National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: 7 Recommending and Prioritizing Promising Practices
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Foundations of a Healthy and Vital Research Community for NASA Science. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26575.
×

References

Allan, E.J. 2011. “Women’s Status in Higher Education: Equity Matters.” AEHE Higher Education Report 37(1):1-163. https://doi.org/10.1002/aehe.3701.

Allen, K.-A., M. L. Kern, C. Rozek, D. McInerney, and G. Slavich. 2021. “Belonging: A Review of Conceptual Issues, an Integrative Framework, and Directions for Future Research.” Australian Journal of Psychology 73(1):87-102. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049530.2021.1883409.

Ancona, D.G., and D.F. Caldwell. 1992. “Demography and Design: Predictors of New Product Team Performance.” Organization Science 3(3):321-341. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.3.3.321.

Austin, A.E. 2002. “Preparing the Next Generation of Faculty: Graduate School as Socialization to the Academic Career.” Journal of Higher Education 73(1):94-122. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2002.11777132.

Bagenal, F. 2021. “The State of the Profession in Solar and Space Physics.” Presentation for the Solar and Space Physics Decadal Strategy: Early-Career Webinar #2—White Papers for the Solar and Space Science Decadal. October 18. Washington, DC: National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. https://www.nationalacademies.org/event/10-18-2021/solar-and-space-physics-decadal-strategy-early-career-webinar-2-white-papers-for-the-solar-and-space-science-decadal.

Bandura, A. 1977. “Self-Efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change.” Psychological Review 84(2):191-215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191.

Baumeister, R., and M. Leary. 1995. “The Need to Belong: Desire for Interpersonal Attachments as a Fundamental Human Motivation.” Psychological Bulletin 117(3):497-529.

Benderly, B.L. 2010. “Does the U.S. Produce Too Many Scientists?” Scientific American February 22. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/does-the-us-produce-too-m.

Bennett, L.M., and H. Gadlin. 2012. “Collaboration and Team Science: From Theory to Practice.” Journal of Investigative Medicine 60(5):768-775. American Federation for Clinical Research. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3652225.

Bitten, B., J. Yoshida, E. Tibor, and C. May. 2016. “Portfolio Mix of NASA Science Missions.” National Academies December 7. https://sites.nationalacademies.org/cs/groups/ssbsite/documents/webpage/ssb_178103.pdf.

Bol, T., M. de Vaan, and A. van de Rijt. 2018. “The Matthew Effect in Science Funding.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115(19):4887-4890. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1719557115.

Bonney, R., T.B. Phillips, H.L. Ballard, and J.W. Enck. 2016. “Can Citizen Science Enhance Public Understanding of Science?” Public Understanding of Science 25(1):2-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515607406.

Brainard, J. 2021. “Funding Agency’s Reviewers Were Biased Against Scientists with Novel Ideas.” ScienceInsider. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.acx9517.

Bras, R.L. 1999. “A Brief History of Hydrology.” Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 80(6):1151-1164. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477-80.6.1151.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Foundations of a Healthy and Vital Research Community for NASA Science. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26575.
×

Burke, R.J. 2007. “Women and Minorities in STEM: A Primer.” Pp. 3-27 in Women and Minorities in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics: Upping the Numbers, R.J. Burke and M.C. Mattis, eds. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Buxner, S. 2021. “L’SPACE Internal Evaluation Report.”

Byars-Winston, A.M., J. Branchaw, C. Pfund, P. Leverett, and J. Newton. 2015. “Culturally Diverse Undergraduate Researchers’ Academic Outcomes and Perceptions of Their Research Mentoring Relationships.” International Journal of Science Education 37(15):2533-2554. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1085133.

Byrne, P., C. Richey, J. Castillo-Rogez, and M. Sykes. 2021. “White Paper on Improvements to the NASA Research and Analysis Proposal and Review System.” http://planetarypolicy.org/whitepapers/ra_proposal_review.pdf.

Carr, E.W., A. Reece, G.R. Kellerman, and A. Robichaux. 2019. “The Value of Belonging at Work.” Harvard Business Review, December 16.

Chamberlain, A. 2017. “Why Do Employees Stay?: A Clear Career Path and Good Pay, for Starters.” Harvard Business Review, March 6. https://hbr.org/2017/03/why-do-employees-stay-a-clear-career-path-and-good-pay-for-starters.

Chang, M.J., M.K. Eagan, M.H. Lin, and S. Hurtado. 2011. “Considering the Impact of Racial Stigmas and Science Identity: Persistence Among Biomedical and Behavioral Science Aspirants.” Journal of Higher Education 82(5):564-596. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2011.11777218.

Choi, S., and H. Rainey. 2009. “Managing Diversity in U.S. Federal Agencies: Effects of Diversity and Diversity Management on Employee Perceptions of Organizational Performance.” Public Administration Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.02115.x.

Chugh, D., and A.P. Brief. 2008. “Was Not That Long Ago: A Story of Gateways and Pathways.” Pp. 318-340 in Cambridge Companions to Management: Diversity at Work, A.P. Brief, ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1017/CBO9780511753725.003.

Clark, R.A., S.L. Harden, and W.B. Johnson. 2000. “Mentor Relationships in Clinical Psychology Doctoral Training: Results of a National Survey.” Teaching of Psychology 27:262. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1207/S15328023TOP2704_04.

Dillman, D.A., J.D. Smyth, and L.M. Christian. 2014. Internet, Phone, Mail, and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method, 4th ed., Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

DiMaggio, P. 1997. “Culture and Cognition.” Annual Review of Sociology 263(1997):263. http://cogweb.ucla.edu/Abstracts/DiMaggio_97.html.

Diniega, S., K. Block, J. Castillo-Rogez, I. Daubar, C. Elder, J. Filiberto, T. Goudge, et al. 2021. “Ensuring a Safe and Equitable Workspace: The Importance and Feasibility of a Code of Conduct (along with clear policies regarding authorship, team membership, etc.),” EDI white paper submitted to Planetary Science and Astrobiology Decadal Survey 2023-2032. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Br8QNQ3Aod8xEtK8M8O_xcLi8tW6IAfMRhX-yDpPZHE/edit.

Dobbin, F., and A. Kalev. 2016. “Why Diversity Programs Fail.” Harvard Business Review, July-August:52-60.

Eby, L.T., T.D. Allen, S.C. Evans, T. Ng, and D. DuBois. 2008. “Does Mentoring Matter? A Multidisciplinary Meta-Analysis Comparing Mentored and Non-Mentored Individuals.” Journal Vocational Behavior 72(2):254-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2007.04.005.

Eby, L.T., and E.L. Dolan. 2015. “Mentoring in Postsecondary Education and Organizational Settings.” Pp. 383-395 in Applications. Vol. 2 of APA Handbook of Career Intervention, P.J. Hartung, M.L. Savickas, and W.B. Walsh, eds. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14439-028.

Fernandez, T., A. Godwin, J. Doyle, D. Verdin, H. Boone, A. Kirn, L. Benson, and G. Potvin. 2016. “More Comprehensive and Inclusive Approaches to Demographic Data Collection.” Paper presented at 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. New Orleans, LA: American Society for Engineering Education 123rd Conference. http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/enegs/60.

Ferrazzi, K., M.-C. Race, and A. Vincent. 2021. “7 Strategies to Build a More Resilient Team.” Harvard Business Review, January 21.

Fine, G.A., and T. Hallett. 2014. “Group Cultures and the Everyday Life of Organizations: Interaction Orders and MesoAnalysis.” Organization Studies. http://oss.sagepub.com/content/early/2014/08/25/0170840614546153.full.pdf+html.

Fiore, S.M. 2008. “Interdisciplinarity as Teamwork: How the Science of Teams Can Inform Team Science.” Small Group Research 39(3):251-277.

Fischer, H.A., and M. Storckdieck. 2021. “L’SPACE External Evaluation Report.”

Flaherty, C. 2021. “Victim, or Astronomy’s Icarus.” Inside Higher Ed November 4. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2021/11/04/astronomer-withdraws-paper-amid-concerns.

Freeman, K. 1999. “No Service Needed?: The Case for Mentoring High-Achieving African American Students.” Peabody Journal of Education 74(2):15-26. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1493073.

FSU (Florida State University). 2017. “Benefits of Diversity in Research Teams.” Center for Global Engagement. https://cge.fsu.edu/article/benefits-diversity-research-teams.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Foundations of a Healthy and Vital Research Community for NASA Science. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26575.
×

Gándara, P., and J. Maxwell-Jolly. 1999. Priming the Pump: Strategies for Increasing the Achievement of Underrepresented Minority Undergraduates. A Report to the Task Force on Minority High Achievement of the College Board. New York: College Entrance Examination Board. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED562803.pdf.

Gasiewski, J.A., M.K. Eagan, G. Garcia, S. Hurtado, and M. Chang. 2012. “From Gatekeeping to Engagement: A Multicontextual, Mixed Method Study of Student Academic Engagement in Introductory STEM Courses.” Research in Higher Education 53:229-261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-011-9247-y.

Giffi, C., P. Wellener, B. Dollar, H.A. Manolian, L. Monck, and C. Moutray. 2018. “The Jobs Are Here, But Where Are the People?: Key Findings from the 2018 Deloitte and the Manufacturing Institute Skills Gap and Future of Work Study.” Deloitte Insights. https://www.themanufacturinginstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/MI-Deloitte-skills-gap-Futureof-Workforce-study-2018.pdf.

Ginther, D.K., J. Basner, U. Jensen, J. Schnell, R. Kington, and W.T. Schaffer. 2018. “Publications as Predictors of Racial and Ethnic Differences in NIH Research Awards.” PLOS ONE 13(11):e0205929. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205929.

Goldin, C., and C. Rouse. 2000. “Orchestrating Impartiality: The Impact of ‘Blind’ Auditions on Female Musicians.” American Economic Review 90(4):715-741.

Gomez, L.E., and P. Bernet. 2019. “Diversity Improves Performance and Outcomes.” Journal of the National Medical Association 111(4):383-392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnma.2019.01.006.

Guillopé, C., and M.-F. Roy, eds. 2020. Survey Question: “Has your career influenced your decisions about children, marriage, or a similar long-term partnership?” Section 3.5, pp. 35-36 in A Global Approach to the Gender Gap in Mathematical, Computing, and Natural Sciences: How to Measure It, How to Reduce It? Gender Gap in Science. https://zenodo.org/record/3882609#.YY0_E1NOm3U.

Hewlett, S.A., M. Marshall, and L. Sherbin. 2013. “How Diversity Can Drive Innovation.” Harvard Business Review, December. https://hbr.org/2013/12/how-diversity-can-drive-innovation.

IOM (Institute of Medicine). 2011. Expanding Underrepresented Minority Participation: America’s Science and Technology Talent at the Crossroads. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

Ivie, R., and S. White. 2020. “Measuring and Analyzing the Gender Gap in Science Through the Global Survey of Scientists.” Pp. 37-81 in A Global Approach to the Gender Gap in Mathematical, Computing, and Natural Sciences: How to Measure It, How to Reduce It? C. Guillopé and M.-F. Roy, eds. https://zenodo.org/record/3882609#.YYK9tp7MKUk.

Ivie, R., S. White, and R.Y. Chu. 2016. “Women’s and Men’s Career Choices in Astronomy and Astrophysics.” Physical Review Physics Education Research 12(2):July-December. American Physical Society. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.020109.

Jacobi, M. 1991. “Mentoring and Undergraduate Academic Success: A Literature Review.” Review of Education Research 61(4):505-532. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543061004505.

Jehn, K.A., and K. Bezrukova. 2004. “A Field Study of Group Diversity, Work Group Context, and Performance.” Journal of Organizational Behavior 25:703-729. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.257.

Johnson, S.K. 2019. Leaking Talent: How People of Color Are Pushed Out of Environmental Organizations. Green 2.0. https://diversegreen.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Green_2.0_Retention_Report.pdf.

Kerzner, H. 2017. Project Management Metrics, KPIs, and Dashboards. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Kormendy, J. 2021. “Metrics of Research Impact in Astronomy: Predicting Later Impact from Metrics Measured 10-15 Years after the PhD,” version 3. https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.14115#.

Krosnik, J.A. 2018. “Questionnaire Design.” Pp. 439-455 in The Palgrave Handbook of Survey Research, D.L. Vannett and J.A. Krosnick, eds. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54395-6_53.

Kulik, C., M.B. Pepper, L. Roberson, and S.K. Parker. 2007. “The Rich Get Richer: Predicting Participation in Voluntary Diversity Training.” Journal of Organizational Behavior 28(6):753-769.

Kunda, G. 1995. “Engineering Culture: Control and Commitment in a High-Tech Corporation.” The Academy of Management Review 6(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.6.2.228.

Lawrence, P.A. 2007. “The Mismeasurement of Science.” Current Biology 17(15):R583-R585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.06.014.

LeClere, F. 2012. “Living in a Soft Money World.” Inside Higher Ed, April 2. https://www.insidehighered.com/advice/2012/04/02/essay-building-career-soft-money-position.

Lungeanu, A., and N. Contractor. 2015. “The Effects of Diversity and Network Ties on Innovations: The Emergence of a New Scientific Field.” American Behavioral Scientist 59(5):548-564.

Ma, Y., S. Mukherjee, and B. Uzzi. 2020. “Mentorship and Protégé Success in STEM Fields.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117(25):14077-14083.

McGee, R., and J.L. Keller. 2007. “Identifying Future Scientists: Predicting Persistence into Research Training.” CBE—Life Sciences Education 6(4):316-331. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.07-04-0020.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Foundations of a Healthy and Vital Research Community for NASA Science. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26575.
×

McLeod, P., S. Lobel, and T. Cox. 1996. “Ethnic Diversity and Creativity in Small Groups.” Small Group Research 27(2):248-264.

McNeil, L., and M. Sher. 1998. “Dual Science-Career Couples: Survey Results.” http://www.physics.wm.edu/~sher/survey.pdf.

Mesmer-Magnus, J.R., D.R. Carter, R. Asencio, and L.A. DeChurch. 2016. “Space Exploration Illuminates the Next Frontier for Teams Research.” Group & Organizational Management 41(5):595-628. https://atlas.soc.northwestern.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Mesmer-Magnus-et-al.-2016.pdf.

Microsoft. 2021. “The Next Great Disruption Is Hybrid Work—Are We Ready?” Microsoft 2021 Work Trend Index: Annual Report, March 22. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/worklab/work-trend-index/hybrid-work.

Milkman, K.L., M. Akinola, and D. Chugh. 2015. “What Happens Before?: A Field Experiment Exploring How Pay and Representation Differentially Shape Bias on the Pathway into Organizations.” Journal of Applied Psychology 100(6):1678-1712.

Mitroff. 1974. The Subjective Side of Science: A Philosophical Inquiry into the Psychology of the Apollo Moon Scientists. New York: Elsevier Science & Technology.

Mohammed, S., and E. Ringseis. 2001. “Cognitive Diversity and Consensus in Group Decision Making: The Role of Inputs, Processes, and Outcomes.” Organizational Behavior Human Decision Processes 85(2):310-335. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2943.

Moravcsik, A. 2019. “Transparency in Qualitative Research.” SAGE Research Methods Foundations. https://www.princeton.edu/~amoravcs/library/TransparencyinQualitativeResearch.pdf.

Mosher, S., and C. Keane, eds. 2021. Vision and Change in the Geosciences: The Future of Undergraduate Geoscience Education. Alexandria, VA: American Geosciences Institute. https://www.americangeosciences.org/change/pdfs/VisionChange-Geosciences.pdf.

Moss-Racusin, C.A., J.F. Dovidio, V.L. Graham, M.J. Brescoll, and J. Handelsman. 2012. “Science Faculty’s Subtle Gender Biases Favor Male Students.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109(41):16474-16479.

Myers, K., W.Y. Tham, Y. Yin, N. Cohodes, J. Thursby, M. Thursby, P. Schiffer, J. Walsh, K. Lakhani, and D. Wang. 2020. “Unequal Effects of the COVID 19 Pandemic on Scientists.” Nature Human Behavior 4:880-883.

Nalewicki, J. 2019. “Before Going to the Moon, Apollo 11 Astronauts Trained at These Five Sites.” Smithsonian Magazine. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/travel/going-moon-apollo-11-astronauts-trained-these-five-sites-180972452.

NAS, NAE, and IOM (National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine). 2011. Expanding Underrepresented Minority Participation: America’s Science and Technology Talent at the Crossroads. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/12984.

NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration). 2016. “NASA 2016 Diversity and Inclusion Strategic Implementation Plan.” NASA Diversity and Equal Opportunity Office. August 15. https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/final_di_plan_8-15-16_tagged.pdf.

NASA. 2020. Science 2020-2024: A Vision for Science Excellence. Washington, DC: NASA Science Mission Directorate. https://science.nasa.gov/files/science-red/s3fs-public/atoms/files/2020-2024_Science.pdf.

NASA. 2021a. Agency Science Workforce Study Phase 1 Report. Science Workforce Study Team. https://science.nasa.gov/files/science-red/s3fs-public/atoms/files/FINAL%20Agency%20Science%20Workforce%20Study%2003.02.pdf.

NASA. 2021b. NASA 2022 Strategic Plan. Washington, DC. https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/fy_22_strategic_plan.pdf?msclkid=dd20dae6bde811ecbd953f339ba13d9c.

NASA. 2021c. “NASA Equity Action Plan.” Washington, DC. https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/nasa_deia_strategic_plan-fy22-fy26-final_tagged.pdf.

NASA. 2021d. Report on NASA’s Top Management and Performance Challenges. Office of Inspector General, Office of Audits. Washington, DC. November 15.

NASA. 2022a. “Grant Stats for Researchers.” NASA Science Mission Directorate. https://science.nasa.gov/researchers/sara/grant-stats.

NASA. 2022b. FY 2022 Budget Estimates. Washington, DC. https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/fy2022_congressional_justification_nasa_budget_request.pdf.

NASEM (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine). 2019a. Minority Serving Institutions: America’s Underutilized Resource for Strengthening the STEM Workforce. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25257.

NASEM. 2019b. The Science of Effective Mentorship in STEMM. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25568.

NASEM. 2020a. The Endless Frontier: The Next 75 Years in Science. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25990.

NASEM. 2020b. NASA’s Science Activation Program: Achievements and Opportunities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25569.

NASEM. 2021. Pathways to Discovery in Astronomy and Astrophysics for the 2020s. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/26141.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Foundations of a Healthy and Vital Research Community for NASA Science. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26575.
×

NASEM. 2022. Advancing Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility in the Leadership of Competed Space Missions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/26385.

NIH (National Institutes of Health). 2021. NIH Data Book—NIH Funded Research Workforce. https://report.nih.gov/nihdatabook/category/14.

NRC (National Research Council). 1990. Interdisciplinary Research: Promoting Collaboration Between the Life Sciences and Medicine and the Physical Sciences and Engineering. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/21296.

NRC. 1992. Setting Priorities for Space Research: Opportunities and Imperatives. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/11144.

NRC. 2007a. Decadal Science Strategy Surveys: Report of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/11894.

NRC. 2007b. Earth Science and Applications from Space: National Imperatives for the Next Decade and Beyond. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/11820.

NRC. 2010. New Worlds, New Horizons in Astronomy and Astrophysics. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/12951.

NRC. 2011a. Recapturing a Future for Space Exploration: Life and Physical Sciences for a New Era. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13048.

NRC. 2011b. Vision and Voyages for Planetary Science in the Decade 2013-2022. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13117.

NRC. 2013. Solar and Space Physics: A Science for a Technological Society. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13060.

NRC. 2015. Enhancing the Effectiveness of Team Science. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/19007.

NSF (National Science Foundation). 2022. Science and Engineering Indicators 2022: The State of U.S. Science and Engineering. NSB-2022-1. Alexandria, VA: National Science Board. https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20221.

OPM (Office of Personnel Management). 2020. “Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey.” Office of Strategy and Innovation. http://www.opm.gov/FEVS.

Page, S.E. 2017. The Diversity Bonus: How Great Teams Pay Off in the Knowledge Economy (Our Compelling Interests). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvc77c0h.

Partnership for Public Service. 2022. “2021 Best Places to Work in the Federal Government Rankings.” http://bestplacestowork.org.

Pascarella, E.T. 1980. “Student–Faculty Informal Contact and College Outcomes.” Review of Educational Research 50(4):545-595. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.2307/1170295.

Pasterkamp, G., J.I. Rotmans, D.V.P. de Kleijn, and C. Borst. 2007. “Citation Frequency: A Biased Measure of Research Impact Significantly Influenced by the Geographical Origin of Research Articles.” Scientometrics 70(1):153-165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-0109-5.

Payne, K., L. Niemi, and J.M. Doris, 2018, “How to Think About ‘Implicit Bias.’” Scientific American March 27. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-to-think-about-implicit-bias.

Pelled, L.H., K.M. Eisenhardt, and K.R. Xin. 1999. “Exploring the Black Box: An Analysis of Work Group Diversity, Conflict, and Performance.” Administrative Science Quarterly 44(1):1-28. https://doi.org/10.2307/2667029.

Porter, A.M., S. White, and J. Dollison. 2020. 2020 Survey of the Planetary Science Workforce. Washington, DC: AAS Division for Planetary Sciences and AIP Statistics. https://dps.aas.org/sites/dps.aas.org/files/reports/2020/Results_from_the_2020_Survey_of_the_Planetary_Science_Workforce.pdf.

Puritty, C., L. Strickland, E. Alia, et al. 2017. “Without Inclusion, Diversity Initiatives May Not Be Enough.” Science 357(6356):1101-1102. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aai9054.

Ragins, B.R., and J.L. Cotton. 1999. “Mentor Functions and Outcomes: A Comparison of Men and Women in Formal and Informal Mentoring Relationships.” Journal of Applied Psychology 84(4):529-550. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0021-9010.84.4.529.

Rhoten, D., and S. Pfirman. 2006. “Women in Interdisciplinary Science: Exploring Preferences and Consequences.” Research Policy 36(1):56-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.08.001.

Rico, R., E. Molleman, M. Manzanares, and G. van der Vegt. 2007. “The Effects of Diversity Faultlines and Team Task Autonomy on Decision Quality and Social Integration.” Journal of Management 33(1). https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0149206306295307.

Rittmayer, A.D., and M.E. Beier. 2009. “Overview: Self-Efficacy in STEM.” In Applying Research to Practice (ARP) Resources, B. Bogue and E. Cady, eds. SWE-AWE and NAE CASEE. http://www.engr.psu.edu/AWE/ARPresources.aspx.

Robnett, R.D., P.A. Nelson, E.L. Zurbriggen, F.J. Crosby, and M.M. Chemers. 2018. “Research Mentoring and Scientist Identity: Insights from Undergraduates and Their Mentors.” International Journal of STEM Education 5(41). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0139-y.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Foundations of a Healthy and Vital Research Community for NASA Science. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26575.
×

Rock, D., and H. Grant. 2016. “Why Diverse Teams Are Smarter.” Harvard Business Review, November 4. https://hbr.org/2016/11/why-diverse-teams-are-smarter.

Rosenberg, S. 2017. “Respectful Collection of Demographic Data.” https://medium.com/managing-on-the-margins/respectfulcollection-of-demographic-data-56de9fcb80e2.

Saaty, T.L. 1977. “A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures.” Journal of Mathematical Psychology 15(3):234-281

Sarikaya, A., M. Correll, L. Bartram, M. Tory, and D. Fisher. 2019. “What Do We Talk About When We Talk About Dashboards?” IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 25(1):682-692. https://research.tableau.com/sites/default/files/DashboardsConspiracy_final.pdf.

Schein, E.H. 1999. The Corporate Culture Survival Guide. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Schein, E.H. 2010. Organizational Culture and Leadership, 4th ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Shah, J.J., and N. Vargas-Hernandez. 2002. “Metrics for Measuring Ideation Effectiveness.” Design Studies 24(2):111-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(02)00034-0.

Sithole, A., E. Chiyaka, P. McCarthy, D. Mupinga, B. Bucklein, and J. Kibirige. 2017. “Student Attraction, Persistence and Retention in STEM Programs: Successes and Continuing Challenges.” Higher Education Studies 7(1). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1126801.pdf.

Smith, E.E. 2007. “The Path of a Postdoc.” Hutch News Stories. September 1. https://www.fredhutch.org/en/news/centernews/2007/09/path-of-a-postdoc.html.

Strauss, J.P., and M.L. Connerley. 2013. “Demographics, Personality, Contact, and Universal-Diverse Orientation: An Exploratory Examination.” Human Resource Management 42(2):159-174. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.10074.

Strolger, L., and P. Natarajan. 2019. “Doling Out Hubble Time with Dual Anonymous Evaluation.” Physics Today, March 1. https://physicstoday.scitation.org/do/10.1063/pt.6.3.20190301a.

Sull, D., C. Sull, and B. Zweig. 2022. “Toxic Culture Is Driving the Great Resignation.” MIT Sloan Management Review, January 11. https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/toxic-culture-is-driving-the-great-resignation.

Thiry, H., and S.L. Laursen. 2011. “The Role of Student-Advisor Interactions in Apprenticing Undergraduate Researchers into a Scientific Community of Practice.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 20:771-784. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-010-9271-2.

Thomas, D.A. 1993. “Racial Dynamics in Cross-Race Developmental Relationships.” Administrative Science Quarterly 38(2):169-194. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393410.

Thomas, D. 2001. “The Truth About Mentoring Minorities, Race Matters.” Harvard Business Review, April. https://hbr.org/2001/04/race-matters.

Thomas, D.A., and M.C. Higgins. 1996. “Mentoring and the Boundaryless Career: Lessons from the Minority Experience.” In Boundaryless Careers: A New Employment Principle for a New Organizational Era, M.B. Arthur and D.M. Rousseau, eds. New York: Oxford University Press.

Toosi, M. 2016. “A Look at the Future of the U.S. Labor Force to 2060.” Spotlight on Statistics, September. https://www.bls.gov/spotlight/2016/a-look-at-the-future-of-the-us-labor-force-to-2060/home.htm.

Tourangeau, R. 2018. “Maintaining Respondent Trust and Protecting Their Data.” Pp. 135-141 in The Palgrave Handbook of Survey Research, D.L. Vannett and J.A. Krosnick, eds. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54395-6_18.

Tsui, A., and C.A. O’Reilly III. 2017. “Beyond Simple Demographic Effects: The Importance of Relational Demography in Superior-Subordinate Dyads.” Academy of Management Journal 32(2). https://doi.org/10.5465/256368.

Underhill, C.M. 2006. “The Effectiveness of Mentoring Programs in Corporate Settings: A Meta-Analytical Review of the Literature.” Journal of Vocational Behavior 68(2):292-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2005.05.003.

Urlings, M.J.E., B. Duyx, G.M.H. Swaen, L.M. Bouter, and M.P. Zeegers. 2021. “Citation Bias and Other Determinants of Citation in Biomedical Research: Findings from Six Citation Networks.” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 132(2021):71-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.11.019.

Vertesi, J., R. Pappalardo, C. Alexander, W. Clancey, B. Cohen, P. Dourish, J. Johnson, et al. 2021. “Sociological Considerations for the Success of Planetary Exploration Missions.” White paper submitted for consideration to the Planetary Science Decadal Survey 2013-2022 Committee. Washington, DC: National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. https://ia800502.us.archive.org/16/items/socialogicalconsiderationsforthesuccessofplanetaryexploration/JanetAVertesi.pdf.

Ware, M. 2008. Peer Review: Benefits, Perceptions and Alternatives. London, UK: Publishing Research Consortium. https://ils.unc.edu/courses/2014_fall/inls690_109/Readings/Ware2008-PRCPeerReview.pdf.

Wilsdon, J., L. Allen, E. Belfiore, P. Campbell, S. Curry, S. Hill, R. Jones, et al. 2015. The Metric Tide: Report of the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management. http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4929.1363.

Yu, L. 2007. “Measuring the Culture of Innovation.” MIT Sloan Management Review. Summer(July 1). https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/measuring-the-culture-of-innovation.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Foundations of a Healthy and Vital Research Community for NASA Science. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26575.
×
Page 81
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Foundations of a Healthy and Vital Research Community for NASA Science. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26575.
×
Page 82
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Foundations of a Healthy and Vital Research Community for NASA Science. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26575.
×
Page 83
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Foundations of a Healthy and Vital Research Community for NASA Science. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26575.
×
Page 84
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Foundations of a Healthy and Vital Research Community for NASA Science. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26575.
×
Page 85
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Foundations of a Healthy and Vital Research Community for NASA Science. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26575.
×
Page 86
Next: Appendixes »
Foundations of a Healthy and Vital Research Community for NASA Science Get This Book
×
 Foundations of a Healthy and Vital Research Community for NASA Science
Buy Paperback | $24.00 Buy Ebook | $19.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The U.S. space science community includes thousands of scientists across multiple disciplines that influence and are influenced by the many engineers, technicians, and support personnel that are part of the space research enterprise. Over one-third of NASA's budget is devoted to space science, and the agency currently operates over 50 space missions in the fields of astrophysics, Earth science, solar and space physics, planetary science, and the biological and physical sciences. The strength of NASA science lies with its people, both those who work directly for the agency and the thousands of researchers and professionals who are funded by NASA grants and contracts.

At the request of NASA, this report examines the foundation for healthy and vital research communities. Foundations of a Healthy and Vital Research Community for NASA Science identifies the characteristics of a healthy and vital research community, defines implementable measures for assessing the health and vitality of a research community, describes the types of data that NASA should be collecting to enable future assessments of the health and vitality of the scientific work force, and recommends best practices to improve the health and vitality of NASA’s research communities.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!