Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
(1) Structunng C i v i l Engineenng forces t d provide a mobile capa- b i l i t y t o respond to emergencies and contingencies, to support normal base requirements, and to achieve an adequate m i l i t a r y manning base to support A i r Fbrce ro t a t i o n requirements (2) Monitoring and coordinating C i v i l Engineenng mobility require- ments f o r f a c i l i t i e s and equipment (3) Providing technical guidance f o r acquisition and use of special- ized C i v i l Engineenng equipment, matenals, and f a c i l i t i e s (4) Providing guidance and coordination f o r major command and A i r Force war and contingency planning (5) Providing guidance and technical support f o r career development, t r a i n i n g , and related personnel functions f o r the m i l i t a r y and c i v i l i a n CE forces (6) Developing and evaluating an automated specification r e t r i e v a l system (7) Developing c n t e n a and guide specifications f o r C i v i l Engineer- ing manufactured end items (8) Directing, providing technical support t o , and monitoring the A i r Force pavements evaluation program, the C i v i l Engineenng Site Selection Program, and the C i v i l Engineenng technical consultant program (9) Assisting major commands and functional managers i n inplementing A i r S t a f f policy decisions and i n the accomplishment o f A i r Force C i v i l Engineering objectives (10) Providing C i v i l Engineering d i r e c t i o n and technical support f o r special studies and programs (11) Serving as Office o f Primary Responsibility withm C i v i l Engineer- ing f o r j u s t i f y i n g and managing C i v i l Engineering WRM requirements , fo r managing the USAF forestry program, and f o r maintaining a cur- rent status of reuseable, excess RPIE as designated by the C i v i l Engineenng Use Over Panel (12) Providing overall A i r Force managment re s p o n s i b i l i t y f o r i n v e s t i - gations, applications, value, and corrosion control/prevention engineering The A i r Force Regional C i v i l Engineenng Offices (AFRCE), under the oper- ational control of the Deputy Director o f C i v i l Engineenng are responsible f o r f i e l d management o f A i r Force M i l i t a r y Construction Programs, and f o r monitoring agency construction actions throu^^ contract award In addition, the AFRCE's participates i n construction s i t i n g , issues design directives t o construction a ^ n t s , reviews and approves plans and specifica- t i o n s , and provides technical assistance t o Air Force organizations i n real estate, maintenance, and other c i v i l engineenng matters An organization chart of the Office o f the A i r Force Regional C i v i l Engineenng Western Region, i s shown i n Figure 40 3 Operation of the System As mentioned e a r l i e r i n t h i s report, the M i l i t a r y Construction Program i s a closed loop r e i t e r a t i v e cycle, making i t d i f f i c u l t t o select a point of entry However, fo r purposes of descnbmg the operation o f the system f o r obtaining A i r Force f a c i l i t i e s , one can begin with the report 4HAFZ-17 (4Z-17), Projected F a c i l i t y U t i l i z a t i o n Detail L i s t 122
AREA HEDICAL CONSTRUCTION LIAISON h- WESTERN AREA . J U S AIR FORCE REGIONAL CIVIL ENGINEER 1 WESTERN REGION STRATEGIC TRAINING AND SYSTEMS FACILITIES DIVISION SAC SUPPORT BRANCH ATC-AFSC-ANG SUPPORT BRANCH ADMINISTRATIVE BRANCH DEFENSE LOGISTICS AND TACTICAL FACILITIES DIVISION AFLC-ADC-HAC SUPPORT BRANCH TAC SUPPORT BRANCH PLAN$ AND CONTROL DIVISION CONTROL BRANCH PLANS BRANCH Figure kO O f f i c e of the A i r Force Regional C i v i l Engineer-Western Region The 4Z-17 report, prepared at the base or i n s t a l l a t i o n l e v e l , approved by the Command, and passed on to the Office of the Air Force Directorate of C i v i l Engineering (AFOCE), reflects evexy known f a c i l i t i e s requirement for Command by location for as many years as one can see based on mission (This seldom exceeds 5 years and v i r t u a l l y never more than 8) The 4Z-17 report reflects a category-coded* itemization of f a c i l i t i e s required for new mission support, continuing svpport of current missions, and modernization The Air Force has conputenzed this a c t i v i t y The 4Z-17 report indicates projected f a c i l i t i e s requirements that are reflected *Five category codes are used within the m i l i t a r y Services 1 Class A f a c i l i t i e s i n which there are no known deficiencies, 2 m use f a c i l i t i e s which contain deficiencies, 3 forced use f a c i l i t i e s which are inproperly used f a c i l i t i e s containing deficiencies, 4 s t e r i l e f a c i l i t i e s that are not i n use, and 5 f a c i l i t i e s proposed for disposal 123
i n the current A i r Force Program Documents (PD's), a series of documents issued by the A i r Staff periodically which are based on the Air Force's ma- j o r force and support programs (missions) reflected m the Five-Year Defense Plan (FYDP), the JSOP, the Joint Force Memo> and other OOD guidance directives The Program Documents, which are classified but are furnished to the Commands and bases for planning purposes, include (a ) Program Gudance Documents (PG) (b ) Program Manpower and Organization (PM) (c)Program Document (Bases, Ukiits and P r i o r i t i e s ) (PD) (d ) Program Supplements (PDIC) (e ) Program Communications (PC) ( f )Program Communications St^port (PCSP) The 4Z-17 reports are s\d)nitted quarterly by the bases t o Command Headquarters Commands i n turn submits the reports to the Office of the Air Force Directorate C i v i l Engineering (AFOCE) semi-annually, i n June and December The June issue arrives at C i v i l Engineenng m early August, the December issue i n February Working with the JSOP, Joint Force Memo, and other guidance siipplied by OSD and the JCS^in January t h r o u ^ March, the m i l i t a r y departments i n i t i a t e the d e t a i l planning of a l l t h e i r programs for the budget year to begin on 1 July ^prox- imately 18 months hence and for the remaining 4 years of the Five Year Defense Plan (FYDP) In anticipation o f the guidance to be received from OSD and JCS, the Office of the Air Force Directorate of C i v i l Engineenng (AFOCE), through i t s Programs Division, issues i n January a request to Commands for a l i s t i n g by l i n e item o f t h e i r proposed Militaxy Construction Program Guidance pro- vided the Commands for t h i s submittal vanes from nothing to d e t a i l f i s c a l guidance Commands relay the request to a l l bases and installations under t h e i r j u n s d i c t i o n through intermediate Commands as required with the understanding that the complete l i s t i n g i s due i n to the AFOCE Programs Division by 1 July The l i s t i n g of the M i l i t a r y Construction Program by l i n e items i s prepared by the Office of the Base C i v i l Engineer The l i s t i n g i s broken i n t o essentially two parts, one concerning f a c i l i t i e s for which funding i s desired m the budget ( f i s c a l ) year m question ( i e , q>proximately 18 months away), and one con- cerning f a c i l i t i e s f o r which funding i s planned over the remaining 4 years and out-years of the Five Year Defense Plan (FYDP) Using the last 4Z-17 report, AF Manual 86-4 Standard F a c i l i t y Requirements, the most recently issued Program Documents, or information fiimished by Commands that mi£|it not yet be reflected i n the Progreun Documents, the Base C i v i l Engi- neer's office personnel work with user agency or tenant on the base and compile a l i s t i n g of f a c i l i t i e s requirements Once conpiled, the Base C i v i l Engineer with a Committee of his personnel select the method by which funds for the needed f a c i l i t y are t o be souj^t, i e , whether a project i s to be si;pported out of 0§M funds, as emergency construction,or t h r o u ^ the M i l i t a r y Construction Program Whether the project i s to be funded out of the OgM account or placed i n the M i l i t a r y Construction Program depends en t i r e l y vpan anticipated cost of the line item and t o t a l anticipated demand upon 0§M funds I t i s seldom that a project whose cost f a l l s within the 0§M funding l i m i t a t i o n ever becomes a part of the M i l i t a r y Construction Program The Committee establishes the funding method and p r i o r i t y ranks MCON items for the next budget year based upon mission needs Repair items are usually the f i r s t items cut 124
S t i l l , i n January, the Base C i v i l Engineer's s t a f f i n i t i a t e s preparation of the documentation whidi w i l l be used to j u s t i f y and support the M i l i t a r y Construction Program by l i n e item This documentation includes Program Development Booklets ( PDB's) and DD1391 and DD1391C forms on each li n e item t o be considered i n the subject budget year and 0D1391 forms on a l l line items planned for the remaining 4 years of the Five Year Defense Plan Form DD1391, Mi l i t a r y Construction Line Item Data, i s a single sheet form which has the basic purpose of conveying scope and estimated construction cost of the li n e Item The DD1391 i s backed vp with Form DD1391C which provides significant detail on existing u t i l i t i e s and other design considerations and on the estimat- ed construction cost of the l i n e item The DD1391 supposedly i s prepared from the Program Development Booklet, an Air Force document which the Service feels contains s u f f i c i e n t information for the Design Agent to i n i t i a t e design without a predesign conference The Program Development Booklet contains a l l the i n f o r - mation reflected on the 1391 and 1391C forms plus additional material on the engineering aspects of design I t contains a concise, comprehensive compila- t i o n of c r i t e r i a , the basis of design, and the basis of the programmed construc- t i o n cost estimate Components of the PDB include, therefore, a project descrip- t i o n , scope, planning c r i t e r i a , s i t e description, siibsoil conditions, s t r u c t u r a l / medianical/electncal/matenal considerations, special considerations, and cost analyses For estimating line item cost and scope, the Base C i v i l Engineer s t a f f uses a host of Air Force and DOD documents, including A ir Force Manual 88-16, M i l i t a r y Construction Pricing Guide, Air Force Manual 88-29, Air Force Design Manual, Design Policy and Procedures, A i r Force Manual, Definitive Drawings, and the entire Air Force Manual 80 series For estimating cost, h i s t o r i c a l cost data, area factors, and local conditions are considered The Air Force Regional C i v i l Engineer provides guidance to the Base C i v i l Engi- neer on preparation of the PDB's and reviews them at the base to ensure coiqili- ance with manuals, c r i t e r i a , and regulations At t h i s time, now perhaps late March or early May, Command headquarters or an Intermediate Command as expropri- ate, sends representation to the base to review the five year l i s t i n g of f a c i l - i t i e s requirements, the representation i s m the form of a s i x man panel re- ferred to as the I n s t a l l a t i o n , Program, and Review Panel This Panel report relays information on amount of funds to expect for the forthcoming f i s c a l year, th i s s^parently being based on information siq)plied from AFOCE throu£^ the cham- of-command after f i s c a l guidance has been finalized by OSD i n March The p r i o r i t y ranked program i s then presented to the Real Property Resources Review Board of the base which selects the actual content and establishes the p r i o r i t i e s of the M i l i t a r y Construction Program, the Board also reviews and approves the program developed for the remaining 4 years of the Five Year De- fense Program The Board i s composed of the Base Commander, Wing Commanders or t h e i r Deputies, and representatives from the operations and maintenance and supply sections of the Wings Staff of the Base C i v i l Engineer presents the material to the Board I f f i s c a l guidance has been provided, the Board w i l l level the base M i l i t a r y Con- struction Program o f f at some magnitude i n excess of the guidance given I f no 125
guidance i s given, and the base has been receiving on the average of $5 mi l l i o n yearly f o r m i l i t a r y construction, the Board w i l l level the program o f f at approximately $8 mil l i o n Hie f a c i l i t i e s contained i n the base proposed program are coordinated with the base master plan which must be approved by the Real Property Resources Review Board and the appropriate Command Except f o r perhaps truely l a r ^ bases and Command bases, master planning seemingly i s given l i t t l e e f f o r t Once cleared through the Board, the s t a f f of the Base C i v i l Engineer begins to fi n a l i z e the fbrmal documentation j u s t i f y i n g the f a c i l i t i e s contained i n the Mi l i t a r y Construction Program As the PDB's and OD1391*s are completed, they then begin the staggering process vp the chain-of-command to the Congress From Command, each DD1391 comes back .0 the base f o r modification at least once, even to those whose f a c i l i t i e s w i l l l a t e r drop out, many come back as many as three times At t h i s time, about 1 June, the Air Force Regional C i v i l Engineer obtains an informal review of the POB from the Desiga Agent (Corps of Engineers or Naval F a c i l i t i e s Engineering Command) and submits these conments to Command By July, Commands have submitted t h e i r construction program by base by lin e item t o AFOCE, and the role of the base m the M i l i t a r y Construction Program i s finished u n t i l the line item i s placed under contract f o r design Many items already have been dropped from the l i s t due to funding limitations and p r i o r i t i e s at the Command level Unless need I S eliminated due t o mission diange or new p r i o r i t i e s , the items dropped w i l l , however, s t a r t the t n p again next January, one li n e item, a commissary, a par- t i c u l a r l y d i f f i c u l t class of f a c i l i t i e s for which t o f i n d Congressional approval, was reported by one base to be on i t s tenth t n p During the period January through June, the Air Staff has been developing a l l programs i n order to respond to OSD by 15 May with POM's As previously ex- plained, the POM provides detailed data on the Service's plan for applications of I t s predetermined Total Obligation Authority (TOA) as reflected i n the OOD Five Year Defense Plan (FYDP) The POM i s divided i n t o 12 major force and sup- port programs, the t o t a l of which cannot exceed the TOA reflected m the FYDP Hie Service's may make adjustments among the various force programs and aocounts, 1 e , M i l i t a r y Construction, R§D, 0§M, Manpower, and Procurement The POM, as revised/sqpproved by OSD, establishes the parameters withm which the Services must submit t h e i r budget request This d i f f e r s from previous years i n that, be- fore requirements m excess of the TOA i n the FYDP could be submitted t o OSD for consideration Based on the guidance received from OSD and JCS, the Office of the Director of Aerospace Programs develops and issues to the A i r Staff tentative Force Structure Guidance le t t e r s which deploy A i r Force forces by location as best to meet the mission requirements reflected m the JSOP and Joint Force Memo The Office of the Director o f Manpower and Organization distributes manpower to support the proposed force changes and deployment issued by the Director of Aerospace Programs The Air Staff studies the effects of proposed changes and options and ultimately arrives at a fi r m A i r Force position which m turn dictates manpower requirements With respect to the M i l i t a r y Construction Program, the Air Force position establishes f a c i l i t y requirements for new missions The Air Force position also provides the basis f o r vqpdating A ir Force Program Documents (PD's) which are issued periodically 126
but at least annually by the various Directors within the Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff (Programs and Resources] Information on the Air Force position understandably remains within Headquarters u n t i l f i n a l i z e d When fina l i z e d . Commands are n o t i f i e d of mission changes either d i r e c t l y or through reissued PD's As affected, bases prepare and include within t h e i r proposed Mil i t a r y Construction Programs f a c i l i t y requirements for new mis- sion changes I f the mission change has not taken place before a base submits I t s program i n June to t h e i r Commands, f a c i l i t y needs for new mission changes are prepared separately Usually, the greatest part of the t o t a l Air Force M i l i t a r y Construction Program i s within Air Force Headquarters by July From July through October the Air Staff v i r t u a l l y finalizes a l l programs fo r submission to OSD i n October During th i s period POM exercises continue and Program Change Request have been submit- ted and argued While for the best part the programs are f i n a l i z e d by October, discussions and changes can/do proceed through December, at which time the De- partment of Defense essentially closes i t s books on the programs to be included m the President's budget message the following month, January With respect to the Air Force M i l i t a r y Construction Program (MCP), most Air Staff review occurs between July and October at which time the program i s essen- t i a l l y f inalized This review i s performed m much det a i l and i s considerably d i f f i c u l t Documentation on the programs proposed by a l l Commands for t h e i r bases are m hand, each generally r e f l e c t i n g a larger program than the f i s c a l guidance given called for In addition, new mission changes to be effected i n the forthcoming budget year must be included i n the t o t a l Air Force M i l i t a r y Construction Program (MCP) while remaining within the parameters established by the POM The review and selection of the M i l i t a r y Construction Program (MCP) content at the Air Staff level proceeds as follows 1 Total deficiencies by bases/commands are i d e n t i f i e d on the 4Z-17 report and this (plus any new mission changes) serves as the primary source for selection of the MCP content, 2 Once tabulated, AFOCE provides a math check on program cost estimate (construction working estimate- CWE) per line item, compensating for escalation, and reviews technical aspects of the DD1391's and PDB's, 3 Results are presented by the s t a f f of the Office of the Air Force Directorate of C i v i l Engineering to the F a c i l i t i e s Requirements Committee on which the following Air Staff offices are represented (a) Directorate of C i v i l Engineering (provides the chairman) Qt>) Directorate of Aerospace Programs (c) Directorate of Budget (d) Directorate of Command Control and Communications (e) Directorate of Development ( f ) Directorate of Maintenance Engineering (g) Directorate of Operations 01) Directorate of Personnel Planning ( i ) Directorate of Plans and Hospitals 0 ) Directorate of Personnel Training and Education (k) For specific items, the Chief of the Air Force Chaplains i s represented at the request of his offi c e or the Committee Chairman The F a c i l i t i e s Requirements Committee reviews, evaluates, and makes recommenda- tions to the Director of C i v i l Engineering on f a c i l i t i e s and real property 127
requirements and acquisition This includes but i s not limited to (a) Annual and sipplementary m i l i t a r y construction programs (>) Operations and maintenance programs (c) Emergency authorization projects (d) Natural disaster projects (e) Minor construction projects ( m i l i t a r y construction P-341 funds) ( f ) Family housing (g) Real estate Qi) Major maintenance and repair projects ( i ) Program change request 0 ) Non-^propriated fund projects In addition, the F a c i l i t i e s Requirement Committee (a) Makes recommendations to the Director o f C i v i l Engineering concerning m i l i t a r y construction program policy Q}) Reviews and validates programs for the procurement of manufactured c i v i l engineer end items (e g prefabricated building, modular dis- pensaries) that are t o be procured from fiind sources other than mil- i t a r y construction impropriations and placed, maintained, and svpport- ed i n the f i e l d by the c i v i l engineer (c) Makes inspection t r i p s to selected bases to obtain first-hahd know- ledge of conditions and current construction requirements (d) Develops and prepares, i n conjunction with the Director o f C i v i l Engineering, data necessary to support f a c i l i t y requirements during reviews by higher authority The Chairman of the F a c i l i t i e s Requirements Committee informs the Director of C i v i l Engineering of Commi-ttee actions and recommendations and ultimately pre- sents the annual MCP as validated by the Committee to the Program Review Com- mittee The Program Review Committee i s composed of menbers designated by, among others, the following Directorates (a) Director of Command Control Communications $)) Director of the Budget (c) Director of Aerospace Programs (Chairman) (d) Director o f Manpower and organization (e) Director of Personnel Planning ( f ) Director o f Operational Requirements and Development Plans (g) Assistant f o r RÌ D Planning, Director of Operations (h) Director of Plans ( i ) Director of Development The Chairman of the F a c i l i t i e s Reqiurements Committee also presents the annual MCP to the Air Staff Board, whidi includes the following membership (a) Director of the Aerospace Programs (Chairman) 0)) Director of Budget (c) Director of Operational Requirements and Development Plans (d) Director of Personnel Planning (e) Director of Plans (f ) Director o f Production and Programming 128
- (g) Representative, Commander, A i r Force Systems Command ( f o r designated Systems only) (h) Representative, Commander, A i r Force Logistics Command (fo r designated Systems only) ( i ) Chief, Operations Analysis (non-voting) After much demanding and conceding, an Air Force MCP i s ultimately established Since World War I I understandable f a c i l i t y requirements for weapon systems/ mission siqpport items have had top p r i o r i t y on the MCP dollar Today, as the dollar gets scarcer and scarcer, these items v i r t u a l l y can consume a l l MCP dollars, with the result that f a c i l i t y improvement programs have suffered greatly As a further result, the Air Force i s faced with a staggering back- log o f f a c i l i t i e s m need of improvements The A i r Force i s now s t r i v i n g to attain and maintain an annual MCP level adequate t o allow correction of t o t a l f a c i l i t y deficiencies i n a reasonable time frame A requisite of such a program I S that I t be be balanced among a l l f a c i l i t i e s categories, i e , things f o r people as well as for missions Towards gaining the balance, the Air Force reviews t o t a l deficiencies f i r s t by individual f a c i l i t y classes (operations and t r a i n i n g , R§D, Supply, etc ) and then integrates these into a recommended MCP p r i o r i t y with f a c i l i t y class Once a line item has been accepted by OSD m October--i e , OSD has forwarded the program to the Bureau of the Budget--OSD advises the Office of the A i r Force Directorate of C i v i l Engineering (AFDCE) of v a l i d projects and design I t i n i t i a t e d , when the project i s included i n the President's budget, design can be taken t o completion Thus, i n October or Noveid>er, AFOCE issues design directives to the expropriate Regional C i v i l Engineer, who i n turn issues the design directive to the Design Agent The Design Agent i s furnished copies of the PDB and DD1391's prepared on the project at the beginning of the year, but generally has a meeting with base level personnel to review the project, and to inspect the s i t e The Design Agent then negotiates an A/E contract The A/E submits concept (preliminary) drawings for simultaneous functional re- view by the Design Agent, the Regional C i v i l Engineer, Conopand, and the Base C i v i l Engineer, and user at the base Review comments are consolidated by Command, Regional C i v i l Engineer, and then by Design Agent who submits these to the A/E with the instructions to f i n a l i z e design When the A/E has completed 95% of the design and specification^ ,the drawings go t h r o u ^ the same functional review process experienced by the concept drawings Final drawings are reviewed for technical and functional adequacy by only the Design Agent and the Regional C i v i l Engineer The Design Agent consolidates a l l comments, forwards these t o the A/E for correction, the A/E coiq>letes the design and returns the f i n a l product to the Design Agent ready to advertise for bids Funds for the design of these f a c i l i t i e s were q>propriated by Congress i n i t s last m i l i t a r y con- struction b i l l , thus, by 1 July, the close of the current f i s c a l year. Services attenpt to have a l l design for f a c i l i t i e s t o be constructed during the next f i s c a l year coiqileted or under contrat Obviously, f a i l u r e by the Congress to c^prove any line item for which design has been completed can effect a sig n i - ficant waste o f funds As design work proceeds. Congress i n i t i a t e s hearings on the annual M i l i t a r y Construction Program and generally enacts by late autumn a b i l l which author- izes construction of f a c i l i t i e s during the f i s c a l year that began on 1 July When bids are received on the A/E package by the Design A^nt they are re- turned to the Regional C i v i l Engineer who i n turn forwards the information t o 129
6 7 8 9 10 I I 12 13 |i« 15 BASE PREPARES PDBS AND 139IS 16 AIR FORCE REGIONAL CIVIL ENGINEER (AFRCE) 17 REVIEWS PDBS/PROVIDES GUIDANCE 18 BASE SUBMITS PROGRAM TO THEIR COMMAND 19 AFRCE BACK CHECK OF PDBS/PROVIDES COMMENTS 20 TO THE MAJOR COMMANDS AND AFOCE INFORMAL REVIEW BY THE DESIGN AGENCY (DA) 21 COMMAND SUBMITTAL TO AIR FORCE OFFICE OF 22 CIVIL ENGINEERING (AFOCE) AFOCE REVIEW AND SUBMITTAL TO DOD 23 DOD REVIEW DOD ADVISES AFOCE OF VALID PROJECTS/FORWARDS 24 TO BOB AFOCE ISSUE DESIGN DIRECTIVE TO AFRCES 25 AFRCE ISSUE DESIGN DIRECTIVES TO DAS 26 DA NEGOTIATE A/E CONTRACT 27 A/E SUBMIT CONCEPT DESIGN FOR FUNCTIONAL REVIEW 28 DA FUNCTIONAL REVIEW 29 AFRCE FUNCTIONAL REVIEW 30 COMMAND FUNCTIONAL REVIEW BASE FUNCTIONAL REVIEW COMMAND CONSOLIDATE REVIEW COMMENTS AFRCE CONSOLIDATE REVIEW COMMENTS DA CONSOLIDATE REVIEW COMMENTS A/E PREPARE FINAL DESIGN DOCUMENTS AND SUBMIT TO DA DA REVIEW FOR TECHNICAL ADEQUACY AFRCE REVIEW FOR FUNCTIONALAECHNICAL ADEQUACY AND SUBMIT COMMENTS TO DA DA CONSOLIDATES COMMENTS AND FORWARDS TO A/E FOR CORRECTION A/E CORRECTS FINAL DESIGN DOCUMENTS AND RETURNS TO DA BACK-CHECK REVIEW AND CORRECTIONS READY TO ADVERTISE (RTA) BOB REVIEWS/FORWARDS TO CONGRESS CONGRESSIONAL REVIEW AUTHORIZATION BILL APPROPRIATION BILL AFRCE PDB/1391 AFOCE CONGRESS F i g u r e ^ i l Flow c h a r t o f the A i r Force M i l i t a r y C o n s t r u c t i o n Program 130