National Academies Press: OpenBook
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Merits and Viability of Different Nuclear Fuel Cycles and Technology Options and the Waste Aspects of Advanced Nuclear Reactors. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26500.
×
Image

Merits and Viability of Different
Nuclear Fuel Cycles and Technology
Options and the Waste Aspects of
Advanced Nuclear Reactors

______

Committee on Merits and Viability of Different
Nuclear Fuel Cycles and Technology Options and
the Waste Aspects of Advanced Nuclear Reactors

Nuclear and Radiation Studies Board

Division on Earth and Life Studies

Board on Energy and Environmental Systems

Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences


Consensus Study Report

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Merits and Viability of Different Nuclear Fuel Cycles and Technology Options and the Waste Aspects of Advanced Nuclear Reactors. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26500.
×

NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS 500 Fifth Street, NW Washington, DC 20001

This activity was supported by contract DE-EP0000026/89243220FNE400048 between the National Academy of Sciences and the U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Nuclear Energy. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of any organization or agency that provided support for the project.

International Standard Book Number-13: 978-0-309-29508-6
International Standard Book Number-10: 0-309-29508-4
Digital Object Identifier: https://doi.org/10.17226/26500

This publication is available from the National Academies Press, 500 Fifth Street, NW, Keck 360, Washington, DC 20001; (800) 624-6242 or (202) 334-3313; http://www.nap.edu.

Copyright 2023 by the National Academy of Sciences. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine and National Academies Press and the graphical logos for each are all trademarks of the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.

Printed in the United States of America.

Suggested citation: National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Merits and Viability of Different Nuclear Fuel Cycles and Technology Options and the Waste Aspects of Advanced Nuclear Reactors. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/26500.

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Merits and Viability of Different Nuclear Fuel Cycles and Technology Options and the Waste Aspects of Advanced Nuclear Reactors. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26500.
×

The National Academy of Sciences was established in 1863 by an Act of Congress, signed by President Lincoln, as a private, nongovernmental institution to advise the nation on issues related to science and technology. Members are elected by their peers for outstanding contributions to research. Dr. Marcia McNutt is president.

The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964 under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences to bring the practices of engineering to advising the nation. Members are elected by their peers for extraordinary contributions to engineering. Dr. John L. Anderson is president.

The National Academy of Medicine (formerly the Institute of Medicine) was established in 1970 under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences to advise the nation on medical and health issues. Members are elected by their peers for distinguished contributions to medicine and health. Dr. Victor J. Dzau is president.

The three Academies work together as the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine to provide independent, objective analysis and advice to the nation and conduct other activities to solve complex problems and inform public policy decisions. The National Academies also encourage education and research, recognize outstanding contributions to knowledge, and increase public understanding in matters of science, engineering, and medicine.

Learn more about the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine at www.nationalacademies.org.

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Merits and Viability of Different Nuclear Fuel Cycles and Technology Options and the Waste Aspects of Advanced Nuclear Reactors. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26500.
×

Consensus Study Reports published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine document the evidence-based consensus on the study’s statement of task by an authoring committee of experts. Reports typically include findings, conclusions, and recommendations based on information gathered by the committee and the committee’s deliberations. Each report has been subjected to a rigorous and independent peer-review process and it represents the position of the National Academies on the statement of task.

Proceedings published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine chronicle the presentations and discussions at a workshop, symposium, or other event convened by the National Academies. The statements and opinions contained in proceedings are those of the participants and are not endorsed by other participants, the planning committee, or the National Academies.

Rapid Expert Consultations published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine are authored by subject-matter experts on narrowly focused topics that can be supported by a body of evidence. The discussions contained in rapid expert consultations are considered those of the authors and do not contain policy recommendations. Rapid expert consultations are reviewed by the institution before release.

For information about other products and activities of the National Academies, please visit www.nationalacademies.org/about/whatwedo.

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Merits and Viability of Different Nuclear Fuel Cycles and Technology Options and the Waste Aspects of Advanced Nuclear Reactors. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26500.
×

COMMITTEE ON MERITS AND VIABILITY OF DIFFERENT NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLES AND TECHNOLOGY OPTIONS AND THE WASTE ASPECTS OF ADVANCED NUCLEAR REACTORS

JANICE DUNN LEE (Chair), International Atomic Energy Agency (retired), Bethesda, Maryland

PATRICIA A. BAISDEN (Vice Chair), Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (retired), Houston, Texas

RODNEY C. EWING (NAE) (Vice Chair), Stanford University, Stanford, California (until July 21, 2022)

MARGARET S. Y. CHU (NAE), M.S. Chu and Associates, LLC, New York, New York

PAUL T. DICKMAN, Argonne National Laboratory, Washington, District of Columbia

CRAIG S. HANSEN, Independent Consultant, Clinton, Tennessee

JOHN C. LEE, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (until September 16, 2022)

EDWIN S. LYMAN, Union of Concerned Scientists, Washington, District of Columbia

ALLISON M. MACFARLANE, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

ALBERT J. MACHIELS, Electric Power Research Institute (retired)

CHRISTOPHE POINSSOT, Bureau de Recherches Géologiques et Minières (BRGM), Paris, France

JEFFREY D. SEMANCIK, Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection, Hartford

KEN B. SORENSON, Sandia National Laboratories (retired)

JASMINA L. VUJIC, University of California, Berkeley (until September 16, 2022)

NATHALIE A. WALL, University of Florida, Gainesville

HOUSTON G. WOOD, University of Virginia, Charlottesville (until September 16, 2021)

Staff

CHARLES D. FERGUSON, Study Director and Senior Board Director, Nuclear and Radiation Studies Board (NRSB) and Board on Chemical Sciences and Technology, Division on Earth and Life Studies (DELS)

OURANIA KOSTI, Senior Program Officer, NRSB, DELS

CATHERINE F. WISE, Program Officer and Co–Study Director (from July 2022), Board on Energy and Environmental Systems, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences

LAURA D. LLANOS, Finance Business Partner

DARLENE GROS, Senior Program Assistant

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Merits and Viability of Different Nuclear Fuel Cycles and Technology Options and the Waste Aspects of Advanced Nuclear Reactors. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26500.
×

NUCLEAR AND RADIATION STUDIES BOARD

WILLIAM H. TOBEY (Chair), Los Alamos National Laboratory, New Mexico

AMY BERRINGTON DE GONZÁLEZ (Vice Chair), National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland

SALLY A. AMUNDSON, Columbia University, New York, New York

STEVEN M. BECKER, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia

MADELYN R. CREEDON, The George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia

LAWRENCE T. DAUER, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York

SHAHEEN A. DEWJI, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia

PAUL T. DICKMAN, Argonne National Laboratory, Washington, District of Columbia

DONALD P. FRUSH, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina

ALLISON M. MACFARLANE, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

ELEANOR MELAMED, U.S. National Nuclear Security Administration (retired), Arlington, Virginia

PER F. PETERSON (NAE), University of California, Berkeley

R. JULIAN PRESTON, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Chapel Hill, North Carolina

MONICA C. REGALBUTO, Idaho National Laboratory, Idaho Falls

Staff

CHARLES D. FERGUSON, Senior Board Director

JENNIFER HEIMBERG, Senior Program Officer

MICHAEL T. JANICKE, Senior Program Officer

OURANIA KOSTI, Senior Program Officer

LESLIE BEAUCHAMP, Senior Program Assistant

DARLENE GROS, Senior Program Assistant

LAURA D. LLANOS, Finance Business Partner

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Merits and Viability of Different Nuclear Fuel Cycles and Technology Options and the Waste Aspects of Advanced Nuclear Reactors. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26500.
×

BOARD ON ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS

JARED L. COHON (NAE) (Chair), Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

VICKY BAILEY, Anderson Stratton Enterprises, LLC, BHMM Energy Services, LLC, Washington, District of Columbia

CARLA BAILO, Center for Automotive Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan

DEEPAKRAJ M. DIVAN (NAE), Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia

MARCIUS EXTAVOUR, XPRIZE Foundation, Culver City, California

T. J. GLAUTHIER, TJG Energy Associates, LLC, Moss Beach, California

PAULA GLOVER, Alliance to Save Energy, Washington, District of Columbia

AMOS N. GOLDHABER, Claremont Creek Ventures, Berkeley, California

DENISE GRAY (NAE), LG Energy Solution Michigan, Inc., Farmington Hills, Michigan

JENNIFER R. HOLMGREN (NAE), LanzaTech, Skokie, Illinois

JOHN G. KASSAKIAN (NAE), Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts

MICHAEL LAMACH, Trane Technologies (retired), Cornelius, North Carolina

JOSÉ G. SANTIESTEBAN (NAE), ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company (retired), Spring, Texas

ALEXANDER H. SLOCUM, SR. (NAE), Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts

SUSAN F. TIERNEY, Analysis Group, Aurora, Colorado

GORDON VAN WELIE (NAE), ISO New England, Inc., Holyoke, Massachusetts

DAVID G. VICTOR, University of California, San Diego

Staff

K. JOHN HOLMES, Director/Scholar

ELIZABETH ZEITLER, Associate Director

BRENT HEARD, Program Officer

KASIA KORNECKI, Program Officer

CATHERINE WISE, Program Officer

REBECCA DEBOER, Research Associate

KYRA HOWE, Research Assistant

JASMINE BRYANT, Research Assistant

KAIA RUSSELL, Program Assistant

HEATHER LOZOWSKI, Financial Manager

Page viii Cite
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Merits and Viability of Different Nuclear Fuel Cycles and Technology Options and the Waste Aspects of Advanced Nuclear Reactors. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26500.
×

This page intentionally left blank.

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Merits and Viability of Different Nuclear Fuel Cycles and Technology Options and the Waste Aspects of Advanced Nuclear Reactors. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26500.
×

Acknowledgments

A number of people and organizations contributed to the successful completion of this report. The committee thanks the U.S. Department of Energy, which sponsored the study, and Dr. Erica Bickford, who served ably as the sponsor liaison to the committee.

The committee also thanks the presenters and speakers who gave high-quality presentations during the public meetings, as listed in Appendix B, and the organizations, companies, and agencies represented by the presenters for the information they provided to the committee.

The committee is grateful to the staff of the Nuclear and Radiation Studies Board (NRSB) and the Board on Energy and Environmental Systems (BEES) of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine for organizing and facilitating this study. Study director Dr. Charles D. Ferguson and staff organized the committee meetings and assisted the committee with collecting the information it needed to write its report. The committee thanks especially Dr. Rania Kosti (NRSB) and Dr. Catherine Wise (BEES), who helped draft and organize the report, as well as Darlene Gros (NRSB), who managed the logistics of the meetings, report review, and publication. These additional National Academies staff assisted with report production: Kasia Kornecki (BEES), Lauren Everett, and Radiah Rose.

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Merits and Viability of Different Nuclear Fuel Cycles and Technology Options and the Waste Aspects of Advanced Nuclear Reactors. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26500.
×

This page intentionally left blank.

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Merits and Viability of Different Nuclear Fuel Cycles and Technology Options and the Waste Aspects of Advanced Nuclear Reactors. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26500.
×

Reviewers

This Consensus Study Report was reviewed in draft form by individuals chosen for their diverse perspectives and technical expertise. The purpose of this independent review is to provide candid and critical comments that will assist the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine in making each published report as sound as possible, and to ensure that it meets the institutional standards for quality, objectivity, evidence, and responsiveness to the study charge. The review comments and draft manuscript remain confidential to protect the integrity of the deliberative process.

We thank the following individuals for their review of this report:

TODD ALLEN, University of Michigan

ROBERT A. BARI, Brookhaven National Laboratory

BRIAN BOYER, International Atomic Energy Agency

ROBERT J. BUDNITZ (NAE), Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (retired)

MARK DEINERT, Colorado School of Mines

JACK EDLOW, Edlow International

ROBERT T. JUBIN, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (retired)

JOHN KESSLER, J. Kessler and Associates, LLC

WARREN F. “PETE” MILLER, JR. (NAE), Texas A&M University

ANDREW SOWDER, Electric Power Research Institute

PAUL J. TURINSKY (NAE), North Carolina State University

JOHN VIENNA, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

PAUL P. H. WILSON, University of Wisconsin–Madison

Although the reviewers listed above provided many constructive comments and suggestions, they were not asked to endorse the conclusions or recommendations of this report, nor did they see the final draft before its release. The review of this report was overseen by DAVID E. DANIEL (NAE), The University of Texas at Dallas (president emeritus), and DAVID W. JOHNSON, JR. (NAE), Bell Labs, Lucent Technologies (retired). They were responsible for making certain that an independent examination of this report was carried out in accordance with the standards of the National Academies and that all review comments were carefully considered. Responsibility for the final content rests entirely with the authoring committee and the National Academies.

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Merits and Viability of Different Nuclear Fuel Cycles and Technology Options and the Waste Aspects of Advanced Nuclear Reactors. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26500.
×

This page intentionally left blank.

Page xiii Cite
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Merits and Viability of Different Nuclear Fuel Cycles and Technology Options and the Waste Aspects of Advanced Nuclear Reactors. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26500.
×
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Merits and Viability of Different Nuclear Fuel Cycles and Technology Options and the Waste Aspects of Advanced Nuclear Reactors. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26500.
×

4.2 Front End of the Fuel Cycle to Support Fuel Production for Advanced Nuclear Reactors

4.3 Back End of the Fuel Cycle

4.4 Cost Estimation of Different Fuel Cycle Options

4.5 Fuel Cycle Safety Considerations

5 MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL OF NUCLEAR WASTE FROM ADVANCED REACTORS

5.1 Chapter 5 Summary, Findings, and Recommendations

5.2 The U.S. Nuclear Waste Management and Disposal Program

5.3 The Concept of Geologic Disposal of Highly Radioactive Nuclear Waste

5.4 What Matters?: What the Committee Learned from the Experts

5.5 Specific Waste Issues That Arise from Advanced Nuclear Reactors and Fuel Cycles

5.6 Potential Impacts of Advanced Nuclear Fuel Cycle Wastes on Storage and Transportation Operations

5.7 An Overview of Decontamination and Decommissioning of Nuclear Power Plants

6 NONPROLIFERATION IMPLICATIONS AND SECURITY RISKS

6.1 Chapter 6 Summary, Findings, and Recommendations

6.2 Background on Nonproliferation, Nuclear Material Safeguards, and Nuclear Security

6.3 Evaluation of Nonproliferation Implications and Security Risks of Advanced Reactors’ Fuels and Fuel Cycles

REFERENCES

APPENDIXES

A BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES OF THE COMMITTEE AND PROJECT STAFF

B PRESENTATIONS AT THE COMMITTEE’S INFORMATION-GATHERING MEETINGS

C ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

D RADIOACTIVE WASTE CLASSIFICATIONS AND WASTE CHARACTERISTICS FROM DIFFERENT STAGES OF THE FUEL CYCLE IN THE UNITED STATES

E FUEL CYCLE CHARACTERISTICS AND GEOLOGIC REPOSITORY METRICS OF ADVANCED NUCLEAR REACTORS

F SAMPLE LIST OF NATIONAL ACADEMIES REPORTS ON NUCLEAR WASTE MANAGEMENT

G REPROCESSING AND GEOLOGIC DISPOSAL OF TRISO FUEL

H REPROCESSING AND RECYCLING PRACTICES IN OTHER COUNTRIES

I STATEMENT OF TASK FOR PARALLEL NATIONAL ACADEMIES’ STUDY LAYING THE FOUNDATION FOR NEW AND ADVANCED NUCLEAR REACTORS IN THE UNITED STATES

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Merits and Viability of Different Nuclear Fuel Cycles and Technology Options and the Waste Aspects of Advanced Nuclear Reactors. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26500.
×
Page R1
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Merits and Viability of Different Nuclear Fuel Cycles and Technology Options and the Waste Aspects of Advanced Nuclear Reactors. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26500.
×
Page R2
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Merits and Viability of Different Nuclear Fuel Cycles and Technology Options and the Waste Aspects of Advanced Nuclear Reactors. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26500.
×
Page R3
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Merits and Viability of Different Nuclear Fuel Cycles and Technology Options and the Waste Aspects of Advanced Nuclear Reactors. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26500.
×
Page R4
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Merits and Viability of Different Nuclear Fuel Cycles and Technology Options and the Waste Aspects of Advanced Nuclear Reactors. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26500.
×
Page R5
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Merits and Viability of Different Nuclear Fuel Cycles and Technology Options and the Waste Aspects of Advanced Nuclear Reactors. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26500.
×
Page R6
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Merits and Viability of Different Nuclear Fuel Cycles and Technology Options and the Waste Aspects of Advanced Nuclear Reactors. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26500.
×
Page R7
Page viii Cite
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Merits and Viability of Different Nuclear Fuel Cycles and Technology Options and the Waste Aspects of Advanced Nuclear Reactors. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26500.
×
Page R8
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Merits and Viability of Different Nuclear Fuel Cycles and Technology Options and the Waste Aspects of Advanced Nuclear Reactors. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26500.
×
Page R9
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Merits and Viability of Different Nuclear Fuel Cycles and Technology Options and the Waste Aspects of Advanced Nuclear Reactors. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26500.
×
Page R10
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Merits and Viability of Different Nuclear Fuel Cycles and Technology Options and the Waste Aspects of Advanced Nuclear Reactors. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26500.
×
Page R11
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Merits and Viability of Different Nuclear Fuel Cycles and Technology Options and the Waste Aspects of Advanced Nuclear Reactors. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26500.
×
Page R12
Page xiii Cite
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Merits and Viability of Different Nuclear Fuel Cycles and Technology Options and the Waste Aspects of Advanced Nuclear Reactors. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26500.
×
Page R13
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Merits and Viability of Different Nuclear Fuel Cycles and Technology Options and the Waste Aspects of Advanced Nuclear Reactors. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26500.
×
Page R14
Next: Executive Summary »
Merits and Viability of Different Nuclear Fuel Cycles and Technology Options and the Waste Aspects of Advanced Nuclear Reactors Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $46.00 Buy Ebook | $36.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The United States has deployed commercial nuclear power since the 1950s, and as of 2021, nuclear power accounts for approximately 20 percent of U.S. electricity generation. The current commercial nuclear fleet consists entirely of thermal-spectrum, light water reactors operating with low-enriched uranium dioxide fuel in a once-through fuel cycle. In recent years, the U.S. Congress, U.S. Department of Energy, and private sector have expressed considerable interest in developing and deploying advanced nuclear reactors to augment, and possibly replace, the U.S. operating fleet of reactors, nearly all of which will reach the end of their currently licensed operating lives by 2050. Much of this interest stems from the potential ability of advanced reactors and their associated fuel cycles - as claimed by their designers and developers - to provide a number of advantages, such as improvements in economic competitiveness, reductions in environmental impact via better natural resource utilization and/or lower waste generation, and enhancements in nuclear safety and proliferation resistance.

At the request of Congress, this report explores merits and viability of different nuclear fuel cycles, including fuel cycles that may use reprocessing, for both existing and advanced reactor technologies; and waste management (including transportation, storage, and disposal options) for advanced reactors, and in particular, the potential impact of advanced reactors and their fuel cycles on waste generation and disposal.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!