National Academies Press: OpenBook

Interim report: the National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice : objectives and planning (1976)

Chapter: Appendix B Mitre Corporation Evaluation of Impact Cities

« Previous: Appendices
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Mitre Corporation Evaluation of Impact Cities." National Research Council. 1976. Interim report: the National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice : objectives and planning. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26975.
×
Page 42
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Mitre Corporation Evaluation of Impact Cities." National Research Council. 1976. Interim report: the National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice : objectives and planning. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26975.
×
Page 43

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

42 Appendix B MITRE CORPORATION EVALUATION OF IMPACT CITIES The d r a f t f i n a l r e p o r t of the M i t r e evaluation discusses the p o l i t i c a l dimensions of Impact C i t i e s i n the f o l l o w i n g way: Among the p o l i t i c a l requirements imposed upon the program from i t s i n c e p t i o n were: • a h i g h l y emphasized a c t i o n focus; • q u a n t i f i e d o b j e c t i v e s f o r the program (the 5 percent and 20 percent reduction f i g u r e s ) t h a t were n e i t h e r based upon any e m p i r i c a l evidence t h a t they could be a t t a i n e d , nor even o p e r a t i o n a l l y defined; • a c i t y s e l e c t i o n process based upon u n c l e a r l y s p e c i f i e d c r i t e r i a ; o use of the New F e d e r a l i s t philosophy t h a t had become a p o l i t i c a l r e q u i s i t e f o r LEAA programs; and o a three-way partnership among f e d e r a l , s t a t e , and c i t y a u t h o r i t i e s without any very clear s p e c i f i c a t i o n and d i f f e r e n t i a t i o n of the r o l e s and funct i o n s of each. The a c t i o n focus and q u a n t i f i e d o b j e c t i v e s were p o l i t i c a l , as opposed to research-based, because the program was openly an attempt t o demonstrate effectiveness i n crime-reduction t o the American p u b l i c . One reason the c r i t e r i a f o r c i t y s e l e c t i o n were u n c l e a r l y s p e c i f i e d was t h a t the c i t i e s were chosen on p o l i t i c a l grounds by a decision made w i t h i n the Nixon Adminis- t r a t i o n . The New F e d e r a l i s t p o l i c y i s f u r t h e r commented on i n the M i t r e

43 r e p o r t as f o l l o w s : The New F e d e r a l i s t approach s i g n i f i e d , i n Impact, t h a t c i t i e s (having determined t h e i r own p r i o r i t i e s based on t h e i r analyses, and chosen t h e i r p r o j e c t s ) would also have c o l l e c t e d t h a t data they saw f i t t o collect...New Federalism meant...that no mandatory e v a l u a t i o n standards had been established f o r the s t a t e s , t h a t no requirements e x i s t e d f o r comparable and uniform data across the s t a t e s , and t h a t no r o u t i n e f e d e r a l monitoring of the adequacy of st a t e planning and assistance f u n c t i o n s had been i n s t i t u t e d . Thus, New Federalism had not only precluded p r e s c r i p t i o n s t o the c i t i e s about e v a l u a t i o n designs (Impact c i t i e s were being allowed t o conduct t h e i r own evaluations and no par- t i c u l a r design s p e c i f i c a t i o n s , no c o n t r o l groups had been mandated), but even the leverage t o insure t h a t some data were being c o l l e c t e d , and t h a t some SFAs were checking on t h a t data c o l l e c t i o n , was also missing. The three-way partnership was described i n t h i s way: The program would be administered w i t h i n the s t r u c t u r e established f o r LEAA block grant programs w i t h the f e d e r a l r e g i o n a l o f f i c e s (ROs), the s t a t e planning agencies (SPAs), and the l o c a l governments a l l p l a y i n g a r o l e i n the IMPACT eff o r t . . . T h e LEAA Regional O f f i c e s (ROs) would r e t a i n f i n a l approval a u t h o r i t y f o r Impact plans, a c t i o n p r o j e c t s , and evaluat i o n components. At LEAA i n Washington, the N a t i o n a l Impact Program Coordinator, the N a t i o n a l I n s t i t u t e f o r Law Enforcement and Criminal J u s t i c e , a P o l i c y Decision Group (made up of three high-ranking LEAA o f f i c i a l s ) and the Na- t i o n a l C r i m i n a l J u s t i c e Information and S t a t i s t i c s Service would monitor the development and progress of the program.

Next: Appendix C Comments of Gerald M Caplan »
Interim report: the National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice : objectives and planning Get This Book
×
 Interim report: the National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice : objectives and planning
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!