National Academies Press: OpenBook

Bonded Concrete Overlays on Asphalt Pavements: Resources for Evaluation (2022)

Chapter: Appendix E: Good, Fair, and Poor Segment Selection

« Previous: Appendix D: Laboratory Test Results
Page 244
Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Good, Fair, and Poor Segment Selection." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Bonded Concrete Overlays on Asphalt Pavements: Resources for Evaluation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26759.
×
Page 244
Page 245
Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Good, Fair, and Poor Segment Selection." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Bonded Concrete Overlays on Asphalt Pavements: Resources for Evaluation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26759.
×
Page 245
Page 246
Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Good, Fair, and Poor Segment Selection." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Bonded Concrete Overlays on Asphalt Pavements: Resources for Evaluation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26759.
×
Page 246
Page 247
Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Good, Fair, and Poor Segment Selection." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Bonded Concrete Overlays on Asphalt Pavements: Resources for Evaluation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26759.
×
Page 247
Page 248
Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Good, Fair, and Poor Segment Selection." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Bonded Concrete Overlays on Asphalt Pavements: Resources for Evaluation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26759.
×
Page 248
Page 249
Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Good, Fair, and Poor Segment Selection." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Bonded Concrete Overlays on Asphalt Pavements: Resources for Evaluation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26759.
×
Page 249
Page 250
Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Good, Fair, and Poor Segment Selection." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Bonded Concrete Overlays on Asphalt Pavements: Resources for Evaluation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26759.
×
Page 250
Page 251
Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Good, Fair, and Poor Segment Selection." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Bonded Concrete Overlays on Asphalt Pavements: Resources for Evaluation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26759.
×
Page 251
Page 252
Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Good, Fair, and Poor Segment Selection." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Bonded Concrete Overlays on Asphalt Pavements: Resources for Evaluation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26759.
×
Page 252
Page 253
Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Good, Fair, and Poor Segment Selection." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Bonded Concrete Overlays on Asphalt Pavements: Resources for Evaluation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26759.
×
Page 253
Page 254
Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Good, Fair, and Poor Segment Selection." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Bonded Concrete Overlays on Asphalt Pavements: Resources for Evaluation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26759.
×
Page 254
Page 255
Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Good, Fair, and Poor Segment Selection." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Bonded Concrete Overlays on Asphalt Pavements: Resources for Evaluation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26759.
×
Page 255
Page 256
Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Good, Fair, and Poor Segment Selection." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Bonded Concrete Overlays on Asphalt Pavements: Resources for Evaluation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26759.
×
Page 256
Page 257
Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Good, Fair, and Poor Segment Selection." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Bonded Concrete Overlays on Asphalt Pavements: Resources for Evaluation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26759.
×
Page 257
Page 258
Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Good, Fair, and Poor Segment Selection." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Bonded Concrete Overlays on Asphalt Pavements: Resources for Evaluation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26759.
×
Page 258
Page 259
Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Good, Fair, and Poor Segment Selection." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Bonded Concrete Overlays on Asphalt Pavements: Resources for Evaluation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26759.
×
Page 259
Page 260
Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Good, Fair, and Poor Segment Selection." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Bonded Concrete Overlays on Asphalt Pavements: Resources for Evaluation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26759.
×
Page 260
Page 261
Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Good, Fair, and Poor Segment Selection." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Bonded Concrete Overlays on Asphalt Pavements: Resources for Evaluation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26759.
×
Page 261
Page 262
Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Good, Fair, and Poor Segment Selection." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Bonded Concrete Overlays on Asphalt Pavements: Resources for Evaluation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26759.
×
Page 262
Page 263
Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Good, Fair, and Poor Segment Selection." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Bonded Concrete Overlays on Asphalt Pavements: Resources for Evaluation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26759.
×
Page 263
Page 264
Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Good, Fair, and Poor Segment Selection." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Bonded Concrete Overlays on Asphalt Pavements: Resources for Evaluation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26759.
×
Page 264
Page 265
Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Good, Fair, and Poor Segment Selection." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Bonded Concrete Overlays on Asphalt Pavements: Resources for Evaluation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26759.
×
Page 265

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

244 APPENDIX E: GOOD, FAIR, AND POOR SEGMENT SELECTION

245 This appendix provides a summary of the automated pavement condition survey. For each project evaluated, IRI, faulting, and percent cracking is plotted according to station (beginning at station 0). Where applicable, cross streets are also included on the plots for project reference. For each project, potential station limits for good, fair, and poor segments (based on NHPP) have been highlighted using green, yellow, and red boxes. Selected segments for the detailed site investigations are noted with text.

246 Colorado I-70 Figure E-1. CO I-70 Eastbound. Figure E-2. CO I-70 Westbound. 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 0 100 200 300 400 500 0 5280 10560 15840 21120 % S la bs C ra ck ed IR I ( in /m i) Fa ul tin g (m ils ) Station (feet) Faulting IRI Cracking Note: Cracking data point for each segment is shown at the end of the segment Good Pavement focus areas Fair Pavement focus areas Poor Pavement focus areas US 50 / CO 139 Interchange Ri ve r B rid ge co nv . P CC sl ab s Old US 6 Interchange Un de rp as s ( co nv . P CC sl ab s) Weigh Station 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 0 100 200 300 400 500 0 5280 10560 15840 21120 % S la bs C ra ck ed IR I ( in /m i) Fa ul tin g (m ils ) Station (feet) Faulting IRI Cracking Note: Cracking data point for each segment is shown at the end of the segment Good Pavement focus areas Fair Pavement focus areas Poor Pavement focus areas US 50 / CO 139 Interchange Weigh Station Ri ve r B rid ge Old US 6 Interchange Un de rp as s Recommended Fair Segment: WB 4,224 - 4,752 Recommended Poor Segment: WB 10,560 - 11,088 Recommended Good Segment: WB 7,920 - 8,448

247 SH-83 Figure E-3. CO SH-83A Northbound. Figure E-4. CO SH-83A Southbound. 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 0 100 200 300 400 500 0 1056 2112 3168 4224 5280 6336 7392 8448 9504 % S la bs C ra ck ed IR I ( in /m i) Fa ul tin g (m ils ) Station (feet) Faulting IRI Cracking Note: Cracking data point for each segment is shown at the end of the segment Good Pavement focus areas Fair Pavement focus areas Poor Pavement focus areas Chambers Way S. Lewiston Way E. Fair Pl / S. Lewiston Way Lake Ave E. Orchard Ave Ri ve r B rid ge Changing Slab Pattern SR 88 / Arapahoe Rd Interchange Ov er pa ss Br id ge Private Private (Entr. to IHOP/Chase Adj. Outer Lane Adj. Outer Lane GPR Radio Interference (528-2112) GPR Radio Interference (6864-9504) Recommended Good Segment: NB 5,808 - 6,336 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 0 100 200 300 400 500 0 1056 2112 3168 4224 5280 6336 7392 8448 9504 % S la bs C ra ck ed IR I ( in /m i) Fa ul tin g (m ils ) Station (feet) Faulting IRI Cracking Note: Cracking data point for each segment is shown at the end of the segment Good Pavement focus areas Fair Pavement focus areas Poor Pavement focus areas Chambers Way S. Lewiston Way E. Fair Pl/ S. Lewiston Way Lake Ave E. Orchard Ave Private Ri ve r B rid ge Changing Slab Pattern Adj. Outer LaneSR 88 / Arapahoe Rd Interchange Ov er pa ss Br id ge Private (Entr to IHOP/Chase Recommended Poor Segment: SB 5,808 - 6,336 Recommended Fair Segment: SB 5,280 - 5,808 Adj. Outer Lane GPR Radio Interference (528-2112) GPR Radio Interference (6864-9504)

248 Figure E-5. CO SH-83B Northbound. Figure E-6. CO SH-83B Southbound. 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 0 100 200 300 400 500 0 1056 2112 3168 4224 5280 6336 7392 8448 9504 10560 % S la bs C ra ck ed IR I ( in /m i) Fa ul tin g (m ils ) Station (feet) Faulting IRI Cracking Private (Entr. to IHOP/Chase) S. Chambers Rd Private E. Belleview Ave E. Whitaker Pl E. Saratoga Pl Note: Cracking data point for each segment is shown at the end of the segment Good Pavement focus areas Fair Pavement focus areas Poor Pavement focus areas E. Temple Dr E. Tufts Dr E. Rice Pl Changing Slab Pattern Adj. Outer Lane(s) over entire length of project E. Quincy Ave Cu lv er t E. Crestline Dr E. Progress Way E. Chenango Ave E. Atchison Ct S. Abilene Cir GPR Radio Interference (0-2640) GPR Radio Interference (4752-6336) GPR Radio Interference (9504-10560) 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 0 100 200 300 400 500 0 1056 2112 3168 4224 5280 6336 7392 8448 9504 10560 % S la bs C ra ck ed IR I ( in /m i) Fa ul tin g (m ils ) Station (feet) Faulting IRI Cracking Note: Cracking data point for each segment is shown at the end of the segment Good Pavement focus areas Fair Pavement focus areas Poor Pavement focus areas Changing Slab Pattern Private (Entr. to IHOP/Chase) S. Chambers Rd E. Progress Way E. Belleview Ave E. Whitaker Pl E. Saratoga Pl E. Temple Dr E. Tufts Dr E. Rice Pl E. Quincy Ave Cu lv er t Adj. Outer Lane Recommended Fair Segment: SB 2,640 - 3,168 Recommended Good Segment: SB 3,696 - 4,224Recommended Poor Segment: SB 3,168 - 3,696 Private E. Crestline Dr E. Chenango Ave E. Atchison Ct S. Abilene Cir GPR Radio Interference (0-2640) GPR Radio Interference (4752-6336) GPR Radio Interference (9504-10560)

249 SH-121 Figure E-7. CO SH-121A Northbound. Figure E-8. CO SH-121A Southbound. 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 0 100 200 300 400 500 0 5280 10560 15840 % S la bs C ra ck ed IR I ( in /m i) Fa ul tin g (m ils ) Station (feet) Faulting IRI Cracking Note: Cracking data point for each segment is shown at the end of the segment Good Pavement focus areas Fair Pavement focus areas Poor Pavement focus areas Brook Dr Fair AvePayneAve Chatfield Ave Private David Dr Ken Caryl Ave Columbine Ave Coal Mine Ave Private Peakview Dr Adj. Outer Lane Adj. Outer Lane Adj. Outer Lane Adj. Outer Lane Tr ai l B rid ge Tr ai l B rid ge Tr ai l B rid ge C-470 GPR Radio Interference (8448-11616) 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 0 100 200 300 400 500 0 5280 10560 15840 % S la bs C ra ck ed IR I ( in /m i) Fa ul tin g (m ils ) Station (feet) Faulting IRI Cracking Note: Cracking data point for each segment is shown at the end of the segment Good Pavement focus areas Fair Pavement focus areas Poor Pavement focus areas Brook Dr Fair AveChatfieldAve Ken Caryl Ave Columbine Ave Coal Mine Ave Peakview Dr Changing Slab Pattern Adj. Outer Lane Adj. Outer Lane Adj. Outer Lane Tr ai l B rid ge Tr ai l B rid ge Tr ai l B rid ge C-470 Recommended Fair Segment: SB 6,336 - 6,864 Recommended Poor Segment: SB 5,808 - 6,336 Recommended Good Segment: SB 6,864 - 7,392 Payne Ave Private David Dr GPR Radio Interference (8448-11616)

250 Figure E-9. CO SH-121B Northbound. Figure E-10. CO SH-121B Southbound. 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 0 100 200 300 400 500 0 1056 2112 3168 4224 5280 6336 7392 8448 9504 10560 % S la bs C ra ck ed IR I ( in /m i) Fa ul tin g (m ils ) Station (feet) Faulting IRI Cracking 88th Ave 90th Ave Independence Dr Unamed Note: Cracking data point for each segment is shown at the end of the segment Good Pavement focus areas Fair Pavement focus areas Poor Pavement focus areas 94th Ave / Private 92nd Ave 100th Ave 101st Ave 102nd Ave 104th Ave Changing Slab Pattern Adj. Outer Lane(s) Adj. Outer Lane Adj. Outer Lane Recommended Fair Segment: NB 5,280 - 5,808 Recommended Poor Segment: NB 5,808 - 6,336 Recommended Good Segment: NB 4,752 - 5,280 Yukon St Private GPR Radio Interference (0-2112) 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 0 100 200 300 400 500 0 1056 2112 3168 4224 5280 6336 7392 8448 9504 10560 % S la bs C ra ck ed IR I ( in /m i) Fa ul tin g (m ils ) Station (feet) Faulting IRI Cracking Note: Cracking data point for each segment is shown at the end of the segment Good Pavement focus areas Fair Pavement focus areas Poor Pavement focus areas 88th Ave 90th Ave Independence Dr94th Ave92nd Ave 100th Ave 101st Ave Yukon St 104th Ave Changing Slab Pattern Adj. Outer Lane(s) Adj. Outer Lane Adj. Outer Lane Adj. Outer Lane Private Unamed 102nd Ave GPR Radio Interference (0-2112)

251 US-6 Figure E-11. CO US-6 Eastbound. Figure E-12. CO US-6 Westbound. 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 0 100 200 300 400 500 0 5280 10560 15840 21120 26400 31680 36960 42240 47520 52800 58080 63360 % S la bs C ra ck ed IR I ( in /m i) Fa ul tin g (m ils ) Station (feet) Faulting IRI Cracking CR 87 CR 89 CR 91/Scott St CR 93 Note: Cracking data point for each segment is shown at the end of the segment Good Pavement focus areas Fair Pavement focus areas Poor Pavement focus areas CR 95 CR 97/CR 1 CR 30 & CR 3 Haxtun Town Limits* CR 7 CR 9 CR 11 CR 28 CR 13 CR 15 *Note: Within Haxtun town limits (Fairview Ave to Burlington Ave), slab size changes to 12ftx15ft, different surface texture, and no sealed joints Lambert St /CR 32 Recommended Fair Segment: EB 45,408 - 45,936 Recommended Poor Segment: EB 53,328-53,856 Recommended Good Segment: EB 60,720 - 61,248 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 0 100 200 300 400 500 0 5280 10560 15840 21120 26400 31680 36960 42240 47520 52800 58080 63360 % S la bs C ra ck ed IR I ( in /m i) Fa ul tin g (m ils ) Station (feet) Faulting IRI Cracking Note: Cracking data point for each segment is shown at the end of the segment Good Pavement focus areas Fair Pavement focus areas Poor Pavement focus areas CR 87 CR 89 CR 91/Scott St CR 93 CR 95 CR 97/ CR 1 CR 30 & CR 3 CR 7 CR 9 CR 11 CR 28 CR 13 CR 15 Lambert St /CR32 Haxtun Town Limits* *Note: Within Haxtun town limits (Fairview Ave to Burlington Ave), slab size changes to 12ftx15ft, different surface texture, and no sealed joints

252 Iowa US-71 Figure E-13. IA US-71 Northbound. Figure E-14. IA US-71 Southbound. 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 0 100 200 300 400 500 0 5280 10560 15840 21120 26400 31680 36960 42240 47520 % S la bs C ra ck ed IR I ( in /m i) Fa ul tin g (m ils ) Station (feet) Faulting IRI Cracking US 18/ 320th St/ 44th St 310th St 300th St 290th St Main St/ B14/280th St 270th St A43/260th St 250th St Note: Cracking data point for each segment is shown at the end of the segment Good Pavement focus areas Fair Pavement focus areas Poor Pavement focus areas A48/240th St 230th St Cu lv er t B rid ge Cu lv er t Recommended Good Segment: NB 29,040 - 29,568 Recommended Fair Segment: NB 12,672 - 13,200 Private Private 5th St SW Recommended Poor Segment: NB 26,928 - 27,456 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 0 100 200 300 400 500 0 5280 10560 15840 21120 26400 31680 36960 42240 47520 % S la bs C ra ck ed IR I ( in /m i) Fa ul tin g (m ils ) Station (feet) Faulting IRI Cracking Note: Cracking data point for each segment is shown at the end of the segment Good Pavement focus areas Fair Pavement focus areas Poor Pavement focus areas 310th St 300th St 290th St Main St/ B14/280th St 270th St A43/260th St 250th St A48/240th St 230th St Cu lv er t B rid ge US 18/ 320th St/ 44th St Cu lv er t Long continuous stretches of longitudinal cracking in outside slabs Private Private 5th St SW

253 Illinois CH-10 Figure E-15. IL CH-10 Eastbound. Figure E-16. IL CH-10 Westbound. 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 0 100 200 300 400 500 0 5280 10560 15840 21120 26400 31680 36960 42240 % S la bs C ra ck ed IR I ( in /m i) Fa ul tin g (m ils ) Station (feet) Faulting IRI Cracking 800th Ave 950th Ave Ri ve rB rid ge Ri ve rB rid ge CR 1000E 1039th Ave CR 1150E CH 9/ 1250th Ave 1375th Ave CR 1400E 1500th Ave CR 1600E Ra ilr oa d Xi ng SR 121 AC pa ve m en t Note: Cracking data point for each segment is shown at the end of the segment Good Pavement focus areas Fair Pavement focus areas Poor Pavement focus areas 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 0 100 200 300 400 500 0 5280 10560 15840 21120 26400 31680 36960 42240 % S la bs C ra ck ed IR I ( in /m i) Fa ul tin g (m ils ) Station (feet) Faulting IRI Cracking Ri ve rB rid ge Ri ve rB rid ge Ra ilr oa d Xi ng AC pa ve m en t Note: Cracking data point for each segment is shown at the end of the segment 800th Ave 950th Ave CR 1000E 1039th Ave CR 1150E CH 9/ 1250th Ave 1375th Ave CR 1400E 1500th Ave CR 1600E SR 121 Recommended Fair Segment: WB 33,792 - 34,320 Good Pavement focus areas Fair Pavement focus areas Poor Pavement focus areas Recommended Good Segment: WB 20,064 - 20,592 Recommended Poor Segment: WB 13,200 - 13,728

254 CH-27 Figure E-17. IL CH-27 Northbound. Figure E-18. IL CH-27 Southbound. 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 0 100 200 300 400 500 0 5280 10560 15840 21120 % S la bs C ra ck ed IR I ( in /m i) Fa ul tin g (m ils ) Station (feet) Faulting IRI Cracking Ri ve rB rid ge Ri ve rB rid ge Ri ve rB rid ge Ov er pa ss Br id ge CH 28/Mt Auburn Rd Pit Rd Pebble Springs Rd I-72 (under) Macon St Rd Old Rt 36/ W. Harristown Blvd Note: Cracking data point for each segment is shown at the end of the segment Recommended Poor Segment: NB 4,752 - 5,280 Recommended Good Segment: NB 12,144 - 12,672 Good Pavement focus areas Fair Pavement focus areas Poor Pavement focus areas Recommended Fair Segment: NB 20,064 - 20,592 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 0 100 200 300 400 500 0 5280 10560 15840 21120 % S la bs C ra ck ed IR I ( in /m i) Fa ul tin g (m ils ) Station (feet) Faulting IRI Cracking Ri ve rB rid ge Ri ve rB rid ge Ri ve rB rid ge Ov er pa ss Br id ge Note: Cracking data point for each segment is shown at the end of the segment CH 28/Mt Auburn Rd Pit Rd Pebble Springs Rd I-72 (under) Macon St Rd Old Rt 36/ W. Harristown BlvdGood Pavement focus areas Fair Pavement focus areas Poor Pavement focus areas

255 SR-53 Figure E-19. IL SR-53 Northbound. Figure E-20. IL SR-53 Southbound. 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 0 100 200 300 400 500 0 5280 10560 15840 21120 % S la bs C ra ck ed IR I ( in /m i) Fa ul tin g (m ils ) Station (feet) Faulting IRI Cracking Br id ge Br id ge W. Arsenal Rd Henslow Trail (over) Note: Cracking data point for each segment is shown at the end of the segment W. Hoff Rd Schweitzer Ed Recommended Poor Segment: NB 10,032 - 10,560 Recommended Fair Segment: NB 18,480 - 19,008 Good Pavement focus areas Fair Pavement focus areas Poor Pavement focus areas Recommended Good Segment: NB 3,696 - 4,224 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 0 100 200 300 400 500 0 5280 10560 15840 21120 % S la bs C ra ck ed IR I ( in /m i) Fa ul tin g (m ils ) Station (feet) Faulting IRI Cracking PC C Pa tc h PC C Pa tc h Br id ge Br id ge Note: Cracking data point for each segment is shown at the end of the segment W. Arsenal Rd Henslow Trail (over) W. Hoff Rd Schweitzer Ed Good Pavement focus areas Fair Pavement focus areas Poor Pavement focus areas

256 Kansas I-70 Figure E-21. KS I-70 Eastbound. Figure E-22. KS I-70 Westbound. 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 0 100 200 300 400 500 0 5280 10560 15840 21120 26400 31680 36960 % S la bs C ra ck ed IR I ( in /m i) Fa ul tin g (m ils ) Station (feet) Faulting IRI Cracking Note: Cracking data point for each segment is shown at the end of the segment Good Pavement focus areas Fair Pavement focus areas Poor Pavement focus areas Ov er pa ss B rid ge Ellsworth/Lincoln County Line Un de rp as s ( 26 th St ) 29th Rd Interchange Lincoln/Saline County Line 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 0 100 200 300 400 500 0 5280 10560 15840 21120 26400 31680 36960 % S la bs C ra ck ed IR I ( in /m i) Fa ul tin g (m ils ) Station (feet) Faulting IRI Cracking Note: Cracking data point for each segment is shown at the end of the segment Good Pavement focus areas Fair Pavement focus areas Poor Pavement focus areas Un de rp as s ( 26 th St ) Ov er pa ss B rid ge 29th Rd Interchange Ellsworth/Lincoln County Line Lincoln/Saline County Line Recommended Fair Segment: WB 19,008 - 19,536 Recommended Poor Segment: WB 2,640 - 3,168 Recommended Good Segment: WB 10,560 - 11,088

257 Louisiana US-167 Figure E-23. LA US-167 Northbound. Figure E-24. LA US-167 Southbound. 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 0 100 200 300 400 500 0 528 1056 1584 2112 2640 3168 3696 4224 4752 5280 5808 % S la bs C ra ck ed IR I ( in /m i) Fa ul tin g (m ils ) Station (feet) Faulting IRI Cracking S Jones St Church St Main St/Boundary Ave Magnolia St Wear St US 84/ Natchitoches Hwy Faith St/ North St Cotton St Note: Cracking data point for each segment is shown at the end of the segment Good Pavement focus areas Fair Pavement focus areas Poor Pavement focus areas Lousiana St Recommended Poor Segment: NB 1,056 - 1,584 Recommended Good Segment: NB 3,168 - 3,696 St John St Roberts St Machen St Recommended Fair Segment: NB 528 - 1,056 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 0 100 200 300 400 500 0 528 1056 1584 2112 2640 3168 3696 4224 4752 5280 5808 % S la bs C ra ck ed IR I ( in /m i) Fa ul tin g (m ils ) Station (feet) Faulting IRI Cracking S Jones St Main St/Boundary Ave Wear St US 84/ Natchitoches Hwy Faith St/ North St Cotton St Good Pavement focus areas Fair Pavement focus areas Poor Pavement focus areas Lousiana St Church St St John St Magnolia St Roberts St Machen St Note: Cracking data point for each segment is shown at the end of the segment

258 US-425 Figure E-25. LA US-425 Northbound. 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 0 100 200 300 400 500 0 528 1056 1584 2112 2640 3168 3696 4224 4752 5280 5808 6336 6864 7392 7920 8448 8976 % S la bs C ra ck ed IR I ( in /m i) Fa ul tin g (m ils ) Station (feet) Faulting IRI Cracking Field Rd Note: Cracking data point for each segment is shown at the end of the segment County Club Rd Panola Dr/ Par Rd 5A Greg Rd Ri ve rB rid ge Good Pavement focus areas Fair Pavement focus areas Poor Pavement focus areas Recommended Good Segment: NB 6,864 - 7,392Recommended Poor Segment: NB 4,752 - 5,280 Recommended Fair Segment: NB 5,808 - 6,336

259 Minnesota CSAH-7 Figure E-26. MN CSAH-7 Northbound. Figure E-27. MN CSAH-7 Southbound. 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 0 100 200 300 400 500 0 5280 10560 % S la bs C ra ck ed IR I ( in /m i) Fa ul tin g (m ils ) Station (feet) Faulting IRI Cracking CSAH18 / 150th St 160th St York Rd / Airport Rd /CSAH 8 Dale St Note: Cracking data point for each segment is shown at the end of the segment Good Pavement focus areas Fair Pavement focus areas Poor Pavement focus areas CSAH82 / Grade Rd AC P at ch (o ve r c ul ve rt ?) Recommended Poor Segment: NB 8,448 - 8,976 Recommended Good Segment: NB 11,616 - 12,144 Recommended Fair Segment: NB 10,560 - 11,088 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 0 100 200 300 400 500 0 5280 10560 % S la bs C ra ck ed IR I ( in /m i) Fa ul tin g (m ils ) Station (feet) Faulting IRI Cracking Note: Cracking data point for each segment is shown at the end of the segment Good Pavement focus areas Fair Pavement focus areas Poor Pavement focus areas 160th St York Rd / Airport Rd / CSAH 8 Dale St CSAH82 / Grade Rd AC P at ch (o ve r c ul ve rt ?) CSAH18 / 150th St

260 CSAH-22 Figure E-28. MN CSAH-22 Eastbound. Figure E-29. MN CSAH-22 Westbound. 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 0 100 200 300 400 500 0 5280 10560 15840 % S la bs C ra ck ed IR I ( in /m i) Fa ul tin g (m ils ) Station (feet) Faulting IRI Cracking CSAH 5 Jasper St CSAH 66 / Cleary Rd Ford Brook Dr Note: Cracking data point for each segment is shown at the end of the segment Good Pavement focus areas Fair Pavement focus areas Poor Pavement focus areas MN 47 / St Francis Blvd Ri ve r B rid ge Recommended Fair Segment: EB 1,584 - 2,112 Recommended Good Segment: EB 7,920 - 8,448 Recommended Poor Segment: EB 4,224 - 4,752 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 0 100 200 300 400 500 0 5280 10560 15840 % S la bs C ra ck ed IR I ( in /m i) Fa ul tin g (m ils ) Station (feet) Faulting IRI Cracking Note: Cracking data point for each segment is shown at the end of the segment Good Pavement focus areas Fair Pavement focus areas Poor Pavement focus areas Jasper St CSAH 66 / Cleary Rd Ford Brook Dr MN 47 / St Francis Blvd Ri ve r B rid ge CSAH 5

261 I-35 Figure E-30. MN I-35 Northbound. Figure E-31. MN I-35 Southbound. 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 0 100 200 300 400 500 0 5280 10560 15840 21120 26400 31680 % S la bs C ra ck ed IR I ( in /m i) Fa ul tin g (m ils ) Station (feet) Faulting IRI Cracking Note: Cracking data point for each segment is shown at the end of the segment Good Pavement focus areas Fair Pavement focus areas Poor Pavement focus areas CSAH 10 Interchange TH 95/St. Croix Trail Interchange CSAH 9/460th St Overpass Rest Area Un de rp as s 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 0 100 200 300 400 500 0 5280 10560 15840 21120 26400 31680 % S la bs C ra ck ed IR I ( in /m i) Fa ul tin g (m ils ) Station (feet) Faulting IRI Cracking Note: Cracking data point for each segment is shown at the end of the segment Good Pavement focus areas Fair Pavement focus areas Poor Pavement focus areas CSAH 10 Interchange TH 95/St. Croix Trail Interchange CSAH 9/460th St Overpass Recommended Poor Segment: SB 3,696 - 4,224 Recommended Fair Segment: SB 6,864 - 7,392 Un de rp as s Recommended Good Segment: SB 10,032 - 10,560

262 TH-30 Figure E-32. MN TH-30 Eastbound. Figure E-33. MN TH-30 Westbound. 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 0 100 200 300 400 500 0 5280 10560 15840 21120 26400 31680 36960 42240 % S la bs C ra ck ed IR I ( in /m i) Fa ul tin g (m ils ) Station (feet) 30 0 ( 30 ) Faulting IRI Cracking 513th Ave Note: Cracking data point for each segment is shown at the end of the segment Good Pavement focus areas Fair Pavement focus areas Poor Pavement focus areas Ri ve r B rid ge CSAH 24/ 473rd Ave T 414/ 481st Ave T 397/494th Ave CSAH 32/ 498th Ave CSAH 40/ 499th Ave CSAH 20/140/ 507th Ave CSAH 40/ 518th Ave T 656 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 0 100 200 300 400 500 0 5280 10560 15840 21120 26400 31680 36960 42240 % S la bs C ra ck ed IR I ( in /m i) Fa ul tin g (m ils ) Station (feet) Faulting IRI Cracking Note: Cracking data point for each segment is shown at the end of the segment Good Pavement focus areas Fair Pavement focus areas Poor Pavement focus areas CSAH 24/ 473rd Ave T 414/ 481st Ave T 397/494th Ave CSAH 32/ 498th Ave Ri ve r B rid ge CSAH 40/ 499th Ave CSAH 20/140/ 507th Ave 513th Ave CSAH 40/ 518th Ave T 656 Recommended Poor Segment: WB 36,432 - 36,960 Recommended Good Segment: WB 10,560 - 11,088 Recommended Fair Segment: WB 13,728 - 14,256

263 Missouri US-60 Figure E-34. MO US-60 Eastbound. Figure E-35. MO US-60 Westbound. 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 0 100 200 300 400 500 0 528 1056 1584 2112 2640 3168 3696 4224 4752 5280 5808 6336 % S la bs C ra ck ed IR I ( in /m i) Fa ul tin g (m ils ) Station (feet) ( ) Faulting IRI Cracking Note: Cracking data point for each segment is shown at the end of the segment Kodiak Rd Lusk Dr BUS 71 Conventional PCC Pavement (transitions to BCOA) AC Pavement I-49 NB Off-Ramp Adams Dr Change in Lateral Slab Pattern and Lane Widths (no longer three 4-ft- wide slabs comprising lane) Good Pavement focus areas Fair Pavement focus areas Poor Pavement focus areas 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 0 100 200 300 400 500 0 528 1056 1584 2112 2640 3168 3696 4224 4752 5280 5808 6336 % S la bs C ra ck ed IR I ( in /m i) Fa ul tin g (m ils ) Station (feet) Faulting IRI Cracking Note: Cracking data point for each segment is shown at the end of the segment Kodiak Rd Lusk Dr BUS 71 I-49 NB On-Ramp Adams Dr Change in Lateral Slab Pattern (no longer three 4-ft-wide slabs comprising lane) Good Pavement focus areas Fair Pavement focus areas Poor Pavement focus areas Recommended Good Segment: WB 1,584 - 2,112 Recommended Fair Segment: WB 0 - 528 Recommended Poor Segment: WB 1,056 - 1,584 AC Pavement

264 Montana SR-16 Figure E-36. MT SR-16 Northbound. Figure E-37. MT SR-16 Southbound. 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 0 100 200 300 400 500 0 528 1056 1584 2112 2640 % S la bs C ra ck ed IR I ( in /m i) Fa ul tin g (m ils ) Station (feet) Faulting IRI Cracking Note: Cracking data point for each segment is shown at the end of the segment Good Pavement focus areas Fair Pavement focus areas Poor Pavement focus areas W Towne St I-94 RampCrisafulli PL Unnamed Rd Recommended Poor Segment: NB 528 - 1,056 Recommended Good Segment: NB 1,056 - 1,584 Recommended Fair Segment: NB 1,584 - 2,112 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 0 100 200 300 400 500 0 528 1056 1584 2112 2640 % S la bs C ra ck ed IR I ( in /m i) Fa ul tin g (m ils ) Station (feet) Faulting IRI Cracking Note: Cracking data point for each segment is shown at the end of the segment Good Pavement focus areas Fair Pavement focus areas Poor Pavement focus areas W Towne St I-94 RampCrisafulli PL Unnamed Rd

265 Pennsylvania SR-119 Figure E-38. PA SR-119 Northbound. Figure E-39. PA SR-119 Southbound. 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 0 100 200 300 400 500 0 5280 10560 15840 21120 % S la bs C ra ck ed IR I ( in /m i) Fa ul tin g (m ils ) Station (feet) Faulting IRI Cracking Eberly Way Mt Braddock Rd Airport Rd Eighty Acres Rd Bell DrPechin Rd/ HiWay Supply Rd Monarch Rd/ Friendship Ln Ranch Rd SR 1053/ Archbridge Rd ICMI Rd Newer BCOA? Note: Cracking data point for each segment is shown at the end of the segment Cellural RdGood Pavement focus areas Fair Pavement focus areas Poor Pavement focus areas Private Private Private 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 0 100 200 300 400 500 0 5280 10560 15840 21120 % S la bs C ra ck ed IR I ( in /m i) Fa ul tin g (m ils ) Station (feet) Faulting IRI Cracking Newer BCOA? Note: Cracking data point for each segment is shown at the end of the segment Eberly Way Mt Braddock Rd Airport Rd Eighty Acres Rd Bell DrPechin Rd/ HiWay Supply Rd Ranch Rd SR 1053/ Archbridge Rd ICMI Rd Cellural Rd Recommended Poor Segment: SB 1,056 - 1,584 Recommended Good Segment: SB 4,752 - 5,280 Good Pavement focus areas Fair Pavement focus areas Poor Pavement focus areas Recommended Fair Segment: SB 2,640 - 3,168 Monarch Rd/ Friendship LnPrivate Private Private

Next: Appendix F: Visual Distress Survey Results »
Bonded Concrete Overlays on Asphalt Pavements: Resources for Evaluation Get This Book
×
 Bonded Concrete Overlays on Asphalt Pavements: Resources for Evaluation
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The TRB National Cooperative Highway Research Program's NCHRP Web-Only Document 329: Bonded Concrete Overlays on Asphalt Pavements: Resources for Evaluation provides Appendices A through G of the contractor’s final report, which detail survey responses from transportation agencies on bonded concrete overlays on asphalt pavements as well as agency plans and projects.

The document is supplemental to NCHRP Research Report 1007: Evaluation of Bonded Concrete Overlays on Asphalt Pavements.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!