Practices for Ensuring the Smoothness of Concrete Bridge Decks (2022)

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

50 Abu-Farsakh, M. Y., and Q. Chen. (2014). Field Demonstration of New Bridge Approach Slab Designs and Per- formance. Louisiana Transportation Research Center, Report No. FHWA/LA 13/520. Briaud, J. L., R. W. James, and S. B. Hoffman. (1997). NCHRP Synthesis 234: Settlement of Bridge Approaches (The Bump at the End of the Bridge). TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). (1995). Recording and Coding Guide for Structure Inventory and Appraisal of the Nation’s Bridges. Report Number PD-96-001. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/mtguide.pdf [Accessed May 24, 2021]. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). (2016). Highway Performance Monitoring System. Field Manual. Office of Highway Policy Information. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policyinformation/hpms/fieldmanual/ hpms_field_manual_dec2016.pdf [Accessed May 24, 2021]. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). (2018). Bridge Preservation Guide. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). (2019). Highway Statistics. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policyinformation/ statistics.cfm [Accessed May 24, 2021]. Federal Register. (2017). National Performance Management Measures; Assessing Pavement Condition for the National Highway Performance Program and Bridge Condition for the National Highway Performance Program. Federal Register, Vol. 82, No. 11: 5886–5970. https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/FR-2017-01-18/ 2017-00550 [Accessed May 24, 2021]. Hearn, G. (2020). NCHRP Research Report 950: Proposed AASHTO Guides for Bridge Preservation Actions. Trans- portation Research Board, Washington, DC. Henderson, B., J. Dickes, G. Cimini, and C. Olmedo. (2016). FHWA LTPP Guidelines for Measuring Bridge Approach Transitions using Inertial Profilers. FHWA-HRT-16-072. Federal Highway Administration. Hoppe, E. J. (1999). Guidelines for the Use, Design, and Construction of Bridge Approach Slabs. VTRC 00-R4. Virginia Transportation Research Council, Charlottesville, Virginia. Iowa Department of Transportation (Iowa DOT). (2018). Determining Pavement and Bridge Ride Quality, Test Method IM 341. https://www.iowadot.gov/erl/current/IM/content/341.htm [Accessed May 24, 2021]. Markow, M. J., and W. A. Hyman. (2009). NCHRP Synthesis 397: Bridge Management Systems for Transportation Agency Decision Making. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC. McGhee, K. K. (2002). A New Approach to Measuring the Ride Quality of Highway Bridges. Report No. VTRC 02-R10. Virginia Transportation Research Council, Charlottesville, Virginia. New Jersey Department of Transportation (New Jersey DOT). (2012). Bridge Deck Ride Quality Acceptance Testing Using a Walking Profiler. MP Number 28-12. Bureau of Materials, New Jersey Department of Transportation. Nicks, J. (2020). Synthesis—The Reduction and Analysis of Pavement Profiler Data to Quantify the Bump at the End of the Bridge. FHWA-HRT-20-021. TechNote. Federal Highway Administration. Phares, B. M., D. J. White, J. Bigelow, M. Berns, and J. Zhang. (2011). Identification and Evaluation of Pavement- Bridge Interface Ride Quality Improvement and Corrective Strategies. Institute for Transportation, Iowa State University, Report No. FHWA/OH-2011/1. ProVAL. (2021). View and Analyze Pavement Profiles. http://www.roadprofile.com/ [Accessed March 15, 2021]. Reza, F. (2013). Synthesis of Bridge Approach Panels Best Practices. Center for Transportation Research and Implementation, Minnesota State University, Mankato, Report No. MN/RC 2013-09. Rufino, D., K. Baraka, and M. Darter. (2001). Development of a Bridge Smoothness Specification for Illinois DOT. Report No. FHWA-IL-UI-279. https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/handle/2142/46348 [Accessed March 15, 2021]. Sayers, M. W. (1995). On the Calculation of International Roughness Index from Longitudinal Road Profile. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1501: 1–12. References

References 51   Sayers, M. W., and S. M. Karamihas. (1998). The Little Book of Profiling: Basic Information about Measuring and Interpreting Road Profiles. University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Sayers, M. W., T. D. Gillespie, and C. A. V. Queiroz. (1986). International Experiment to Establish Correlations and Standard Calibration Methods for Road Roughness Measurements. Technical Paper Number 45. World Bank, Washington, DC. Schleppi, B. (2003). How Bridges Affect Ride Quality on Ohio’s Interstate Highway System. New York City Bridge Conference, October 2003, New York, NY. Schleppi, B. (2010). Development of Rideability (IRI) Based Smoothness Specifications for Bridges. Pavement Evalu- ation 2010. Roanoke, Virginia. https://www.vtti.vt.edu/PDFs/PE_2010/Schleppi%20-%20Development%20 of%20Rideability%20(IRI)%20Based%20Smoothness%20Specifications%20for%20Bridges.pdf [Accessed May 24, 2021]. Scofield, L. (1992). Profilograph Limitations, Correlations and Calibration Criteria for Effective Performance-Based Specifications. Final Report, NCHRP Project 20-07, Task 53. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.