National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Appendix A
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B." National Research Council. 1998. U.S.-European Collaboration in Space Science. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5981.
×

B

Letter from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration to the Enrico Fermi Institute, University of Chicago, August 11, 1972

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B." National Research Council. 1998. U.S.-European Collaboration in Space Science. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5981.
×

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20546

August 11, 1972

OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR

Dr. John A. Simpson
The Enrico Fermi Institute
University of Chicago
933 East 56th Street Chicago, IL 60637

Dear Dr. Simpson:

Your letter of 11 July 1972 to Dr. Fletcher has been referred to me. Your arguments for committing Pioneer H to an out-of-the-ecliptic mission are well taken and very persuasive. The relatively low-cost of such a mission, since the Pioneer H spacecraft is a spare for Pioneers 10 and G, and the considerable scientific value to be derived, argue very strongly in favor of the mission. In fact, this kind of mission was described to the Space Science Board 1971 Woods Hole Summer Study by our Science Advisory Group. Moreover, on 15 June 1972 our Outer Planets Science Advisory Group presented to NASA management their recommended strategy for exploring the outer planets, in which the Pioneer H out-of-the-ecliptic mission was an important item.

On the other hand, there are other considerations that argue against committing to this mission at the present time. Quoting from the Woods Hole Summer Study referred to earlier:

"The radiation belt of Jupiter constitutes a hazard of undetermined magnitude for close-in Jupiter flybys, orbiters, and entry probes. We recommend that Pioneers F and G be utilized to evaluate the radiation environment of Jupiter as fully as possible, even at the risk of possible disablement of the spacecraft, and that Pioneer H be held in readiness for use as a Jupiter magnetosphere mission for further evaluation of the radiation hazard if it has not been clarified by Pioneers F and G. This will permit the choice of safe trajectories for both Grand Tour missions and those for the more intensive study of Jupiter. Studies of instrument design for Pioneer H to operate in a high-intensity radiation environment should also be started soon in case such hardened instrumentation should turn out to be the only solution for Jupiter exploration conducted within its radiation belt."

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B." National Research Council. 1998. U.S.-European Collaboration in Space Science. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5981.
×

NASA agrees that we must determine the radiation environment of Jupiter in order to support the overall outer planets exploration strategy that has been proposed to us by a majority of the planetary scientists working with us. Although Pioneer 10, presently on its way to Jupiter, is still working well, we cannot assume that it will give us all the definitive information on the radiation environment of Jupiter that is required. Nor, can we be certain that the combination of Pioneers 10 and G will complete the task. Thus, to determine Jupiter's radiation environment adequately to plan and design orbiter and probe missions to Jupiter, it seems prudent to hold Pioneer H as a backup for this very vital objective.

Later, if Pioneers 10 and G have given us sufficient information for planning and designing the further investigation of Jupiter, we can then reconsider the use of Pioneer H for other attractive missions that various scientists have urged NASA to undertake. Since there are many such missions, we will again have to make a choice, and your arguments for the out-of-the-ecliptic mission will be of considerable assistance in deciding, and we greatly appreciate having your recommendations. Because of your interest, we will keep you informed. In the meantime, my very best regards and sincere thanks for your thoughts.

Sincerely,

Homer E. Newell

Associate Administrator

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B." National Research Council. 1998. U.S.-European Collaboration in Space Science. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5981.
×
This page in the original is blank.
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B." National Research Council. 1998. U.S.-European Collaboration in Space Science. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5981.
×
Page 125
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B." National Research Council. 1998. U.S.-European Collaboration in Space Science. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5981.
×
Page 126
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B." National Research Council. 1998. U.S.-European Collaboration in Space Science. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5981.
×
Page 127
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B." National Research Council. 1998. U.S.-European Collaboration in Space Science. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5981.
×
Page 128
Next: Appendix C »
U.S.-European Collaboration in Space Science Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $49.00
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

U.S.-European Collaboration in Space Science reviews the past 30 years of space-based research across the Atlantic. The book, which was prepared jointly with the European Space Science Committee (under the aegis of the European Science Foundation) begins with a broad survey of the historical and political context of U.S.-European cooperation and collaboration in space.

The focus of the book is a set of 13 U.S.-European missions in astrophysics, space physics, planetary sciences, earth sciences, and life and microgravity research that illustrate "lessons learned" on the evolution of the cooperation, mission planning and scheduling, international agreements, cost-sharing, management, and scientific output.

These lessons form the basis of the joint committee's findings and recommendations, which serve to improve the future conduct and enhance the scientific output of U.S.-European cooperation and collaboration in space science.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!