National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Chapter 5 - Summary of Findings
Page 50
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Practices for Assessing and Mitigating the Moisture Susceptibility of Asphalt Pavements. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26725.
×
Page 50
Page 51
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Practices for Assessing and Mitigating the Moisture Susceptibility of Asphalt Pavements. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26725.
×
Page 51
Page 52
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Practices for Assessing and Mitigating the Moisture Susceptibility of Asphalt Pavements. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26725.
×
Page 52
Page 53
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Practices for Assessing and Mitigating the Moisture Susceptibility of Asphalt Pavements. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26725.
×
Page 53

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

50 1. Hicks, G. (1991). NCHRP Synthesis 175: Moisture Damage in Asphalt Concrete. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C. 2. Taylor, M.A., and N. P. Khosla. (1983). Stripping of Asphalt Pavements: State of the Art. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 911, National Research Council, Washington D.C. 3. Majidzadeh, K., and F. N. Brovold. (1969). State of the Art: Effect of Water on Bitumen-Aggregate Mixtures. Highway Research Board, Special Report, 98, Publication 1456. 4. Fromm, H.J. (1974). The Mechanisms of Asphalt Stripping from Aggregate Surfaces. Journal of Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 43. 5. Caro, S. (2018). Moisture Damage in Asphalt Pavements; Research Need Gaps. Transportation Research Board webinar. http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/webinars/181031.pdf 6. Kiggundu, B. M., and F. L. Roberts. (1988). Stripping in HMA Mixtures: State-of-the-Art and Critical Review of Test Methods. NCAT Report 88-02, National Center for Asphalt Technology, Auburn University. 7. Caro, S. (2018). Moisture Damage in Asphalt Pavements, Concepts and Fundamentals. TRB Webinar Series on Moisture Damage in Asphalt Pavements: Forensic Analyses and Research Needs. 8. Roberts, F. L., P. S. Kandhal, E. R. Brown, D.-Y Lee, and T. W. Kennedy. (1996). Hot Mix Asphalt Materials, Mixture Design and Construction, 2nd edition. NAPA Research and Education Foundation. 9. Bahia, H. and S. Ahmad. (1999). Evaluation and Correlation of Lab and Field Tensile Strength Ratio (TSR) Procedures and Values in Assessing the Stripping Potential of Asphalt Mixes. WisDOT Study# 95-04. 10. Yoon, H. N., and A. R. Tarrer. (1998). Effect of Aggregate Properties on Stripping. Transportation Research Record, No. 1170. 11. Petersen, J. C., H. Plancher, E. K. Ensley, R. L. Venable, and G. Miyake. (1982). Chemistry of Asphalt- Aggregate Interactions: Relationship with Moisture-Damage Prediction Test. Transportation Research Record, No. 843. 12. Tarrer, A. R., and V. Wagh. (1991). The Effect of the Physical and Chemical Characteristics of the Aggregate on Bonding. SHRP-A/UIR-91-507, Strategic Highway Research Program, National Research Council. 13. Kandhal, P. S. (1994). Field and Laboratory Investigation of Stripping in Asphalt Pavements: State of the Art Report. Transportation Research Record, No. 1454. 14. Martin, A. E., E. Arambula, F. Yin, L. G. Cucalon, A. Chowdary, R. Lytton, J. Epps, C. Estakhri, and E. S. Park. (2014). NCHRP Report 763: Evaluation of the Moisture Susceptibility of WMA Technologies. Transpor- tation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. 15. Omar, H. A., N. I. M. Yusoff, M. Mubaraki, and H. Ceylan. (2020). Effects of Moisture Damage on Asphalt Mixtures. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, Vol. 7, No. 5. 16. Hefer, A. W., D. N. Little, and R. L. Lytton. (2004). A Synthesis of Theories and Mechanisms of Bitumen- Aggregate Adhesion Including Recent Advances in Quantifying the Effects of Water. Journal of Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 74. 17. TRB Committee on Bituminous-Aggregate Combinations to Meet Surface Requirements. (2003). Moisture Sensitivity of Asphalt Pavements: A National Seminar. San Diego, CA. 18. Goetz, W. H. (1958). Methods of Testing for Water Resistance of Bituminous Paving Mixtures, Technical Paper. Joint Highway Research Project, No. C-36-6, File No. 2-4. 19. Riis, A. (1941). Report of the VIII Permanent International Association of Road Congress (PIARC), The Hague. 20. Neumann, E. (1941). Experiments on the Adhesiveness of Asphaltic Concrete Mixtures Under the Influence of Water. Bitumen, Vol. 11, Berlin. References

References 51   21. Krchma, L. C., and R. J. Loomis. (1943). Bituminous-Aggregate Water Resistance Studies. Journal of Associa- tion of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 15. 22. Liu, Y., A. Apeagyei, N. Ahmad, J. Grenfell. and G. Airey. (2014). Examination of Moisture Sensitivity of Aggregate-Bitumen Bonding Strength Using Loose Asphalt Mixture and Physico-Chemical Surface Energy Property Tests. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, Vol. 15, No. 7. 23. Caro, S., E. Masad, A. Bhasin, and D. N. Little. (2008). Moisture Susceptibility of Asphalt Mixtures, Part 1: Mechanisms. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, Vol. 9, No. 2. 24. Thelen, E. (1958). Surface Energy and Adhesion Properties in Asphalt-Aggregate Systems. HRB 192-005, Franklin Institute Laboratories, Philadelphia. 25. Little, D., and A. Bhasin. (2007). Final Report for NCHRP RDD 316: Using Surface Energy Measurements to Select Materials for Asphalt Pavement. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. 26. American Society for Testing and Materials International. (n.d.). ASTM D3625-20. Standard Practice of Effect of Water on Asphalt-Coated Aggregate Using Boiling Water. American Society for Testing and Materials International, West Conshohocken, PA. 27. Aschenbrener, T., R. B. McGennis, and R. L. Terrel. (1985). Comparison of Several Moisture Susceptibility Tests to Pavements of Known Field Performance. Journal of Association for Asphalt Paving Technologists (AAPT), Vol. 64. 28. Goode, J. F. (1959). Use of the Immersion-Compression Test in Evaluating and Designing Bituminous Paving Mixtures. ASTM Special Technical Publication No. 252. 29. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (2007). AASHTO T 165-02. Standard Method of Test for Effect of Water on Cohesion of Compacted Bituminous Mixtures. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington D.C. 30. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (2002). AASHTO T 182-84. Standard Method of Test for Coating and Stripping of Bitumen-Aggregate Mixtures. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington D.C. 31. Matthews, D. H., D. M. Colwill, and R. Yüce. (1965). Adhesion Tests for Bituminous Materials. Journal of Applied Chemistry, Vol. 15. 32. Lottman, R. P. (1978). NCHRP Report 192: Predicting Moisture-Induced Damage to Asphaltic Concrete. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C. 33. Tunnicliff, D. R., and R. Root. (1984). NCHRP Report 274: Use of Anti-Stripping Additives in Asphaltic Concrete Mixtures, Laboratory Phase. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C. 34. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (2018). AASHTO T 283-14. Standard Method of Test for Resistance of Compacted Asphalt Mixtures to Moisture-Induced Damage. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington D.C. 35. Aschenbrener, T. (1995). Evaluation of Hamburg Wheel-Tracking Device to Predict Moisture Damage in Hot Mix Asphalt. Transportation Research Record, No. 1492. 36. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (2017). AASHTO T 324-17. Standard Method of Test for Hamburg Wheel-Track Testing of Compacted Asphalt Mixtures. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington D.C. 37. Mohammad, L. N., M. A. Elseifi, A. Radhavendra, and Y. Mengqiu. (2016). NCHRP Web-Only Document 219: Hamburg Wheel-Track Test Equipment Requirements and Improvements to AASHTO T 324. Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C. 38. Izzo, R. P., and M. Tahmoressi. (1999). Use of the Hamburg Wheel-Tracking Device for Evaluation Moisture Susceptibility of Hot-mix Asphalt. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1681. 39. Fitts, G. L. (2005). Hamburg Wheel Tracking (HWT) Test. Presented at Asphalt Technology Conference, Asphalt Institute. 40. Lu, Q., and J. Harvey. (2008). Investigation and Conditions for Moisture Damage in Asphalt Concrete and Appropriate Laboratory Test Methods. Report No. UCPRC-RR-2005-15, Univ. of California-Berkeley, Pavement Research Center. 41. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (n.d.). AASHTO TP 140-20. Standard Method of Test for Moisture Sensitivity Using Hydrostatic Pore Pressure to Determine Cohesion and Adhe- sion Strength of Compacted Asphalt Mixture Specimens. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington D.C. 42. DeCarlo, C., E. V. Dave, J. E. Sias, G. Airey, and R. Mallick. (2020). Comparative Evaluation of Moisture Susceptibility Test Methods for Routine Usage in Asphalt Mixture Design. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, Vol. 48, No. 1.

52 Practices for Assessing and Mitigating the Moisture Susceptibility of Asphalt Pavements 43. Tayebali, A. A., M., Guddati, S. Yadav, and A. LaCroix. (2019). Use of Moisture Induced Stress Tester (MiST) to Determine Moisture Sensitivity of Asphalt Mixtures. FHWA/NC/2017-01, North Carolina Department of Transportation. 44. Cross, S., H. Shitta, and A. Workie. (2013). Evaluation of Hamburg Rut Tester and Moisture Induced Stress Tester (MiST) for Field Control of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) in Oklahoma. FHWA-OK-13-01, Oklahoma Department of Transportation. 45. Cheng, D. (2002). Surface Free Energy of Asphalt-Aggregate System and Performance Analysis of Asphalt Concrete Based on Surface Free Energy. Ph.D. Thesis, Texas A&M University. 46. Lytton, R. L., E. A. Masad, C. Zollinger, R. Bulut, and D. Little. (2005). Measurements of Surface Energy and its Relationship to Moisture Damage. FHWA/TX-050-4524-2, Texas Department of Transportation. 47. Bhasin, A., E. Masad, D. Little, and R. Lytton. (2006). Limits of Adhesive Bond Energy for Improved Resis- tance of Hot-Mix Asphalt to Moisture Damage. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transporta- tion Research Board, No. 1970. 48. Bhasin, A., D. N. Little, K. L. Vasconcelos, and E. Masad. (2007). Surface Free Energy to Identify Moisture Sensitivity of Materials for Asphalt Mixes. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2001. 49. Masad, E., C. Zollinger, R. Bulut, D. N. Little, and R. L. Lytton. (2006). Characterization of HMA Moisture Damage Using Surface Energy and Fracture Properties. Journal of Association of Asphalt Paving Technolo- gists, Vol. 75. 50. Epps, J., E. Berger, and J. N. Anagnos. (2003). Topic 4: Treatments. Moisture Sensitivity of Asphalt Pave- ments, A National Seminar, Transportation Research Board, San Diego, CA. 51. Tunnicliff, D. G., and R. E. Root. (1982). Antistripping Additives in Asphalt Concrete—State-of-the-Art. Journal of Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 51. 52. Stroup-Gardiner, M., and J. Epps. (1987). Four Variables that Affect the Performance of Lime in Asphalt- Aggregate Mixtures. Transportation Research Record, No. 1115. 53. Little, D. N. and J. A. Epps. (2001). The Benefits of Hydrated Lime in Hot Mix Asphalt. Prepared for National Lime Association. 54. Sebaaly, P. E., D. N. Little, and J. A. Epps. (2006). The Benefits of Hydrated Lime in Hot Mix Asphalt. National Lime Association. 55. Mathews, D. H. (1962). Surface-active Agents in Bituminous Road Materials. Journal of Applied Chemistry, Vol. 12. 56. Yoon, H. H., R. R. Tarrer, F. L. Roberts, and B. M. Kiggundu. (1989). Thermal Degradation Properties of Antistripping Additives and Enhanced Performance by Curing. Transportation Research Record, No. 1228. 57. Dybalski, J. N. (1982). Cationic Surfactants in Asphalt Adhesion. Journal of Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 51. 58. Anderson, D. A., E. L. Dukatz, and J. C. Petersen. (1982). The Effect of Antistrip Additives on the Properties of Asphalt Cement. Journal of Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 51. 59. Putnam, B. J. and S. N. Amirkhanian. (2006). Laboratory Evaluation of Anti-Strip Additives in Hot Mix Asphalt. SCDOT Report No. FHWA-SC-06-07, South Carolina Department of Transportation. 60. TechBrief. (2012). The Use and Performance of Asphalt Binder Modified with Polyphosphoric Acid (PPA). FHWA-HIF-12-030, USDOT, FHWA, Office of Pavement Technology. 61. Buncher, M. (2005). Polyphosphoric Acid Modification of Asphalt. Asphalt Magazine. 62. Innophos Inc. (2009). Best Practices for PPA-Modification of Asphalt. Phosphate Forum of the Americas, Washington, D.C. 63. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies. (2009). Transportation Research Circular E-C160: Polyphosphoric Acid Modification of Asphalt Binders: A Workshop. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. 64. Curtis, C. W. (1990). A Literature Review of Liquid Antistripping and Tests for Measuring Stripping. SHRP-A/ UIR-90-016, Strategic Highway Research Program, National Research Council, Washington D.C. 65. Gu, F., R. Moraes, F. Yin, D. Watson, A. Taylor, and C. Chen. (2020). Study of Anti-Strip Additives on Granite Based FC-5 Asphalt Mixtures, Final Report. Florida Department of Transportation, Contract No. BE555. 66. Stark, C. (2018). Nano Scare Organosilane Asphalt Applications. PAPA Mini-Conferences, All States Materials Group (ASMG). 67. Ameri, M., S, Kouchaki, and H. Roshani. (2013). Laboratory Evaluation of the Effect of Nano-Organosilane Anti-stripping Additive on the Moisture Susceptibility of HMA Mixtures under Freeze-Thaw Cycles. Con- struction and Building Materials, Vol. 48. 68. Srinivasan, A. K. (2018). Effect of Using Organosilane with Crumb Rubber Modified Hot Mix. Master’s Thesis, Arizona State University. 69. Hicks, R. G., and T. V. Scholz. (2003). Life Cycle Costs for Lime in Hot Mix Asphalt, Volume I - Summary Report. National Lime Association.

References 53   70. Christensen, D., D. Morian, and W. Wang. (2015). Cost Benefit Analysis of Anti-Strip Additives in Hot Mix Asphalt with Various Aggregate. PennDOT Report No. 110204, FHWA-PA-2015-04-110204, Pennsylvania Department of Transportation. 71. Birgisson, B., R. Roque, G. C. Page, and J. Wang. (2007). Development of New Moisture-Conditioning Pro- cedure for Hot-Mix Asphalt. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2001. 72. Georgia Department of Transportation. (2016). GDT-66. Supplemental Specifications, Construction of Transportation System, Georgia Department of Transportation. 73. Georgia Department of Transportation. (2016). GDT-56. Supplemental Specifications, Construction of Transportation System, Georgia Department of Transportation. 74. Nevada Department of Transportation. (2005). Nev. T341D, Method of Test for Resistance of Compacted Bituminous Mixture to Moisture-Induced Damage (Lottman). Nevada Department of Transportation. 75. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (n.d.). AASHTO M 320-16, Standard Specification for Performance-Graded Asphalt Binder. American Association of State Highway and Trans- portation Officials, Washington D.C. 76. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (2017). AASHTO T 301-13, Standard Method of Test for Elastic Recovery Test of Asphalt Materials by Means of a Ductilometer. American Asso- ciation of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington D.C. 77. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (n.d.). AASHTO T 332-14, Standard Specification for Performance-Graded Asphalt Binder Using Multiple Stress Creep Recovery (MSCR) Test. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington D.C. 78. American Society for Testing and Materials International. (n.d.). ASTM D8225-19, Standard Test Method for Determination of Cracking Tolerance Index of Asphalt Mixture Using the Indirect Tensile Crack- ing Test at Intermediate Temperature. American Society for Testing and Materials International, West Conshohocken, PA. 79. American Society for Testing and Materials International. (n.d.). ASTM D6931-17, Standard Test Method for Indirect Tensile (IDT) Strength of Asphalt Mixtures. American Society for Testing and Materials Inter- national, West Conshohocken, PA.

Next: Bibliography »
Practices for Assessing and Mitigating the Moisture Susceptibility of Asphalt Pavements Get This Book
×
 Practices for Assessing and Mitigating the Moisture Susceptibility of Asphalt Pavements
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

Incompatibility between aggregate type and asphalt binder, presence of standing water or water under pressure in the pavement layers, and improper construction practices are some of the many factors that influence moisture susceptibility of flexible pavements.

The TRB National Cooperative Highway Research Program's NCHRP Synthesis 595: Practices for Assessing and Mitigating the Moisture Susceptibility of Asphalt Pavements documents practices used by state departments of transportation to prevent or to minimize moisture damage in hot-mix asphalt pavements.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!