National Academies Press: OpenBook

Fare-Free Transit Evaluation Framework (2023)

Chapter: Front Matter

Page i
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Fare-Free Transit Evaluation Framework. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26732.
×

TRANSIT COOPERATIVE RESEARCH PROGRAM


TCRP RESEARCH REPORT 237


Fare-Free Transit Evaluation Framework

Mariel Kirschen
Amy Pettine
Miranda Adams
NELSON\NYGAARD

San Francisco, CA

Heidy Persaud
CENTER FOR NEIGHBORHOOD TECHNOLOGY

Chicago, IL

Subject Areas
Public Transportation • Finance


Research sponsored by the Federal Transit Administration in cooperation with the American Public Transportation Association


Image

Page ii
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Fare-Free Transit Evaluation Framework. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26732.
×

TRANSIT COOPERATIVE RESEARCH PROGRAM

The nation’s growth and the need to meet mobility, environmental, and energy objectives place demands on public transit systems. Current systems, some of which are old and in need of upgrading, must expand service area, increase service frequency, and improve efficiency to serve these demands. Research is necessary to solve operating problems, adapt appropriate new technologies from other industries, and introduce innovations into the transit industry. The Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP) serves as one of the principal means by which the transit industry can develop innovative near-term solutions to meet demands placed on it.

The need for TCRP was originally identified in TRB Special Report 213—Research for Public Transit: New Directions, published in 1987 and based on a study sponsored by the Urban Mass Transportation Administration—now the Federal Transit Administration (FTA). A report by the American Public Transportation Association (APTA), Transportation 2000, also recognized the need for local, problem-solving research. TCRP, modeled after the successful National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP), undertakes research and other technical activities in response to the needs of transit service providers. The scope of TCRP includes various transit research fields including planning, service configuration, equipment, facilities, operations, human resources, maintenance, policy, and administrative practices.

TCRP was established under FTA sponsorship in July 1992. Proposed by the U.S. Department of Transportation, TCRP was authorized as part of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA). On May 13, 1992, a memorandum agreement outlining TCRP operating procedures was executed by the three cooperating organizations: FTA; the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, acting through the Transportation Research Board (TRB); and APTA. APTA is responsible for forming the independent governing board, designated as the TCRP Oversight and Project Selection (TOPS) Commission.

Research problem statements for TCRP are solicited periodically but may be submitted to TRB by anyone at any time. It is the responsibility of the TOPS Commission to formulate the research program by identifying the highest priority projects. As part of the evaluation, the TOPS Commission defines funding levels and expected products.

Once selected, each project is assigned to an expert panel appointed by TRB. The panels prepare project statements (requests for proposals), select contractors, and provide technical guidance and counsel throughout the life of the project. The process for developing research problem statements and selecting research agencies has been used by TRB in managing cooperative research programs since 1962. As in other TRB activities, TCRP project panels serve voluntarily without compensation.

Because research cannot have the desired effect if products fail to reach the intended audience, special emphasis is placed on disseminating TCRP results to the intended users of the research: transit agencies, service providers, and suppliers. TRB provides a series of research reports, syntheses of transit practice, and other supporting material developed by TCRP research. APTA will arrange for workshops, training aids, field visits, and other activities to ensure that results are implemented by urban and rural transit industry practitioners.

TCRP provides a forum where transit agencies can cooperatively address common operational problems. TCRP results support and complement other ongoing transit research and training programs.

TCRP RESEARCH REPORT 237

Project J-11/Task 39
ISSN 2572-3782
ISBN 978-0-309-69831-3

© 2023 by the National Academy of Sciences. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine and the graphical logo are trademarks of the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.

COPYRIGHT INFORMATION

Authors herein are responsible for the authenticity of their materials and for obtaining written permissions from publishers or persons who own the copyright to any previously published or copyrighted material used herein.

Cooperative Research Programs (CRP) grants permission to reproduce material in this publication for classroom and not-for-profit purposes. Permission is given with the understanding that none of the material will be used to imply TRB, AASHTO, APTA, FAA, FHWA, FTA, GHSA, or NHTSA endorsement of a particular product, method, or practice. It is expected that those reproducing the material in this document for educational and not-for-profit uses will give appropriate acknowledgment of the source of any reprinted or reproduced material. For other uses of the material, request permission from CRP.

Cover photo credit: Nelson\Nygaard

NOTICE

The research report was reviewed by the technical panel and accepted for publication according to procedures established and overseen by the Transportation Research Board and approved by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine.

The opinions and conclusions expressed or implied in this report are those of the researchers who performed the research and are not necessarily those of the Transportation Research Board; the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; or the program sponsors.

The Transportation Research Board does not develop, issue, or publish standards or specifications. The Transportation Research Board manages applied research projects which provide the scientific foundation that may be used by Transportation Research Board sponsors, industry associations, or other organizations as the basis for revised practices, procedures, or specifications.

The Transportation Research Board; the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; and the sponsors of the Transit Cooperative Research Program do not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers’ names or logos appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the object of the report.

Published research reports of the

TRANSIT COOPERATIVE RESEARCH PROGRAM

are available from

Transportation Research Board
Business Office
500 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20001

and can be ordered through the Internet by going to
https://www.mytrb.org/MyTRB/Store/default.aspx

Printed in the United States of America

Page iii
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Fare-Free Transit Evaluation Framework. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26732.
×

Image

The National Academy of Sciences was established in 1863 by an Act of Congress, signed by President Lincoln, as a private, nongovernmental institution to advise the nation on issues related to science and technology. Members are elected by their peers for outstanding contributions to research. Dr. Marcia McNutt is president.

The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964 under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences to bring the practices of engineering to advising the nation. Members are elected by their peers for extraordinary contributions to engineering. Dr. John L. Anderson is president.

The National Academy of Medicine (formerly the Institute of Medicine) was established in 1970 under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences to advise the nation on medical and health issues. Members are elected by their peers for distinguished contributions to medicine and health. Dr. Victor J. Dzau is president.

The three Academies work together as the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine to provide independent, objective analysis and advice to the nation and conduct other activities to solve complex problems and inform public policy decisions. The National Academies also encourage education and research, recognize outstanding contributions to knowledge, and increase public understanding in matters of science, engineering, and medicine.

Learn more about the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine at www.nationalacademies.org.


The Transportation Research Board is one of seven major programs of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. The mission of the Transportation Research Board is to provide leadership in transportation improvements and innovation through trusted, timely, impartial, and evidence-based information exchange, research, and advice regarding all modes of transportation. The Board’s varied activities annually engage about 8,000 engineers, scientists, and other transportation researchers and practitioners from the public and private sectors and academia, all of whom contribute their expertise in the public interest. The program is supported by state transportation departments, federal agencies including the component administrations of the U.S. Department of Transportation, and other organizations and individuals interested in the development of transportation.

Learn more about the Transportation Research Board at www.TRB.org.

Page iv
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Fare-Free Transit Evaluation Framework. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26732.
×

COOPERATIVE RESEARCH PROGRAMS

CRP STAFF FOR TCRP RESEARCH REPORT 237

Christopher J. Hedges, Director, Cooperative Research Programs

Waseem Dekelbab, Deputy Director, Cooperative Research Programs

Gwen Chisholm Smith, Manager, Transit Cooperative Research Program

Dianne S. Schwager, Senior Program Officer

Dajaih Bias-Johnson, Senior Program Assistant

Natalie Barnes, Director of Publications

Heather DiAngelis, Associate Director of Publications

Ellen M. Chafee, Senior Editor

TCRP PROJECT J-11/TASK 39 PANEL
Field of Special Projects

Joana M. Conklin, Montgomery County Department of Transportation, Rockville, MD (Chair)

Walter E. Allen, Acumen Building Enterprise, Inc., Oakland, CA

Jeff Bernstein, InfraTrends, LLC, Teaneck, NJ

Julie Karen Fernandez, Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County, Houston, TX

Andrea Hamre, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT

Xavier Joshua Harmony, Northern Virginia Transportation Commission, Woodbridge, VA

Djuana Harvell, Stapleton Foundation for Sustainable Urban Communities, Denver, CO

Rich J. Lee, King County (WA) Metro Transit, Seattle, WA

Doreen Morrissey, California Department of Transportation (CALTRANS), Sacramento, CA

Jitender S. Ramchandani, Commonwealth of Virginia, Henrico, VA

Judis Santos, Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC), San Francisco, CA

Jeremy Furrer, FTA Liaison

Terence Plaskon, FTA Liaison

Matthew Dickens, APTA Liaison

AUTHOR ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors would like to thank the many transit agencies that provided information about their programs, as well as the individuals and organizations who agreed to participate in interviews for this research:

  • David Bragdon, TransitCenter
  • Wyatt Gordon, Virginia Conservation Network
  • Reginald Johnson, Willowbrook Inclusion Network
  • Kate Lowe, University of Illinois at Chicago
  • Grace Perdomo, Transit Alliance Miami
  • Oboi Olantuji Reed, Equiticity
  • Laura Saltzman, Access Living
  • Audrey Wennink, Metropolitan Planning Council
Page v
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Fare-Free Transit Evaluation Framework. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26732.
×

Image

FOREWORD

By Dianne S. Schwager

Staff Officer

Transportation Research Board

This report presents a framework to evaluate the potential benefits, costs, and trade-offs of implementing fare-free transit. The framework will be of immediate use to public transit practitioners and community partners, including staff from related organizations (e.g., municipal departments, metropolitan planning organizations, or neighboring transit agencies).


Because public transportation benefits non-riders and enhances community development, its funding has long relied on a wide range of local sources, typically inclusive of sales, gas, and property taxes. During the past decade, and in particular during the COVID-19 pandemic, many communities have considered eliminating fare payments, in whole or in part, to engender broader societal benefits. Communities are exploring the merits of providing public transit without charging fares and identifying strategies for replacing passenger fare revenues. The economic, social, and environmental costs and benefits of fare-free public transit are being weighed against the costs and benefits of current fare payment systems and the available capacity for increased ridership.

Under TCRP Project J-11/Task 39, “Evaluation Framework for Fare-free Public Transportation,” Nelson\Nygaard was asked to develop a framework to evaluate fare-free public transportation. The framework addresses the benefits, costs, and trade-offs that must be considered by public transit providers, policy-makers, and other stakeholders as they consider eliminating fares, in whole or in part, for public transit.

There are two primary time periods in which fare-free transit can be evaluated: before and after implementation. This report focuses on the first of the two time periods: feasibility evaluation. TCRP Research Report 237: Fare-Free Transit Evaluation Framework provides practical guidance for public transit agencies and a 10-step evaluation framework. The steps are grouped into three phases:

  • Get organized. Set the context, assess existing conditions, review peer transit agencies, identify opportunities and challenges.
  • Make a plan. Set evaluation goals and objectives, determine performance measures, establish selection criteria, and select fare-free transit alternatives.
  • Evaluate. Estimate impacts and select preferred alternative.

The research approach for this project included a literature review, industry survey, interviews with transit agencies and stakeholders, and 23 case studies. This timely report provides examples of public transit agencies throughout the United States that have evaluated fare-free transit to demonstrate how the framework works in practice and identifies opportunities to engage relevant stakeholders and the public in the process.

The report is accompanied by an infographic that can be found on the National Academies Press website (nap.nationalacademies.org) by searching on TCRP Research Report 237: Fare-Free Transit Evaluation Framework.

Page vi
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Fare-Free Transit Evaluation Framework. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26732.
×

This page intentionally left blank.

Page viii
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Fare-Free Transit Evaluation Framework. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26732.
×

This page intentionally left blank.

Page i
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Fare-Free Transit Evaluation Framework. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26732.
×
Page R1
Page ii
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Fare-Free Transit Evaluation Framework. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26732.
×
Page R2
Page iii
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Fare-Free Transit Evaluation Framework. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26732.
×
Page R3
Page iv
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Fare-Free Transit Evaluation Framework. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26732.
×
Page R4
Page v
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Fare-Free Transit Evaluation Framework. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26732.
×
Page R5
Page vi
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Fare-Free Transit Evaluation Framework. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26732.
×
Page R6
Page vii
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Fare-Free Transit Evaluation Framework. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26732.
×
Page R7
Page viii
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Fare-Free Transit Evaluation Framework. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26732.
×
Page R8
Next: Summary »
Fare-Free Transit Evaluation Framework Get This Book
×
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

Recognizing the strong recent interest throughout the United States to consider and implement fare-free transit, decision-making tools are needed to help public transit practitioners evaluate fare-free transit.

The TRB Transit Cooperative Research Program's TCRP Research Report 237: Fare-Free Transit Evaluation Framework presents a framework that can be used by public transit practitioners to evaluate the potential benefits, costs, and trade-offs of implementing fare-free transit.

Supplemental to the report is an Infographic.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!