National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Chapter 5 - Summary of Findings
Page 107
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Use of Smart Work Zone Technologies for Improving Work Zone Safety. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26637.
×
Page 107
Page 108
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Use of Smart Work Zone Technologies for Improving Work Zone Safety. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26637.
×
Page 108
Page 109
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Use of Smart Work Zone Technologies for Improving Work Zone Safety. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26637.
×
Page 109
Page 110
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Use of Smart Work Zone Technologies for Improving Work Zone Safety. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26637.
×
Page 110
Page 111
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Use of Smart Work Zone Technologies for Improving Work Zone Safety. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26637.
×
Page 111
Page 112
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Use of Smart Work Zone Technologies for Improving Work Zone Safety. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26637.
×
Page 112
Page 113
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Use of Smart Work Zone Technologies for Improving Work Zone Safety. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26637.
×
Page 113
Page 114
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Use of Smart Work Zone Technologies for Improving Work Zone Safety. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26637.
×
Page 114
Page 115
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Use of Smart Work Zone Technologies for Improving Work Zone Safety. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26637.
×
Page 115
Page 116
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Use of Smart Work Zone Technologies for Improving Work Zone Safety. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26637.
×
Page 116
Page 117
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Use of Smart Work Zone Technologies for Improving Work Zone Safety. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26637.
×
Page 117

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

References 109   Colorado DOT and APEX Design. I-25 Gap Queue Warning System Evaluation. Colorado Department of Trans- portation, Denver, Colo., 2020a. Colorado DOT and APEX Design. I-25 South Gap Work Zone Performance Measures Report. Colorado Depart- ment of Transportation, Denver, Colo., 2020b. Colorado DOT and Stantec. Smart Work Zone (SWZ) Project Lessons Learned. Colorado Department of Transportation, Denver, Colo., 2013. Colorado DOT and Ulteig Engineers, Inc. Smart Work Zone Guidelines. Colorado Department of Transportation, Denver, Colo., 2020. Colorado State University. Autonomous Maintenance Technology (AMT). n.d. [Online]. Available: http://csits. colostate.edu/autonomous-maintenance-technology.html [accessed April 21, 2021]. Craig, C. M., J. Achtemeier, N. L. Morris, D. Tian, and B. Patzer. In-Vehicle Work Zone Messages. Report No. MN/RC 2017-19, Minnesota Department of Transportation, St. Paul, Minn., 2017. Datta, T., C. Hartner, and L. Grillo. Evaluation of the Dynamic Late Lane Merge System at Freeway Construction Work Zones. Report No. RC-1500, Michigan Department of Transportation, Lansing, Mich., 2007. Debnath, A. K., R. Blackman, N. Haworth, and Y. Adinegoro. Influence of Remotely Operated Stop-Slow Con- trols on Driver Behavior in Work Zones. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2615, 2017, pp. 19–25. Delaware DOT. Delaware Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). Delaware Department of Transportation, Dover, Del., 2011. Delaware DOT. Work Zone Incident Communication System (WZIC). 2020 [Online]. Available: https:// deldot.gov/Programs/WZIC/index.shtml [accessed November 17, 2020]. Desai, J., H. Li, J. K. Mathew, Y. Cheng, A. Habib, and D. M. Bullock. Correlating Hard-Braking Activity with Crash Occurrences on Interstate Construction Projects in Indiana. Journal of Big Data Analytics in Trans- portation, October 2020. Douma, F., L. Munnich, and T. Garry. Options for Automated Speed Enforcement Pilot Projects in Minnesota Work and School Zones. Report No. CTS 14-06, Center for Transportation Studies, Minneapolis, Minn., 2014. Edara, P., C. Sun, and Y. Hou. Effectiveness of Work Zone Intelligent Transportation Systems. Smart Work Zone Deployment Initiative, Ames, Iowa, 2013a. Edara, P., C. Sun, and Y. Hou. Evaluation of Variable Advisory Speed Limits in Congested Work Zones. InTrans Project 06-277, Ames, Iowa, 2013b. Edara, P., C. Sun, C. Keller, and Y. Hou. Evaluating the Benefits of Dynamic Message Signs on Missouri’s Rural Corridors. Report No. cmr 13-004, Missouri Department of Transportation, Jefferson City, Mo., 2011. ENTERPRISE Pooled Fund Program. Dynamic Merge Systems in Work Zones. ENTERPRISE Pooled Fund Program, Roseville, Minn., 2014, pp. 1–10. Falero, C., Z. Hanson, and S. Knickerbocker. Traffic Critical Projects Program 2017 Final Report. Iowa Depart- ment of Transportation, Ames, Iowa, 2018. Federal Highway Administration. A Field Test and Evaluation of Variable Speed Limits in Work Zones. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 2004. Federal Highway Administration. Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways, 2009 Edition Including Revision 1 dated May 2012 and Revision 2 dated May 2012. Federal Highway Admin- istration, Washington, D.C., 2009. Federal Highway Administration. Join the Work Zone Data Initiative. Publication No. FHWA-HOP-18-083, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 2019a. Federal Highway Administration. Utilizing Probe-Vehicle Data for Work Zone Mobility. Publication No. FHWA- HOP-19-051, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 2019b. Federal Highway Administration. Crash Modification Factors Clearinghouse. 2021a [Online]. Available: http:// www.cmfclearinghouse.org/ [accessed June 19, 2021]. Federal Highway Administration. WZDx Demonstration Grants. 2021b [Online]. Available: https://ops.fhwa. dot.gov/wz/wzdx/demonstration_grants.htm [accessed March 26, 2021]. Finley, M. D. Field Evaluation of Automated Flagger Assistance Devices in Work Zones on Two-Lane Roads. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Vol. 2337, 2013, pp. 1–8. Finley, M. D., P. Songchitruksa, and S. R. Sunkari. Evaluation of Innovative Devices to Control Traffic Entering from Low-Volume Access Points Within a Lane Closure. Report No. FHWA/TX-13/0-6708-1, Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, Tex., 2013. Florida DOT. Interstate 4 (SR-400) Queue Warning System. Florida Department of Transportation, Tallahassee, Fla., 2016. Florida DOT. New System Helps Keep I-4 Work Zones Safe. 2017a [Online]. Available: https://i4ultimate.com/ new-system-helps-keep-i-4-work-zones-safe/ [accessed March 26, 2021]. Florida DOT. New Technology Helps Keep Drivers and Workers Safe. 2017b [Online]. Available: https:// i4ultimate.com/new-technology-helps-keep-drivers-and-workers-safe/ [accessed March 26, 2021].

110 Use of Smart Work Zone Technologies for Improving Work Zone Safety Florida DOT. Florida’s Connected and Automated Vehicles (CAV) Business Plan. Florida Department of Trans- portation, Tallahassee, Fla., 2019. Florida DOT. Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction. Florida Department of Transportation, Tallahassee, Fla., 2020. Florida DOT. Construction Map. 2021a [Online]. Available: https://i4ultimate.com/construction-info/construction- map/#constructionAlerts [accessed March 26, 2021]. Florida DOT. FDOT’s Smart Work Zone Initiative. National Operations Center of Excellence, Washington, D.C., 2021b [Online]. Available: https://transportationops.org/case-studies/fdots-smart-work-zone-initiative [accessed March 26, 2021]. Florida DOT. Florida’s Connected and Automated Vehicles (CAV) Initiative. 2021c [Online]. Available: https:// www.fdot.gov/traffic/its/projects-deploy/cv/connected-vehicles [accessed March 26, 2021]. Florida DOT. I-4 Ultimate Project Update. 2021d [Online]. Available: https://i4ultimate.com/alertemails/ 4617-Project-update-handout.pdf [accessed March 26, 2021]. Fontaine, M. D., H. Benjamin, J. Cottrell, and P. Chun. Considerations for the Development of Work Zone Mobility Performance Measures and Thresholds for Virginia Freeways. Report No. VCTIR-14-R6, Virginia Department of Transportation, Richmond, Va., 2014. Francis, V. Review of Enhanced Traffic Control Measures (TCM). Oregon Department of Transportation, Salem, Ore., 2020. Fudala, N., and M. D. Fontaine. Work Zone Variable Speed Limit Systems: Effectiveness and System Design Issues. Report No. FHWA/VTRC 10-R20, Virginia Department of Transportation, Richmond, Va., 2010. Fyhrie, P. B. Work Zone Intrusion Alarms for Highway Workers. California Department of Transportation, Sacramento, Calif., 2016. Gambatese, J. A., H. W. Lee, and C. A. Nnaji. Work Zone Intrusion Alert Technologies: Assessment and Practical Guidance. Report No. FHWA-OR-RD-17-14, Oregon Department of Transportation, Salem, Ore., 2017. Gambatese, J., and N. Tymvios. Evaluation of a Mobile Work Zone Barrier System. Report No. FHWA-OR- RD-14-05, Oregon Department of Transportation, Salem, Ore., 2013. Gambatese, J., and F. Zhang. Impact of Advisory Signs on Vehicle Speeds in Highway Nighttime Paving Project Work Zones. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Vol. 2555, 2016, pp. 65–71. Georgia DOT. Standard Specifications for Construction of Transportation Systems. Georgia Department of Transpor tation, Atlanta, Ga., 2021. GitHub. Work Zone Data Exchange (WZDx) Specification. 2021a [Online]. Available: https://github.com/ usdot-jpo-ode/wzdx/blob/master/README.md [accessed April 17, 2021]. GitHub. Work Zone ITS Tool (Version 2.0). 2021b [Online]. Available: https://github.com/kittelson/WZITS_Tool [accessed April 17, 2021]. Haghani, A., M. Hamedi, R. Fish, and A. Nouruzi. Evaluation of Dynamic Message Signs and Their Potential Impact on Traffic Flow. Report No. MD-13-SP109B4C, Maryland State Highway Administration, Baltimore, Md., 2013. Hallmark, S., A. Sharma, B. Lawton, G. Basulto-Elias, A. Bilek, N. Oneyear, and T. Litteral. Assessing Driver Behavior at Back of Queues: Implications for Queue Warning System in Work Zones. InTrans Project 19-686, Smart Work Zone Deployment Initiative, Ames, Iowa, 2020. Hallmark, S., J. Turner, and C. Albrecht. Synthesis of Work-Zone Performance Measures. InTrans Project 12-436, Smart Work Zone Deployment Initiative, Ames, Iowa, 2013. Harb, R., E. Radwan, M. Abdel-Aty, and X. Su. Two Simplified Intelligent Transportation System-Based Lane Management Strategies for Short-Term Work Zones. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems: Tech- nology, Planning, and Operations, Vol. 15, No. 1, 2011, pp. 52–61. Harb, R., E. Radwan, and V. V. Dixit. Comparing Three Lane Merging Schemes for Short-Term Work Zones: A Simulation Study. ISRN Civil Engineering, 2012, pp. 1–18. Hourdos, J. Portable, Non-Intrusive Advance Warning Devices for Work Zones with or Without Flag Operators, Report No. MN/RC 2012-26. Minnesota Department of Transportation, Saint Paul, Minn., 2012. Hourdos, J., Z. Liu, P. Dirks, H. X. Liu, S. Huang, W. Sun, and L. Xiao. Development of a Queue Warning System Utilizing ATM Infrastructure System Development and Field-Testing, Report No. MN/RC 2017-20. Minnesota Department of Transportation, Saint Paul, Minn., 2017. Hourdos, J., G. Parikh, P. Dirks, D. Lehrke, and P. Lukashin. Evaluation of the Smart Work Zone Speed Notifica- tion System, Report No. MN/RC 2019-21. Minnesota Department of Transportation, St. Paul, Minn., 2019. Houston Radar. SpeedLane®Pro. n.d. [Online]. Available: https://houston-radar.com/products/radar-data- collectors/speedlane-pro-multi-lane-radar/ [accessed April 1, 2021]. Huang, Y., and Y. Bai. Effectiveness of Graphic-Aided Portable Changeable Message Signs in Reducing Vehicle Speeds in Highway Work Zones. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 48, 2014, pp. 311–321.

References 111   Huang, Y., and Y. Bai. Driver Responses to Graphic-Aided Portable Changeable Message Signs in Highway Work Zones. Journal of Transportation Safety and Security, Vol. 11, No. 6, 2019, pp. 661–682. IBI Group. Connecticut Department of Transportation Smart Work Zones Guide. Connecticut Department of Transportation, Hartford, Conn., 2017. Indiana DOT. Protect the Queue: INDOT’s Queue Awareness Program. 2021 [Online]. Available: https:// www.iowadot.gov/erl/index.html [accessed June 15, 2021]. Institute for Transportation Research and Education. Freeval. 2018 [Online]. Available: http://freeval.org/#home [accessed March 26, 2021]. Iowa DOT. Electronic Reference Library (ERL). 2021a [Online]. Available: https://www.iowadot.gov/erl/index.html [accessed April 1, 2021]. Iowa DOT. Traffic Critical Projects: Office of Traffic Operations. 2021b [Online]. Available: https://sites.google. com/site/iowatcp/home [accessed April 1, 2021]. Iowa State University. Audible Attenuator. 2021a [Online]. Available: https://intrans.iastate.edu/research/in-progress/ audible-attenuator/ [accessed April 1, 2021]. Iowa State University. Iowa DOT Smart Arrow Board Map. 2021b [Online]. Available: https://isu-intrans. maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=4ca460dcc5054d1db7321a1a1d2ac20b&extent=- 11393518.5523%2C4643895.4522%2C-9384141.9528%2C5687108.0142%2C102100 [accessed April 1, 2021]. Iowa State University. REACTOR: Real-Time Analytics of Transportation Data Lab. 2021c [Online]. Available: https://reactor.ctre.iastate.edu/ [accessed April 1, 2021]. Jafarnejad, A., J. Gambatese, and S. Hernandez. Influence of Truck-Mounted Radar Speed Signs in Controlling Vehicle Speed for Mobile Maintenance Operations: Oregon Case Study. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2617, 2017, pp. 19–26. Jo, B. W., Y. S. Lee, J. H. Kim, D. K. Kim, and P. H. Choi. Proximity Warning and Excavator Control System for Prevention of Collision Accidents. Sustainability, Vol. 9, No. 8, 2017, pp. 1–20. Kalina, S. Arizona Work Zone Notification System Pilot Project. Commercial Vehicle Safety Summit, Northampton, Mass., 2019. Kamyab, M., S. Remias, E. Najmi, K. Hood, M. Al-Akshar, and I. Ustun. Evaluation of Interstate Work Zone Mobility Using Probe Vehicle Data and Machine Learning Techniques. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Vol. 2673, No. 2, 2019, pp. 811–822. Kang, K., and G. Chang. Evaluation of the Work Zone Merge Control Strategies Using the Extensive Simulation Experiments. In 90th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2011. Kang, M. W., and S. U. Momtaz. Assessment of Driver Compliance on Roadside Safety Signs with Auditory Warning Sounds Generated from Pavement Surface—A Driving Simulator Study. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition), Vol. 5, No. 1, 2018, pp. 1–13. Kansas DOT. Dynamic Late Lane Merge System (DLLMS). Kansas Department of Transportation, Topeka, Kans., 2016a. Kansas DOT. Zipper Merge. 2016b [Online]. Available: https://www.ksdot.org/bureaus/kcmetro/zipper-merge.asp [accessed November 17, 2020]. Khan, G., S. Sanni, S. Berr, and K. Shafizadeh. Evaluation of Work Zone Intrusion Alarms. California Department of Transportation, Sacramento, Calif., 2019. Kimley-Horn and Associates. Final Draft Working Paper 1—Nationwide Review of SWZ Technologies. Arizona Department of Transportation, Phoenix, Ariz., 2019a. Kimley-Horn and Associates. MCDOT Smarter Work Zone System—Evaluation Report. Maricopa County Department of Transportation, Phoenix, Ariz., 2019b. Kimley-Horn and Associates. Smart Work Zone (SWZ) Technical Concept Study: Phase 1 Working Paper 2— Challenges to Implementation. Arizona Department of Transportation, Phoenix, Ariz., 2019c. Kimley-Horn and Associates. Smart Work Zone (SWZ) Technical Concept Study: Phase No. 1 Final Report. Arizona Department of Transportation, Phoenix, Ariz., 2020. King, J., and S. McCrea. Portable Changeable Message Sign Handbook, 2nd Edition. Oregon Department of Transportation, Salem, Ore., 2018. Knickerbocker, S., V. Ravichandra-Mouli, N. Hawkins, and A. Sharma. Developing a Research-Grade Iowa Work Zone Database. InTrans Project 18-675, Iowa Department of Transportation, Ames, Iowa, 2020. Krupa, C. Work Zone Intrusion Alarm Effectiveness. Report No. NJ-2010-004, New Jersey Department of Transportation, Trenton, N.J., 2010. Kuhn, B., K. Balke, R. Brydia, L. Theiss, I. Tsapakis, L. Ruback, and M. Le. Evaluation of TxDOT Variable Speed Limit Pilot Projects. Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, Tex., 2015. Kweon, Y., I. Lim, and M. Fontaine. Work Zone Safety Performance Measures for Virginia. Report No. FHWA/ VTRC 16-R10, Virginia Department of Transportation, Richmond, Va., 2016. Lammers, E., J. G. Pigman, B. Howell, and A. Kirk. Applicability of Zipper Merge Versus Early Merge in Kentucky Work Zones. Research Report KTC-17-27/SPR16-526-IF, Kentucky Transportation Cabinet, Frankfort, Ky., 2017.

112 Use of Smart Work Zone Technologies for Improving Work Zone Safety Li, Y., and Y. Bai. Determining the Optimal Deployment Location of a Portable Changeable Message Sign in the Upstream of Work Zones. In 91st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2012. Li, Y., Y. Bai, and U. Firman. Determining the Effectiveness of PCMS on Reducing Vehicle Speed in Rural Highway Work Zones. In 89th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2010. Li, Y., J. C. Martínez Mori, and D. B. Work. Estimating Traffic Conditions from Smart Work Zone Systems. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems: Technology, Planning, and Operations, Vol. 22, No. 6, 2018, pp. 490–502. Liao, C. F. Development of a Navigation System Using Smartphone and Bluetooth Technologies to Help the Visually Impaired Navigate Work Zones Safely. Report No. MN/RC 2014-12, Minnesota Department of Transportation, Saint Paul, Minn., 2014. Liao, C. F. Test and Evaluate a Bluetooth Based In-Vehicle Message System to Alert Motorists in Work Zones. Report No. CTS 19-09, Center for Transportation Studies, Minneapolis, Minn., 2019. Liu, Y., Y. Hu, and X. Li. A Smartphone-Based Prototype System for Incident/Work Zone Management Driven by Crowd-Sourced Data. InTrans Project 06-277, Smart Work Zone Deployment Initiative, Ames, Iowa, 2015. Luttrell, T., M. Robinson, J. Rephlo, R. Haas, J. Srour, R. Benekohal, J.-S. Oh, and T. Scriba. Comparative Anal- ysis Report: The Benefits of Using Intelligent Transportation Systems in Work Zones. Report No. FHWA- HOP-09-002, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 2008. Mao, J., Y. Liu, Z. Luo, and J. Yu. A Dynamic Lane-Based Signal Merge Control Model for Freeway Work Zone Operation. In 92nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2013. Maricopa County. Connected Vehicles Program. n.d. [Online]. Available: https://www.maricopa.gov/640/ Connected-Vehicles-Program [accessed March 26, 2021]. Marks, E., and J. Teizer. Proximity Sensing and Warning Technology for Heavy Construction Equipment Opera- tion. In Construction Research Congress, American Society of Civil Engineers, West Lafayette, Ind., 2012, pp. 981–990. Marks, E., S. Vereen, and I. Awolusi. Active Work Zone Safety Using Emerging Technologies 2017. Report No. 15412, University Transportation Center for Alabama, Huntsville, Ala., 2017. Maryland State Highway Administration. Use of Intelligent Transportation Systems in Work Zones. Maryland State Highway Administration, Annapolis, Md., 2005a. Maryland State Highway Administration. Use of Portable Changeable Message Signs with Speed Display in Work Zones. Maryland State Highway Administration, Annapolis, Md., 2005b, pp. 1–9. Maryland State Highway Administration. Maryland Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways. Maryland State Highway Administration, Annapolis, Md., 2011. Massachusetts DOT. Item 856.3: Real-Time Traffic Management System for Work Zones. n.d. [Online]. Available: https://www.workzonesafety.org/files/documents/SWZ/Item-856.3.pdf [accessed November 17, 2020]. Massachusetts DOT. Massachusetts Smart Work Zone Standard Operating Procedures. Massachusetts Depart- ment of Transportation, Boston, Mass., 2016a. Massachusetts DOT. MassDOT Scoring Criteria for Work Zone ITS. Massachusetts Department of Transportation, Boston, Mass., 2016b. Massachusetts DOT. Smart Work Zone Design Standards. Massachusetts Department of Transportation, Boston, Mass., 2016c. Mattox, J. H., W. A. Sarasua, J. H. Ogle, R. T. Eckenrode, and A. Dunning. Development and Evaluation of Speed-Activated Sign to Reduce Speeds in Work Zones. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2015, 2007, pp. 3–11. Mekker, M. M., H. Li, M. L. McNamara, J. D. McGregor, M. Kachler, and D. Bullock. Implementation of a Real Time Data Driven Smart Work Zone. In 95th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2017. Mekker, M. M., S. M. Remias, M. L. McNamara, W. A. Bunnell, D. W. Krohn, J. R. Sturdevant, E. D. Cox, and D. M. Bullock. Identifying Effects and Applications of Fixed and Variable Speed Limits. Report No. FHWA/ IN/JTRP-2016/31, Indiana Department of Transportation, Indianapolis, Ind., 2016. Messina, J., M. Song, J. D. Ortiz-Varela, and J. H. Wang. Assessing the Message Design on Variable Message Signs in Mitigating the Bottleneck Issue at Work Zones. In 91st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2012. Michigan DOT. Portable Changeable Message Sign Guidelines. Michigan Department of Transportation, Lansing, Mich., 2011. Michigan DOT. Special Provisions. 2021 [Online]. Available: https://mdotjboss.state.mi.us/SpecProv/specProvHome. htm [accessed April 17, 2021].

References 113   Middleton, D., R. Brydia, G. Pesti, P. Songchitruksa, K. Balke, and G. L. Ullman. Use of Intelligent Transportation Systems in Rural Work Zones. Report No. FHWA/TX-11-0-6427-1, Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, Tex., 2011. Minnesota DOT. Use This Flow Chart to Assist with ITS/IWZ System Deployments System Planning. Minnesota Department of Transportation, St. Paul, Minn., n.d. Minnesota DOT. ITS Concept of Operations: End of Queue Warning System for Work Zone. Minnesota Department of Transportation, St. Paul, Minn., 2015a. Minnesota DOT. Work Zone Intrusion Warning System: System Requirements. Minnesota Department of Trans- portation, St. Paul, Minn., 2015b. Minnesota DOT. End of Queue Warning Systems: Systems Requirements. Minnesota Department of Transpor- tation, St. Paul, Minn., 2018. Minnesota DOT. Use This Decision Tree to Identify Potential ITS/IWZ Scoping Needs. Minnesota Department of Transportation, St. Paul, Minn., 2019. Minnesota DOT. Autonomous Truck Mounted Attenuator (ATMA) Project. 2020a [Online]. Available: http:// www.dot.state.mn.us/automated/docs/automated-crash-cushion-project.pdf [accessed April 1, 2021]. Minnesota DOT. MnDOT ITS/IWZ Systems Generalized (Boiler Plate) Special Provisions Fully Automated Stand-alone Systems. Minnesota Department of Transportation, St. Paul, Minn., 2020b. Minnesota DOT. MnDOT ITS/IWZ Systems Generalized (Boiler Plate) Special Provisions RTMC/IRIS Controlled Systems. Minnesota Department of Transportation, St. Paul, Minn., 2020c. Minnesota DOT. Minnesota IWZ Toolbox. Minnesota Department of Transportation, St. Paul, Minn., 2020d. Minnesota DOT. Time and Traffic Provisions. Minnesota Department of Transportation, St. Paul, Minn., 2020e. Minnesota DOT. Zipper Merge. 2020f [Online]. Available: http://www.dot.state.mn.us/zippermerge/ [accessed February 25, 2021]. Minnesota DOT. I-94 Maple Grove to Clearwater. 2021a [Online]. Available: https://www.dot.state.mn.us/ i94-mg-clearwater/index.html [accessed April 1, 2021]. Minnesota DOT. Long Term Typical Applications: Intelligent Work Zone. 2021b [Online]. Available: http:// www.dot.state.mn.us/trafficeng/workzone/iwz.html, [accessed February 25, 2021]. Minnesota DOT. MnDOT Tests I-35 Snowplow Activation of Warning Signs to Boost Safety. 2021c [Online]. Available: https://www.dot.state.mn.us/news/2021/01/22-d6-i35.html [accessed April 1, 2021]. Minnesota DOT. Systems Engineering for Work Zone Data Initiatives (WZDI) and Warning Systems—Phase 1. 2021d [Online]. Available: http://www.dot.state.mn.us/its/projects/2016-2020/se-wzdi-phase1.html [accessed April 19, 2021]. Mishra, S., M. M. Golias, and D. Thapa. Work Zone Alert Systems. Report No. RES2019-01, Tennessee Depart- ment of Transportation, Memphis, Tenn., 2021. Misra, A., A. Leslie, A. Cao, L. Molnar, D. Eby, and C. Flanagan. MDOT/ATLAS Identifying Potential Work Zone Countermeasures Using Connected-Vehicle and Driving Data. Report No. SPR-1672, Michigan Department of Transportation, Lansing, Mich., 2018. Missouri DOT. Job Special Provisions. 2018 [Online]. Available: https://spexternal.modot.mo.gov/sites/de/JSP/ Forms/JSPByTitle.aspx [accessed April 19, 2021]. Missouri DOT. Tracker: Measures of Departmental Performance. Missouri Department of Transportation, Jefferson City, Mo., 2019. Missouri DOT. Missouri Standard Specifications for Highway Construction. Missouri Department of Transportation, Jefferson City, Mo., 2021. Mollenhauer, M., E. White, and N. Roofigari-Esfahan. Design and Evaluation of a Connected Work Zone Hazard Detection and Communication System for Connected and Automated Vehicles (CAVs). Report No. 03-050, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2019. Morris, T., J. Schwach, and P. Michalopoulos. Low-Cost Portable Video-Based Queue Detection for Work-Zone Safety. Report No. CTS 11-01, Center for Transportation Studies, Minneapolis, Minn., 2011. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). U.S. Climate Regions. n.d. [Online]. Available: https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/monitoring-references/maps/us-climate-regions.php [accessed April 18, 2021]. New Hampshire DOT. New Hampshire Work Zone ITS Toolbox. New Hampshire Department of Transportation, Concord, N.H., 2011. New Hampshire DOT. TSMO Construction Work Zone Program Process. New Hampshire Department of Trans- portation, Concord, N.H., 2016. New Jersey DOT. Real Time Work Zone Traffic Systems. New Jersey Department of Transportation, Trenton, N.J., 2013. Nnaji, C., J. Gambatese, and H. W. Lee. Work Zone Intrusion Technology to Reduce Injuries and Fatalities. Professional Safety, Vol. 63, No. 4, 2018a, pp. 36–41. Nnaji, C., H. W. Lee, A. Karakhan, and J. Gambatese. Developing a Decision-Making Framework to Select Safety Technologies for Highway Construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 144, No. 4, 2018b, pp. 1–11.

114 Use of Smart Work Zone Technologies for Improving Work Zone Safety Nnaji, C., J. Gambatese, H. W. Lee, and F. Zhang. Improving Construction Work Zone Safety Using Technology: A Systematic Review of Applicable Technologies. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition), Vol. 7, No.1, 2020, pp. 61–75. North Carolina DOT. Guidelines for Work Zone Variable Speed Limits for NC Highway Construction and Maintenance Activities on High Speed Facilities. North Carolina Department of Transportation, Raleigh, N.C., 2011. North Carolina DOT. Standard Specifications for Roads and Structures. North Carolina Department of Trans- portation, Raleigh, N.C., 2018. North Carolina DOT. New NCDOT Work Zone System Reduces Backups, Aids Drivers. 2019 [Online]. Available: https://www.ncdot.gov/news/press-releases/Pages/2019/2019-06-13-new-work-zone-system- reduces-backups.aspx [accessed November 17, 2020]. Ohio DOT. Standard Construction Drawings—Traffic. 2018 [Online]. Available: https://www.dot.state.oh.us/ Divisions/Engineering/Roadway/DesignStandards/traffic/SCD/Pages/default.aspx [accessed April 17, 2021]. Ohio DOT. Traffic Engineering Manual. Ohio Department of Transportation, Columbus, Ohio, 2021. Oregon DOT. Guidelines for the Operation of Permanent Variable Message Signs. Oregon Department of Trans- portation, Salem, Ore., 2013. Oregon DOT. Oregon Work Zone ITS Concept of Operations. Oregon Department of Transportation, Salem, Ore., 2016. Oregon DOT. Standard Guidelines for Product Review: 00225, 16C—Smart Work Zone System (Vendor). Oregon Department of Transportation, Salem, Ore., 2017. Oregon DOT. I-5 Interstate Bridge Trunnion Replacement Project. 2020a [Online]. Available: https://www.oregon. gov/odot/projects/pages/project-details.aspx?project=15119 [accessed March 23, 2021]. Oregon DOT. I-5 Interstate Bridge Trunnion Replacement Project. 2020b [Online]. Available: https://www.flickr. com/photos/oregondot/albums/72157715364127571 [accessed April 5, 2021]. Oregon DOT. About TripCheck. 2021a [Online]. Available: https://www.tripcheck.com/Pages/New-Features [accessed March 24, 2021]. Oregon DOT. Special Provisions. 2021b [Online]. Available: https://www.oregon.gov/odot/Business/Pages/ Special-Provisions.aspx [accessed March 17, 2021]. Pack, M., and N. Ivanov. Use of Vehicle Probe and Cellular GPS Data by State Departments of Transportation. NCHRP Synthesis 561, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2021. Pant P. Smart Work Zone Systems. 2017 [Online]. Available: https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/wz/workshops/accessible/ Pant_paper.htm [accessed November 17, 2020]. Paracha, J., M. Kapitanov, T. Peterson, W. D. Baldwin, and N. Boudreau. Smarter Work Zones Webinar Series Webinar 1: Overview of the Smarter Work Zones Initiative. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 2015. Paracha, J., and R. Ostroff. Improving Work Zones Every Day, in Every Way. Public Roads. Publication No. FHWA- HRT-18-004, Vol. 82, No. 2, 2018. Parikh, G., M. Duhn, A. Loutfi, and J. Hourdos. Work Zone Mapping and Tag Deployment System. Report No. CTS 19-29, Center for Transportation Studies, Minneapolis, Minn., 2019. Park, J., and S. Sakhakarmi. Embedded Safety Communication System for Robust Hazard Perception of Individuals in Work Zones. The Center for Construction Research and Training, Silver Spring, Md., 2019. Paulus, S. Development of Best Practices for Portable Changeable Message Sign Use in Work Zones for Design and Construction Engineers. In 95th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2016. Pennsylvania DOT. Pennsylvania’s Automated Work Zone Speed Enforcement. 2020a [Online]. Available: https:// workzonecameras.penndot.gov/ [accessed April 17, 2021]. Pennsylvania DOT. Specifications. PUB 408/2020, Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, Harrisburg, Pa., 2020b. Pesti, G., C. L. Chu, H. Charara, G. L. Ullman, and K. Balke. Simulation Based Evaluation of Dynamic Queue Warning System Performance. In 92nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1500, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2013. Petersen, S., E. Minge, and C. Iverson. Queue Warning and Travel Time Estimation Near a Work Zone. In 93rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2014. Peterson, T., G. L. Ullman, T. Nemsky, and C. Brookes. Smarter Work Zones Webinar Series Webinar 4: Smarter Work Zones Technology Showcase—Queue Warning Systems. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 2015a. Peterson, T., J. Van Jura, and C. Brookes. Smarter Work Zones Webinar Series Webinar #6: Technology Appli- cation Case Studies: Variable Speed Limit and Dynamic Lane Merge. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 2015b.

References 115   Petter, A., and C. Poe. I-35 Queue Detection Warning System. Training slides, Texas Department of Transporta- tion, Austin, Tex., 2013. Qiao, F., J. Jia, L. Yu, Q. Li, and D. Zhai. Drivers’ Smart Assistance System Based on Radio Frequency Identification: Enhanced Safety and Reduced Emissions in Work Zones. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2458, 2014, pp. 37–46. Qualtrics. Online survey software. 2021 [Online]. Available: https://www.qualtrics.com/research-core/survey- software/ [accessed April 18, 2021]. Radwan, E., Z. Zaidi, and R. Harb. Operational Evaluation of Dynamic Lane Merging in Work Zones with Variable Speed Limits. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 16, 2011, pp. 460–469. Rahman, R., F. Qiao, Q. Li, and L. Yu. Developing a Smartphone Based Warning System Application to Enhance the Safety at Work Zones. Report No. TranLIVE/TSU/16/06, 2016, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. Ravani, B., and C. Wang. Speeding in Highway Work Zone: An Evaluation of Methods of Speed Control. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 113, 2018, pp. 202–212. Reinker, J., J. H. Wang, and J. Messina. Assessing the Effectiveness of a Portable Dynamic Lane Merging System at Work Zones. In 94th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2015. Ren, T., Y. Xie, and L. Jiang. Cooperative Highway Work Zone Merge Control Based on Reinforcement Learning in a Connected and Automated Environment. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Vol. 2674, No. 10, 2020, pp. 1–12. Roadway Safety Consortium. Guidelines on Improving Work Zone Safety Through Public Information and Traveler Information. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 2011. Roberts, C. A., and E. J. Smaglik. Reduction of Speed in Work Zones Using ITS DMS Instant Feedback to Drivers: Vehicle Speed Versus Traffic Fine. Report No. FHWA-AZ-14-681, Arizona Department of Transportation, Phoenix, Ariz., 2014. Roelofs, T., and C. Brookes. Synthesis of Intelligent Work Zone Practices. Report No. ENT-2014-1, ENTERPRISE Pooled Fund Study TPF-5(231), Lansing, Mich., 2014. Sadabadi, K. F., M. L. Pack, N. Ivanov, and T. H. Jacobs. Work Zone Performance Monitoring Application Develop- ment. Report No. MD-16-SHA-UM-3-16, Maryland State Highway Administration, Baltimore, Md., 2016. Saito, M., and A. B. Wilson. Evaluation of the Effectiveness of a Variable Advisory Speed System on Queue Mitiga- tion in Work Zones. Report No. UT-11.04, Utah Department of Transportation, Salt Lake City, Utah, 2011. Sakhare, R., J. Desai, J. Mathew, J. McGregor, and D. Bullock. Evaluation of the Impact of Presence Lighting and Digital Speed Limit Trailers on Interstate Speeds in Indiana Work Zones. Journal of Transportation Technolo- gies, Vol. 11, 2021, pp. 157–167. Schattler, K. L., S. Maharjan, A. Hawkins, and K. Maillacheruvu. Work Zone Safety Performance on Illinois State Routes. Report No. FHWA-ICT-20-001, Illinois Department of Transportation, Springfield, Ill., 2020. Schroeder, B., L. Trask, and M. Anderson. Work Zone Intelligent Transportation System (WZITS) Implementation Tool Version 2.0—User Guide. Contract No. DTFH61-12-D-00049-5003, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 2021. Schulze, A. Queue Warning System Study. Wisconsin Department of Transportation, Madison, Wis., 2018. Scriba, T., and J. Atkinson. Creating Smarter Work Zones. Public Roads, Publication No. FHWA-HRT-14-003, Vol. 77, No. 5, 2014. Sommers, N., and D. McAvoy. Improving Work Zone Safety Through Speed Management. Report No. FHWA/ OH-2013/5, Ohio Department of Transportation, Columbus, Ohio, 2013. Songchitruksa, P., and D. Middleton. Enhancing Work Zone Travel Time Estimation Using Smart Work Zone Data. In 92nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2013. South Carolina DOT. Trailer Mounted Automated Flagger Assistance Device System (AFAD). South Carolina Department of Transportation, Columbia, S.C., 2012. South Dakota DOT. SDDOT Construction Manual. South Dakota Department of Transportation, Pierre, S.Dak., 2020. Sprengeler, D. E. Smart Arrow Board Deployment. National Work Zone Traffic Management and Safety Conference, Virtual Event, 2020. Stephens, D., J. Schroeder, and R. Ostroff. A Framework for Work Zone Activity Data Collection and Management (Version 3). Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 2019. Sun, C., P. Edara, Y. Hou, and A. Robertson. Cost-Benefit Analysis of Sequential Warning Lights in Nighttime Work Zone Tapers. Smart Work Zone Deployment Initiative, Ames, Iowa, 2011. Teizer, J., B. S. Allread, C. E. Fullerton, and J. Hinze. Autonomous Proactive Real-Time Construction Worker and Equipment Operator Proximity Safety Alert System. Automation in Construction, Vol. 19, No. 5, 2010, pp. 630–640.

116 Use of Smart Work Zone Technologies for Improving Work Zone Safety Teng, H., X. Xu, X. Li, V. Kwigizile, and A. R. Gibby. Evaluation of Speed Monitoring Displays for Work Zones in Las Vegas, Nevada. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2107, 2009, pp. 46–56. Tennessee DOT. Protect the Queue. n.d. [Online]. Available: https://www.tn.gov/tdot/traffic-operations-division/ transportation-management-office/protect-the-queue.html [accessed June 15, 2021]. Terhaar, E. F. Implementation of Automatic Flagger Assistance Devices (AFADs) for Minnesota Department of Transportation Flagger Operations. Report No. MN/RC 2014-44, Minnesota Department of Transportation, St. Paul, Minn., 2014. Terhaar, E. F. Development of a Moving Automatic Flagger Assistance Device (AFAD) for Moving Work Zone Operations. Report No. MN/RC 2017-09, Minnesota Department of Transportation, St. Paul, Minn., 2017. Texas DOT. 0-5326: Improved Techniques for Traffic Control for Freeways and Work Zones. Project Summary, Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, Tex., 2007. Texas DOT. Smart Work Zone Guidelines. Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, Tex., 2018. Texas DOT. Traffic Engineering Standard Plan Sheets. 2019 [Online]. Available: https://www.dot.state.tx.us/ insdtdot/orgchart/cmd/cserve/standard/toc.htm [accessed March 16, 2021]. Texas DOT. Go/No-Go Decision Tool. 2020 [Online]. Available: http://ftp.dot.state.tx.us/pub/txdot-info/trf/ gng-decision-tool.xlsx [accessed November 17, 2020]. Theen, A. I-5 Bridge Project: Predictions of Traffic Catastrophe Don’t Materialize. The Oregonian/OregonLive, 2020 [Online]. Available: https://www.oregonlive.com/commuting/2020/09/i-5-bridge-project-predictions- of-traffic-catastrophe-dont-materialize.html [accessed March 23, 2021]. Theiss, L. A., T. Lindheimer, and G. L. Ullman. Closed Course Performance Testing of a Work Zone Intrusion Alarm System. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Vol. 2672, No. 16, 2018, pp. 57–67. Transportation Research Board. Phase III: Smart Proximity Work Zone Safety Technology Deployment. 2019 [Online]. Available: https://trid.trb.org/view/1601102 [accessed November 17, 2020]. Trout, N. D., M. D. Finley, and B. R. Ullman. Motorists’ Understanding of Automated Flagger Assistance Devices in Work Zones. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2337, 2013, pp. 42–49. Tsai, Y. Development of a Sensing Methodology for Intelligent and Reliable Work-Zone Hazard Awareness. Highway NCHRP-IDEA Project 139, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2011. Ullman, B., N. Trout, and D. Sun. Truck-Mounted Changeable Message Signs with Symbols for Work Zone Operations. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2272, 2012, pp. 78–86. Ullman, G. L., V. Iragavarapu, and R. E. Brydia. Safety Effects of Portable End-of-Queue Warning System Deployments at Texas Work Zones. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2555, 2016, pp. 46–52. Ullman, G. L., T. Lomax, and T. Scriba. A Primer on Work Zone Safety and Mobility Performance Measurement. Report No. FHWA-HOP-11-033, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 2011. Ullman, G. L., G. Pesti, and R. Klein. Guidance on Data Needs, Availability, and Opportunities for Work Zone Perfor- mance Measures. Report No. FHWA-HOP-13-011, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 2013. Ullman, G. L., M. Pratt, M. D. Fontaine, R. J. Porter, and J. Medina. Estimating the Safety Effects of Work Zone Characteristics and Countermeasures: A Guidebook. NCHRP Research Report 869, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2018a. Ullman, G. L., M. Pratt, M. D. Fontaine, R. J. Porter, and J. Medina. Analysis of Work Zone Crash Characteristics and Countermeasures. NCHRP Web-Only Document 240, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2018b. Ullman, G. L., and J. Schroeder. Mitigating Work Zone Safety and Mobility Challenges Through Intelligent Transpor- tation Systems: Case Studies. Report No. FHWA-HOP-14-007, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 2014. Ullman, G. L., J. Schroeder, and D. Gopalakrishna. Work Zone Intelligent Transportation Systems Implementa- tion Guide: Use of Technology and Data for Effective Work Zone Management. Federal Highway Adminis- tration, Washington, D.C., 2014. Ullman, G. L., and L. Theiss. Personal Warning Sensor for Road Construction Workers. Report No. MN/RC 2019-08, Minnesota Department of Transportation, St. Paul, Minn., 2019. U.S. DOT. Work Zone Data Exchange (WZDx). 2021 [Online]. Available: https://www.transportation.gov/av/ data/wzdx [accessed April 19, 2021]. Van Jura, J. Smart Work Zones in Utah. Presentation slides, Utah Department of Transportation, Salt Lake City, Utah, n.d. Van Jura, J., D. Haines, and A. Gemperline. Use of Portable and Dynamic Variable Speed Limits in Construction Zones. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Vol. 2672, No. 16, 2018, pp. 35–45.

References 117   Vermont Agency of Transportation. VTrans Quality Standards for Temporary Traffic Control Devices. Vermont Agency of Transportation, Montpelier, Vt., 2018. Viray, R. Advancing Work Zone Safety Technology. Presentation slides, Virginia Department of Transportation, Richmond, Va., n.d. Virginia DOT. Appendix D Portable Changeable Message Sign (PCMS) Displays. Virginia Department of Trans- portation, Richmond, Va., 2015. Wang, F., W. Dong, Y. Gao, X. Yan, and Z. You. The Full-Automatic Traffic Cone Placement and Retrieval System Based on Smart Manipulator. In 19th COTA International Conference of Transportation Professionals, Nanjing, China: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2019, pp. 3442–3453. Wang, S., S. Knickerbocker, and A. Sharma. Big-Data-Driven Traffic Surveillance System for Work Zone Monitoring and Decision Supporting. In 96th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2017a. Wang, S., A. Sharma, and S. Knickerbocker. Analyzing and Improving the Performance of Dynamic Message Sign Reporting Work Zone–Related Congestion. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2617, 2017b, pp. 71–77. Washington State DOT. Design—Plan Sheet Library. 2021 [Online]. Available: https://wsdot.wa.gov/Design/ Standards/PlanSheet/default.htm [accessed April 16, 2021]. Weaver, S., M. Arnold, T. Gonzalez, and S. Balk. The Dynamic Merge: Using Traffic Volume Based Signing to Improve Workzone Throughput. In Tenth International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design, Santa Fe, N.Mex., 2019, pp. 356–362. Wisconsin DOT. ITS Design & Operations Guide. Wisconsin Department of Transportation, Madison, Wis., 2009. Wisconsin DOT. Wisconsin DOT Joins Waze Connected Citizens Program. 2017 [Online]. Available: https:// drydenwire.com/news/wisconsin-dot-joins-waze-connected-citizens-program/ [accessed November 17, 2020]. Wisconsin DOT. Standard Specifications for Highway and Structure Construction. Wisconsin Department of Transportation, Madison, Wis., 2021. Xu, W., X. Zhao, Y. Chen, Y. Bian, and H. Li. Research on the Relationship Between Dynamic Message Sign Control Strategies and Driving Safety in Freeway Work Zones. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2018, pp. 1–19. Yang, G., M. Ahmed, S. Gaweesh, and E. Adomah. Connected Vehicle Real-Time Traveler Information Messages for Freeway Speed Harmonization Under Adverse Weather Conditions: Trajectory Level Analysis Using Driving Simulator. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 146 (July), No. 105707, 2020. Yang, X., Y. Lu (Carl), and Y. Lin. Optimal Variable Speed Limit Control System for Freeway Work Zone Opera- tions. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, Vol. 31, No. 1, 2017. Yang, X., J. Park, and Y. K. Cho. Adaptive Signal-Processing for BLE Sensors for Dynamic Construction Prox- imity Safety Applications. Construction Research Congress 2018, 2018, pp. 84–93. You, B., F. Qiao, and L. Yu. Drivers’ Reaction of Warning Messages in Work Zone Termination Areas with Left Turn. Journal of Transportation Technologies, Vol. 6, No. 3, 2016, pp.139–147. Zaidi, Z., E. Radwan, and R. Harb. Evaluating Variable Speed Limits and Dynamic Lane Merging Systems in Work Zones: A Simulation Study. ISRN Civil Engineering, 2012, pp. 1–9. Zhang, Y., H. Suarez, and S. Perera. Next Generation Smart Barrel System for Workzone Safety Enhancement. Report No. FHWA-OK-12-02, Oklahoma Department of Transportation, Oklahoma City, Okla., 2012. Zhou, Z., J. Irizarry, and Q. Li. Applying Advanced Technology to Improve Safety Management in the Construction Industry: a Literature Review. Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 31, No. 6, 2013, pp. 606–622. Zhu, X., and D. Fan. Vehicle Intrusion Warning System in Work Zone Within Vehicle Infrastructure Integration Environment. In 20th COTA International Conference of Transportation Professionals, American Society of Civil Engineers, Xi’an, China, 2020, pp. 687–697.

118 AADT annual average daily traffic ADT average daily traffic AFAD automated flagger assistance device API application programming interface Arizona DOT Arizona Department of Transportation ARTBA American Road and Transportation Builders Association ATM active traffic management ATMA autonomous truck-mounted attenuator ATMS advanced traffic management system ATSSA American Traffic Safety Services Association AWARE Advanced Warning and Risk Evasion AWS Amazon web services B/C benefit-cost BLE Bluetooth low energy CARS Condition Acquisition and Reporting System CAT Cooperative Automated Transportation CAV connected and automated (or autonomous) vehicle CCTV closed circuit television CDOT Colorado Department of Transportation CMF Crash Modification Factor CMS changeable message sign CMV commercial motor vehicle CTDOT Connecticut Department of Transportation CV commercial vehicle CVISN Commercial Vehicle Information Systems and Network DAD driveway assistance device DLLMS dynamic late lane merge system DMS dynamic message sign DOT Department of Transportation DSAS driver smart assistance system DSL digital speed limit DSRC dedicated short range communications EB eastbound EDC Every Day Counts EFTCD emergency flasher traffic control device EMS emergency management services ERS Emergency Response System (Arizona DOT) FAO Food and Agricultural Organization (United Nations) List of Abbreviations

List of Abbreviations 119   GIS geographic information systems GUI graphical user interface HAR Highway Advisory Radio HMA hot mix asphalt I Interstate highway IRIS Intelligent Roadway Information System ITS intelligent transportation systems IWZ intelligent work zone LCS lane closure system MassDOT Massachusetts Department of Transportation MC Maricopa County MM mile marker MP milepoint MnDOT Minnesota Department of Transportation MOT maintenance of traffic MUTCD Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices MVDS microwave vehicle detection sensor MVRDS microwave radar detection sensor NB northbound NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NPS National Park Service NTP network time protocol OBU onboard unit PCMS portable changeable message sign PTS portable traffic signal PTZ pan-tilt-zoom PVMS portable variable message sign PVSL portable variable speed limit QWS queue warning system RCRS Road Condition Reporting System RFID radio frequency identification RFP request for proposal RITIS Regional Integrated Transportation Information System RSA roadside alert RSFS radar speed feedback sign RSU roadside unit RTMC Regional Traffic Management Center RTWZTS Real Time Work Zone Travel System SB southbound SPF safety performance function SWIS Statewide Work Zone Information System SWiZAPP Smart Work Zone Activity App SWZ smart work zone SWZDI Smart Work Zone Deployment Initiative SWZM Smart Work Zone Manager TC traffic control TIM traffic incident management TMC traffic management center TMDD Traffic Management Data Dictionary TMP transportation management plan TOC traffic operations center

Next: List of Abbreviations »
Use of Smart Work Zone Technologies for Improving Work Zone Safety Get This Book
×
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

To make work zones safer, state departments of transportation (DOTs) use smart technologies with specialized components, such as sensors, communications, software, and electronic equipment, to manage traffic and operations and disseminate traveler information.

The TRB National Cooperative Highway Research Program's NCHRP Synthesis 587: Use of Smart Work Zone Technologies for Improving Work Zone Safety reviews and documents state DOT practices and implementation challenges regarding the use of smart work zone technologies designed to improve safety for motorists, construction and maintenance workers, and other users of the transportation system.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!