National Academies Press: OpenBook
Page i
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2022. Quantifying the Effects of Implements of Husbandry on Pavements: Appendices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26816.
×
Page R1
Page ii
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2022. Quantifying the Effects of Implements of Husbandry on Pavements: Appendices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26816.
×
Page R2
Page iii
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2022. Quantifying the Effects of Implements of Husbandry on Pavements: Appendices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26816.
×
Page R3
Page iv
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2022. Quantifying the Effects of Implements of Husbandry on Pavements: Appendices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26816.
×
Page R4

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

NCHRP Web-Only Document 338: Quantifying the Effects of Implements of Husbandry on Pavements Appendices L. Khazanovich S. Sen University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh, PA Appendices for NCHRP Project 01-58 Submitted May 2022 © 2022 by the National Academy of Sciences. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine and the graphical logo are trademarks of the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. NATIONAL COOPERATIVE HIGHWAY RESEARCH PROGRAM Systematic, well-designed, and implementable research is the most effective way to solve many problems facing state departments of transportation (DOTs) administrators and engineers. Often, highway problems are of local or regional interest and can best be studied by state DOTs individually or in cooperation with their state universities and others. However, the accelerating growth of highway transportation results in increasingly complex problems of wide interest to highway authorities. These problems are best studied through a coordinated program of cooperative research. Recognizing this need, the leadership of the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) in 1962 initiated an objective national highway research program using modern scientific techniques—the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP). NCHRP is supported on a continuing basis by funds from participating member states of AASHTO and receives the full cooperation and support of the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), United States Department of Transportation, under Agreement No. 693JJ31950003. COPYRIGHT INFORMATION Authors herein are responsible for the authenticity of their materials and for obtaining written permissions from publishers or persons who own the copyright to any previously published or copyrighted material used herein. Cooperative Research Programs (CRP) grants permission to reproduce material in this publication for classroom and not-for-profit purposes. Permission is given with the understanding that none of the material will be used to imply TRB, AASHTO, APTA, FAA, FHWA, FTA, GHSA, or NHTSA endorsement of a particular product, method, or practice. It is expected that those reproducing the material in this document for educational and not-for-profit uses will give appropriate acknowledgment of the source of any reprinted or reproduced material. For other uses of the material, request permission from CRP. DISCLAIMER The opinions and conclusions expressed or implied in this report are those of the researchers who performed the research. They are not necessarily those of the Transportation Research Board; the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; the FHWA; or the program sponsors. The Transportation Research Board does not develop, issue, or publish standards or specifications. The Transportation Research Board manages applied research projects which provide the scientific foundation that may be used by Transportation Research Board sponsors, industry associations, or other organizations as the basis for revised practices, procedures, or specifications. The Transportation Research Board, the National Academies, and the sponsors of the National Cooperative Highway Research Program do not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers’ names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the object of the report. The information contained in this document was taken directly from the submission of the author(s). This material has not been edited by TRB.

The National Academy of Sciences was established in 1863 by an Act of Congress, signed by President Lincoln, as a private, non- governmental institution to advise the nation on issues related to science and technology. Members are elected by their peers for outstanding contributions to research. Dr. Marcia McNutt is president. The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964 under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences to bring the practices of engineering to advising the nation. Members are elected by their peers for extraordinary contributions to engineering. Dr. John L. Anderson is president. The National Academy of Medicine (formerly the Institute of Medicine) was established in 1970 under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences to advise the nation on medical and health issues. Members are elected by their peers for distinguished contributions to medicine and health. Dr. Victor J. Dzau is president. The three Academies work together as the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine to provide independent, objective analysis and advice to the nation and conduct other activities to solve complex problems and inform public policy decisions. The National Academies also encourage education and research, recognize outstanding contributions to knowledge, and increase public understanding in matters of science, engineering, and medicine. Learn more about the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine at www.nationalacademies.org. The Transportation Research Board is one of seven major programs of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. The mission of the Transportation Research Board is to provide leadership in transportation improvements and innovation through trusted, timely, impartial, and evidence-based information exchange, research, and advice regarding all modes of transportation. The Board’s varied activities annually engage about 8,000 engineers, scientists, and other transportation researchers and practitioners from the public and private sectors and academia, all of whom contribute their expertise in the public interest. The program is supported by state transportation departments, federal agencies including the component administrations of the U.S. Department of Transportation, and other organizations and individuals interested in the development of transportation. Learn more about the Transportation Research Board at www.TRB.org.

C O O P E R A T I V E R E S E A R C H P R O G R A M S CRP STAFF FOR NCHRP WEB-ONLY DOCUMENT 338 Christopher J. Hedges, Director, Cooperative Research Programs Waseem Dekelbab, Deputy Director, Cooperative Research Programs, and Manager, National Cooperative Highway Research Program Sid Mohan, Associate Program Manager, Implementation and Technology Transfer, National Cooperative Highway Research Program Amir N. Hanna, Senior Program Officer Emily Griswold, Program Coordinator Natalie Barnes, Director of Publications Heather DiAngelis, Associate Director of Publications Jennifer J. Weeks, Publishing Projects Manager NCHRP PROJECT 01-58 PANEL Field of Design—Area of Pavements Karim Chatti, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI (Chair) Edgardo D. Block, Connecticut Department of Transportation, Newington, CT Xingwei Chen, Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development, Baton Rouge, LA Laura L. Fenley, Wisconsin Department of Transportation (formerly), Madison, WI Brian J. Hogan, Illinois Department of Transportation, Paris, IL Mohammad Karim, Alberta Transportation and Utilities, Edmonton, AB Nadarajah Sivaneswaran, FHWA Liaison Stephen F. Maher, TRB Liaison

Contents APPENDIX A: SUMMARY OF STATE DOT RESPONSES ........................................................................................... 1 APPENDIX B: DEVELOPMENT OF LAYERED VISCOELASTIC ANALYSIS PROGRAM PITTLAYER-VE ............................ 8 B.1. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................................... 8 B.2. LAYERED ELASTIC THEORY ......................................................................................................................................... 8 B.3. LAYERED VISCOELASTIC THEORY ............................................................................................................................... 13 B.3.1. Recursive functions .............................................................................................................................. 14 B.3.2. Transformation of the LVET problem to a set of auxiliary LET problems ............................................. 19 B.3.3. Solution of the LVET problem ............................................................................................................... 21 B.4. LAYERED VISCOELASTIC THEORY ANALYSIS PROGRAM PITTLAYER-VE ............................................................................ 22 B.5. MOVING LOAD ANALYSIS ....................................................................................................................................... 27 B.6. CONCLUSIONS ...................................................................................................................................................... 43 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................................................... 44 APPENDIX C: EVALUATION OF THE SUBGRADE STRENGTH ESTIMATION METHODOLOGY USING LTPP DATABASE ......................................................................................................................................................................... 46 C.1 LTPP SMP SECTIONS ............................................................................................................................................. 46 C.2 FWD DATA SELECTION ........................................................................................................................................... 46 C.3 FWD DATA PROCESSING ......................................................................................................................................... 47 C.4 SUBGRADE SHEAR PARAMETERS ................................................................................................................................ 50 CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................................................................................. 56 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................................................... 57 APPENDIX D: DEVELOPMENT OF PRONY SERIES FOR VARIOUS MIXES ................................................................ 58 D.1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................... 58 D.2 DATA COLLECTION ................................................................................................................................................. 58 D.3 PRONY SERIES ....................................................................................................................................................... 61 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................................................... 64 APPENDIX E: IOH CHARACTERTSICS ................................................................................................................... 65 VEHICLE 1: 4,400-GAL TANKER TRUCK ........................................................................................................................... 65 VEHICLE 2: 4,400-GAL TANKER TRUCK ........................................................................................................................... 66 VEHICLE 3: CASE IH 9330, 1,000-BUSHELS GRAIN CART ................................................................................................... 67 VEHICLE 4: AGCO TERRAGATOR 8144 ........................................................................................................................ 68 VEHICLE 5: AGCO TERRAGATOR 3104 ........................................................................................................................ 69 VEHICLE 6: JOHN DEERE 8230, 6,000 GAL ................................................................................................................... 70 VEHICLE 7: CASE IH 335, 7,300-GAL TANK................................................................................................................... 71 VEHICLE 8: CASE IH 335, 9,500 GAL ........................................................................................................................... 72 VEHICLE 9: MNROAD NAVISTAR 80-KIP SEMI-TRUCK .................................................................................................... 73 VEHICLE 10: MNROAD MACK 102-KIP TRUCK ............................................................................................................. 74 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................................................... 74 APPENDIX F: LABORATORY STUDY OF SEASONAL VARIATION IN SHEAR STRENGTH ........................................... 75 F.1 GRADATIONS ......................................................................................................................................................... 75 F.2 FREEZE/THAW RATES .............................................................................................................................................. 75 F.3 SHEAR STRENGTH TESTING ....................................................................................................................................... 78 NCHRP Web-Only Document 338 contains the appendices for NCHRP Project 01-58 and accompanies NCHRP Research Report 1019: Quantifying the Effects of Implements of Husbandry on Pavements. Readers can read or purchase NCHRP Research Report 1019 on the National Academies Press website (www.nap.edu).

Next: Appendix A Summary of State DOT Responses »
Quantifying the Effects of Implements of Husbandry on Pavements: Appendices Get This Book
×
 Quantifying the Effects of Implements of Husbandry on Pavements: Appendices
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

Implements of husbandry (IoH) are vehicles designed for agricultural purposes and exclusively used in the conduct of agricultural operations.

The TRB National Cooperative Highway Research Program's NCHRP Web-Only Document 338: Quantifying the Effects of Implements of Husbandry on Pavements: Appendices is supplemental to NCHRP Research Report 1019: Quantifying the Effects of Implements of Husbandry on Pavements.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!