National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: 5 Assessment of a Tolerable Upper Intake Level for Carbohydrates
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Using Systematic Reviews to Support Future Dietary Reference Intakes: A Letter Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/27031.
×

A

References

Arnesen, E. K., J. J. Christensen, R. Andersen, H. Eneroth, M. Erkkola, A. Høyer, E. W. Lemming, H. M. Meltzer, Þ. I. Halldórsson, I. Þórsdóttir, U. Schwab, E. Trolle, and R. Blomhoff. 2020a. The Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2022—Handbook for qualified systematic reviews. Food & Nutrition Research 64. https://doi.org/10.29219/fnr.v64.4404.

Arnesen E. K., J. J. Christensen, R. Andersen, H. Eneroth, M. Erkkola, A. Høyer, E. W. Lemming, H. M. Meltzer, Þ. I. Halldórsson, I. Þórsdóttir, U. Schwab, E. Trolle, and R. Blomhoff. 2020b. The Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2022—Structure and rationale of qualified systematic reviews. Food & Nutrition Research 64. https://doi.org/10.29219/fnr.v64.4403.

Christensen, J. J., E. K. Arnesen, R. Andersen, H. Eneroth, M. Erkkola, A. Høyer, E. W. Lemming, H. M. Meltzer, Þ. I. Halldórsson, I. Þórsdóttir, U. Schwab, E. Trolle, and R. Blomhoff. 2020. The Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2022—Principles and methodologies. Food & Nutrition Research 64. https://doi.org/10.29219/fnr.v64.4402.

EFSA (European Food Safety Authority). 2015. Principles and process for dealing with data and evidence in scientific assessments. EFSA Journal 13(6):4121.

Høyer, A., J. J. Christensen, E. K. Arnesen, R. Andersen, H. Eneroth, M. Erkkola, E. W. Lemming, H. M. Meltzer, Þ. I. Halldórsson, I. Þórsdóttir, U. Schwab, E. Trolle, and R. Blomhoff. 2021. The Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2022—Prioritisation of topics for de novo systematic reviews. Food & Nutrition Research 65. https://doi.org/10.29219/fnr.v65.7828.

IOM (Institute of Medicine). 2002/2005. Dietary Reference Intakes for energy, carbohydrate, fiber, fat, fatty acids, cholesterol, protein, and amino acids. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

IOM. 2008. The development of DRIs 1994-2004: Lessons learned and new challenges: Workshop summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

IOM. 2011. Dietary Reference Intakes for calcium and vitamin D. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Using Systematic Reviews to Support Future Dietary Reference Intakes: A Letter Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/27031.
×

Lichtenstein, A. H., E. A. Yetley, and J. Lau. 2008. Application of systematic review methodology to the field of nutrition. Journal of Nutrition 138(12):2297-2306.

NASEM (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine). 2017. Guiding principles for developing Dietary Reference Intakes based on chronic disease. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/24828.

NASEM. 2019. Dietary Reference Intakes for sodium and potassium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

NDA (EFSA Panel on Nutrition, Novel Foods and Food Allergens), D. Turck, T. Bohn, J. Castenmiller, S. de Henauw, K. I. Hirsch-Ernst, H. K. Knutsen, A. Maciuk, I. Mangelsdorf, H. J. McArdle, A. Naska, C. Peláez, K. Pentieva, A. Siani, F. Thies, S. Tsabouri, R. Adan, P. Emmett, C. Galli, M. Kersting, P. Moynihan, L. Tappy, L. Ciccolallo, A. de Sesmaisons-Lecarré, L. Fabiani, Z. Horvath, L. Martino, I. Muñoz Guajardo, S. Valtueña Martínez, and M. Vinceti. 2022. Scientific Opinion on Tolerable Upper Intake Level for dietary sugars. EFSA Journal 20(2):7074.

NTP (National Toxicology Program). 2019. Handbook for Conducting a Literature-Based Health Assessment Using OHAT Approach for Systematic Review and Evidence Integration. Office of Health Assessment and Translation. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/whatwestudy/assessments/noncancer/handbook/index.html.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Using Systematic Reviews to Support Future Dietary Reference Intakes: A Letter Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/27031.
×
Page 25
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Using Systematic Reviews to Support Future Dietary Reference Intakes: A Letter Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/27031.
×
Page 26
Next: Appendix B: Committee Member Biographies »
Using Systematic Reviews to Support Future Dietary Reference Intakes: A Letter Report Get This Book
×
 Using Systematic Reviews to Support Future Dietary Reference Intakes: A Letter Report
Buy Paperback | $15.00 Buy Ebook | $12.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

In response to a request from the US Department of Agriculture, the Health and Medicine Division (HMD) of the National Academies established the Standing Committee to Review the Dietary Reference Intake (DRI) Framework. The committee was asked to respond to DRI-related questions to inform the Federal DRI working group about the conduct of new DRI reviews and DRI-related issues more broadly, including their application.

This second letter report advises the Federal DRI Working Group on three questions: 1) Are de novo systematic reviews are needed in future DRI reviews or can qualified systematic reviews be used? 2) If qualified systematic reviews can be used, what are the appropriate inclusion and exclusion criteria? 3) Can previously published systematic review be updated? In response, the standing committee developed a report that includes a decision tree that addresses the need for systematic reviews to support the DRI process.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!