National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: CONCLUSION
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Equitable and Resilient Infrastructure Investments. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26633.
×

References

ASCE (American Society of Civil Engineers). 2021. Report card for America’s infrastructure. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers.

Baja, K. 2019. Resilience hubs: Shifting power to communities and increasing community capacity. Baltimore, MD: Urban Sustainability Directors Network.

Bakkensen, L. A., C. Fox-Lent, L. K. Read, and I. Linkov. 2017. Validating resilience and vulnerability indices in the context of natural disasters. Risk Analysis 37(5):982–1004. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12677.

Belkhir, J. A., and C. Charlemaine. 2007. Race, gender and class: Lessons from Hurricane Katrina. Race, Gender, and Class 14(1/2):120–152.

Berke, P. R., J. Kartez, and D. Wenger. 1993. Recovery after disaster: Achieving sustainable development, mitigation and equity. Disasters 17:93–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7717.1993.tb01137.x.

Bird, E. L., J. O. Ige, P. Pilkington, A. Pinto, C. Petrokofsky, and J. Burgess-Allen. 2018. Built and natural environment planning principles for promoting health: An umbrella review. BMC Public Health 18(1):930.

Boardman, A. D., A. Greenberg, A. Vining, and D. Weimer. 2018. Cost-benefit analysis in theory and practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Browning, M. H. E. M., K. Lee, and K. L. Wolf. 2019. Tree cover shows an inverse relationship with depressive symptoms in elderly residents living in U.S. nursing homes. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 41:23–32.

Burton, C. G. 2010. Social vulnerability and hurricane impact modeling. Natural Hazards Review 11(2):58–68.

Christopher, S., V. Watts, A. K. H. G. McCormick, and S. Young. 2008. Building and maintaining trust in a community-based participatory research partnership. American Journal of Public Health 98(8):1398–1406.

Coleman, N., A. Esmalian, and A. Mostafavi. 2020. Equitable resilience in infrastructure systems: Empirical assessment of disparities in hardship experiences of vulnerable populations during service disruptions. Natural Hazards Review 21(4):04020034.

Cutter, S. L. 2016. The landscape of disaster resilience indicators in the USA. Natural Hazards 80(2):741–758.

Cutter, S. L., L. R. Barnes, M. Berry, C. G. Burton, E. Evans, E. Tate, and J. J. Webb. 2008. A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters. Global Environmental Change: Human and Policy Dimensions 18:598–606.

Cutter, S. L., and C. Finch. 2008. Temporal and spatial changes in social vulnerability to natural hazards. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105(7):2301–2306.

Cuyahoga County. 2019. Cuyahoga County Climate Change Action Plan. https://www.countyplanning.us/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Final_CCCCAP-1.pdf.

Domingue, S. J., and C. T. Emrich. 2019. Social vulnerability and procedural equity: Exploring the distribution of disaster aid across counties in the United States. The American Review of Public Administration 49(8):897–913. doi:10.1177/0275074019856122.

Dorado, S. 2005. Institutional entrepreneurship, partaking, and convening. Organization Studies 26(3):385–414.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Equitable and Resilient Infrastructure Investments. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26633.
×

Dormady, N., A. Rose, C. B. Morin, and A. Roa-Henriquez. 2022. The cost-effectiveness of economic resilience. International Journal of Production Economics 244:108371. doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108371.

Emrich, C. T., S. A. Aksha, and Y. Zhou. 2022. Assessing distributive inequities in FEMA’s disaster recovery assistance fund allocation. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 74:102855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102855.

Emrich, C. T., E. Tate, S. E. Larson, and Y. Zhou. 2019. Measuring social equity in flood recovery funding. Environmental Hazards 19(3):228–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/17477891.2019.1675578.

Enarson, E. 1998. Through women’s eyes: A gendered research agenda for disaster social science. Disasters 22:157–173. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7717.00083.

EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). 2021. Climate Change and Social Vulnerability in the United States: A Focus on Six Impacts. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

Fekete, A. 2009. Validation of a social vulnerability index in context to river-floods in Germany. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 9(2):393-403. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess9-393-2009.

FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). 2011. National disaster recovery framework: Strengthening disaster recovery for the nation. Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency.

FEMA. 2019. National response framework, fourth edition, Washington DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency.

FEMA. 2022. 2022 Building Code Adoption Tracking Overview. Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency.

Finch, C., C. T. Emrich, and S. L. Cutter. 2010. Disaster disparities and differential recovery in New Orleans. Population and Environment 31:179–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-009-0099-8.

Gaspar, V., P. Mauro, C. Pattillo, and R. Espinoza. 2020. Public investment for the recovery. International Monetary Fund, IMF Blog (posted October 5, 2020). https://blogs.imf.org/2020/10/05/public-investment-for-the-recovery/.

Gunderson, L. H., and C. S. Hollings. 2002. Panarchy: Understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Washington, DC: Island Press.

Hartwick, J. M. 1977. Intergenerational equity and the investment of rents from exhaustible resources. American Economic Review 67(5):972–974.

Hollings, C. S. 1986. The resilience of terrestrial ecosystems: Local surprise and global change. In Sustainable development of the biosphere, edited by W. C. Clark and R. E. Munn. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 292–317.

Hunter, M. R., B. W. Gillespie, and S. Y.-P. Chen. 2019. Urban nature experiences reduce stress in the context of daily life based on salivary biomarkers. Frontiers in Psychology 10.

IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). Forthcoming. 2022: Summary for policymakers, edited by H.-O. Pörtner, D. C. Roberts, E. S. Poloczanska, K. Mintenbeck, M. Tignor, A. Alegría, M. Craig, S. Langsdorf, S. Löschke, V. Möller, and A. Okem. In Climate change 2022: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by H.-O. Pörtner, D. C. Roberts, M. Tignor, E. S. Poloczanska, K.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Equitable and Resilient Infrastructure Investments. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26633.
×

Mintenbeck, A. Alegría, M. Craig, S. Langsdorf, S. Löschke, V. Möller, A. Okem, and B. Rama. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Jerolleman, A. 2019. Disaster recovery through the lens of justice. New York: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04795-5.

Kettl, D. F. 2006. Is the worst yet to come? Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 604(1):273–287. doi:10.1177/0002716205285981.

Khunwishit, S., and D. McEntire. 2012. Testing social vulnerability theory: A quantitative study of Hurricane Katrina’s perceived impact on residents living in FEMA designated disaster areas. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/1547-7355.1950.

Kristie, L. E., A. Capon, P. Berry, C. Broderick, R. de Dear, G. Havenith, Y. Honda, R. S. Kovats, W. Ma, A. Malik, N. B. Morris, L. Nybo, S. I. Seneviratne, J. Vanos, and O. Jay. 2021. Hot weather and heat extremes: Health risks. Heat and Health 398(10301):698–708. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01208-3.

Lin, J., Q. Wang, and X. Li. 2021. Socioeconomic and spatial inequalities of street tree abundance, species diversity, and size structure in New York City. Landscape and Urban Planning 206:103992.

Liu, D., and Y. Li. 2016. Social vulnerability of rural households to flood hazards in western mountainous regions of Henan province, China. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 16(5):1123–1134. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-1123-2016.

Locke, D. H., B. Hall, J. M. Grove, S. T. A. Pickett, L. A. Ogden, C. Aoki, C. G. Boone, and J. P. M. O’Neil-Dunne. 2021. Residential housing segregation and urban tree canopy in 37 US cities. NPJ Urban Sustainability 1(1):15.

Loerzel, J., and M. Dillard. 2021. An analysis of an inventory of community resilience frameworks. Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology 126(Article No. 126031).

Magis, K. 2010. Community resilience: An indicator of social sustainability. Society & Natural Resources 23(5):401–416.

Maguire, S., C. Hardy, and T. Lawrence. 2004. Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada. Academy of Management Journal 47(5):657–679. 10.2307/20159610.

Markart, G., M. Teich, C. Scheidl, and B. Kohl. 2021. Flood protection by forests in alpine watersheds: Lessons learned from Austrian case studies. In Protective forests as ecosystem-based solution for disaster risk reduction (ECO-DRR), edited by M. Teich, C. Accastello, F. Perzl, and K. Kleemayr. London: IntechOpen. doi:10.5772/intechopen.99507.

Matin, N., J. Forrester, and J. Ensor. 2018. What is equitable resilience? World Development 109:197–205.

McAllister, T. 2013. Developing guidelines and standards for disaster resilience of the built environment: A research needs assessment. NIST Technical Note 1795. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology. https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/TechnicalNotes/NIST.TN.1795.pdf.

McAllister, T. P., R. F. Walker, and A. Baker. 2022. Assessment of resilience in codes, standards, regulations, and best practices for buildings and infrastructure systems. NIST Technical Note 2209. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology. https://www.nibs.org/files/pdfs/NIBS_MMC_MitigationSaves_2019.pdf.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Equitable and Resilient Infrastructure Investments. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26633.
×

Miles, S. B. 2018. Participatory disaster recovery simulation modeling for community resilience planning. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science 9(4):519–529.

MMC (Multi-Hazard Mitigation Council). 2005. Natural hazard mitigation saves: An independent study to assess the future savings from mitigation activities. Washington, DC: National Institute of Building Sciences.

MMC. 2019. Natural hazard mitigation saves 2: Interim report. Washington, DC: National Institute of Building Sciences.

MMC. 2020. A roadmap to resilience incentivization. Porter, K.A. and Yuan, J.Q., eds. Washington, DC: National Institute of Building Sciences.

Muñoz, C. E., and E. Tate. 2016. Unequal recovery? Federal resource distribution after a midwest flood disaster. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 13(5):507. doi:10.3390/ijerph13050507.

Myers, C. A., T. Slack, and J. Singelmann. 2008. Social vulnerability and migration in the wake of disaster: The case of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Population and Environment: A Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies 29(6):271–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-008-0072-y.

NASEM (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine). 2012. Disaster resilience: A national imperative. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13457.

NASEM. 2021a. Enhancing community resilience through social capital and connectedness: Stronger together! Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/26123.

NASEM. 2021b. Motivating local climate adaptation and strengthening resilience: Making local data trusted, useful, and used. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/26261.

NIBS (National Institute of Building Sciences). 2019. Natural hazard mitigation saves: 2019 report. Washington, DC: National Institute of Building Sciences.

Nigg, J. M. 1995. Disaster recovery as a social process. Newark, DE: Disaster Research Center.

NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology). 2016. Community resilience planning guide for buildings and infrastructure systems, volumes 1 and 2. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology.

NIST. 2020. Community resilience planning guide for buildings and infrastructure systems: A playbook, NIST SP 1190GB-16, Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology. https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/SpecialPublications/NIST.SP.1190GB-16.pdf.

NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) National Centers for Environmental Information. 2022. U.S. Billion-dollar weather and climate disasters. https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/access/monitoring/billions/.

NRC (National Research Council). Committee on National Earthquake Resilience–Research, Implementation, and Outreach 2011. National earthquake resilience: research, implementation, and outreach. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

NSTC (National Science and Technology Council). 2005. Tsunami Risk Reduction for the United States: A Framework for Action. https://nws.weather.gov/nthmp/documents/A_Framework_for_Action-2005-12-22.pdf.

Plowman, D. A., S. Solansky, T. E. Beck, L. Baker, M. Kulkarni, and D. V. Travis. 2007. The role of leadership in emergent self-organization. Leadership Quarterly 18(4):341-356.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Equitable and Resilient Infrastructure Investments. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26633.
×

Preston, B. L., M. E. Miro, and A. Lauland. 2022. New thinking to translate infrastructure dollars into resilience. RAND Corporation, The RAND Blog (posted June 2, 2021). https://www.rand.org/blog/2021/06/new-thinking-to-translate-infrastructure-dollars-into.html.

Putnam, R.D., L. Feldstein, and D.J. Cohen. 2004. Better Together: Restoring the American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster.

Reid, M. 2013. Disasters and social inequalities. Sociology Compass 7(11):984–997.

Reina, D. S., and M. L. Reina. 2007. Building sustainable trust. OD Practitioner 39(1):36.

Robles, F., and J. Bidgood. 2017. Three months after Maria, roughly half of Puerto Ricans still without power. The New York Times, December 29, 2017.

Rose, A. 2017. Defining and measuring economic resilience from a societal, environmental and security perspective. Singapore: Springer.

Rose, A., K. Porter, N. Dash, J. Bouabid, C. Huyck, J. Whitehead, D. Shaw, R. Eguchi, C. Taylor, T. McLane, L. T. Tobin, P. T. Ganderton, D. Godschalk, A. S. Kiremidjian, K. Tierney, and C. T. West. 2007. Benefit-cost analysis of FEMA hazard mitigation grants. Natural Hazards Review 8(4):97–111.

Rozenberg, J., and M. Fay. 2019. Beyond the gap: How countries can afford the infrastructure they need while protecting the planet. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.

Rufat, S., E. Tate, C. T. Emrich, and F. Antolini. 2019. How valid are social vulnerability models? Annals of the American Association of Geographers 109:1131–1153. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2018.1535887.

SAMHSA (Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration). 2017. Greater impact: How disasters affect people of low socioeconomic status. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.

Schmidtlein, M., J. Shafer, M. Berry, and S. Cutter. 2011. Modeled earthquake losses and social vulnerability in Charleston, South Carolina. Applied Geography 31(1):269–281. 10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.06.001.

Schoch-Spana, M., E. Brunson, D. Hosangadi, R. Long, S. Ravi, M. Taylor, M. Trotochaud, T. G. Veenema, and on behalf of the CommuniVax Coalition. 2021a. A waypoint on the path to health equity: COVID-19 vaccination at month 11. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security.

Schoch-Spana, M., E. Brunson, D. Hosangadi, R. Long, S. Ravi, M. Taylor, M. Trotochaud, T. G. Veenema, and on behalf of the Working Group on Equity in COVID-19. 2021b. Equity in vaccination: A plan to work with communities of color toward COVID-19 recovery and beyond. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security.

Schwartz, G., M. Fouad, T. Hansen, and G. Verdier. 2020. Well spent: How strong infrastructure governance can end waste in public investment. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.

Smith, G. 2012. Planning for post-disaster recovery: A review of the United States Disaster Assistance Framework. Washington, DC: Island Press.

Smith, G. P., and D. Wenger, D. 2007. Sustainable disaster recovery: Operationalizing an existing agenda. In Handbook of disaster research. Handbooks of sociology and social research. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-32353-4_14.

Snowden, D.J., and M.E. Boone. 2007. A Leader’s Framework for Decision Making. Harvard Business Review 85(11): 68-149.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Equitable and Resilient Infrastructure Investments. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26633.
×

Surminski, S., and T. Tanner. 2016. Realising the triple resilience dividend: A new business case for disaster risk management. Heidelberg: Springer.

Tate, E., and C. Emrich. 2021. Assessing social equity in disasters, Eos 102. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EO154548.

Tate, E., A. Strong, T. Kraus, and H. Xiong. 2016. Flood recovery and property acquisition in Cedar Rapids, Iowa. Natural Hazards 80(3):2055–2079.

Tierney, K., and A. Oliver-Smith. 2012. Social dimensions of disaster recovery. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters 30(2):123–146.

Troppe, M. 1994. Participatory action research: Merging the community and scholarly agenda. Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States.

Uekusa, S. 2018. Rethinking resilience: Bourdieu’s contribution to disaster research. Resilience 6(3):181–195.

UNDRR (United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction). 2020. Hazard definition and classification review technical report. Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. https://www.undrr.org/publication/hazard-definition-and-classifcation-review.

USGCRP (U.S. Global Change Research Program). 2018. Fourth national climate assessment: Volume II – impacts, risks, and adaptation in the United States. https://purl.fdlp.gov/GPO/gpo112011.

USGS (U.S. Geological Survey). 2022. How can climate change affect natural disasters? Frequently Asked Questions: Climate and Land Use Change. https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/how-can-climate-change-affect-natural-disasters.

Walpole, E. H., J. Loerzel, and M. Dillard. 2021. A review of community resilience frameworks and assessment tools: An annotated bibliography. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology.

Wang, W. L., J. W. van de Lindt, B. Hartman, H. Cutler, J. L. Kruse, T. P. McAllister, and S. Hamideh. 2022. Determination of individual building performance targets to achieve community-level social and economic resilience metrics. Journal of Structural Engineering 148(5):04022045.

Watkins, S. L., and E. Gerrish. 2018. The relationship between urban forests and race: A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Management 209:152–168.

Watkins, S. L., S. K. Mincey, J. Vogt, and S. P. Sweeney. 2017. Is planting equitable? An examination of the spatial distribution of nonprofit urban tree-planting programs by canopy cover, income, race, and ethnicity. Environment and Behavior 49(4):452–482.

Westley, F. R., O. Tjornbo, L. Schultz, P. Olsson, C. Folke, B. Crona, and Ö. Bodin. 2013. A theory of transformative agency in linked social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society 18(3).

Xie, W., A. Rose, S. Li, J. He., N. Li, T. Ali, T., and W. Wei. 2018. Dynamic economic resilience and economic recovery from disasters: A quantitative assessment. Risk Analysis 38(6): 1306-18. doi.org/10.1111/risa.12948.

Yoon, D. K. 2012. Assessment of social vulnerability to natural disasters: A comparative study. Natural Hazards 63(2):823–843.

Zobel, C.W. 2014. Quantitatively representing nonlinear disaster recovery. Decision Sciences 45(6):1053-1082. Decision Sciences Institute. https://doi.org/10.1111/deci.1210.3.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Equitable and Resilient Infrastructure Investments. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26633.
×
Page 31
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Equitable and Resilient Infrastructure Investments. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26633.
×
Page 32
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Equitable and Resilient Infrastructure Investments. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26633.
×
Page 33
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Equitable and Resilient Infrastructure Investments. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26633.
×
Page 34
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Equitable and Resilient Infrastructure Investments. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26633.
×
Page 35
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Equitable and Resilient Infrastructure Investments. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26633.
×
Page 36
Next: Appendix A: Committee Member Biographical Sketches »
Equitable and Resilient Infrastructure Investments Get This Book
×
 Equitable and Resilient Infrastructure Investments
Buy Ebook | $14.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

Communities across the United States are subject to ever-increasing human suffering and financial impacts of disasters caused by extreme weather events and other natural hazards amplified in frequency and intensity by climate change. While media coverage sometimes paints these disasters as affecting rich and poor alike and suggests that natural disasters do not discriminate, the reality is that they do. There have been decades of discriminatory policies, practices, and embedded bias within infrastructure planning processes. Among the source of these policies and practices are the agencies that promote resilience and provide hazard mitigation and recovery services, and the funding mechanisms they employ. These practices have resulted in low-income communities, often predominantly Indigenous people and communities of color, bearing a disproportionate share of the social, economic, health, and environmental burdens caused by extreme weather and other natural disasters.

At the request of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the Resilient America Program of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine convened the Committee on Applied Research Topics for Hazard Mitigation and Resilience to assist the FEMA in reducing the immense human and financial toll of disasters caused by natural hazards and other large-scale emergencies. FEMA asked the committee to identify applied research topics, information, and expertise that can inform action and collaborative priorities within the natural hazard mitigation and resilience fields. This report explores equitable and infrastructure investments for natural hazard mitigation and resilience, focusing on: partnerships for equitable infrastructure development; systemic change toward resilient and equitable infrastructure investment; and innovations in finance and financial analysis.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!