National Academies Press: OpenBook

Coatings for High-Temperature Structural Materials: Trends and Opportunities (1996)

Chapter: F EXAMPLE OF A COATING DESIGNATION SYSTEM

« Previous: E MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGIES OF COATING PROCESSES
Suggested Citation:"F EXAMPLE OF A COATING DESIGNATION SYSTEM." National Research Council. 1996. Coatings for High-Temperature Structural Materials: Trends and Opportunities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5038.
×

Appendix F
Example of a Coating Designation System

Any standard designation system for coatings must capture the essential features of the materials and processes being used and be sufficiently flexible so that future materials and processes can readily be added without requiring a new framework. A potential designation system would also have to be agreed on by all interested parties before it could be adopted. The purpose of this appendix is to suggest some possible approaches to such a system.

An example of a standard coating designation system is a code with four elements. The code would be "XX-####X###-T##(M or E)." The code has the flexibility to be used by the first part alone, the first two parts, the first three parts, or the entire code. The coating is progressively better defined as more parts of the code are used.

The first part of the code, "XX," refers to the class of coating, such as AL for a simple aluminide, AS for a silicon modified aluminide, AP for a platinum aluminide, CR for a chromide, NI for a nickel-base overlay, CO for a cobalt-base overlay, and NC for nickel/cobalt-base overlay.

The second part of the code, "###," is four numbers that give the nominal chemical composition. For a simple aluminide coating, this would be the aluminum level in weight percent, such as "2300" for 23-weight-percent aluminum. For a platinum aluminide this would be the aluminum level followed by the platinum level, such as "2310" for 23-weight-percent aluminum and 10-weight-percent platinum. For an overlay coating, the numbers would be the chromium and aluminum levels in weight percent, such as "2308" for 23-weight-percent chromium and 8-weight-percent aluminum.

The third part of the code, "X###," refers to processing, chemistry, or base-metal requirements. They are defined by reference to a table of terms, such as for the aluminum standards. Processing codes would start with a "P" and would refer to a slurry process, an inward diffusion coating, an air plasma spray, a low-pressure plasma spray, etc. Chemistry codes would start with a "C" and refer to special alloying elements, such as hafnium or silicon. Base-metal codes would start with a "B" and would refer to the specific superalloy types for which the coating is intended. Multiple designators would be used as needed. This portion of the code has the greatest potential for creating a very long code.

The last part of the code, "T##(M or E)," is the nominal thickness of the coating, expressed in either millimeters or mils. The "M" is used for millimeters and the "E" is used for mils to identify the units of thickness.

Duplex coatings and thermal barrier coatings (TBCs) require that the individual parts of the coating be separately specified. Thus a duplex coating would be called "DPXX/YY" and a TBC would be "TB-XX/YY," where XX would be the top coating and YY the bottom coating. As an example, an aluminide on top of a NiCrAlY would be called "DP-AL/NI." A TBC over the same bondcoat would be "TB-ZR/NI." The codes for the component coatings would still be required after this designation.

The advantage of this coding system is that it captures the essential features of the coating. The disadvantage is its potential for a long and ungainly designator.

Alternatives to this system are to use either a number for each coating, similar to what is currently used by vendors, or a two-digit letter to identify the class of coating (e.g., AL, AP, CO) followed by a number for the specific type of coating. Both of these alternatives have the advantage of a simpler designator but the disadvantage of providing little information about the coating from the designator.

Suggested Citation:"F EXAMPLE OF A COATING DESIGNATION SYSTEM." National Research Council. 1996. Coatings for High-Temperature Structural Materials: Trends and Opportunities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5038.
×
Page 83
Next: G BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS »
  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!