National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: 5 Building a 21st Century National Data Infrastructure Requires Identifying Short- and Medium-Term Activities
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Toward a 21st Century National Data Infrastructure: Mobilizing Information for the Common Good. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26688.
×

References

Abraham, K.G., Haltiwanger, J.C., Hou, C., Sandusky, K., and Spletzer, J.R. (2021). Reconciling survey and administrative measures of self-employment. Journal of Labor Economics, 39(4), 825–860.

Advisory Committee on Data for Evidence Building. (2021). Year 1 Report (October 29, 2021). https://www.bea.gov/system/files/2021-10/acdeb-year-1-report.pdf

Alba, R. (2020). The Great Demographic Illusion: Majority, Minority, and the Expanding American Mainstream. Princeton University Press.

American Economic Association. (2021). How Data Sync Can Save US Official Statistics. https://www.aeaweb.org/content/file?id=15315

Arora, V. (2022). “Evidence Building and America’s DataHub.” Presentation at meeting of the Advisory Committee on Data for Evidence Building. January 21, 2022. https://www.bea.gov/system/files/2022-01/Arora-ACDEB-AmericasDataHub.pdf

Bahrampour, T. (2021). Census Bureau delays release of 5-year ACS data, citing pandemic. Washington Post, November 10. https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2021/11/10/2020-census-acs-delay/

Beauchamp, T.L., and Childress, J.F. (2001). Principles of Biomedical Ethics (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Bhaskar, R., Dillon, M., Foster, B., Knop, B., McBride, L., Perez-Patron, M., and Vickstrom, E. (2021). “Estimating SNAP Eligibility and Access Using Linked Survey and Administrative Records.” Presentation at the Federal Committee on Statistical Methodology Annual Conference. November 4, 2021. https://copafs.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/H2Bhaskar.pptx

Biemer, P.P. (2010). Total survey error: Design, implementation, and evaluation. Public Opinion Quarterly, 74(5), 817–848.

Biemer, P.P., Groves, R.M., Lyberg, L.E., Mathiowitz, N.A., and Sudman, S. (2013). Measurement Errors in Surveys. John Wiley & Sons.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Toward a 21st Century National Data Infrastructure: Mobilizing Information for the Common Good. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26688.
×

Bohman, M. (2021). “Health Care and Private-Sector Data: The Role of Private-Sector Data in the Health Care Sector.” Presentation to the National Academies’ Panel on The Scope, Components, and Key Characteristics of a 21st Century Data Infrastructure. December 9, 2021. https://www.nationalacademies.org/event/12-16-2021/docs/DBDC04350B8F03F-7C59C1BCE7C378E4A4EE5B942929F

Bowlby, G. (2021). “Private Sector Administrative Data and the Canadian Statistical System.” Presentation to the National Academies’ Panel on the Scope, Components, and Key Characteristics of a 21st Century Data Infrastructure. December 9, 2021. https://www.nationalacademies.org/event/12-09-2021/docs/DFD7AB9D5A0E38DE6E461557C33371D724BF52CAEB86

British Academy and the Royal Society. (2017). Data Management and Use: Governance in the 21st Century. https://royalsociety.org/-/media/policy/projects/data-governance/data-management-governance.pdf

Brown, A., Caporaso, A., Abraham, K.G., and Kreuter, F. (2018). Findings from the Integrated Data Workshops Hosted by the Federal Committee on Statistical Methodology and Washington Statistical Society. University of Maryland. https://nces.ed.gov/fcsm/pdf/Workshop_Summary.pdf

Buil-Gil, D., Solymosi, R., and Moretti, A. (2020). Nonparametric Bootstrap and Small Area Estimation to Mitigate Bias in Crowdsourced Data: Simulation Study and Application to Perceived Safety. Big Data Meets Survey Science: A Collection of Innovative Methods, 487–517. John Wiley & Sons.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2022). Change in the Reporting of Marriage and Divorce Statistics. National Vital Statistics System. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/marriage-divorce.htm

Citro, C.F., Auerbach, J., Smith Evans, K., Groshen, E.L., Landefeld, J.S., Mulrow, J., Petska, T., Pierson, S., Potok, N., Rothwell, C.J., Thompson, J., Woodworth, J.L., and Wu, E. (2022). What protects the autonomy of the federal statistical agencies? An assessment of the procedures in place that protect the independence and objectivity of official statistics. Statistics and Public Policy (in press).

Commission on Evidence-Based Policymaking. (2017). The Promise of Evidence-Based Policymaking: Report of the Commission on Evidence-Based Policymaking. https://bipartisanpolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Full-Report-The-Promise-of-Evidence-Based-Policymaking-Report-of-the-Comission-on-Evidence-based-Policymaking.pdf_

Cunningham, J., Hui, A., Lane, J., and Putnam, G. (2022). A value-driven approach to building data infrastructures: The example of the Midwest Collaborative. Harvard Data Science Review, 4(1). https://hdsr.mitpress.mit.edu/pub/mfhpwpxq/release/2

Cutshall, C., and Lane, J. (2022). “Governance Focus Area.” Presentation at the meeting of the Advisory Committee on Data for Evidence Building. March 18, 2022. https://www.bea.gov/system/files/2022-03/Governance-Report-Mar2022.pdf

Czajka, J.L., and Beyler, A. (2016). Declining Response Rates in Federal Surveys: Trends and Implications (Background Paper). Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research. https://www.mathematica.org/publications/declining-response-rates-in-federal-surveys-trends-and-implications-background-paper

Czajka, J.L., and Stange, M. (2018). Transparency in the Reporting of Quality for Integrated Data: A Review of International Standards and Guidelines. Washington, DC: Mathematica, Policy Research. https://mathematica.org/publications/transparency-in-the-reporting-of-quality-for-integrated-data-a-review-of-international-standards

Darr, J. (2022). New Tech, New Math, New Methods in Massive Upgrade of Census Bureau Construction Programs. February 8, 2022. U.S. Census Bureau. https://www.census.gov/library/stories/2022/02/census-bureau-construction-data-from-stone-age-to-space-age.html

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Toward a 21st Century National Data Infrastructure: Mobilizing Information for the Common Good. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26688.
×

Datta, A.R., Ugarte, G., and Resnick, D. (2020). Linking Survey Data with Commercial or Administrative Data for Data Quality Assessment. Big Data Meets Survey Science: A Collection of Innovative Methods, 99–129. John Wiley & Sons.

Davies, T., Walker, S., Rubinstein, M., and Perini, F. (2019). The State of Open Data: Histories and Horizons. Cape Town and Ottawa: African Minds and International Development Research Centre. https://idl-bnc-idrc.dspacedirect.org/bitstream/handle/10625/57585/The%20State%20of%20Open%20Data.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y

DeFrances, C.J., and Lau, D.T. (n.d.). Collecting Electronic Health Record Data for the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey and the National Hospital Care Survey. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/FCSM/pdf/J4_DeFrances_2018FCSM.pdf

Deshpande, M., and Mueller-Smith, M.G. (2022). Does Welfare Prevent Crime? The Criminal Justice Outcomes of Youth Removed from SSI. NBER Working Paper 29800. National Bureau of Economic Research. http://www.nber.org/papers/w29800.pdf

Eticas Foundation. (2020). Impact on Privacy and Data Protection of Citizen Science Projects. https://eticasfoundation.org/governance/impact-on-privacy-and-data-protection-of-citizen-science-projects/

European Commission (n.d.) European Data Strategy. Making the EU a Role Model for a Society Empowered by Data. https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/priorities-2019-2024/europe-fit-digital-age/european-data-strategy

________. (2022). Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Harmonised Rules on Fair Access to and Use of Data (Data Act). https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/data-act-proposal-regulation-harmonised-rules-fair-access-and-use-data

Federal CDO Council. (n.d.). Working Group Data Inventory. https://www.cdo.gov/data-inventory/

Federal Committee on Statistical Methodology. (2020). A Framework for Data Quality. FCSM 20-04. September, 2020. https://nces.ed.gov/fcsm/pdf/FCSM.20.04_A_Framework_for_Data_Quality.pdf

Federal Data Strategy. (n.d.). Data Ethics Framework. https://resources.data.gov/assets/documents/fds-data-ethics-framework.pdf

Federal Register. (1997). Order providing for the confidentiality of statistical information. 62 FR 35044. June 27, 1997. https://www.federalregister.gov/d/97-16934

________. (2011). Human subjects research protections: Enhancing protections for research subjects and reducing burden, delay, and ambiguity for investigators. 76 FR 44512. July 26, 2011. https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2011-18792

________. (2015). Federal policy for the protection of human subjects. 80 FR 53933. September 8, 2015. https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2015-21756

________. (2016). Agency information collection activities; request for comments; revision of the confidentiality pledge under Title 13 United States Code, Section 9. 81 FR 94321. December 23, 2016. https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2016-30959

________. (2017). Federal policy for the protection of human subjects. 82 FR 7149. January 19, 2017. https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2017-01058

________. (2022). The interagency council on statistical policy’s recommendation for a standard application process (SAP) for requesting access to certain confidential data assets. 87 FR 2459. January 14, 2022. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/01/14/2022-00620/the-interagency-council-on-statistical-policys-recommendation-for-a-standard-application-process-sap

Finlay, K., Mueller-Smith, M.G., and Papp, J. (2022). The Criminal Justice Administrative Records System: A Next-Generation Research Data Platform. Criminal Justice Administrative Records System Working Paper. https://sites.lsa.umich.edu/mgms/wp-content/uploads/sites/283/2022/04/CJARS_Scientifiic_Data_article_20220408.pdf

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Toward a 21st Century National Data Infrastructure: Mobilizing Information for the Common Good. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26688.
×

Fischer, H.A., Gerber, L.R., and Wentz, E.A. (2021). Evaluating the fitness for use of citizen science data for wildlife monitoring. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, November 16, 2021. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fevo.2021.620850/full

Fobia, A.C., Childs, J.H., and Eggleston, C. (2020). Attitudes Toward Data Linkage: Privacy. Big Data Meets Survey Science: A Collection of Innovative Methods, 683–712. John Wiley & Sons.

Gebru, T., Morgenstern, J., Vecchione, B., Wortman Vaughan, J., Wallach, H., Daumé III, H., and Crawford, K. (2021). Datasheets for datasets. Communications of the ACM, 64(12), 86–92.

Gee, M. (2021). “The Jobs and Employment Data Exchange.” Presentation to the National Academies Panel on the Scope, Components, and Key Characteristics of a 21st Century Data Infrastructure. December 9, 2021. https://www.nationalacademies.org/event/12-09-2021/docs/DFC0803181C2CEE4C14F95764606900E4C9E5E84C1CC

Goodchild, M.F. (2007). Citizens as sensors: The world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal, 69, 211–221.

Grotpeter, J.K. (2007). Respondent Recall. Handbook of Longitudinal Research Design, Measurement, and Analysis, 109–122. Academic Press.

Groves, R.M., and Lyberg, L. (2010). Total survey error past, present, and future. Public Opinion Quarterly, 74(5), 849–879.

Groves, R.M., and Peytcheva, E. (2008). The impact of nonresponse rates on nonresponse bias: A meta-analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72(Summer), 167–189.

Haltiwanger, J.C., Cafarella, M.J., Ehrlich, G., Jarmin, R.S., Johnson, D., and Shapiro, M.D. (2021). “RESET Project: Re-Engineering Statistics using Economic Transactions.” Presentation to the National Academies’ Panel on the Scope, Components, and Key Characteristics of a 21st Century Data Infrastructure. December 9, 2021. https://www.nationalacademies.org/event/12-09-2021/docs/D4C8E6E2696BAFD87311FBE547948D4A74401727C6F7

Hart, N., and Potok, N. (2020). Modernizing U.S. Data Infrastructure: Design Considerations for Implementing a National Secure Data Service to Improve Statistics and Evidence Building. Washington, DC: The Data Foundation. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID3700156_code4389785.pdf?abstractid=3700156&mirid=1

Hoeksema, M.J., Fienberg, H., and Jost, S. (2022). America’s Essential Data at Risk: A Vision to Preserve and Enhance the American Community Survey. The Census Project (March). https://censusproject.files.wordpress.com/2022/03/census_white-paper_final_march_2022.pdf

Igo, S.E. (2018). The Known Citizen: A History of Privacy in Modern America. Harvard University Press.

ILR School. (2021). Pandemic, Racial Inequities Underscore Need for Better Labor Market Data. May 5, 2021. https://www.ilr.cornell.edu/work-and-coronavirus/public-policy/pandemic-racial-inequities-underscore-need-better-labor-market-data

Irby, L. (2022). What Are the 3 Major Credit Reporting Agencies? The Balance. February 12, 2022. https://www.thebalance.com/who-are-the-three-major-credit-bureaus960416#:~:text=1%20Equifax.%20Equifax%20has%20been%20in%20business%20since,did%20not%20pay%20their%20bills.%203%20TransUnion.%20

Jarmin, R.S. (2019). Evolving measurement for an evolving economy: Thoughts on 21st century US economic statistics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33(1), 165–184.

Joint Center for Housing Studies. (2020). Slight Gains in 2020 Outlook for Residential Remodeling. Harvard University. January 16, 2020. https://www.jchs.harvard.edu/press-releases/slight-gains-2020-outlook-residential-remodeling

Kwan, M.P., Casas, I., and Schmitz, B.C. (2004). Protection of geoprivacy and accuracy of spatial information: How effective are geographical masks? The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 39(2), 15–28.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Toward a 21st Century National Data Infrastructure: Mobilizing Information for the Common Good. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26688.
×

Lambert, L. (2022). Redfin: More sellers are cutting home prices as housing market demand begins to soften. Fortune, April 15, 2022. https://fortune.com/2022/04/15/housing-market-slowing-down-redfin-softening-mortgage-rates/

Latham & Watkins. (2016). What you need to know about the Cybersecurity Act of 2015. Client Alert Commentary, no. 1927. https://www.lw.com/thoughtLeadership/lw-Cybersecurity-Act-of-2015

Lee-Ibarra, J. (2021). Data Equity: What Is It, and Why Does It Matter? JLI Consulting, July 10. https://www.jliconsultinghawaii.com/blog/2020/7/10/data-equity-what-is-it-and-why-does-it-matter

Liao, D., Berzofsky, M., Couzens Ianas, L., and Cooper A. (2020). Improving Quality of Administrative Data: A Case Study with FBI’s National-Incident-Based Reporting System Data. Big Data Meets Survey Science: A Collection of Innovative Methods, 217–243. John Wiley & Sons.

Market Research Store. (2021). ICT Market – Global Industry Research Analysis. https://www.marketresearchstore.com/market-insights/ict-market-805765

Markle Foundation. (2021). Unlocking Responsible Access to Data to increase Equity and Economic Mobility. https://markle.org/app/uploads/2022/03/Unlocking-Responsible-Access-to-Data.pdf

Marten, A. (2022). “The Evidence Act’s Standard Application Process.” Presentation at meeting of the Advisory Committee on Data for Evidence Building. January 21, 2022. https://www.bea.gov/system/files/2022-01/Marten-ICSP-Presentation-to-ACDEB-1-18-22.pdf

Marwick, A.E., and boyd, d. (2014). Networked privacy: How teenagers negotiate context in social media. New Media & Society, 16(7), 1051–1067.

Melendez, S., and Pasternac, A. (2019). Here are the data brokers quietly buying and selling your personal information. Fast Company, March 2. https://www.fastcompany.com/90310803/here-are-the-data-brokers-quietly-buying-and-selling-your-personal-information

Moyer, B. (2021). “Private-Sector Health Data: Overview of Data Infrastructure, Initiatives, & Lessons Learned.” Presentation to the National Academies’ Panel on the Scope, Components, and Key Characteristics of a 21st Century Data Infrastructure. December 16, 2021. https://www.nationalacademies.org/event/12-16-2021/docs/D668C778936FB43CD-9F9E24040531F742FF9FCB9886A

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2017a). Federal Statistics, Multiple Data Sources, and Privacy Protection: Next Steps. The National Academies Press.

________. (2017b). Innovations in Federal Statistics: Combining Data Sources While Protecting Privacy. The National Academies Press.

________. (2021). Principles and Practices for a Federal Statistical Agency, Seventh Edition. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25885

________. (2022a). Transparency in Statistical Information for the National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics and All Federal Statistical Agencies. The National Academies Press.

________. (2022b). A Vision and Roadmap for Education Statistics. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/26392

National Archives. (2021). Using the National Archives catalog. https://www.archives.gov/research/catalog/help/using

National Institutes of Health. (2022). NIH’s All of Us Research Program Releases First Genomic Dataset of Nearly 100,000 Whole Genome Sequences. March 17, 2022. https://www.nih.gov/news-events/news-releases/nih-s-all-us-research-program-releases-first-genomic-dataset-nearly-100000-whole-genome-sequences

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Toward a 21st Century National Data Infrastructure: Mobilizing Information for the Common Good. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26688.
×

National Research Council (NRC). (2003) Protecting Participants and Facilitating Social and Behavioral Sciences Research. Panel on Institutional Review Boards, Surveys, and Social Science Research, C.F. Citro, D.R. Ilgen, and C.B. Marrett, eds. Committee on National Statistics and Board on Behavioral, Cognitive, and Sensory Sciences. Washington D.C” The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/10638

________. (2014). Proposed Revisions to the Common Rule for the Protection of Human Subjects in the Behavioral and Social Sciences. Committee on Revisions to the Common Rule for the Protection of Human Subjects in Research in the Behavioral and Social Sciences, Board on Behavioral, Cognitive, and Sensory Sciences, Committee on National Statistics, and Committee on Population. The National Academies Press https://doi.org/10.17226/18614

O’Connor, N. (2018). Reforming the U.S. Approach to Data Protection and Privacy. Council on Foreign Relations, Digital and Cyberspace Policy Program. January 30, 2018. https://www.cfr.org/report/reforming-us-approach-data-protection

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). Institutions Guaranteeing Access to Information: OECD and MENA Region. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/governance/institutions-guaranteeing-access-to-information_e6d58b52-en

Osano. (2020). Data Privacy Laws: What You Need to Know in 2022. June 14, 2020. https://www.osano.com/articles/data-privacy-laws

Page, E.T., Young, S.K., Sweitzer, M.D., and Okrent, A.M. (2021). “Determining Household Obesity Status Using Scanner Data.” Presentation at the 2021 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, Austin TX. https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/312785/files/Abstracts_21_06_15_15_11_43_90__199_136_105_37_0.pdf

Potok, N., and Hart, N. (2022). A Blueprint for Implementing the National Secure Data Service: Initial Governance and Administrative Priorities for the National Science Foundation. The Data Foundation, Washington, DC. https://www.datafoundation.org/a-blueprint-for-implementing-the-national-secure-data-service-2022

Pozen, D. (2018). Transparency’s ideological drift. The Yale Law Journal, 128, 100–165.

Prewitt, K., (2013). What Is “Your” Race?: The Census and Our Flawed Efforts to Classify Americans. Princeton University Press.

Privacy Bee. (2021). These Are the Largest Data Brokers in America. https://privacybee.com/blog/these-are-the-largest-data-brokers-in-america/

Rao, J., and Prasad, N. (1986). Discussion: Jackknife, bootstrap and other resampling methods in regression analysis. The Annals of Statistics, 14(4), 1320–1322.

Reamer, A. (2021). “Federal Statistical Agency Uses of Private Sector Data: Study Findings to Date.” Presentation to the National Academies’ Panel on the Scope, Components, and Key Characteristics of a 21st Century Data Infrastructure. December 9, 2021. https://www.nationalacademies.org/event/12-09-2021/docs/D9B3CF5B91DDB9DF7FD2E270029E54A38A98AE27B7B6

Ruhaak, A. (2019). Data Trusts: Why, What and How. Medium, November 11, 2019. https://medium.com/@anoukruhaak/data-trusts-why-what-and-how-a8b53b53d34

Snijkers, G., Haraldsen, G., Jones, J., and Willimack, D.K. (2013). Designing and Conducting Business Surveys. John Wiley & Sons.

Statista. (2022). Residential Improvements in The United States from 2005 to 2021, with Forecasts from 2022 to 2026. https://www.statista.com/statistics/604682/value-of-us-residential-building-improvement-construction/

Statistics Canada. (2015). Statistics Canada Policy on the Use of Administrative Data Obtained under the Statistics Act. https://www.statcan.gc.ca/en/about/policy/admin_data

________. (2021). Requests for Information – Prices and Price Indexes. https://www.statcan.gc.ca/en/our-data/where/admin-rfi/prices-price-indexes

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Toward a 21st Century National Data Infrastructure: Mobilizing Information for the Common Good. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26688.
×

Stevens, J. (2021). “Federal Reserve Board Experience Using Transaction Data.” Presentation to the National Academies’ Panel on the Scope, Components, and Key Characteristics of a 21st Century Data Infrastructure. December 9, 2021. https://www.nationalacademies.org/event/12-09-2021/docs/D621B5C5E61EBE2489A00AC98C86D5CC096F7CE3BA62

Studds, S. (2021). “Blended Data in the Census Bureau’s Monthly State Retail Sales Data Product.” Presentation to the National Academies’ Panel on the Scope, Components, and Key Characteristics of a 21st Century Data Infrastructure. December 9, 2021. https://www.nationalacademies.org/event/12-09-2021/docs/DBA437A832BAE8FF4072013340D57EED2F46017EE82D

Sweeney, L., Yoo, J.S., Perovich, L., Boronow, K.E., Brown, P., and Brody, J.G. (2017). Re-identification risks in HIPAA Safe Harbor data: A study of data from one environmental health study. Technology Science. https://techscience.org/a/2017082801/

Tam, S.M., Kim, J.K., Ang, L., and Pham, H. (2020). Mining the New Oil for Official Statistics. Big Data Meets Survey Science: A Collection of Innovative Methods, 339–357. John Wiley & Sons.

U.K. Department for Digital, Culture, Media, & Sport. (2019). National Data Strategy. https://www.gov.uk/guidance/national-data-strategy

U.K. Statistics Authority. (2022a). Five Year Strategy: Statistics for the public good: Informing the UK. Improving Lives. Building the Future. https://uksa.statisticsauthority.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/UKSA-Strategy-2020.pdf

U.K. Statistics Authority. (2022b). About the Authority. https://uksa.statisticsauthority.gov.uk/about-the-authority/

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (n.d.). Mass Layoff Statistics. https://www.bls.gov/mls/

________. (2021). Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages. https://www.bls.gov/cew/overview.htm

________. (2022). Household and Establishment Survey Response Rates. Office of Survey Methods Research. https://www.bls.gov/osmr/response-rates/

U.S. Census Bureau. (n.d.). Title 13 U.S. Code. https://www.census.gov/history/www/reference/privacy_confidentiality/title_13_us_code.html

________. (2007). Residential Improvements and Repairs. https://www.census.gov/construction/c50/c50index.html#:~:text=Announcements%20The%20U.S.%20Census%20Bureau%20has%20discontinued%20the,last%20report%20of%20residential%20improvements%20and%20repairs%20data

________. (2021a). Census Bureau Announces Changes for 2020 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates. https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2021/changes-2020-acs-1-year.html

________. (2021b). 2020 ACS 1-Year Experimental Data Release. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/data/experimental-data.html

________. (2021c). 2020 ACS 1-Year Estimates What You Need to Know. July, 2021. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/library/flyers/flow-chart.html

________. (2021d). Survey of Income and Program Participation. https://www.census.gov/history/www/programs/demographic/survey_of_income_and_program_participation.html

U.S. Congress. (1974). The Privacy Act of 1974. P.L. 93-579. https://www.archives.gov/about/laws/privacy-act-1974.html

________. (1995). Paperwork Reduction Act. P.L. 104-13. https://www.congress.gov/104/plaws/publ13/PLAW-104publ13.pdf

________. (1996). Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996. P.L. 104-191. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-104publ191/pdf/PLAW-104publ191.pdf

________. (2002a). The E-Government Act of 2002. P.L. 107-347. https://www.congress.gov/107/plaws/publ347/PLAW-107publ347.pdf

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Toward a 21st Century National Data Infrastructure: Mobilizing Information for the Common Good. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26688.
×

________. (2002b). Confidential Information Protection and Statistical Efficiency Act of 2002. H.R. 5215. https://www.congress.gov/bill/107th-congress/house-bill/5215#:~:text=Confidential%20Information%20Protection%20and%20Statistical%20Efficiency%20Act%20of%202002%20%2D%20Requires,to%20this%20Act%20to%20be

________. (2019). Foundations for Evidence-Based Policymaking Act of 2018. P.L. 115-435. https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/4174/text

________. (2021). National Science Foundation for the Future Act. H.R. 2225. https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2225

________. (2022a). CHIPS and Science Act of 2022. P.L. 117-167. https://science.house.gov/imo/media/doc/the_chips_and_science_act.pdf

________. (2022b). Confidentiality and Disclosure of Returns and Return Information. 26 USC 6103. https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=(title:26%20section:6103%20edition:prelim)#codification-note

U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis. (2022). Advisory Committee on Data for Evidence Building. https://www.bea.gov/evidence

U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2020). Internet of Things: Information on Use by Federal Agencies. GAO-20-577. https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-20-577.pdf

U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB). (2003). OMB Guidance for Implementing the Privacy Provisions of the E-Government Act of 2002, Memorandum (M-03-22). September 26, 2003. https://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/omb/memoranda/m03-22.html

________. (2016). Supplemental guidance on the implementation of M-15-14 “Management and oversight of federal information technology”—Applying FITARA common baseline to statistical agencies and units. Memorandum from Tony Scott, Federal Chief Information Officer, and Howard Shelanski, Administrator, Office of Regulatory Affairs. https://management.cio.gov/assets/docs/FITARA_Guidance_Statistical_Agencies_and_Units_OMB.pdf

________. (2019). Phase 1 Implementation of the Foundations for Evidence-Based Policymaking Act of 2018: Learning Agendas, Personnel, and Planning Guidance, Memorandum M-19-23. July 10, 2019. https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/M-19-23.pdf

Valentino-DeVries, J., Singer, N., Keller, M.H., and Krolik, A. (2018). Your Apps Know Where You Were Last Night, and They’re Not Keeping It Secret. The New York Times, December 10.

Voorheis, J. (2021). “Measuring the Distributional Effects of Climate Change and Environmental Inequality with Linked Survey, Census and Administrative Data.” Presentation at the Federal Committee on Statistical Methodology Annual Conference. November 2, 2021. https://copafs.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/C5Voorheis.pptx

The White House. (2021a). Restoring Trust in Government Through Scientific Integrity and Evidence-Based Policymaking, Memorandum. January 27, 2021. https://www.white-house.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2021/01/27/memorandum-on-restoring-trust-in-government-through-scientific-integrity-and-evidence-based-policymaking/

________. (2021b). Executive Order on Advancing Racial Equity and Support for Underserved Communities Through the Federal Government. January 20, 2021. https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2021/01/20/executive-order-advancing-racial-equity-and-support-for-underserved-communities-through-the-federal-government/

________. (2022a). Fact Sheet: Biden-Harris Administration Announces New Initiative to Improve Supply Chain Data Flow. March 15, 2022. https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2022/03/15/fact-sheet-biden-harris-administration-announces-new-initiative-to-improve-supply-chain-data-flow/

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Toward a 21st Century National Data Infrastructure: Mobilizing Information for the Common Good. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26688.
×

________. (2022b). A Vision for Equitable Data: Recommendations from the Equitable Data Working Group. https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/eo13985-vision-for-equitable-data.pdf

Willkie, Farr, and Gallagher, LLP. (n.d.). State Data Broker Laws. https://complianceconcourse.willkie.com/resources/privacy-and-cybersecurity-us-state-data-broker-laws

Wright, T. (2021). The Platform Transparency and Accountability Act: New legislation addresses platform data secrecy. Stanford Cyber Policy Center. December 9, 2021. https://cyber.fsi.stanford.edu/news/platform-transparency-and-accountability-act-new-legislation-addresses-platform-data-secrecy

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Toward a 21st Century National Data Infrastructure: Mobilizing Information for the Common Good. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26688.
×

This page intentionally left blank.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Toward a 21st Century National Data Infrastructure: Mobilizing Information for the Common Good. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26688.
×
Page 135
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Toward a 21st Century National Data Infrastructure: Mobilizing Information for the Common Good. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26688.
×
Page 136
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Toward a 21st Century National Data Infrastructure: Mobilizing Information for the Common Good. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26688.
×
Page 137
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Toward a 21st Century National Data Infrastructure: Mobilizing Information for the Common Good. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26688.
×
Page 138
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Toward a 21st Century National Data Infrastructure: Mobilizing Information for the Common Good. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26688.
×
Page 139
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Toward a 21st Century National Data Infrastructure: Mobilizing Information for the Common Good. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26688.
×
Page 140
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Toward a 21st Century National Data Infrastructure: Mobilizing Information for the Common Good. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26688.
×
Page 141
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Toward a 21st Century National Data Infrastructure: Mobilizing Information for the Common Good. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26688.
×
Page 142
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Toward a 21st Century National Data Infrastructure: Mobilizing Information for the Common Good. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26688.
×
Page 143
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Toward a 21st Century National Data Infrastructure: Mobilizing Information for the Common Good. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26688.
×
Page 144
Next: Appendix A: Biographical Sketches of Panel Members »
Toward a 21st Century National Data Infrastructure: Mobilizing Information for the Common Good Get This Book
×
 Toward a 21st Century National Data Infrastructure: Mobilizing Information for the Common Good
Buy Paperback | $24.00 Buy Ebook | $19.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

Historically, the U.S. national data infrastructure has relied on the operations of the federal statistical system and the data assets that it holds. Throughout the 20th century, federal statistical agencies aggregated survey responses of households and businesses to produce information about the nation and diverse subpopulations. The statistics created from such surveys provide most of what people know about the well-being of society, including health, education, employment, safety, housing, and food security. The surveys also contribute to an infrastructure for empirical social- and economic-sciences research. Research using survey-response data, with strict privacy protections, led to important discoveries about the causes and consequences of important societal challenges and also informed policymakers. Like other infrastructure, people can easily take these essential statistics for granted. Only when they are threatened do people recognize the need to protect them.

Toward a 21st Century National Data Infrastructure: Mobilizing Information for the Common Good develops a vision for a new data infrastructure for national statistics and social and economic research in the 21st century. This report describes how the country can improve the statistical information so critical to shaping the nation's future, by mobilizing data assets and blending them with existing survey data.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!