Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
C-1Â Â A P P E N D I X C Individual Survey Responses from DOTs Table C-1. Individual DOT responses to Question 1 (status of implementation for smart work zone technologies). Q1. What is the current status of implementation of each of the following smart work zone technologies by your agency? (3 = Already Implemented, 2 = Not Currently Implemented but Plan to Implement in Future, 1 = No Current Plans to Implement) Respondent Tr av el er In fo rm at io n Sy st em s Q ue ue W ar ni ng D yn am ic L an e M er ge D yn am ic (V ar ia bl e) S pe ed Li m it W or k Zo ne D at a C ol le ct io n Te ch no lo gi es W or k Zo ne L oc at io n Te ch no lo gi es W or k Zo ne In tr us io n A la rm N ot ifi ca tio n of C on st ru ct io n Eq ui pm en t E nt er in g/ Ex iti ng O th er Alabama 3 3 2 3 2 2 2 2 - Alaska 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 Arizona 3 3 3 2 3 2 1 2 2 Arkansas 3 3 1 1 2 1 1 1 - California 3 3 3 3 1 3 1 1 3 Colorado 3 2 3 2 2 2 3 2 - Connecticut 3 3 2 2 3 3 2 2 - Delaware 3 3 1 2 2 2 1 2 - District of Columbia 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 - Florida 3 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 - Georgia 3 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 - Hawaii 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 -
C-2 Use of Smart Work Zone Technologies for Improving Work Zone Safety Q1. What is the current status of implementation of each of the following smart work zone technologies by your agency? (3 = Already Implemented, 2 = Not Currently Implemented but Plan to Implement in Future, 1 = No Current Plans to Implement) Respondent Tr av el er In fo rm at io n Sy st em s Q ue ue W ar ni ng D yn am ic L an e M er ge D yn am ic (V ar ia bl e) S pe ed Li m it W or k Zo ne D at a C ol le ct io n Te ch no lo gi es W or k Zo ne L oc at io n Te ch no lo gi es W or k Zo ne In tr us io n A la rm N ot ifi ca tio n of C on st ru ct io n Eq ui pm en t E nt er in g/ Ex iti ng O th er Illinois 3 3 3 1 2 2 1 2 - Indiana 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 - Iowa 3 3 1 1 3 3 1 3 - Kansas 3 3 3 1 2 1 1 1 - Kentucky 3 3 1 1 3 3 1 1 - Louisiana 3 3 1 1 3 2 1 1 - Maine 3 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 - Maryland 2 2 3 3 2 2 1 1 3 Massachusetts 3 3 3 2 3 2 2 2 3 Michigan 3 3 2 2 3 2 1 3 - Minnesota 3 3 3 2 3 2 2 2 3 Mississippi 3 3 1 1 3 3 1 1 - Missouri 3 3 3 1 3 3 2 1 - Montana 2 3 1 2 2 2 2 1 - Nebraska 1 3 2 1 1 2 1 1 - Nevada 3 2 3 3 2 2 1 1 - New Hampshire 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 1 - New Jersey 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 New Mexico 2 1 2 1 2 2 2 2 - New York 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 North Carolina 3 3 3 3 1 3 1 3 - Idaho 3 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 -
