National Academies Press: OpenBook

Strategies to Renew Federal Facilities (2023)

Chapter: References

« Previous: 7 Conclusions and Recommendations
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Strategies to Renew Federal Facilities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26806.
×

References

ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials). 1995. Standard Practice for Prioritizing Asset Resources in Acquisition, Utilization, and Disposition. E2495-18. https://www.astm.org/e2495-13.html.

Ayyub, B.M. 2014a. Risk Analysis in Engineering and Economics, 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC Press.

Ayyub, B.M. 2014b. “Systems Resilience for Multi-Hazard Environments: Definition, Metrics and Valuation for Decision Making.” Risk Analysis 34(2):340-355. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12093.

Beemiller, R. 1999. Experimental estimates of state and local government highway capital stocks. Presentation at the annual meeting of the Southern Regional Science Association, Richmond, VA, April.

California State Board of Equalization. 2012. “Basic Appraisal.” Assessors Handbook 501. Sacramento: California State Board of Equalization.

Callicott, J.B. 2004. “Explicit and Implicit Values.” In The Endangered Species Act at Thirty: Renewing the Conservation Promise, F. Davies, D. Goble, G. Heal, and M. Scott, eds. Washington, DC: Island Press.

Dempsey, J. 2017. “Managing Assets in the Context of Asset Management.” International Organization for Standardization. https://committee.iso.org/sites/tc251/home/news/content-left-area/news-and-updates/new-article-managing-assets-in-t.html.

Desai, A. 2012. Simulation for Policy Inquiry. New York: Springer.

District of Columbia. 2017. 2017-2021 Strategic Plan: Vision, Values, and a Culture of Continuous Improvement. Office of the Chief Financial Officer. Washington, DC: Government of the District of Columbia.

DoD (Department of Defense). 2016. Financial Management Regulation, vol. 2b. DoD 7000.14-R. https://comptroller.defense.gov/Portals/45/documents/fmr/Volume_02b.pdf.

DoD. 2018. Summary of the National Defense Strategy of the United States of America: Sharpening the American Military’s Competitive Edge. https://dod.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/pubs/2018-National-Defense-Strategy-Summary.pdf.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Strategies to Renew Federal Facilities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26806.
×

Executive Office of the President. 2015. “National Strategy for the Efficient Use of Real Property, 2015-2020.” March 25, 2015. Washington, DC: White House. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/omb/financial/national-strategy-efficient-use-real-property.pdf.

Fraumeni, B.M. 1997. “The Measurement of Depreciation in the U.S. National Income and Product Accounts.” Survey of Current Business 77(July):7-23.

Fraumeni, B.M. 1999. Productive Highway Capital Stock Measures. Report prepared for the Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, January. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/reports/phcsm/phcsm.pdf.

Frisinger, J. 2013. “DoD adopts Army Corps of Engineers BUILDER SMS Standard for All Facility Condition Assessments.” U.S. Army. December 31. https://www.army.mil/article/117669/dod_adopts_army_corps_of_engineers_builder_sms_standard_for_all_facility_condition_assessments.

GAO (Government Accountability Office). 1997. Defense Infrastructure. High-Risk Series. GAO-HR-97-7. Washington, DC: GAO.

GAO. 2003. Federal Real Property. High-Risk Series. GAO-03-122. Washington, DC: GAO.

GAO. 2009a. Defense Infrastructure: DOD Needs to Periodically Review Support Standards and Costs at Joint Bases and Better Inform Congress of Facility Sustainment Uses. March 30, 2009. GAO-09-336. Washington, DC: GAO. https://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-09-336.

GAO. 2009b. GAO Cost Estimating and Assessment Guide: Best Practices for Developing and Managing Capital Program Costs. GAO-09-3SP. Washington, DC: GAO. https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-09-3sp.pdf.

GAO. 2009c. Military Housing Privatization: DOD Faces New Challenges Due to Significant Growth at Some Installations and Recent Turmoil in the Financial Markets. GAO-09-352. Washington, DC: GAO.

GAO. 2010. Defense Infrastructure: Army’s Privatized Lodging Program Could Benefit from More Effective Planning. GAO-10-771. Washington, DC: GAO.

GAO. 2011a. Defense Infrastructure: The Enhanced Use Lease Program Requires Management Attention. GAO-11-574. Washington, DC: GAO.

GAO. 2011b. Excess Facilities: DOD Needs More Complete Information and a Strategy to Guide Its Future Disposal Efforts. GAO-11-814. Washington, DC: GAO.

GAO. 2011c. Federal Real Property: An Update on High-Risk Issues. GAO 07-895T. Washington, DC: GAO.

GAO. 2011d. Federal Real Property: The Government Faces Challenges to Disposing of Unneeded Buildings. GAO11-370T. Washington, DC: GAO.

GAO. 2011e. High-Risk Series: An Update. GAO-11-278. Washington, DC: GAO.

GAO. 2012a. Federal Real Property: Improved Cost Reporting Would Help Decision Makers Weigh the Benefits of Enhanced Use Leasing. GAO-13-14. Washington, DC: GAO.

GAO. 2012b. Federal Real Property: National Strategy and Better Data Needed to Improve Management of Excess and Underutilized Property. GAO-12-645. Washington, DC: GAO.

GAO. 2013a. Climate Change: Future Federal Adaptation Efforts Could Better Support Local Infrastructure Decision Makers. GAO-13-242. Washington, DC: GAO.

GAO. 2013b. Defense Infrastructure: Army Brigade Combat Teams Inactivations Informed by Analyses, But Actions Needed to Improve Stationing Process. GAO-14-76. Washington, DC: GAO.

GAO. 2013c. Defense Management: More Reliable Cost Estimates and Further Planning Needed to Inform the Marine Corps Realignment Initiatives in the Pacific. GAO-13-360. Washington, DC: GAO.

GAO. 2013d. Military Bases: Opportunities Exist to Improve Future Base Realignment and Closure Rounds. GAO-13-149. Washington, DC: GAO.

GAO. 2014a. Capital Financing: Alternative Approaches to Budgeting for Federal Real Property. GAO-14-239. Washington, DC: GAO.-

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Strategies to Renew Federal Facilities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26806.
×

GAO. 2014b. Climate Change Adaptation: DOD Can Improve Infrastructure Planning and Processes to Better Account for Potential Impacts. GAO-14-446. Washington, DC: GAO.

GAO, 2014c. Defense Infrastructure: DOD Needs to Improve Its Efforts to Identify Unutilized and Underutilized Facilities. GAO-14-538. Washington, DC: GAO.

GAO. 2014d. Defense Infrastructure: Risk Assessment Needed to Identify If Foreign Encroachment Threatens Test and Training Ranges. GAO-15-149. Washington, DC: GAO.

GAO. 2014e. Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government. GAO-14-704G. Washington, DC: GAO. https://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-14-704G.

GAO. 2015a. Amphibious Combat Vehicle: Some Acquisition Activities Demonstrate Best Practices; Attainment of Amphibious Capability to Be Determined. GAO-16-22. Washington, DC: GAO.

GAO. 2015b. DOE Real Property: Better Data and a More Proactive Approach Needed to Facilitate Property Disposal. GAO-15-305. Washington, DC: GAO.

GAO. 2015c. Underutilized Facilities: DOD and GSA Information Sharing May Enhance Opportunities to Use Space at Installations. GAO-15-346. Washington, DC: GAO.

GAO. 2016a. Climate Change: Improved Federal Coordination Could Facilitate Use of Forward-Looking Climate Information in Design Standards, Building Codes, and Certifications. GAO-17-3. Washington, DC: GAO.

GAO. 2016b. Defense Facility Condition: Revised Guidance Needed to Improve Oversight of Assessments and Ratings. GAO-16-662. Washington, DC: GAO.

GAO. 2016c. Federal Building Management: Building Disposal Authorities Provide Varying Degrees of Flexibility and Opportunities for Use. GAO-17-123. Washington, DC: GAO.

GAO. 2016d. Federal Real Property: Efforts Made, But Challenges Remain in Reducing Unneeded Facilities. GAO-16-869T. Washington, DC: GAO.

GAO. 2016e. Federal Real Property: Observations on GSA’s Cancelled Swap Exchange Involving Buildings in the Federal Triangle South Area. GAO-16-571R. Washington, DC: GAO.

GAO. 2016f. Federal Real Property: Public–Private Partnerships Have a Limited Role in Disposal and Management of Unneeded Property. GAO-16-776R. Washington, DC: GAO.

GAO. 2016g. Joint Intelligence Analysis Complex: DOD Partially Used Best Practices for Analyzing Alternatives and Should Do So for Future Military Construction Decisions. GAO-16-853. Washington, DC: GAO.

GAO. 2017a. Climate Change Adaptation: DOD Needs to Better Incorporate Adaptation into Planning and Collaboration at Overseas Installations. GAO-18-206. Washington, DC: GAO.

GAO. 2017b. Drinking Water: DOD Has Acted on Some Emerging Contaminants But Should Improve Internal Reporting on Regulatory Compliance. GAO-18-78. Washington, DC: GAO.

GAO. 2017c. Federal Real Property: GSA Should Inform Tenant Agencies When Leasing High-Security Space from Foreign Owners. GAO-17-195. Washington, DC: GAO.

GAO. 2017d. Government Efficiency and Effectiveness: Opportunities to Address Pervasive Management Risks and Challenges While Reducing Federal Costs. GAO-17-631T. Washington, DC: GAO.

GAO. 2017e. Intelligence Community: Analysis of Alternatives Approach for a New Site Reflects Most Characteristics of a High-Quality Process. GAO-17-643. Washington, DC: GAO.

GAO. 2017f. Marine Corps Asia-Pacific Realignment: DOD Should Resolve Capability Deficiencies and Infrastructure Risks and Revise Cost Estimates. GAO-17-415. Washington, DC: GAO.

GAO. 2017g. Military Base Realignment and Closures: DOD Has Improved Environmental Cleanup Reporting But Should Obtain and Share More Information. GAO-17-151. Washington, DC: GAO.

GAO. 2017h. VA Construction: Improved Processes Needed to Monitor Contract Modifications, Develop Schedules, and Estimate Costs. GAO-17-70. Washington, DC: GAO.

GAO. 2018a. Asbestos in GSA Buildings: Improved Data Would Enhance Oversight. GAO-19-45R. Washington, DC: GAO.-

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Strategies to Renew Federal Facilities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26806.
×

GAO. 2018b. Defense Infrastructure: Actions Needed to Increase the Reliability of Construction Cost Estimates. GAO-18-101. Washington, DC: GAO.

GAO. 2018c. Defense Real Property: DOD Needs to Take Additional Actions to Improve Management of Its Inventory Data. GAO-19-73. Washington, DC: GAO.

GAO. 2018d. Drinking Water: Status of DOD Efforts to Address Drinking Water Contaminants Used in Firefighting Foam. GAO-18-700T. Washington, DC: GAO.

GAO. 2018e. Federal Buildings: Agencies Focus on Space Utilization as They Reduce Office and Warehouse Space. GAO-18-304. Washington, DC: GAO.

GAO. 2018f. Federal Real Property Asset Management: Agencies Could Benefit from Additional Information on Leading Practices. GAO-19-57. Washington, DC: GAO.

GAO. 2018g. Military Housing Privatization: DOD Should Take Steps to Improve Monitoring, Reporting, and Risk Assessment. GAO-18-218. Washington, DC: GAO.

GAO. 2018h. VA Construction: Actions Taken to Improve Denver Medical Center and Other Large Projects’ Cost Estimates and Schedules. GAO-18-329T. Washington, DC: GAO.

GAO. 2018i. VA Construction: Management of Minor Construction and Non-Recurring Maintenance Programs Could Be Improved. GAO-18-479. Washington, DC: GAO.

GAO. 2018j. VA Medical Centers: VA Should Establish Goals and Measures to Enable Improved Oversight of Facilities’ Conditions. GAO-19-21. Washington, DC: GAO.

GAO. 2019a. Climate Change: Opportunities to Reduce Federal Fiscal Exposure. GAO-19-625T. Washington, DC: GAO.

GAO. 2019b. Climate Resilience: DOD Needs to Assess and Provide Guidance on Use of Climate Projections in Installation Master Plans and Facilities Designs. GAO-19-453. Washington, DC: GAO.

GAO. 2019c. Federal Buildings: GSA Can Improve Its Communication About and Assessment of Major Construction Projects. GAO-20-144. Washington, DC: GAO.

GAO. 2019d. Federal Real Property: GSA Needs to Strengthen Oversight of Its Delegated Leasing Program. GAO-19-405. Washington, DC: GAO.

GAO. 2019e. GSA Leasing: Improving Stakeholder Outreach and Lease Model Evaluation Could Enhance Competition. GAO-20-181. Washington, DC: GAO.

GAO. 2019f. High-Risk Series: Substantial Efforts Needed to Achieve Greater Progress on High-Risk Areas. GAO-19-157SP. Washington, DC: GAO.

GAO. 2019g. Managing Federal Real Property, GAO-19-157SP. Washington, DC: GAO. https://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-19-157sp.

GAO. 2019h. Military Housing Privatization: Preliminary Observations on DOD’s Oversight of the Condition of Military Privatized Housing. GAO-20-280T. Washington, DC: GAO.

GAO. 2019i. Naval Shipyards: Key Actions Remain to Improve Infrastructure to Better Support Navy Operations. GAO-20-64. Washington, DC: GAO.

GAO. 2019j. VA Real Property: Clear Procedures and Improved Data Collection Could Facilitate Property Disposals. GAO-19-148. Washington, DC: GAO.

GAO. 2019k. VA Real Property: Improvements in Facility Planning Needed to Ensure VA Meets Changes in Veterans Needs and Expectations. GAO-19-440. Washington, DC: GAO.

GAO. 2020a. Cost Estimating and Assessment Guide: Best Practices for Developing and Managing Program Costs. GAO-20-195G. Washington, DC: GAO.

GAO. 2020b. Military Housing: Preliminary Recommendations to Strengthen DOD’s Oversight and Monitoring of Privatized Housing. GAO-20-471T. Washington, DC: GAO.

GAO. 2021. High-Risk Series: Dedicated Leadership Needed to Address Limited Progress in Most High-Risk Areas. GAO-21-119SP. Washington, DC.

Gardiner, W. 1989. “Formula Budgeting as a Technique.” Chapter 5 in Facilities Management, A Manual for Plant Administration. Washington, DC: Association of Physical Plant Administrators of Universities and Colleges.

Gravelle, J. 1999. Depreciation and the Taxation of Real Estate. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Strategies to Renew Federal Facilities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26806.
×

Hanna, K.T. 2022. Public–Private Partnership (PPP). TechTarget. https://www.techtarget.com/whatis/definition/Public-private-partnership-PPP.

Herrera, G., C. Stokes, V. Peña, and S. Howies. 2017. A Review of the BUILDER Application for Assessing Federal Laboratory Facilities. Washington, DC: IDA Science & Technology Policy Institute. https://www.ida.org/-/media/feature/publications/a/ar/a-review-of-the-builder-application-for-assessing-federal-laboratory-facilities/d-8407.ashx.

Hulten, C.R., and F.C. Wykoff. 1979. “Tax and Economic Depreciation of Machinery and Equipment: A Theoretical and Empirical Appraisal, Phase II Report.” In Economic Depreciation of the U.S. Capital Stock: A First Step. Washington, DC: Department of the Treasury.

Hulten, C.R., and F.C. Wykoff. 1980. “Economic Depreciation and the Taxation of Structures.” In The Measurement of Capital: Studies in Income and Wealth, vol. 45. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Hulten, C.R., and F.C. Wykoff. 1981a. “The Estimation of Economic Depreciation Using Vintage Asset Prices.” Journal of Econometrics 15(April):367-396.

Hulten, C.R., and F.C. Wykoff. 1981b. “The Measurement of Economic Depreciation.” In Depreciation, Inflation, and the Taxation of Income from Capital, C.R. Hulten, ed. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press. Pp. 81-125.

Hutson, R., and F. Biedenweg. 1982. “Before the Roof Caves in: A Predictive Model for Physical Plant Renewal.” In Critical Issues in Facility Management, S. Glasner, ed. Washington, DC: APPA. Pp. 12-29.

ISO (International Organization for Standardization). 2008. “ISO 15686-5: Buildings and Constructed Assets, Service-Life Planning, Part 5 (Life-Cycle Costing).” https://www.iso.org/standard/61148.html.

ISO. 2014a. “ISO 55002: Asset Management—Management Systems—Guidelines for the Application of ISO 55001.” https://www.iso.org/standard/70402.html.

ISO. 2014b. “ISO 55001: Asset Management—Management Systems—Requirements.” https://www.iso.org/standard/55089.html.

ISO. 2014c. “ISO 55000: Asset Management—Overview, Principles, and Terminology.” https://www.iso.org/standard/55088.html.

ISO. 2015a. “ISO 9001: Quality Management Systems, Requirements.” https://www.iso.org/standard/62085.html.

ISO. 2015b. “ISO 14001: Environmental Management Systems, Requirements with Guidance for Use.” https://www.iso.org/standard/60857.html.

ISO. 2019. “ISO 31000: Risk Management—Guidelines.” https://www.iso.org/standard/61148.html.

Janke, J., and P. Lufkin. 2005. “Facility Cost Models.” Military Engineer 97(10).

Kaplan, S., and B.J. Garrick. 1981. “On the Quantitative Definition of Risk.” Risk Analysis 1(1):11-27.

Lufkin, P. 2020. Notes on the Builder Condition Assessment System. Santa Barbara, CA: Pomar Lane.

Lufkin, P., A. Desai, and J. Janke. 2005. “Estimating the Restoration and Modernization Costs of Infrastructure and Facilities.” Public Works Management and Policy 10(1):40-52.

MTA (Metropolitan Transportation Authority). 2019. MTA Capital Program 2020-2024: Rebuilding New York’s Transportation System. https://new.mta.info/document/10511.

National Council on Public Works Improvement. 1988. Fragile Foundations—A Report on America’s Public Works. https://www.infrastructurereportcard.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/1988-Fragile-Foundations-ExSum.pdf.

Neely, E.S., R.D. Neathammer, and J.R. Stirn. 1991. Maintenance Resource Prediction in the Facility Life-Cycle Process. CERL-TR-P-91/10. Champaign, IL: U.S. Army, Construction Engineering Research Laboratory.

NRC (National Research Council). 1990. Committing to the Cost of Ownership: Maintenance and Repair of Public Buildings. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

NRC. 1998. Stewardship of Federal Facilities: A Proactive Strategy for Managing the Nation’s Public Assets. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.-

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Strategies to Renew Federal Facilities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26806.
×

NRC. 2004a. Intelligent Sustainment and Renewal of Department of Energy Facilities and Infrastructure. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

NRC. 2004b. Investments in Federal Facilities: Asset Management Strategies for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

NRC. 2005a. Key Performance Indicators for Federal Facilities Portfolios. Federal Facilities Council Technical Report Number 147. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

NRC. 2005b. Valuing Ecosystem Services: Toward Better Environmental Decision-Making. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

NRC. 2008. Core Competencies for Federal Facilities Asset Management Through 2020. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

NRC. 2012a. Assessing the Reliability of Complex Models: Mathematical and Statistical Foundations of Verification, Validation, and Uncertainty Quantification. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

NRC. 2012b. Predicting Outcomes of Investments in Maintenance and Repair of Federal Facilities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2001. “Measuring Capital.” OECD Manual, Annex 1—Glossary of Technical Terms Used in the Manual. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/61/57/1876369.pdf.

OGP (Office of Government-wide Policy). 2016. FY 2016 Federal Real Property Profile (FRPP) Open Data Set. Washington, DC: GSA. https://www.gsa.gov/cdnstatic/FY_2016_Open_Data_Set.xlsx.

OMB (Office of Management and Budget). 1992. “Circular A-94—Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit-Cost Analysis of Federal Programs.” https://www.wbdg.org/FFC/FED/OMB/OMB-Circular-A94.pdf.

OMB. 2016. “Circular No. A-123—Management’s Responsibility for Enterprise Risk Management and Internal Control.” OMB M-16-17. Washington, DC. https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/whitehouse.gov/files/omb/memoranda/2016/m-16-17.pdf.

OMB. 2017. “Capital Programming Guide: 2017 Supplement to OMB Circular No. A-11.” Washington, DC.

OMB. 2018. “Management of Reporting and Data Integrity Risk. Appendix A to Circular A-123.” https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/M-18-16.pdf.

OMB. 2019. “Implementation of Agency-wide Real Property Capital Planning.” M-20-03. November 6, 2019. Washington, DC.

OMB. 2020a. “Issuance of an Addendum to the National Strategy for the Efficient Use of Real Property.” M-20-10. March 6, 2020. https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/M-20-10.pdf.

OMB. 2020b. “Update to Circular No. A-11.” Washington, DC.

OMB. 2022a. “Capital Programming Guide 3.1: 2022 Supplement to OMB Circular A-11.” Washington, DC.

OMB. 2022b. “Circular A-11—Preparation, Submission, and Execution of the Budget.” Washington, DC.

Ottoman, G., W. Nixon, and S. Lofgren. 1999. “Budgeting for Facility Maintenance and Repair I: Methods and Models.” Journal of Management in Engineering 15(4):71-83.

Shang, C., Y. Abed, J. Farrell, W. Hampton, et al. 2019. “Science-Based Infrastructure Stewardship.” Presentation to the committee on November 5. Washington, DC: National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine.

Silva, A., J. de Brito, and P. Gaspar. 2016. Methodologies for Service Life Prediction of Buildings: With a Focus on Façade Claddings. New York: Springer.

USACE (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers). 2015. “Washington Aqueduct, District of Columbia, VA, and MD: Fact Sheet.” USACE-Baltimore District. https://www.nab.usace.army.mil/portals/63/docs/FactSheets/FY15_Factsheets/Washington%20Aqueduct.pdf.-

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Strategies to Renew Federal Facilities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26806.
×

USAF (U.S. Air Force). 2018. MDI Playbook. https://www.afcec.af.mil/Portals/17/documents/CE-Online/2018%20Spring%20CE%20mag.pdf.

USAF. 2019. USAF Infrastructure Investment Strategy. YouTube. March 22, 2019. Video, 0:00-0:27. https://www.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/1793099/air-force-unveils-new-infrastructure-strategy-to-get-more-value-for-money-impro.

Uzarski, D.R., M.N. Grussing, and B.B. Mehnert. 2018. Knowledge-Based Condition Assessment Reference Manual for Building Component-Sections: For Use with BUILDER™ and Build-erRED™ (v. 3 series). USACERL Technical Report 3SR-18-7. Champaign, IL: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ Construction Engineering Research Laboratory.

White House. 2004. “Federal Real Property Asset Management.” Executive Order 13327 of February 4, 2004. Federal Register 69(25):5897-5900. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2004-02-06/pdf/04-2773.pdf.

White House. 2019. A Budget for a Better America: Promises Kept, Taxpayers First: Analytical Perspectives. Fiscal Year 2020. Budget of the U.S. Government. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/BUDGET-2020-PER/pdf/BUDGET-2020-PER.pdf.

White House. 2020. A Budget for America’s Future: Analytical Perspectives. Fiscal Year 2021. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/BUDGET-2021-PER/pdf/BUDGET-2021-PER.pdf.

Whitestone Research. 2002. Support and Extension of the Department of Defense Sustainment Model: Final Report. Washington, DC.

Whitestone Research. 2003. Development of a Restoration & Modernization Requirements Process: Final Report. Washington, DC.

Wildavsky, A. 1979. Speaking Truth to Power. Boston: Little Brown.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Strategies to Renew Federal Facilities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26806.
×
Page 112
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Strategies to Renew Federal Facilities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26806.
×
Page 113
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Strategies to Renew Federal Facilities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26806.
×
Page 114
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Strategies to Renew Federal Facilities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26806.
×
Page 115
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Strategies to Renew Federal Facilities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26806.
×
Page 116
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Strategies to Renew Federal Facilities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26806.
×
Page 117
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Strategies to Renew Federal Facilities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26806.
×
Page 118
Next: Appendixes »
Strategies to Renew Federal Facilities Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $24.00 Buy Ebook | $19.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The United States real property portfolio is critical infrastructure that provides places and means for the federal government to operate and generate the products, services, security, and assurances that contribute to national prosperity and values. This report identifies broad-based, practical, and compelling strategies for securing continuing investment in the renewal of federal real properties and portfolios. Strategies to Renew Federal Facilities focuses on the how- not the what - for adapting, repurposing, restoring, recapitalizing, and replacing real property assets.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!