis, MD. Karlaftis, M., S. Latoski, N. Richards, and K. Sinha. 1999. ITS Impacts on Safety and Traffic Management: An Investigation of Secondary Crash Causes. Intelligent Transportation Systems Journal, Vol. 5, Issue 1. Khalilzadeh, Z. 2020. Benefit-Cost Analysis of the Iowa Department of Transportation’s Safety Service Patrol Program. Iowa State University, Ames, IA. Khattak, A., and N. Rouphail. 2004. Incident Management Assistance Patrols: Assessment of Investment Benefits and Costs. Report No. NCDOT 2003-06. North Carolina Department of Transportation, Raleigh, NC. Khattak, A., X. Wang, H. Zhang, and M. Cetin. 2011. Primary and Secondary Incident Management: Predicting Durations in Real Time. Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA. Kuhn, B., L. Higgins, A. Nelson, M. Finley, G. Ullman, S. Chrysler, K. Wunderlich, V. Shah, and C. Dudek. 2012. Final Report, SHRP2-L14: Effectiveness of Different Approaches to Disseminating Traveler Information on Travel Time Reliability. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC. Latoski, S., R. Pal, and K. Sinha. 1998. An Evaluation of the Cost Effectiveness of the Hoosier Helper Program and Framework for the Design of ITS Optimal System Configuration, Phase 1. Report No. FHWA/IN/JTRP-97/9. Indiana Department of Transportation, West Lafayette, IN. Lin, P., A. Fabregas, H. Chen, H. Zhou, and Q. Wang. 2012. Review and Update of Road Ranger Cost Benefit Analysis. Prepared for the Florida Department of Transportation, Tallahassee, FL. Lindley, J. A. 1987. Urban Freeway Congestion: Quantification of the Problem and Effectiveness of Potential Solution. ITE Journal, Vol. 57, pp. 27–32. Lomax,T., and L. Simcic. 2016. Review of Literature and Practices for Incident Management Programs: Technical Report. Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, TX. Masinick, J. P., and H. Teng. 2004. An Analysis on the Impact of Rubbernecking on Urban Freeway Traffic. Report No. UVACTS-15-0-62. University of Virginia–Center for Transportation Studies, Charlottesville, VA. Minnesota DOT. 2004. Minnesota Department of Transportation FIRST Program Evaluation. Minnesota Depart- ment of Transportation. http://www.dot.state.mn.us/rtmc/reports/first/2004FIRSTprogramEvaluation.pdf. Accessed March 2015. Moore, F., and D. Diaz. 2015. Temperature Impacts on Economic Growth Warrant Stringent Mitigation Policy. Nature Climate Change, Vol. 5, pp. 127–131. Moore, J. E., G. Giuliano, and S. Cho. 2004. Secondary Accident Rates on Los Angeles Freeways. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 130, No. 5, pp. 280–285. Morris, M., and W. Lee. 1994. Survey of Efforts to Evaluate Freeway Service Patrols. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1446, pp. 77–85. Moss, S. D. 2012. A Benefit-Cost Model for Traffic Incident Management. MS thesis. University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Traffic Safety Facts 2011 (2011 National Statistics). National Center for Statistics and Analysis, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC. https://crashstats. nhtsa.dot.gov/#!/DocumentTypeList/12. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). 2012. Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards for MY 2017-MY 2025 Passenger Cars and Light Trucks; Final Regulatory Impact Analysis. Office of Regulatory Analysis and Evaluation, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC. Nee, J., and M. Hallenbeck. 2001. Evaluation of the Service Patrol Program in the Puget Sound Region. Washington State Transportation Center (TRAC), University of Washington, Seattle, WA. Newgard, C., R. Schmicker, J. Hedges, J. Trickett, D. Davis, E. Bulger, T. Aufderheide, J. Minei, J. Hata, K. Gubler, T. Brown, J. Yelle, B. Bardarson, and G. Nichol. 2009. Emergency Medical Services Intervals and Survival in Trauma: Assessment of the “Golden Hour” in a North American Prospective Cohort. Annals of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 55, Issue 3, pp. 235–246. www.annemergmed.com/article/S0196-0644(09)01284-0/abstract. New Jersey Department of Transportation. 2016. NJDOT Safety Service Patrol Brochure. http://www.state.nj.us/ transportation/commuter/motoristassistance/pdf/commentcard.pdf. Accessed March 26, 2016. Noblis, University of Maryland Center for Advanced Transportation Technology, and Harper’s Enterprise. 2014. Guidance on Quantifying Benefits of Traffic Incident Management Strategies. Presented in the T3 Webinar Series. Office of Management and Budget. 1992. Circular A-94: Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit-Cost Analysis of Federal Programs. https://www.wbdg.org/ffc/fed/omb-circulars/a94. Accessed September 22, 2021. Office of Management and Budget. 2013. Circular A-4: Regulatory Analysis. https://obamawhitehouse.archives. gov/omb/circulars_a004_a-4/. Accessed September 22, 2021. Owens, N., A. Armstrong, P. Sullivan, C. Mitchell, D. Newton, R. Brewster, and T. Trago. 2010. Traffic Incident Management Handbook. Science Applications International Corporation, McLean, VA, for the U.S. Depart- ment of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration.

76 Guidelines for Quantifying Benefits of Traffic Incident Management Strategies Pecheux, K. K., J. Holzbach, and R. E. Brydia. 2014. Final Report, NCHRP 07-20: Guidance for Imple- mentation of Traffic Incident Management Performance Measurement. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC. Pecheux, K. K., V. Shah, and C. O’Donnell. 2016. Making the Business Case for Traffic Incident Management, Report FHWA-HOP-16-084. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC. https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/ publications/fhwahop16084/index.htm. Professional Capacity Building Program. 2014. Saving Lives and Keeping Traffic Moving: Quantifying the Outcomes of Traffic Incident Management (TIM) Programs. Presentation for T3 Webinar, Intelligent Transportation Systems Joint Program Office. https://www.pcb.its.dot.gov/t3/s140731_TIM_programs.asp. Analysis of Survey Response. September 2014. Raub, R. A. 1997. Secondary Crashes: An Important Component of Roadway Incident Management. Trans- portation Quarterly, Vol. 51, No. 3, pp. 93–104. Rensel, E., D. Lebo, B. Graves, K. Malarich, and C. Yorks. 2012. Traffic Incident Management Cost Management and Cost Recovery Primer, Report FHWA-HOP-12-044. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC. https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/fhwahop12044/index.htm. Salimol, T. 2007. Modeling of Freeway Air Quality during Recurring and Nonrecurring Congestion. PhD dissertation. Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN. Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. 2004. FIRST Program Evaluation. Prepared for Minnesota Department of Transportation. Short Elliott Hendrickson, St. Paul, MN. Skabardonis, A., K. Petty, H. Noeimi, D. Rydzewski, and P. P. Varaiya. 1998. I-880 Field Experiment: Data-Base Development and Incident Delay Estimation Procedures. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1554, pp. 204–212. Sun, C., and R. Chilukuri. 2007. Secondary Accident Data Fusion for Assessing Long-Term Performance of Transportation Systems. Midwest Transportation Consortium, Ames, IA. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/intrans_ reports/164/. Accessed September 22, 2021. Sun, C., V. Chilukuri, T. Ryan, and M. Trueblood. 2010. Evaluation of Freeway Motorist Assist Program. Prepared for the Missouri Department of Transportation and Federal Highway Administration. University of Missouri, Columbia, MO. Sun, C. (Univ. of Missouri–Columbia) and V. Chilukuri, T. Ryan, and M. Trueblood (HDR Engineering). 2009. Evaluation of Freeway Motorist Assist Program. University of Missouri–Columbia Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. Tennessee Department of Transportation. 2014. Tennessee Department of Transportation HELP Program and Transportation Management Centers Annual Operations Report: July 1, 2013–June 30, 2014, Traffic Operations Division, http://kms.timnetwork.org/article/AA-00357/0/TDOT-HELP-Program-and-Transportation- Management-Centers-Annual-Operations-Report-2014, then download file under attachments. Texas A&M Transportation Institute. 2014. Urban Mobility Report, 2014 data. TTI, College Station, TX. https://mobility.tamu.edu/umr/. U.S. Department of Transportation. 2013. Departmental Guidance on Valuation of a Statistical Life in Economic Analysis. U.S. DOT, Washington, DC. https://www.transportation.gov/office-policy/transportation-policy/ revised-departmental-guidance-on-valuation-of-a-statistical-life-in-economic-analysis. U.S. Department of Transportation Office of Economic and Strategic Analysis. 2014. Guidance on Treatment of the Economic Value of a Statistical Life. https://www.transportation.gov/sites/dot.gov/files/docs/VSL_ Guidance_2014.pdf. Accessed September 22, 2021. U.S. Department of Transportation. 2016. Revised Departmental Guidance on Valuation of Travel Time in Economic Analysis. U.S. DOT, Washington, DC. https://www.transportation.gov/sites/dot.gov/files/docs/2016%20 Revised%20Value%20of%20Travel%20Time%20Guidance.pdf. U.S. Department of Transportation. 2021. Benefit-Cost Analysis Guidance for Discretionary Grant Programs. U.S. DOT, Washington, DC. https://www.transportation.gov/sites/dot.gov/files/2021-02/Benefit%20Cost%20 Analysis%20Guidance%202021.pdf. U.S. Department of Transportation Office of the Secretary. 2011. Revised Departmental Guidance on Valuation of Travel Time in Economic Analysis. http://www.dot.gov/sites/dot.gov/files/docs/vot_guidance_092811c_0. pdf. Accessed March 26, 2014. Virginia Department of Transportation. 2013. Hampton Roads Transportation Operations Center 2013 Annual Report. https://www.virginiadot.org/travel/resources/Hampton_Roads/HRTOC_2013_Annual_Report.pdf. Accessed September 22, 2021. Virginia Department of Transportation. 2014. Hampton Roads Transportation Operations Center 2011 Annual Report. http://www.virginiadot.org/travel/resources/Hampton_Roads/HRTOC_2014_Annual_Report.pdf. Accessed March 10, 2015.

Bibliography 77   Wang, Y., R. Yu, Y. Lao, and T. Thomson. 2011. Quantifying Incident-Induced Travel Delays on Freeways Using Traffic Sensor Data: Phase II. Washington State Transportation Center (TRAC), University of Washington, Seattle, WA. http://depts.washington.edu/trac/bulkdisk/pdf/758.1.pdf. Washington State Department of Transportation. https://wsdot.wa.gov/accountability/gray-notebook/home. Last accessed September 2021. Zegeer, J., J. Bonneson, R. Dowling, P. Ryus, M. Vandehey, W. Kittelson, N. Rouphail, B. Schroeder, A. Hajbabaie, B. Aghdashi, T. Chase, S. Sajjadi, M. Margiotta, and L. Elefteriadou. 2014. Final Report, SHRP2-L08: Incorporating Travel Time Reliability into the Highway Capacity Manual. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

Next: Acronyms and Abbreviations »
Guidelines for Quantifying Benefits of Traffic Incident Management Strategies Get This Book
×
 Guidelines for Quantifying Benefits of Traffic Incident Management Strategies
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

Ensuring a coordinated response to highway crashes and other incidents is vital to protecting public safety, keeping traffic moving, and reducing environmental impacts.

The TRB National Cooperative Highway Research Program's NCHRP Research Report 981: Guidelines for Quantifying Benefits of Traffic Incident Management Strategies aims to offer guidance on Traffic Incident Management (TIM) programs, which can vary widely and may have different goals, guidelines, and methods applicable under a variety of data scenarios.

Supplemental to the report is NCHRP Web-Only Document 301: Development of Guidelines on Quantifying Benefits of Traffic Incident Management Strategies, an Implementation Plan, and a Summary Presentation.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!