National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: 4. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
Page 61
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A - CROSS SECTIONAL DATASET." Transportation Research Board. 1998. Trends in Single Occupant Vehicle and Vehicle Miles of Travel Growth in the United States: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6355.
×
Page61
Page 62
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A - CROSS SECTIONAL DATASET." Transportation Research Board. 1998. Trends in Single Occupant Vehicle and Vehicle Miles of Travel Growth in the United States: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6355.
×
Page62
Page 63
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A - CROSS SECTIONAL DATASET." Transportation Research Board. 1998. Trends in Single Occupant Vehicle and Vehicle Miles of Travel Growth in the United States: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6355.
×
Page63
Page 64
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A - CROSS SECTIONAL DATASET." Transportation Research Board. 1998. Trends in Single Occupant Vehicle and Vehicle Miles of Travel Growth in the United States: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6355.
×
Page64
Page 65
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A - CROSS SECTIONAL DATASET." Transportation Research Board. 1998. Trends in Single Occupant Vehicle and Vehicle Miles of Travel Growth in the United States: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6355.
×
Page65
Page 66
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A - CROSS SECTIONAL DATASET." Transportation Research Board. 1998. Trends in Single Occupant Vehicle and Vehicle Miles of Travel Growth in the United States: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6355.
×
Page66
Page 67
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A - CROSS SECTIONAL DATASET." Transportation Research Board. 1998. Trends in Single Occupant Vehicle and Vehicle Miles of Travel Growth in the United States: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6355.
×
Page67
Page 68
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A - CROSS SECTIONAL DATASET." Transportation Research Board. 1998. Trends in Single Occupant Vehicle and Vehicle Miles of Travel Growth in the United States: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6355.
×
Page68
Page 69
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A - CROSS SECTIONAL DATASET." Transportation Research Board. 1998. Trends in Single Occupant Vehicle and Vehicle Miles of Travel Growth in the United States: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6355.
×
Page69
Page 70
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A - CROSS SECTIONAL DATASET." Transportation Research Board. 1998. Trends in Single Occupant Vehicle and Vehicle Miles of Travel Growth in the United States: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6355.
×
Page70
Page 71
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A - CROSS SECTIONAL DATASET." Transportation Research Board. 1998. Trends in Single Occupant Vehicle and Vehicle Miles of Travel Growth in the United States: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6355.
×
Page71
Page 72
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A - CROSS SECTIONAL DATASET." Transportation Research Board. 1998. Trends in Single Occupant Vehicle and Vehicle Miles of Travel Growth in the United States: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6355.
×
Page72
Page 73
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A - CROSS SECTIONAL DATASET." Transportation Research Board. 1998. Trends in Single Occupant Vehicle and Vehicle Miles of Travel Growth in the United States: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6355.
×
Page73
Page 74
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A - CROSS SECTIONAL DATASET." Transportation Research Board. 1998. Trends in Single Occupant Vehicle and Vehicle Miles of Travel Growth in the United States: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6355.
×
Page74
Page 75
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A - CROSS SECTIONAL DATASET." Transportation Research Board. 1998. Trends in Single Occupant Vehicle and Vehicle Miles of Travel Growth in the United States: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6355.
×
Page75
Page 76
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A - CROSS SECTIONAL DATASET." Transportation Research Board. 1998. Trends in Single Occupant Vehicle and Vehicle Miles of Travel Growth in the United States: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6355.
×
Page76
Page 77
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A - CROSS SECTIONAL DATASET." Transportation Research Board. 1998. Trends in Single Occupant Vehicle and Vehicle Miles of Travel Growth in the United States: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6355.
×
Page77
Page 78
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A - CROSS SECTIONAL DATASET." Transportation Research Board. 1998. Trends in Single Occupant Vehicle and Vehicle Miles of Travel Growth in the United States: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6355.
×
Page78
Page 79
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A - CROSS SECTIONAL DATASET." Transportation Research Board. 1998. Trends in Single Occupant Vehicle and Vehicle Miles of Travel Growth in the United States: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6355.
×
Page79
Page 80
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A - CROSS SECTIONAL DATASET." Transportation Research Board. 1998. Trends in Single Occupant Vehicle and Vehicle Miles of Travel Growth in the United States: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6355.
×
Page80
Page 81
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A - CROSS SECTIONAL DATASET." Transportation Research Board. 1998. Trends in Single Occupant Vehicle and Vehicle Miles of Travel Growth in the United States: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6355.
×
Page81
Page 82
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A - CROSS SECTIONAL DATASET." Transportation Research Board. 1998. Trends in Single Occupant Vehicle and Vehicle Miles of Travel Growth in the United States: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6355.
×
Page82
Page 83
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A - CROSS SECTIONAL DATASET." Transportation Research Board. 1998. Trends in Single Occupant Vehicle and Vehicle Miles of Travel Growth in the United States: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6355.
×
Page83
Page 84
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A - CROSS SECTIONAL DATASET." Transportation Research Board. 1998. Trends in Single Occupant Vehicle and Vehicle Miles of Travel Growth in the United States: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6355.
×
Page84
Page 85
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A - CROSS SECTIONAL DATASET." Transportation Research Board. 1998. Trends in Single Occupant Vehicle and Vehicle Miles of Travel Growth in the United States: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6355.
×
Page85
Page 86
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX A - CROSS SECTIONAL DATASET." Transportation Research Board. 1998. Trends in Single Occupant Vehicle and Vehicle Miles of Travel Growth in the United States: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6355.
×
Page86

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Appendix A Cross Sectional Dataset 1990 Trips by Mode ~ -- 7~.~ ~.~ =- ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~- | ~ ~ ~ Total trips ~ ~ ~ MSA - CC-CC Swburb-CC ~ ~CC-CC: Atlanta Baltimore Boston Buffalo Chicago Cincinnati Cleveland Columbus Dallas Denver Detroit Houston Indianapolis Kansas City Los Angeles Miami Milwaukee Minneapolis New Orleans New York Philadelphia Phoenix Pittsburgh Portland Providence Sacramento San Antonio San Diego San Francisco Seattle St. Louis Tampa Washington 124,74E 208,091 398,81 ~ 101,427 1,076,22~ 124,757 218,12C 256,44~ 694,03c 198,73c 277,84C 705,33C 305,15~ 228,477 1,614,442 261,40E 222,02C 246,911 156,23~ 3,146,822 589, 19C 656,011 119,592 164,17~ 95,937 151,81 ~ 351,157 462,681 761,17 281,901 150,71C 203,35E 327,57c 309,190 197,639 370,358 99,751 497,490 166,878 254,512 155,854 401,435 221,154 294,765 429,170 122,090 181,612 952,756 376,502 151,621 280,156 98,059~ 348,722 329,490 138,962 177,511 156,342 78 251 162,584 96,402 223,264 405,828 289,430 . 246,152 239,581 _ 527,237 76,552 97,18~ 188,30E 58,97' 494,41 ~ 82,24= 150,37 194,77~ 526,537 134,53E 183,474 511,717 240,777 173,244 1,089,77E 175,29E 146,984 150,78~ 89,38E 799,56~ 256,544 506,541 52,12E 104,97~ 62,63C 106,85C 261,887 342,407 435,33C 172,95~ 101,74C 155,586 115,37C . ~. ~ ~ I. ~ . ~ . ~.~ Suburb-CC 244,015 153,496 239,136 81,782 323,908 135,503 204,330 133,598 336,060 175,702 256,808 349,869 105,006 153,784 742,165 297,552 129,875 218,765 75,086 218,756 223,916 113,774 112,625 123,766 65,064 127,542 80,666 177,861 297,467 222,976 201 ,242 201 ,690 275,888 - ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ . ,~ ^ . . ~ _-_~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ I: ~ ~ :- :.. I. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I. ~ 91,134 1 29,07E 231 ,30~ 72,68E 637,94' 98, 1 8 1 78,001 226,60E 630,20 160,13' 222,61 621 ,681 283,07~ 205,622 1 ,336,707 21 8,39E 1 76,25~ 1 78,767 1 1 4,554 1 ,070,392 334,372 598,791 68,42 1 26,506 78, 1 BE 1 29,63 317,14 403,58 524,881 206,934 1 23,43~ 1 83,447 1 56,637 182,24 278,61 9 94,012 . 377,06C 1 57,205 l 231 ,544 151 ,894 392,1 86 l 205,281 286,648 41 0,699 l 1 20,992 1 78,925 893,281 l 351 ,683 1 45,486 258,481 l 93,671 260,454 268,233 1 34,582 141 ,221 144,31 6 74,350 1 52,637 93,572 211 ,747 353,71 1 l l 261,226 236,333 232,394 407,354

1990 Mode Shares 1 '' ~. 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.~ :~ ~ ~ ~ ~:.. | ~ MSA Lanta |Baltimore |Boston 1 |Buffalo Chicago Cincinnati Cleveland Columbus 1 Dallas Denver Detroit Houston Indianapolis Kansas City Los Angeles Miami Milwaukee Minneapolis New Orleans New York Philadelphia Phoenix Pittsburgh Portland Providence Sacramento San Antonio l San Diego San Francisco . Seattle St. Louis Tampa Washington . !~, ~ . . .. ' 5 ou~·~uWnI ve~ ~ ~ share ~ .~ ~ . . . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ . . . . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~Total ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~CC-CC-~ ~ ~ ~ Suburb-CC~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ . ~ . . ~ 79.7% 61.4% 78.9% 72.5% 46.7% 77.7% 71.9% 47.2% 64.6% 78.5% 58.1 % 82.0% 68.9% 45.9% 65.1% 80.9% 65.9% 81.2% 81.1 % 68.9% 80.3% 81.4% 76.0% 85.7% . 80.5% 75.9% 83.7% 77.8% 67.7% 79.4% . 84.1 % 66.0% 87.1 % 77.7% 72.5% 81.5% . 81.7% 78.9% 86.0% . 82.2% 75.8% 84.7% 74.4% 67.5% 77.9% 76.8% 67.1 % 79.0% 78.9% 66.2% 85.7% 78.6% 61.1 % 78.1 % 72.2% 57.2% 76.6% 54.9% 25.4% 62.7% 70.7% 43.5% 68.0% 77.3% 77.2% 81.9% 72.9% 43.6% 63.4% 76.7% 63.9% 79.2% 80.0% 65.3% 83.1 % 77.6% 70.4% 78.4% 76.3% 74.6% 83.7% . 74.6% 74.0% 79.7% 70.8% 57.2% 73.3% 76.0% 61.4% 77.0% 81.7% 67.5% 81.8% 80.6% 76.5% 84.2% 64.8% 35.2% 52.3%~ 86.3°/c 82.0°/c 89.4°/c 80.1 °/c 92.1% 91.1 °/c 92.3% 93.9% 90.1% 93.8% 91.9% 94.4% 94.3% 89.0% 90.8% 89.3% 89.8% 87.2% 65.2% 82.6% 91.4% 85.7% 88.9% 92.1% 91.1% 91.0% 88.2% 83.5% 87.9% 93.5% 93.6% 80.7% 59.3°/c 78.7°/c 81.6°/c 88.4°/c 90.8°/c 80.6°/c 80.1 °/c 88.1 °/c 92.8°/c 90.0°/c 82.8°/c 83.5% 79.4% 72.4% 73.3% 34.0% 56.8% 91.3% 57.2% 77.1% 81.5% 85.4% 90.3% 87.2% 69.0% 73.4% 81.9% 90.2% 47.8% : ::::::: :::::: ::: ::: ::::::: ::::: :::: :::::: :: ::::::::: :: ::::: :: ::::::: :::: :::: Swburb-CC~ 92.5% 92.2% 75.2% . , 94.2% ~ 75.8% 94.2% 91.0% 97.5% 97.7% 92.8% 97.2% 95.7% 99.1% 98.5% 93.8°/ 93.4°/o 96.0% 92.3% . 95.5% 74.7% 81 .4% 96.8% 79.6% . 92.3% 95.0% 93.9% 97.1% 94.8% 87.2% 90.3% 96.0% 97.0% . ~ ~ ~ Transit share ~ ~-~ ~ . ~:.: ~.: . ~:.:~ ~:~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - Total~ ~: 4.7% 7.6% 10.7% 4.5% 13.7% 3.6% 4.6% 2.7% 2.3% 4.3% 2.4% 3.7% 2.0% 2.1% 4.7% 4.3% 4.9% 5.4% 7.1% 26.5% 10.3% 2.1% 8.0% 5.6% 2.6% 2.4% 3.7% 3.4% 9.5% 6.5% 2.9% 1 .4% 13.7% ~ ~ ~.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ CC-CC ~. 20.1% 24.9% 23.7% 14.6% 29.9% 12.3% 1 0.2% 5.2% 4.9% 8.0% 10.4% 6.8% 3.6% 5.5% 9.5% 8.5% 11.4% 16.1% 18.1% 51 .6% 29.0% 2.6% 25.7% 13.0% 4.5% 4.2% 5.2% 4.3% 18.8% 15.6% 1 1 .0% 3.2% 36.5% Subiurb-CC~ 6.8% 6.4% 22.7% 1 4.7% 1 23.3% 5.0% 1 8.1% 1 1.7% 1.5% 1 6.1% 1 2.2% 3.2% 1 0.4% 1 0.9% 4.4% 4.5% 1 3.0% 7.0% 3.0% 23.9% 17.6% 1 .2% 19.4% 6.5% 3.8% 3.7% 1 .1% 3.0% 10.1% 8.5% 2.8% 1 .2% 21 .9% A-2

1990 Private Vehicle Occupancy and Daily VMT . ~ . . . . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Privatev~ehicleoccilpangy hi ~ . ~ I., ~,~ I. ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ it. ~ - . . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.~ ~.~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~:~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~.~ .: ~ ~ .~ ~ .~ I. ~: ~ .. ~ ~.~ .~ . ~ it. . ~.~ ~ . - - M$A: ~Total ~ COCCI Atlanta ~1 .08 1 . 10 . Baltimore 1 . 10 1 . 16 Boston 1.07 1.11 . Buffalo 1 .07 1 . 11 Chicago 1 .09 1 . 14 Cincinnati 1 .07 1 .09 Cleveland 1.06 1.09 Columbus 1.07 1.08 Dallas 1 .09 1 . 10 . Denver 1.08 1.09 Detroit 1 .06 1 . 10 . Houston 1 .1 0 1.1 1 Indianapolis 1 .08 1 .09 Kansas City 1.08 1.09 . Los Angeles 1 .1 1 1 .1 1 Miami 1.10 1.12 Milwaukee 1 .07 1 .10 . Minneapolis 1.07 1.09 New Orleans 1 .1 1 1 . 14 New York 1.10 1.17 . , Philadelphia 1.09 1 . 15 Phoenix 1.09 1.09 Pittsburgh 1.09 1 . 15 . , Portland 1 .08 1 . 10 ~1 Providence 1 .08 1 . 12 Sacramento 1 .09 1 . 10 San Antonio 1 . 10 ~ .1 0 San Diego 1.10 1.09 San Francisco 1 . 10 1 . 10 Seattle 1 .08 1 . 10 St. Louis 1.08 1.11 Tampa 1.08 1.09 Washington 1 . 13 1 . 17 Daily : VMT ~Subuir:b-CC~'~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~1' ~- ~11 1.09 1.09 1.08 1 .07 1.08 1.08 1.07 1.07 1.08 1.08 1.06 1.09 1.08 1.08 64,831 36,374 51 ,338 1 7,003 1 23,471 23,612 32,289 1 7,51 6 80,200 27, 1 50 78,223 71 ,61 3 21 ,074 27,468 250,673 33,526 28,659 1.10 1.09 1.06 1 .09 1.13 1.10 1 .10 1.09 1.12 1 .08 1.07 1.10 1.08 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.08 1.24 43, 1 85 1 6,723 225,01 0 65,759 39,654 32,466 22,41 6 1 7,358 23,61 9 25,31 7 51 ,606 76,950 40,840 45,288 1 5,728 64,323 A-3

1990 Population Chicago Cincinnati Cleveland Columbus Dallas Denver Detroit . Houston Indianapolis Kansas City Los Angeles Miami Milwaukee Minneapolis New Orleans New York Philadelphia Phoenix Pittsburgh Portland Providence Sacramento San Antonio San Diego San Francisco Seattle St. Louis Tampa Washington _-1 All____ ~ ~ TO central city 2,833,511 2,382,172 4,171,747 1,189,288 8,065,633 1,744,124 2,759,823 1,377,419 3,885,415 1,848,319 4,665,236 3,711,043 1,249,822 1,566,280 14,531,529 3,192,58 1,607,18 2,464,12 1,238,81 18,087,251 5,899,34 2,122,101 2,242,79 1,477,89 1,141,52 1,481,10 1,302,09 2,498,01 6,253,311 2,559,16 2,444,09 2,067,95 3,923,57 .. .. Centiral . ''city': 394,01 736,01 ~ 574,28' 328,12' 2,783,72E . 364,04( 505,61 632,91 ~ . . 1,006,877 467,610 1,027,974 . 1,630,553 731,327 435,146 3,485,398 358,548 628,088 368,383 496,938 7,322,564 1,585,577 983,403 369,879 437,319 160,728 369,365 935,933 1,110,549 723,959 516,259 396,685 280,015 606,900 Suburbs 2,439,494 1,646,158 3,597,464 861,165 5,281,907 1,380,084 2,254,207 744,509 2,878,538 1,380,709 3,637,262 2,080,490 518,495 1,131,134 11,046,131 2,834,034 979,095 2,095,741 741,878 10,764,687 4,313,768 1,138,698 1,872,919 1,040,576 980,797 1,111,737 366,166 1,387,467 5,529,352 2,042,905 2,047,414 1,787,944 3,316,674 Federal aid Urbanized area l 1,860,00 1,991,00 2,803,00 1,064,00 7,303,00 1,136,00 1,752,000 834,00 3,030,00 1,540,00 3,905,00 2,798,00 863,00 1,281,00 11,428,00 1,800,000 1,220,00 2,055,00 1,080,00 15,780,00 4,216,00 1,920,00 1 ,708,00 1, 196,00 880,00 1 ,096,00 1, 165,00 2,294,00 3,676,00 1 ,730,00 1 ,950,00 700,00 3.240.000 :°/O suburban 86.1% 69.1% 86.2% 72.4% 65.5% 79.1% 81 .7% 54.1% 74.1% 74.7% 78.0% 56.1% 41 .5% 72.2% 76.0% 88.8% 60.9% 85.1% 59.9% 59.5% 73.1% 53.7% 83.5% 70.4% 85.9% 75.1% 28.1% 55.5% 88.4% 79.8% 83.8% 86.5% 1 3.9°/c 30.9% 13.8% 27.6% 34.5°/c 20.9°/c 1 8.3°/c 45.9°/c 25.9°/c 25.3°/c 22.0°/c 43.9°/c 58.5°/c 27.8°/c 24.0°/c 11 .2°/c 39.1 °/c 1 4.9o/c 40.1 °/c 40.5°/c 26.9°/c _ o 46.3% 1 6.5°/c 29.6°/c 14.1°/c 24.9°/c 71 .9°/c 44.5°/c 1 1.6°/c 20.2°/c 1 6.2°/c _ 13.5°% 84.5% 15.5% . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Population~den~s~ity~ ~ . . ~ ~ ~ I. ~ ~ ~ USA ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Central ~-~ : :::::: :: :~ :: I: I: : : :~: ~ ~ ~ .:~ ~ ~ ~ ;: ~ ~ ~ ~ -it ~ ~ :~ .~b ~ ~ cl . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, 5531 ,154 9133,517 1 ,7104,580 7593,119 1 ,4354,730 6731 ,820 9482,534 3851 ,280 5581 ,1 35 4101,178 9012,861 5221 ,1 66 407781 314539 4282,867 1 ,0123,893 8962,524 4882,589 5371 ,062 2,3719,151 1 ,1044,530 231904 5852,567 3381,354 1 ,2133,363 2911,481 5171 ,085 5941,323 8495,983 4342,376 4582,473 810995 3,81 5 A-4

1990 Households Atlanta Baltimore Boston Buffalo Chicago Cincinnati Cleveland Columbus Dallas Denver Detroit Houston Indianapolis Kansas City Los Angeles Miami Milwaukee Minneapolis New Orleans New York Philadelphia Phoenix Pittsburgh Portland Providence Sacramento San Antonio San Diego San Francisco Seattle St. Louis Tampa Washington 879,96E 1 ,545,347 460,707 2,903,236 652,333 1 ,058,648 525,558 1 ,452,215 739,001 1 ,724,767 1 ,333,707 480,406 602,514 4,909,21 8 1 ,220,097 601 ,967 935,760 454,41 7 6,61 7,074 2,151 ,624 808,1 62 891 ,071 576,083 428,869 557,81 1 451 ,731 887,71 9 2,334,992 1 ,003,337 923,639 870,999 1 ,460,785 : : :::: :~ ~ T::: :: ::: :: ::: ::::: ~ ~ ::: ~ Central city ~ . 155,18~ 285,907 221 ,03~ 134,116 999,797 151 ,418 197,531 259,002 399, 155 21 2,556 359, 169 598,023 284,443 1 72,669 1 ,224,001 135,210 243,773 1 66,634 1 79,841 2,831 ,988 590,034 374,1 19 146,100 1 93,570 60,509 1 46,565 334,744 400,759 293,91 3 241 ,189 1 60,481 1 14,660 249,703 -Suburbs ; 901,747 594,061 1 ,324,314 326,589 1 ,903,439 500,91 6 861,117 266,556 1 ,053,060 526,445 1 ,365,598 735,684 1 95, 964 429,845 3,685,21 7 1 ,084,887 358, 195 769, 126 274,576 3,785,086 1 ,561,590 434,043 744,971 382,51 3 368,360 41 1,246 116,987 486,960 2,041 ,079 762, 148 763, 158 756,339 1,21 1,082 86 8% % suburban 85.3% 67.5% 85.7% 70.9% 65.6% 76.8% 81 .3% 50.7% 72.5% 71 .2% 79.2% 55.2% 40.8% 71 .3% 75.1% 88.9% 59.5% 82.2% 60.4% 57.2% 83.6% TSAR ~ 2.68 2.71 2.70 2 96 2 63 2781 2781 277 O 2.671 2.401 2.76 O 2.61 2.56 2.62 _ 1 O 2.62 2.44 2.79 O 2.68 2.52 2.73 _ 2.50 2.20 1 _ 1 2.70 2.86 2.66 1 _ O 2.78 2.73 2.83 O 2.60 2.57 2.65 O 2.60 2.52 2.63 D 2.96 2.85 3.00 , 2.62 2.65 2.61 2.67 2.58 2.73 _ 2.63 2.21 2.72 , 2.73 2.76 2.70 2.73 2.59 2.84 _ 2.74 2.69 2.76 2.62 72.6% 53.7% 2.63 2.63 2.62 2.52 2.53 2.51 2.26 66.4% 85.9% 73.7% 25.9% 54.9% 87.4% 2.57 2.66 2.66 2.66 2.66 2.52 2.70 2.88 2.80 2.72 3.13 l 11 2.81 2.772.85 11 2.68 2.462.711 2.142.68| . 2.472.68ll 11 2.442.36 2.432.74 2.69 A-5

1990 Workers not Working at Home ~ MSA~ Atlanta Baltimore Boston Buffalo Chicago Cincinnati Cleveland Columbus Dallas Denver Detroit Houston Indianapolis Kansas City Los Angeles Miami Milwaukee Minneapolis New Orleans New York Philadelphia Phoenix Pittsburgh Portland Providence Sacramento San Antonio 1 San Diego San Francisco Seattle St. Louis Tampa 1 |Washington Workers not working At home workers ~ 1,481,781 1,191,813 2,141,717 531,122 3,841,337 812,766 1,242,099 677,859 1,976,606 964,912 2,079,880 1,759,79E 624,971 771,30' 6,809,04 1,476,08 772,75~ 1,307,624 514,72E 8,550,47` 2,794,917 996,49~ 956,154 724,53~ 544,66E 685,94~ 569,14C 1,230,44E 3,200,83` 1,308,33E 1,144,33E 914,711 2,214,35C Total ~ ~ 1,448,560 1,164,537 2,088,025 521,314 3,760,505 795,724 1,217,698 662,230 1,931,490 930,145 2,043,224 1,723,456 609,982 749,972 6,622,941 1,446,936 755,421 1,263,199 505,849 8,347,823 2,731,827 967,186 936,346 697,226 535,131 - 664,607 556,034 1,169,161 3,089,268 1,264,359 1,117,184 893,942 . 2,151,472 : Central city ~ 191,627 320,365 638,417 149,567 1,501,299 196,295 341,989 346,801 952,412 292,745 453,978 824,706 355,505 315,017 2,492,978 421,327 331,407 359,607 193,995 3,719,714 781,017 735,093 156,587 226,279 177,201 217,410 387,843 585,174 1,238,061 389,812 240,030 276,955 422,491 : Suburbs : . 1,256,93 844,17 1,449,60 371,74 2,259,20 599,42 875,70 315,429 979,078 637,400 1,589,246 898,750 254,477 434,955 4,129,963 1,025,609 424,01 4 903,592 31 1,854 4,628,1 09 1 ,950,81 0 232,093 779,759 470,947 357,930 447, 1 97 168,191 583,987 1 ,851 ,207 874,547 877, 1 54 61 6,987 1 ,728,981 1 47 1.26 2n4 2 93 1 62 1.16 Workers not working at home per household ~ Total ~ ~ .. ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1.3 1.32 1 .1 2 1 .42 1.35 2.89 1.09 1.13 1.12 1.14 1 .30 1 .50 1 . 19 1.22 1.30 1.20 1.15 1.73 1.02 1.26 1.34 1 .18 1.33 2.39 0.93 1 .26 1 .38 1 .21 1.18 1.26 1.29 1 .38 1 .22 1 .27 1 .25 1.30 1 .24 1 .82 1 .01 1 .35 2.04 1 .12 1.19 3.12 0.95 1.25 1.36 1 .18 1 .35 2.16 1 .17 1 .11 1 .08 1.1 4 1 .26 1.31 1 .22 1 .27 1.32 1 .25 1 .20 1 .96 0.53 1 .05 1 .07 1 .05 1.21 1.17 1.23 1 .25 2.93 0.97 1 . 19 1 .48 1 .09 1 .23 1 .1 6 1 .44 1 .32 1.46 1 .20 1 .32 4.21 0.91 1 .26 1 .62 1 .15 1 .21 1.50 1 . 15 1.03 2.42 0.82 1.47 1.69 1.43 A-6

Boston Buffalo Chicago Cincinnati Cleveland Columbus Dallas Denver Detroit Houston Indianapolis Kansas City Los Angeles Miami Milwaukee Minneapolis New Orleans New York Philadelphia Phoenix Pittsburgh Portland Providence Sacramento San Antonio San Diego San Francisco Seattle St. Louis Tampa Washington 1990 Labor Force and Employment Civilian ~ : Empb~ ~: Fame labor MSA ~ force . ~ ~. Atlanta altimore 1,521,859 1,214,498 2,055,669 558,684 4,321,385 919,255 1,406,703 739,532 2,166,752 1,033,253 2,314,100 1,920,153 670,671 852,499 7,256,906 1,612,477 848,960 1,410,227 577,471 9,031,741 2,997,565 1,074,542 1,051,785 812,040 471,031 739,134 605,702 1,174,417 3,324,011 1,380,047 1,272,232 1,017,874 2,209,784 I:::: :::: ~ ~ ~ T:: :~: ~ T::: VISA ~ ~ ~ . ~. ~ ~ 1,444,624 1,152,88~ 1,943,521 530,914 4,070,48 878,77/ 1,334,46E 706,90~ 2,054,76' 987,09~ 2,145,97` 1,818,356 642,65~- 810,231 6,864,06E 1,512,397 815,84C 1,350,236 544,34~ 8,549,98C 2,855,08~ 1,028,12C 999,28 777,05 438,78 703,66~ 563,94C 1,121,64E 3,187,94C 1,328,63C 1,196,98E 965,76E 2,134,411 : :: :: ::: :: :::::: ::: ::: :: :: Central city 175,126 314,688 288,704 131,001 1,207,108 158,881 182,225 325,088 511,202 233,602 335,462 788,520 367,512 211,817 1,670,488 151,446 274,237 192,508 186,036 3,257,637 651,621 480,945 153,991 218,750 69,200 161,812 389,772 524,841 386,530 284,160 161,434 129,830 303,994 °/O-CC 12.1% 27.0% 13.8% 25.1% 32.1% 20.0% 15.0% 49.1% 26.5% 25.1% 16.4% 45.8% 60.2% 28.2% 25.2% 10.5% 36.3% 15.2% 36.8% 39.0% 23.9% 49.7% 16.4% 31.4% 12.9% 24.3% 70.1% 44.9% 12.5% 22.5% 14.5% 14.5% 14.1 % Unemploy ment ~MSA ::: :: :::: ::: : :: ::::: :: 77,235 61,616 112,148 27,770 250,903 40,478 72,235 32,630 111,983 46,160 168,127 101,797 28,018 42,268 392,840 100,080 33,120 59,991 33,128 481,752 142,480 46,422 52,500 34,988 32,248 35,472 41,753 52,771 136,062 51,411 75,246 52,108 75,373 . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Non~-agricultural employment ; ~ ~ l ~: ~: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~'~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ..~ ~ ~ .:~ ~:~, . . ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~': ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ::.: ~- ~ 1 MSA~ 1,528,80C 1,151,60C 1,824,60C 547,90C 3,709,00C 757,30C 1,069,40C 702,50C 1,420,70C 840,70C 1,901,70C 1,611,20C 721,70C 787,00C 4,133,30C 881,40C 757,60C 1 ,3so,70a 556,30C 4,093,80C 2,22s,soa 1,013,00C 1 ,022,20a 728,30C 499,60C 555,90C 526,50C 966,60C 947,30C 1, 1 1 s,20a 1, 1 ss,soa sso'40a 6s6, 10a :~:~:,~:~: :~ Central cilty 457,975 401,223 672,132 211,438 1,552,159 . 277,552 415,072 437,371 805,769 379,512 532,952 1,060,614 505,492 . 430,336 1,602,158 388,581 374,719 580,267 279,656 1,714,226 748,543 832,630 324,345 334,802 162,622 262,975 423,787 567,103 357,852 505,286 422,658 436,229 272,597 :~ ~.~: ~ ~: ~ ~:, ~ . ~ Suburbs 1,070,825 750,377 1,152,468 336,462 2,156,841 479,748 654,328 265,129 614,931 461,188 1,368,748 550,586 216,208 356,664 2,531,142 492,819 382,881 810,433 276,644 2,379,574 1,477,357 1 80,370 697,855 393,498 336,978 292,925 102,713 399,497 589,448 612,914 767,142 444,171 413,503 | % suburban 70.00/c 65.2°/c 63.2°/c 61.4°/c 58.2°/c 63.3°/c 61.2°/c 37.7°/c 43.3°/c 54.90/c 72.0°/c 34.2°/c 30.0°/c 45.3°/c 61 .2°/< 55.9o/c 50.5°/c 58.3°/c 49.7o/c 58.1 °/c 66.4°/c 17.8°X 68.3oX 54.ooX 67.4oX 52.7°% 19.5°% 41 .3oX 62.2°7 . 54.8°> 64.5oX 5o.5oV 60.3oi A-7

1990 Vehicle Availability Private vehicles in MSA ~ ~ ~ ~Total~vehicles available ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~: ~:~ ~ ~ ~ ~: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~: ~ ~ MESA | per Capote | per household | per worker not |Suburbs ~ |CentraI~city | Xtlanta 1 0.68 1 1.82 1 ~ 331 1,741,5781 186,219; Baltimore 0.58 1.58 1 .19 1 ,130,363 257,31 6 . Boston 0.57 1 .55 1 .15 2,1 97,361 1 98,930 . 3uffalo 1 0.57 1 1.481 1 31 1 546,360 1 134,1 18; Chicago 0.54 1.50 1 . 16 3,351,567 999,797 Cincinnati 1 0.64 ~ 711 1 401 931,908| 181,701 Cleveland 0.63 1.64 1 .43 1,519,092 217,284 Columbus 0.66 1.73 1.37 519,064 388,503 Dallas 0.65 1 .75 1 .31 1 ,938,545 598,733 Denver 0.71 1.79 1 .42 1 ,022,721 297,578 Detroit 1 0.62 1.67 1 1 .411 2,492,479 | 395,086 Houston 1 0.59 1.65| 1.28| 1,301,944| 897,035j Indianapolis 0.66 1 .72 1 .36 372,718 455, 108 Kansas City 0.67 1.73 1.39 784,318 259,004 os Angeles 1 0.60 ~ 771 ~ 31 1 6,857,124| 1,836,002 Miami 0.57 1 .50 1 .26 1 ,676,299 148,731 villwaukee 1 0.60 1.60| 1.28| 671,283| 292,527 Minneapolis 1 0.67 1 751 1.301 1,439,1251 199,961 New Orleans 0.51 1.40 1.26 439,390 197,825 New York 0.45 1.24 0.98 6,519,248 1,699,193 'hiladelphia 1 0.55 150 1 1 ~ ~ 8 1 2,694,774 | 531 ,031 Phoenix 0.63 1 .66 1 .38 739,629 598,590 Piffsburgh 0.58 1 .45 1 .38 1 ,147,068 146,100 'ortland 1 0.69 177 1 1 .47 1 750,459 ~270,998 Providence 0.62 1 .66 1 .33 640,365 72,611 Sacramento 0.68 1.80 1 .51 784,362 219,848 Ban Antonio 1 0.57 1.631 ~ 331 236,372| 502,116 San Diego 0.63 1.78 1.35 896,079 681,291 San Francisco 0.66 1.76 1.33 3,787,553 323,304 Seattle 0.72 1 .8 1 .46 1 ,507,520 337,665 St. Louis 0.63 1.67 1.38 1,365,510 176,529 Tampa 1 0.64 1 .52 1 ~ .48 1 ,164,576 1 160,524 Nashington 1 0.63 ].68| ].44 2,233,893| 224,733 A-9

1990 Vehicle Availability (can't.) ~1 ~ ~ i: ~ ' ~ ~ ?~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 'it .~.~!'!~1'~:~:~'~ i. ~.:~ :::: ~ ~ .~ ..: ... :'. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~":~ .~ "~'"..~: ~. ~ i. ~ :~ i: . .. :. .:~ :. i: - ~ ~ . ~ MS~A~ Atlanta Baltimore Boston Buffalo Chicago Cincinnati Cleveland Columbus Dallas Denver Detroit Houston Indianapolis Kansas City Los Angeles Miami Milwaukee Minneapolis New Orleans New York Philadelphia Phoenix Pittsburgh Portland Providence Sacramento San Antonio San Diego San Francisco Seattle St. Louis Tampa Washington Private vehicles in central city: per capita . . 0.47 0.35 0.35 0.41 0.36 0.50 0.43 0.61 0.59 0.64 0.38 0.55 0.62 0.60 0.53 0.41 0.47 0.54 0.40 0.23 0.33 0.61 0.39 0.62 0.45 0.60 0.54 0.61 0.45 0.65 0.45 0.57 0 37 . ~ : ~ ~ ~ ::~ :~: ::~ hi: ~ i:. ~ ~ ~:~.~ i: l per household _ . ~ . ~ . ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 1 .20 ~ 0.90 0.90 1 .00 6 1.00 ~1 .20 3 1.10 _ 1 .50 9 L50 4 1 .40 3 1.10 _ 5 1 .50 _ 2 1.60 _ _ _ ::: :~ :::::::::: ::: :: ::::: :::: :::~::::::::~:: ::::~: :: ~ pied worker not -working at home . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0.97 0.80 0.31 0.90 0.67 0.93 0.64 1.12 0.63 1.02 0.87 1.09 1.28 1.5 0.82 _ 1.5 0.74 1 1.10 0.35 _ 1.2 . 1.20 _ 1.10 3 0.60 3 0.90 1 ~1.60 3 1.00 1.40 5 1.20 _ 1.50 _ 1.50 1 1.70 5 1.10 5 1.40 5 1.10 7 1.40 7 nso Private vehicles in suburbs ~ ~:~ per capita 0.88 0.56 1.02 0.46 0.68 0.81 0.93 1.20 0.41 1 .01 1.29 1.16 0.26 0.87 0.74 0.58 0 53 i: :~ :. ~ ~ ~:~ ~::.~.~.~ ~ ~ ::: ~:~ per household ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ = 1 .9` 1 .9C 1.66 1 .67 1.76 1.86 1.76 1 .95 1 .84 1 .94 1.83 1.77 1 .90 1.82 1 .86 1 .55 1 .87 1.87 1.60 1.72 . 1.73 1.70 1 .54 1.96 1.74 1.91 . 2.02 1.84 1 .86 1 .98 1.79 1.54 1 84 per worker not working at home 1 .39~ 1 .34j 1 .52 1.47 1.48 1.55 1 7311 1 .65|| 1 .98ll 1.601 1.57 1.4511 1 .46|| 1.8011 1 .66|| 1 .63|| 1 .58|| 1.59 1.41 1.41 l1 1 .38|| 3.19|| 1.47 1.59 1.79 1 .41 1.53 2.0511 1 .72|| 1 .89|| _ ~~~~~J ~-- 1 -- I 1.29| A-10

1990 Vehicle Availability (con't.) . . . , ~, ,,~ ·~ ~F~ ~ .~ ~ ,!l, . ,~! ~,,~ ,! !,~!~ ~ !~. ~-; ~ ~ ~ ;-~ ~! -~ ~! ~ . . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~- ~ ~ . ~ .. ~..~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ . ~ : ~ ~Distributio~n of vehicles in MSA (percentage of ho~useholds with given numper of vehicles) ~ ~ MSA 1 0 ~ 1 2 ~ ~ ~1* ~ :1 ~2+~ ~ Atlanta 8.9% 29.9% 39.9% 91 .1 % 61 .2% ~ 3altimore T 16 4% 31 6%T 36.0% 83.6%1 52.0% Boston 14.7% 35.4% ~35.9% 85.3% 49.9% 3uffalo T 16.3% 37.2%1 34 0% 83.7%1 46.5% ,hicago T 16.6% 35.4%T 34.7% 83.4O/o| 48.0% ,incinnati T 1 1.7% 317%1 38.5% 88.3%| 56.6% ,leveland 1 12.4% 34.2%1 36.8% 87 6%1 53 3% ,olumbus T 8.9% 33.50Xol 40.1 %| 91 .1%1 57.6% Dallas 6.4% 35.0% ~ ~ ~4~1.6% 93.6% 58.7% )enver T 7.8% 333%1 38.9%1 92.2%1 59.0% )etroit T 12.2% 32.8%| 37.6%1 87.8%| 55.1% Houston 8.3% 37.1 o/o 40.2% 91 .7% 54.6% ndianapolis 1 8.8% 33.8%1 39.9 ~91.2%| 57.3% (ansas City 1 8.6% 33.1%| 40.8%1 91.4%| 58.3% os Angeles 1 8.9% 33.7%T 37.4%1 91.1%| 57.4% Aiami 1 13.5% 4o 1%1 33.8%1 86.5%1 46.3% Milwaukee 13.4% 33.9% 37.7o/o 86.6% 52.7% Minneapolis 9. 1% 31.4% 41.4% 90.9% 59.4% Jew Orleans | 1 8.2% 37.3% | 33.7% | 81 .8% | 44.5% New York 30.4% 31.8% 26.1% 69.6% 37.8% Philadelphia 16.9% 34.8% 34.9% 83. 1% 48.3% 'hoenix 1 7.1% 39 3%1 39.1%1 92.9%1 53.6% Pittsburgh 16.5% 37.6% 34.0% 83.5% 45.8% Portland 8.8% 32.3% 39.5% 91 .2% 58.9% 'rovidence 1 11.4% 34.8%1 37 3%1 88.6%| 53.8% Sacramento 7.6% 32.6% 39.4% 92.4% 59.7% San Antonio 10.9% 33.6% 39.1% 89.1% 55.5% fan Diego 1 10.0% 36.7%1 37.8%1 90.0%1 53.3% ,an Francisco 1 7.9% 34.1 %1 38.7%1 92.1 %1 58.0% Seattle 10.4% 32.4% 36.6% 89.6% 57.2% ~t. Louis 1 7 9°/° 31 5%1 38.8%1 92.1%1 60.6% ~ampa 1 9.1% 44 4%1 35.0%1 90.9%1 46.5% Washington 1 1.9% 33.2% 36.8% 88.1% 55.0% A-11

1990 Private Vehicle Level of Service . ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~l~l~l~con-~ ~ ~ Mera~ ~e ~ ~ ~ ~O/ ~ f ~ ~ ~ ~: : ~ . ~ : : :::::: : :: :g ::: ~ : :: : /0~ 0 ~ ~: ~: , . ~ . ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ . gestion~ ~ ~ commute~ ~ ~ com:m-~ In~dex ~ ~ ~ ~trip~ ti~me~ ~ ~uters ~with ~ ~-~ - ~ ~ ~: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ :~, ~ ~ ~ ~.. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :~: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~45+~m~in~ute : ~.~ :, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. _ _ . ~ _. . ~ ::: : . ~ ~11: 11 ,= . ~ ~ ~ ~- . . ~ ~ ~1 .14 26.0 1 7.2°/c 1.01 26.0 1 6.7°/c 1.06 24.2 1 5.3°/c 19.4 5.9°/c 1 .25 28.1 21 .8°/c 0 96 22.1 9.1°/c 0.94 22.0 9.3°/c 0.89 21 .2 7.9°/c 1.05 24.1 13.1°/c 1.03 22.4 9.5°/c 1. 13 23.4 1 1 .7°/c 1.12 26.1 17.3°/c 0.84 21.9 8.4% 0.74 21 .4 8.2% 1.55 26.4 1 8.0°/c 1 .27 24.1 12.5% 0.99 20.0 6.7% 0.95 21 .1 7.8% 1.12 24.4 13.9% 1 .14 30.6 27.2% 1 .05 24.1 15.1% 1 .05 23.0 10.9% 0.82 22.6 12.4% 1 .08 21 .7 9.3o/o 19.7 8.2% 1 .02 21 .8 9.6% 0.88 21 .9 8.2% 1.22 22.2 9.5% 1 .36 25.6 17.0% 24.3 13.6% 23.1 11.1 % 21 .8 10.3% _ 29.5 24.~% Kansas City Los Angeles 1 Miami Milwaukee Minneapolis New Orleans 1 New York Philadelphia Phoenix 1 . Pittsburgh ~Portland 1 Providence ~Sacramento San Antonio 1 |San Diego |San Francisco |Seattle ~1.20 ISt. Louis 0 95 |Tampa 1.05 1 |Washington 1.34 :::~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~::: ~ ~ ~:~:~: ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ 1 ~: :' ~ ~. ~ ~ . . .. . . ~. , $ 2.85 $ 5.12 $ 11.14 $ 2.83 $ 7.99 $ 3.67 $ 4.663 $ 3.17 $ 8.1~3 $ 3.00 $ 3.00 $ 2.02 $ 3.33 $ 2.50 $ 15.00 $ 2.93 $ 3.00 $ 6.09 1 $ 3.83 1 $ 16.00 $ 7.63 $ 3.00 $ 4.90 $ 6.50 $ 3.50 $ 3.27 $ 2.17 $ 10.00 $ 10.43 ~ $ 7.50 1 $ 3.47 $ 1.83 $ 6.50 ., ~. 1'~'~ ~ ''~ -~ :~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ 107.5 114.C 111.5 109.1 1 116.6 1 1 08.a 1 111.5 1 108.a 107.6 116.3 1 112.1 1 1 os.a 1 114.6 1 106.5 120.8 109.8 114.3 1 113.8 1 111.1 1 116.5 112.9 118.1 110.6 121.7 116.7 116.8 107.6 124.6 1 22.7 114.8 1 06.2 113.7 118.8 :: ::: r~ e :: ~: - ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ . . ~ ~ . . ~. . :::: :: ::: :::: ::: ::::: ::: ::: 0.224 0.31 C 0.24C 1 0.36 T 0.221 0.284 1 0.35C 1 0.45`C 0.311 1 0.40C 1 0.22E 0.20 0.33E 1 0.52 0.28 T 0251 1 0.19 0.29~ 0.165 1 0.327 0.24C 1 1 0.101 1 0.197 1 0.30E 1 1 0.215 0.28 0.367 1 0.33E 1 0.41 0.264 0.38 0.15 0.311 A-12

1990 Transit Level of Service MSA ~ ~ ;: ~ Peak fare ~ ; :Peak~ it: ~ ~ ~ Vehicles ~ $ 1.00694 $ 1.00713 $ 0.751,092 $ 1 .1 0353 $ 1.253,465 $ 0.65260 $ 1.00660 l $ 0.75252 $ 0.75509 $ 1.00500 $ 1.00680 $ 0.70714 $ 1.00171 $ 0.75236 $ 1.102,211 $ 1.00494 $ 1.00410 $ 0.75839 $ 0.80394 5 1.15 ~ ~11,108 $ 1.50 1,837 $ 0.85 268 $ 1 .1 0 768 $ 0.90 441 $ 0.75 179 $ 1.00 179 $ 0.40 457 $ 1.00 323 $ 0.80 1,400 $ 0.75 1,210 $ 0.85 549 $ 0.85 128 _ $ 0 85 1 ,792 Atlanta Baltimore Boston Buffalo Chicago Cincinnati Cleveland Columbus Dallas Denver Detroit Houston Indianapolis Kansas City Los Angeles Miami Milwaukee Minneapolis New Orleans New York Philadelphia Phoenix Pittsburgh Portland Providence Sacramento San Antonio San Diego San Francisco Seattle St. Louis Tampa Washington Vehicle: Imies 41 ,685 26,049 66,236 1 0,576 1 76,467 11,131 26,594 8,1 14 23,1 80 21,81 6 34,065 31 ,228 6,000 8,694 11 5,399 32,492 21 ,091 21 ,635 12,719 611 ,565 70,886 11,785 . 29,41 20,55 6,372 7,970 1 9,904 26,046 76,673 32,738 1 9,605 7,159 73,403 ~ Vehicle ~ ~ . ~ . : ours ~ ~ :: ~ I::: I: ~ ~ ~ ~ :: ~ :~ 2,647 2,01 6 4,003 940 1 1,558 807 1,71 2 636 1,541 1 ,442 2,461 2,21 2 384 715 9,074 2,51 0 1,801 1 ,557 1 ,522 37,522 5,751 780 2,278 1 ,270 386 553 1 ,381 1 ,779 4,948 1 ,952 1 ,321 507 5,059 Vehicles petri vehicle mile 0.017 0.027 0.016 0.033 0.020 0.023 0.025 0.031 0.022 0.023 0.020 0.023 0.028 0.027 0.019 0.015 0.019 0.039 0.031 0.018 0.026 0.023 0.026 0.021 0.028 0.022 0.023 0.012 0.018 0.037 0.028 0.018 0.024 Vehicles per:vehicle hour: 0.26` 0.352 0.27 0.37' 0.30( 0.32 0.38E 0.396 0.33( 0.34/ 0.27E 0.32` 0.44E 0.33C 0.244 0.197 0.22E 0.53S 0.25C 0.29E 0.31 c 0.344 0.337 0.347 0.464 0.324 0.331 0.18 0.28~ 0.62C 0.41 C 0.25 0.354 .. . ~.. . ~ Vehicle~ ~ . ~ ~ml es~per~ -~ worker 28.777 22.368 31.722 20.287 46.926 13.988 21.839 1 2.252 1 2.001 23.455 1 6.672 1 8.11 9 9.837 1 1.593 17.424 22.456 27.920 17.127 25. 143 73.260 25.948 12.185 31 .414 29.477 11.907 11 .991 35.796 22.277 24.819 25.893 1 7.549 8.009 34.118 r '~ r! |~ ~Vehicle~ | ~hours per worker 1.8273 1.7310 1.9171 1.8033 3.0736 1.0137 1.4055 10.9601 10.7977 11.55021 11 11.2042| 11 2836 11 10.6290 10.9535 11 1.3701 11 7346 12.3838 11.2324 13.0088 14.4948 12.1054| 10.8064 12.4323 11.8208| 10.7208 11 10.8313 12.4838 1.5214 1.6018 11.5439| 11.1822| 11 10.5668 2.3513 ~-Peak,v~ehicles- per worker~ 0.4791 0.6123 0.5230 0.6771 0.9214 0.3267 0.5420 0.3805 0.2635 0.5376~ 1 0.3328 0.4143 0.2803 0.3147 1 0.3338 0.3414| 0.5427 0.6642 0.7789 1 .3306 0.6724 0.2771 0.8202 0.6325 0.33451 1 0.26931 0.8219| 0.2763 0.4532 0.9570 0.4914 0.1432 0.8329 ~Capital~ spending for ~ transit: $ 1 20,956,500 $ 1 75,974,700 $ 1 43,808,500 $ 8,51 9,300 $ 1 02,020,700 $ 9,947,900 $ 63,31 3,800 $ 4,064,500 $ 1 5,899,900 $ 27,529,400 $ 47,673,600 $ 48,014,1 00 $ 3,222,700 $ 8,559,000 $ 350,726,800 $ 49,124,300 $ 9,1 06,400 $ 27,783,000 $ 27,1 58,000 $1 ,469,877,400 $ 125,644,600 $ 18,738,100 $ 16,860,800 $ 19,570,600 $ 858,900 $ 20,262,800 $ 11,594,700 $ 20,773,200 $ 237,359,900 $ 112,595,800 $ 28,489,700 $ 3,313,100 $ 348,259,200 A-13

1990 Land Use ~ ~r ~ ~ I. ~ . ~ ~: i. ... ~ ~ I. ....~.. ~ ~ I. ~ ... ~ . ~ . ~.~ ~ .. ~ ~ ~ .. ~ a.. I. ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ . .~:~..~ ~ -I: - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ · ~ ~ ~ ~ - VISA Atlanta Baltimore Boston Buffalo Chicago Cincinnati Cleveland Columbus Dallas Denver Detroit Houston Indianapolis Kansas City Los Angeles Miami Milwaukee Minneapolis New Orleans New York Philadelphia Phoenix Pittsburgh Portland Providence Sacramento San Antonio San Diego San Francisco Seattle St. Louis Tampa Washington : ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~.~ ~ ~ ~ ~.~ ~ Land Ariea ~- ~MS;.4 : ~: 1 5,122 2,609 2,440 1 ,568 5,61 9 2,592 2,91 0 3,579 6,968 4,503 . 5,176 7,107 3,071 . 4,988 33,966 3,153 1,793 . 5,051 2,30E . 7,62' 5,34E 9,204 3,83` 4,371 941 . 5,094 2,52C 4,20~ 7,36' 5,89~ 5,331 2,55~ 3,967 . . . , federal aid urban area ~ 1 ,198 765 1 ,033 405 1 ,958 564 629 305 1 ,404 433 1 ,243 1 ,549 422 608 2,100 442 550 995 361 3,186 1 ,240 971 1 ,033 416 536 340 442 680 816 645 694 392 926 . °/0, CC ~- ~ ~ .~ .~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ zone as residential ~ 48.83% 45.61 % #N/A 77.55% 47.65% #N/A #N/A #N/A 80.81 % 32.02% 40.26% 24.30% 65.99% #N/A #N/A 37.71 % 34.33% #N/A #N/A 73.63% #N/A #N/A #N/A 5 1 .94% 55.04% #N/A #N/A #N/A 56.95% #N/A 82.61 % 24.23% 57.67% ~ ~ ~ . I. I, ~ ~ .: ~ ~ I. ~ . Song exams y. ., detach ids ~ ~ 59.8% 42.1% 46.3% 54.6% 48.8% 60.1% 63.2% 59.5% 58.0% 57.2% 66.7% 57.7% 62.2% 66.5% 51 .8% 38.9% 54.3% 59.5% 52.7% 37.2% 41 .3% 52.8% 64.6% 64.1% 50.7% 62.3% 63.4% 49.4% 53.1% 59.5% 64.1% 52.8% 44.0% ~ ~ - Distributionofhousin~g-~%of~total) ~ ~ . ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ . . ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. . 1~unit~in structure 63.6% 72.1% 50.5% 57.2% 53.4% 63.3% 67.8% 65.0% l 61 .3% 64.9% 71 .6% 61 .2% 68.0% 71 .5% 59.3% 47.2% 58.2% l 65.5% 63.4% 42.6% 72.1% 60.1% 72.0% . 66.8% 53.2% 68.9% 66.8% 58.4% . 61 .8% 62.0% 67.1% 56.7% 62.6% high density apartments 2.5% 3.1% 5.3% 2.3% 7.6% 2.5% 6.2% 2.0% 5.6% 5.4% 3.4% 10.9% 2.0% 2.8% 5.6% 1 6.2% 3.9% 8.8% 4.2% 1 6.2% 4.3% 8.2% 3.5% 3.8% 3.9% 4.8% 4.4% 6.1% 5.3% 3.9% 2.5% 4.5% 10.8% ~5+ units in building l 24.8% 18.6% 23.0% 10.9% 27.1% 20.0% 18.0% 19.4% 27.8% 26.4% 16.6% 28.6% 20.3% 1 7.5% ; 27.1% 41.0% l 18.8% ; 24.6% 16.8% l 36.9% 16.2% 23.9% l 13.4% 19.3% 17.1%| 18.0%| 20.4 28.4% 1 23.6% 24.7 1 4.6%1 1 21.1 % 32.4% A-14

1990 Land Use (con 't.) ~ MSA Atlanta Baltimore Boston Buffalo Chicago Cincinnati Cleveland Columbus Dallas Denver Detroit Houston Indianapolis Kansas City Los Angeles Miami Milwaukee Minneapolis New Orleans New York Philadelphia Phoenix Pittsburgh Portland Providence acramento an Antonio an Diego an Francisco eattle t. Louis ampa . Washington . ~: ~ ~ ~ ~: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~: -~ ~ ~:: ~ ~ ~ ~Hou~sing~in~MSA Percen t prewar _ . ' _ 5.7°/c 1 9.9°/c 39.5°/c 37.6°/c 25.7°/c 23.8°/c 26.5°/c 17.8% 5.0% 10.5% 17.6% 4.6% 1 8.7% _ 1 6.5°/c . 9.4% 3.2% . 28.0% ~ 20.5% 16.8% 31 .1% 29.9% 1 .8% 34.3% 18.4% 35.8% 6.6% 7.8% 5.5% 1 7.3% 15.2% 21 .3% 4.3% 11.4% _ Percent post Median year ~ _ 1970 ~ ~ Built 61.6% 1975 36.7% 1961 27.4% 1952 19.0% 1950 29.2% 1958 34.0% 1960 24.4% 1956 40.4% 1965 59.2% 1974 52.5% 1971 29.9% 1958 /o 60.0% 1973 _ /o 38.8% 1964 /o 40 1% 1965 _ /o 42.0% 1966 /o 55. 6% 1 972 _ /o 26.7% 1956 /o 42.9% 1966 _ /o 40.6% 1965 /o 21.2% 1953 _ /o 26.8% 1956 /o 70.4% 1977 /o 22.3% 1952 /o 44.6% 1967 /o 28.9% 1954 _ /o 54.7% 1972 /o 53.5% 1972 /o 57.7% 1973 /o 37.2% 1963 0 46.8% 1968 0 33.5% 1961 _ . ...... 0 62.7% 1974 43.7% 1967 Median value Housiag~ ~density ~ $ 89,300 229.2 $ 100,000 359.9 $ 175,800 676.5 $ 71,500 314.2 $ 102,100 552.8 $ 70,800 267.2 $ 70,400 385.8 $ 71,600 156.3 $ 77,900 233.5 $ 89,000 180.0 $ 68,500 352.7 $ 63,000 215.2 $ 66,300 168.6 $ 66,000 131.8 $ 209,800 155.8 $ 88,300 443.9 $ 74,300 350.8 $ 88,300 195.7 $ 69,500 227.1 $ 190,100 930.4 $ 100,900 431.7 $ 84,700 103.4 $ 54,600 249.3 $ 72,300 138.5 $ 133,200 493.6 $ 136,200 119.7 $ 56,40 200.2 $ 186,200 225.1 $ 255,50 333.5 $ 123,200 179.9 $ 69,50 188.7 $ 70,900 401.3 $ 165,300 392.5 . .:~: - _ _ _ ~ ~ ~ ~Housing in central city ~ ~ -~ ~: °tO~prewar . ~% single fam:il~y~ : ~:~: ~ detached . 42.1% 11.5% 11.2% 27.8% 23.6% 33.5% 42.1% 45.5% 44.2% 47.6% 59.6% 46.1% 55.5% 60.0% 39.4% 29.7% 37.0% 43.9% 36.7% 8.6% 5.5% 55.4% 41 .5% 62.6°/` 22.1 o/c 57.3o/` 59.9o/< 46.9°/< 1 6.9°/` 51 .6°X 36.5°X 56.5°/' 12.4°X A-15

1990 Demographics I: MSA Atlanta Baltimore Boston Buffalo Chicago Cincinnati Cleveland Columbus Dallas Denver Detroit Houston Indianapolis Kansas City Los Angeles Miami Milwaukee Minneapolis New Orleans New York Philadelphia Phoenix Pittsburgh Portland Providence Sacramento San Antonio San Diego San Francisco Seattle St. Louis Tampa Washington :: :~: ~ ~ it. ~ ~ .. . . ~:~ ~ :, i::: i:: ~ :::: .:::: :.:: ::.:::: :~: ::: :: ~%on~e~-paren;t family ~hou~sehold~ . ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 49 46.1 39.6 40.6 17.9 14.6 #N/A 12.1 _ . . _ 7.7 7.7 #N/A #N/A _ ....... . 15.3 _ 10.5 _ 10.2 9 ~ _ 14.6 _ 15.2 16.6 _ 14.6 ~ 12.8 NO of families font public assistance ~ 13.6 16.4 11.9 18.7 7.6 18 13.7 10.9 10.1 47.5 #N/A 16.2 9 6 %~female head l of household ~ , '~ ~''~;~ it's ~ I- -; ~ ..- [, 41.6% l 38.9% l 32.1% l 34.4% . 36.6% . 21.9% 21.0% 28.4% 16.8°% 29.60X 19.0°% 29.40X 23.5°/< 21.8°/< 17.7°% 21.0°% 18.0°X 37.0% 24.8%11 39.20Xoll . 258 ma97 8.9 A-16

1990 Miscellaneous CentralCity ~ ~ ~ YONonpe k Coefficient of |- ~ ~ - ~ -it ~ ~ ~ ~ ~var~ation ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ . .~ ~ ~.~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i. ~ Aft. ~ ~ ~ ~:~ I: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.~.~ ~-.~ ... .:~..~ . i..- ~.~ ~ ~.~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~..~ Am. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.~- - MSA - ~-~ Annual ~ Average ~ departure~time ~in: departure ~-~ ~ -- ~ ~ precipitation ~ January ~ ~ ~ ~to~work~ ~ ~$~me~to work -~ ~ ~ ~ If- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~-~ ~ ~ -aft ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (duchess ~ ~ ~ ~ temperature ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -A ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~:~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ ~ . ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ .~ i. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Hi ~ ~ Atlanta 50.8 41 21.2% 0.780 Baltimore 40.8 31.8 24.0% 0.703 Boston 41.5 28.6 21.7% 0.751 Buffalo 38.6 23.6 26.8% 0.702 Chicago 37.4 22.4 27.3% 0.652 Cincinnati 40.7 29.8 26.3% 0.711 Cleveland 36.6 24.8 ~26.5% 0.691 Columbus 38.1 26.4 25.9% 0.733 Dallas 36.1 44.6 22.5% 0.796 Denver 15.4 29.7 23.9% 0.750 Detroit 32.1 24.7 29.4% 0.616 Houston 50.8 52.2 23.6% 0.756 1 ndianapol is 39.9 25.5 24.7% 0.787 Kansas City 37.6 25.7 23.8% 0.801 Los Angeles 14.8 58.3 28.0% 0.592 Miami 55.9 67.2 21.5% 0.734 Milwaukee 31.1 19.9 29.6% 0.691 Minneapolis 28.3 11.8 25.6% 0.748 New Orleans 61.9 51.3 24.7% 0.678 New York 47.3 31.5 20.2% 0.761 Philadelphia 41.4 30.4 22.1 % 0.753 Phoenix 7.7 53.6 30.7% 0.620 Pittsburgh 36.9 26.1 25.8% 0.684 Portland 36.3 39.6 26.1 % 0.708 Providence #N/A 27.9 23.5% 0.743 Sacramento 17.5 45.2 25.4% 0.699 San Antonio 31 49.3 26.5% 0.706 San Diego 9.9 57.4 24.6% 0.777 San Francisco 19.7 51.1 26.9% 0.636 Seattle 37.2 40.1 24.8% 0.663 St. Louis 37.9 28.4 29.4% 0.601 Tampa 43.9 59.9 23.2% 0.740 Washington 38.6 34.6 21.3% 0.707 A-17

1980 Mode Shares || ~ | ~ ~ ~Singi~e occupant vehl leshar~e ~ | : CC-CC :~ 53.3% 42.0% 35.1% 46.4% 46.7% 59.2% 60.3% ~: MSA ::::::: ::::::: ::: :: :: :::::: :::: Atlanta Baltimore Boston Buffalo Chicago Cincinnati Cleveland Columbus Dallas Denver 66.8°/c Detroit 75.1 °/c Houston Indianapolis Kansas City Los Angeles Miami Milwaukee Minneapolis New Orleans New York Philadelphia Phoenix Pittsburgh Portland Providence Sacramento San Antonio San Diego San Franc~sco Seattle St. Louis Tampa Washington . . ~ ~ ~ ~ otal 69.6% 60.7% 58.7% 67.8% 59.6% 70.9% 71 .4% 71 .3% 65.2% 75.5% 89.9% 72.2% 67.3% 71 .5% 92.8% 58.9% 58.6% 68.3% 70.1% 72.9% 66.3% 64.0% 555.3% 42.3% 50.1% 20.7% 38.7% 72.2% 36.2% 53.7% 54.4% 66.4% 68.2% gub~urb-CC~ 66.6% 65.8% 48.7% 68.7% 39.0% 69.2% 68.0% !~ ,.~. ~ !. f!~ !~! .~! ~ '~! !~! ~ Private vehicle share ~ ~ - ~ . . . ~:~ ~ ~ ~::~ :: ~ ~ ~:~ ~:~: ~ ~ ~:~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Total ~ - CC-CC . . 89.2% 67.4°/c 83.1% 77.5% 86.6% 76.8°/c~ . 89.4% 87.6% 70.2°/c 71 .5°/c 70.3°/c 71 .4°/c 70.7°/c 66.8°/c 66.4°/c 62.3°/c 45.9°/c 61 .0°/c 71 .2°/c 61 .1 °/c 66.5°/c 66.6°/c 70.4°/c 67.8°/c 65.2°/c 64.2°/c 66.0°/c 68.6°/c 73.3% 54.6°/c 26.9% 40.6% 66.7% 71 .7% 71 .5% 73.0% 74.5% 72.8% 74.2% 87.4% 92.1% 92.6% 92.7% 92.0% 88.5% 89.6% 71.5% 85.9% 62.5% 85.0% 64.0% 46.6% 54.0% 73.6% 53.0% 64.9% 69.9% 70.2% 67.2% 66.0% 70.9% 50.5% 58.0% 54.6% 51.6% 71.1% 65.9% 64.2% 75.8% 60.2°/c 49.3°/c 65.1 °/c 60.3°/c 75.8°/c 76.7°/c 84.1 °/c 86.8°/c 76.7°/c 75.9°/c . 89.6°/c 90.6°/c 92.2°/c 81 .6°/c 81 .2°/c 73.7°/c 56.6°/c 67.2°/c 30.2°/c . 54.4°/c 90.2°/c 81 .0% 51 .4°/c 85.2% 70.0°/c 88.1% 88.4% 88.3% 84.0% 80.6% 85.0% 90.1% 91 .4% 83.3% 59.9% 79.3% 90.6% 75.4% 84.0% 88.6% 82.1% 632% 69.7% 7t3% 88.7% 77.5% · :~:~! :~. Suburb4::C 89.3% 90.8% ~, - : ,!~ ,~. !: ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ Transit shar~e ~: ~ ~ . :: ::::: : ::::::::: :::::: :: :::::~: ~ l~tal ~ : ::: : ::: ::: ::: ::: ::: 7.5% 10.4% 67.2% 13.4% 90.5% 6.7% 58.9% 91 .2% 85.2% 95.5% 96.9% 90.5% 16.9% 5.9% 7.9% 4.7% 3.4% 6.2% 93.0% 3.8% . . 97.5% 3. 1% 98.4% 3. 1% . 96.7% . 91 .3% 92.9% 92.5% 84.3% 93.0% 64.3% 74.2% 95.6% 73.7°/; . 87.2°/( 92.1 °/( 91 2°/ 87.5°/ 94.1 o/c 79.6°/< 89.1 o/c 74.30/c 4.2% 5.1% 5.0% 7.2% 9.0% 11.1% 30.6% 12.9% 2.0% 11.8% 8.6% 4.1% 3.6% 4.6% 3.4% 11.5% 8.3% 92.0% 5.7% 96.0% 1 .9% 15.9% 1 ~: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~::~ ~ ~ ~ :: ~ 1~, ~:~::::: ~ ~ ~: ~: : ~ ~ :: 11 1~-~ ~ ~ ~-CC=C~ ~-~ I Su~b~wrb-CC-~ 11 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~'~ ~ ~11 127.3%11 o. 1 %11 -128.4%17 5% 130.0%130.4%11 1111 -120.8%|8.1%|| -130.8%140.2%11 15.7%T7 5%11 1111 -115.5%|13.9%|| -1 r 11 9.6% |1 .94~/o|| 1111 -112.5% 18.5%|| 11 4.30Xol6.4o/ 53%L ~4% 5.2%11.oo/oll 2.0%11.8%|| 1 0.2%16.3%|| 1111 -19.8%14.7% - 115.6% |5.9% 29.1 o/o11 4.90/o|| 111 -123.9%16.0 56.00/ol34.6% ~31 .90/0124.5 ~oll -,3.0%119%|1 33.5%124.9%1 ~1 8., %11 1 .2%|| -17.8o/ol6.1%1 16.5%16.3%11 ~1.3°~| -14.9%12.1%|| 124.9%11 6.7%|| 19.0% 20.8% 3.5% 42.3% 94% 7.5% 1 1.5%|| 1 24.5%11 A-18

1980 Private Vehicle Occupancy and VAT ~ al . , A ... ... . . .. . .. ~ - ~ ~ ~ - Privatevehicleoccupancy ~; ~ 1 :':::': i: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ aim. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~aft- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ::: ~:~: ~ ~ - ~ :~ ~-it: - : ~ 1~:~:~:~:-~ ~.~.~ I- I: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~.~ ~ ~ ~.~ ~ i. ~ ~ ~ MSA ~ ~ ~Total -; CC-CC ~ Atlanta 1 . 15 1 . 13 Baltimore 1 .1 9 1.21 Boston 1 . 15 1 .21 Buffalo 1.14 1.19 Chicago 1 .14 1.19 Cincinnati 1 .12 1 .15 Cleveland 1 .1 1 1 .1 5 Columbus 1 .14 1 .1 Dallas 1. 14 1 . 14 Denver 1 . 15 1 .1 4 Detroit 1 .12 1 .1 Houston 1.16 1.15 Indianapolis 1 . 13 1 . 14 ansas City 1 . 17 1 .1 Los Angeles 1 . 12 1 . 12 Miami 1.13 1.15 Milwaukee 1 . 14 1 .1 Minneapolis 1 . 16 1 . 16 New Orleans 1 .1 8 1 .1 7 New York 1.17 1.2 Philadelphia 1 . 15 1 .20 Phoenix 1 . 13 1 . 12 Pittsburgh 1 .17 1 .1 9 Portland 1 .15 1 . 14 Providence 1 .1 6 1 .1 9 Sacramento 1 .14 1 .13 San Antonio 1.15 1.15 San Diego 1 .13 1 . 12 San Francisco 1 . 14 1 .1 8 Seattle 1 .14 1 .14 St. Louis 1.16 1.18 Tampa 1.13 1.12 Washington 1 .23 ~ Suburb-CC Daily VAT 1.17 1.18 1.20 1.16 1.14 1.17 1.13 1.11 1.18 1.17 23,500 1 91226 41 ,400 1 3,750 94,709 1 9,405 31 ,021 1 2,81 3 36,255 22,631 64,675 49,728 1 4,648 1 3,241 1 35,634 25,31 6 21 ,238 29,596 1 0,708 1.15 1.18 1.18 1.15 1.15 1.14 1.14 1.16 1.22 1.31 1.17 1.16 1.19 1 .16 1 .16 1 .15 1 .15 1 .15 1 .28 1.18 1.21 1.12 1.39 1 70,553 49,703 18,656 25,960 1 3,759 1 1,289 1 1,729 1 5,703 25,451 54,184 24,163 24, 1 69 1 1 ,443 47,551 A-19

198C Popolallon ~ ~ MSA Atlanta Baltimore Boston Buffalo Chicago Cincinnati Cleveland Columbus Dallas Denver Detroit Houston Indianapolis Kansas City Los Angeles Miami Milwaukee Minneapolis New Orleans New York hiladelphia hoenix ittsburgh ortland rovidence acramento San Antonio San Diego San Francisco Seattle St. Louis Tampa Washington I: MSA ~ 2,029,710 2,174,023 3,448,122 1,242,826 7,869,542 1,660,27 2,834,06 1,093,31 2,974,805 1,620,902 4,618,161 . 3,101,293 1,305,911 1,327,106 11,497,568 2,643,981 1,570,275 2,113,533 1,187,073 16,121,297 5,547,902 1,509,052 2,263,894 1,242,594 1,096,047 . 1,014,002 1,071,954 1,861,846 5,179,784 2,093,112 2,356,460 1,569,134 = 3,060,922 :~ :~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ Central city .. ~ ~ ~-I ~ ~ At. : - . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .. : : : ::: :: :: : ::: 425,022 786,755 562,994 357,870 3,005,072 385,457 573,822 564,871 . 904,078 492,365 1,203,339 . 1,595,138 700,807 448,159 2,966,850 346,865 636,212 . 370,951 557,515 7,071,639 . 1,688,210 789,704 423,938 366,383 156,804 275,741 785,880 875,538 678,974 493,846 453,085 271,523 638,333 2,885,128 884,956 4,864,470 1,274,821 2,260,240 528,445 2,070,727 1,128,537 3,414,822 1,506,155 605,104 878,947 8,530,718 2,297,116 934,063 1,742,582 629,558 9,049,658 3,859,692 719,348 1,839,956 876,211 939,243 738,261 286,074 986,308 4,500,810 1,599,266 1,903,375 1,297,611 2,422,589 1,223,000 2,853,000 1,113,000 6,942,000 1,234,000 2,181,000 862,000 1,461,000 1,242,000 4,004,000 1,905,000 853,000 360,000 9,641,000 1,608,000 1,207,000 1,753,000 1,060,000 16,398,000 4,026,000 1,375,000 1,917,000 . 1,105,000 831 ,000 787,000 . 838,000 1 ,556,000 3,381 ,OoO . 1 ,362,000 31 5,000 52 1 ,ooo 3,323,000 83.7°/c 71 .2°/c 61 .8°/c 76.8°/c 79.8°/c 48.3°/c 69.6°/c 69.6°/c 73.9% 48.6% 46.3% 66.2% 74.2% 86.9% ~ . . .~: ~ 77~ ~ ~ ~ % Central city 20.9°/< 36.2°/< . 1 6.3°/c 28.8°k . 38.2°/c TO 23.2% _ tO 20.2% /o 51 .7o/o 30.4% 30.4% /o 26.1 °/O 51 .4% 53.7°/c 33.8°/c 25.8% 13.1% 59.5% 82.4% 17.6% 53.0% 47.0% 56.1% _ 69.6% 30.4% 47.7% 52.3% 81 .3% 70.5% 85.7% 40.5% 43.9% 18.7% 29.5% 14.3% 72.8% 27.2% 26.7% 73.3% 47.0% 53.0% . 86.9% 76.4% 80.8% 82.7% 79.1% 13.1% 23.6% 1 9.2% A-20

1980 Households Atlanta Baltimore Bo.~ton 11~ Buffalo Chicago Cincinnati |CIeveland |Columbus 1 |Dallas IDenver 1 |Detroit 1 Houston Indianapolis l Kansas City l Los Angeles l Miami l Milwaukee l Minneapolis l New Orleans l New York l Philadelphia l Phoenix Pittsburgh Portland Providence Sacramento San Antonio San Diego San Francisco Seattle St. Louis Tampa Washington MESA ~ 719,799 756,980 1,219,603 445,475 2,744,032 586,818 1,019,284 397,034 1,076,297 609,360 1,601,967 1,096,353 468,470 493,485 4,141,097 1,027,347 560,102 762,376 418,406 5,830,076 1,925,787 544,759 828,504 477,513 391,366 383,841 349,330 670,094 1,970,549 792,194 837,997 638,816 1,112,770 ~ . ~ ~ . ~ i. ~ ~..~ i. ~ . ~ .~.. ~ ~ ~Ceotral~city ::: :: :::: :: ::::: :::::: :::: ::: ::::: 162,553 281,414 218,457 140,954 1,093,409 157,677 218,297 217,150 355,073 211,566 433,488 602,696 260,167 175,227 1,135,230 134,046 241,818 161,858 206,435 2,788,530 619,781 284,780 166,067 158,847 60,157 112,859 258,984 321,060 298,956 219,469 178,048 105,603 _ 253,143 557,246 475,566 1,001,146 304,521 1,650,623 429,141 800,987 179,884 721,224 397,794 1,168,479 493,657 208,303 318,258 3,005,867 893,301 318,284 600,518 211,971 3,041,546 1,306,006 259,979 662,437 318,666 331,209 270,982 90,346 349,034 1,671,593 572,725 659,949 533,213 859,627 . ~ A, i, ~! : [lousehold size ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~- MESA ~- 77.4% 2.82 62.8% 2.8, 82.1% 2.8~ 2.7' 68.4% 60.2% 73.1% 78.6% 45.3% 67.0% 65.3% 72.9% 45.0% 72.6% 78 8% 67 8% 66.7% Central city 2.61 2 BE ::~:~ :~ all: ::~:~:~:~ :~ ~: Suburbs ~ 2.863 2.80 44.5% 2.7 64.5% 2.6C 72.6% 2.78 87.0% 2.57 56.8% 2.8 2.63 2.93 78.8% 2.77 2.29 2.90 50.7% 2.84 2.70 2.97 52.2% 2.77 2.54 2.98 67.8% 2.88 2.72 2.96 47.7% 2.77 2.77 2.77 80.0% 2.7 2.55 2.78 2.60 2.31 2.75 2.80 2.61 2.84 84.6% 70.6% 25.9% 2.6 2.44 2.72 3.07 3.03 3. 17 _ 2.73 2.83 2.27 2.69 2 2~; 2 7C] _ 2.43 2.82 A-21 2.88

1980 Workers, Employment, and Income ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ . .~ ~.~ . ~ ..~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Workers not working at ~home ~ ~ ~ _ ::: :: : : : ::::::: ::: :: ~ ~ ~ per _ household 1 .30 1.26 1.31 1.10 1.25 1.16 1.17 1.21 1 .35 1 .30 1.13 1 .36 1.21 1.24 1 .23 1.11 1.27 1 .30 1 .14 1 .17 1 .19 1 .19 1.09 1 .17 1.23 1.11 1 .27 1.25 1.24 1.21 1.18 0.94 1 .38 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ all. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ MSA Atlanta Baltimore Boston Buffalo Chicago Cincinnati Cleveland Columbus Dallas Denver Detroit Houston Indianapolis Kansas City Los Angeles Miami Milwaukee Minneapolis New Orleans New York Philadelphia Phoenix Pittsburgh Portland Providence Sacramento San Antonio San Diego San Francisco Seattle St. Louis Tampa Total 938,457 955,246 1 ,592, 145 492, 1 55 3,424,787 683, 1 29 1, 188,805 480,738 1 ,448,828 792,045 1 ,81 7,285 1,491 ,980 568,01 6 609,951 5,110,660 1, 139,286 709,258 994,697 478,731 6,795, 148 2,289,539 648,252 901 ,699 556,532 481 ,666 . 426,455 442,671 836,510 . 2,434,840 956,677 988,572 . 599,197 Washington 1 ,532,737 ::: I:: ::: :: ::: :: ~CG 37.7% 46.1% 34.6% 41 .7% 45.7% 47.6% 45.6% 65.0% 60.4% 54.8% 28.3% 72.4% 73.8% 60.8% 44.0% 47.1% 51 .7% 44.1% 57.0% 54.6% 38.7% 60.7% 35.2% 52.6% 5o.5o/ 48.0°/< 83.6°/< 59.3o/< 41 .9o/< 54.40/c 33.6°/< 34.3/ 39.2°/c ~ % Woricbrs~ ~ · ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I. Aft. ~ ~ ~.~ -if - suburbs ~ ~ ~ I:: ~ ~ :: ~ I:: ~ ~:,~ ~ :~ ~ ~ . 62.3% 53.9% 65.4% 58.3% 54.3% 52.4% l 54.4% 35.0% 39.6% 45.2% 71 .7% 27.6% 26.2% 39.2% 56.0% 52.9% 48.3% 55.9% 43.0% 45.4% 61.3% 39.3% 64.8°/ 47.4O/ 49.5o/< 52.0°/< 16.4°/< 4o.7o/< 58.1 °/< 45.6°/< 66.4°/< 65.7°/c 60.8°/c . :: :: :~ ~ : : :::: I:: ~:~ ~ I: ~ . . ~ ~ MESA ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ : : :: : ::: :: ::::: : :::: ~ ::: : : :: :::::: : :: :: : : : : : 1,004,800 965,800 1,474,100 418,300 3,220,400 600,700 895,700 560,200 1,034,400 799,300 1,702,000 1,399,200 533,200 627,600 3,610,300 730,500 671,800 1,110,500 534,400 3,747,700 1,922,800 636,200 908,400 556,200 407,10( 417,90C 398,60C 650,20C 875,40C 766,00C 1,003,70C 557,70C 616,10C .~ I I. ~ ~^,_~ ~ ~ -it `, ~ . :: : : : : : : : : : i: : ::: ::: :~: :: :::::: :::::~: - - 320,593 387,930 385,174 183,869 1,247,820 243,685 322,215 287,095 589,270 . 354,091 417,822 894,661 . 351,530 68,288 1,328,981 284,423 297,547 249,434 . 234,273 2,533,943 686,030 . 357,755 300,136 265,446 . 104,873 . 181,353 339,101 442,81 434,60~ 343,44' 305,89 180,92, 559,311 ~ hi. hi. ~ i:. ~ i. Suburbs ~ :~ ::::: :::::: ::::: :::: :: ::: : ::: ::::: :::: :: 684,207 577,870 1,088,926 234,431 1,972,580 357,015 573,485 . 273,105 445,130 445,209 1,284,178 504,539 181,670 559,312 2,281,319 446,077 374,253 861,066 300,127 1,213,757 1,236,770 278,445 608,264 290,754 302,227 236,547 59,499 207,382 440,798 422,551 697,808 376,773 56,789 ~ apt% - suburban 68.1% 59.8% 73.9% 56.0% 61.3% 59.4% 64.0% 48.8% 43.0% 55.7% 75.5% 36.1% 34.1% 89.1% 63.2% 61.1% 55.7% 77.5% 56.2% 32.4% 64.3% 43.8% 67.0% 52.3% 74.2% 56.6% 14.9% 31.9% 50.4% 55.2% 69.5% 67.6% . 9.2% HoQusehold~ i ncome ~ $ 18,119 $ 18,939 $ 18,514 $ 17,251 $ 20,829 $ 18,214 $ 19,076 $ 17,354 $ 18,854 $ 19,989 $ 21,197 $ 21,019 $ 18,674 $ 18,834 $ 18,499 $ 16,009 . $ 20,192 $ 20,664 $ 16,092 $ 18,054 $ 18,117 $ 17,728 $ 17,804 $ 18,357 $ 16,029 $ 17,366 $ 15,157 $ 17,106 $ 20,484 $ 20,007 $ 18,499 $ 13,537 $ 23,309 ~MSA ~i Per~icapita~ ~ . . l income~- $ 9,807 $ 9,887 $ 10,751 $ 9,488 $ 11,174 $ 9,668 $ 10,475 $ 9,282 $ 10,926 $ 11,402 . $ 10,901 $ 11,627 $ 10,060 $ 10,353 $ 11,110 $ 10,233 $ 10,806 $ 11,130 $ 9,626 l $ 11,230 $ 10,11: $ 9,71 ~ $ 9,966 $ 10,49' $ 9,22 $ 10,22~ $ 8,34E $ 10,09~ $ 12,431 $ 11,20E $ 10,17t $ 8,90E $ 12,57/ A-22

1980 Vehicle Availability Boston Cleveland Columbus Houston Indianapolis Kansas City Los Angeles Milwaukee Minneapolis New Orleans New York Philadelphia Phoenix Pittsburgh Portland Providence Sacramento San Antonio San Diego San Francisco Seattle St. Louis Tampa Washington 0.47 0.61 0.54 0.60 0.49 0.38 0.48 0.64 0.50 0.65 0.52 0.66 0.55 0.62 0.62 0.67 0.56 0.59 Private veh cles in CC ~: total available. 1 78,468 253,1 90 1 62,25' 128,54' 961,1 1 ~ 1 76,77E 230,49~ 309,231 554,29C 303,47( 487,1 14 956,90 400,39~ 249,05C 1 ,608,52C 1 45,809 281 ,79E 1 86,047 21 6,63C 1 ,447,424 533,009 501,34E 1 48,91 1 211,138 62,447 1 65,349 410,107 51 0,496 284,475 292,71 0 179,132 1 44,438 218,190 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Aft: . ~ per household :~ ~ 1.10 0.90 0.74 0.91 0.88 1.12 1 .06 1.42 1 .56 1.43 1.12 1.59 . 1 .54 1.42 1 .42 1 .09 1.17 1.15 1.05 0.52 0.86 1.76 0.90 1.33 1.04 1.47 1.58 1.59 0.95 1.33 1.01 1.37 0.86 . . . . . .. Percentage of households in MSA with given number of vehicles I:: ~ I:: :~: :: mu: ::~: :: ~0 ~ Aft, Aft. ~ . ~ I. ~ ~. 11.0% 18.2% 18.8% 16.8% 19.1% 13.3% 12.5% 10.4% 6.5% 8.0% 11.8% 7.2% 9.5% 10.0% 10.3% 14.8% 14.2% 10.8% 19.1% 35.1% 19.0% 6.0% 17.6% 10.6% 13.9% 8.6% 10.2% 9.3% 12.2% 9.8% 12.4% 11.2% 1 3 9% ~':.~'~ ~ ~ ~1: ~ ~ ~ ~ 32.1% 35.6% 41.1% 42.0% 39.0% 34.3% 36.9% 37.0% 33.3% 33.1% 35.4% 35.3% 34.9% 34.3% 36.7% 43.8% 38.0% 35.3% 37.9% 34.1% 37.6% 37.9% 40.6% 34.6% 40.7% 35.1% 35.8% 36.5% 35.8% 33.1% 35.7% 47.4% . , . , ,,,,,,,,,, ,~ 2 36.4% 32.8% 29.8% 30.7% 31.1% 36.0% 35.6% 36.8% 37.2% 35.3% 36.0% 37.0% 38.1% 37.3% 32.7% 30.1% 34.8% 36.3% 31 .3% 22.6% 31 .5% 34.3% 31.1% 33.6% 32.9% 33.9% 34.6% 33.0% 32.6% l 34.2% 36.5% 29.6% 33.3% ~1+ At: 89.0% 81.8% 81.2% 83.2% 80.9% 86.7% 87.5% 89.6% 93.5% 92.0% 88.2% 92.8% 90.5% 90.0% 89.7% 85.2% 85.8% 89.2% 80.9% 64.9% 81.0% 94.0% 82.4% 89.4% 86.1% 91 .4% 89.8% 90.7% 87.8% 90.2% 87.6% 88.8% 86.1% 2 ~ 57.0% 46.2% 40.1% 41 .2% 41.9% 52.4% l 50.6% 52.6% 60.2% 58.9% 52.8% 57.5% . 55.6% . 55.6% . 53.0% . 41.4% . 47.9% . 53.9% . 43.0 30.7 43.4% 56.1 % 41.8%1 1 54.7% 45.3% . 1 56.3% 54.1% . 54.2% 52.0% 57.2% 51.9% 41 .4% 48.1% A-23

1980 Private Vehicle Level of Service Atlanta Baltimore 1 Boston Buffalo Chicago Cincinnati Cleveland 1 Columbus Dallas 1 Denver Detroit Houston 1 Indianapolis Kansas City Los Angeles Miami Milwaukee Minneapolis New Orleans New York Philadelphia Phoenix Pittsburgh Portland Providence Sacramento San Anti San Diego San Francisco Seattle St. Louis Tampa Washington T171 congestion ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ index (1982) ~ ~ 0.91 0.84 0.90 1.02 0.86 0.80 0.68 0.84 0.88 1.06 1 .17 0.67 0.62 1.22 1.05 0.83 0.76 0.98 1.01 1.00 1.15 0.78 0.87 0.80 0.77 0.78 1.01 0.95 0.83 0.94 1 12 ~ ~ i. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ . . ~ ~ ~. ~ Average ~ ~ . ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~.~ ~ ~ ~ Gasoline price 125.10 1 25.08 124.12 1 27.97 1 30.35 1 20.64 1 20.32 1 20.64 118.64 121.70 1 30.33 1 1 8.33 1 30.35 119.03 1 27.07 1 23.48 119.76 1 23.08 118.33 1 28.61 123.27 127.96 124.24 1 22.63 124.12 130.98 118.64 127.96 130.98 125.30 120.82 125.10 127 56 - Freeway mileage per square mile 0.192 0.285 0.264 0.364 0.203 0.315 0.269 0.335 0.277 0.298 0.220 0.170 0.326 0.387 0.325 0.409 0.203 0.309 0.113 0.322 0.285 0.073 0.192 0.284 0.255 0.296 0.411 0.329 0.420 0.305 0.174 0.091 0 346 ~ ~ Total freeway ~ ~ .~ .~ ~ . ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~.~ ~ i. ~ ~ i. . ~ ~ In: ~ ~ mileage ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -'- ' . 178 117 _ 240 _ 4136 _ 3385 _ 147 _ 3246 _ 127 _ 7247 _ __ 3124 _ 239 _ 223 _ , 137 _ _70 _ 560 ~ 3168 _ 3106 _ 3248 _ 331 _ 1 000 _ 257 _40 _ 188 _ 118 _ ~109 _ 94 _ 144 _202 _ _314 _ 197 _ $ 33 _ 1 ~29 _ ~283 _ ~ I otal ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~.~ ~ road~ mileage~ ~ 5,605 3,386 8,569 3,263 1 8,238 3,783 5,930 2,708 8,578 5,278 1 2,049 9,722 3,783 2,082 25,515 5,090 4,461 7,921 2,928 33,984 9,81 6 5,253 7,308 4,676 3,204 2,411 3,81 8 4,853 7,381 5,805 1 ,492 2,589 8,447 ~ ~ ~ ~HOV ~ ..~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.'~. ~'~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ lane ~miles~ _ ~ -~~- ~~~ ~ 0.0 0.0 9 0.0 3 0.0 _ 0.0 3 0.0 0.0 _ 0.0 ~0.0 8 0.0 _ 0.0 2 0.0 _ 3 0.0 _ 0.0 5 12.0 _ 28.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 _ 0.0 _ 5.6 6 0.0 _ 0.0 8 0.0 0.0 _ 0.0 _ 0.0 B ~0.~0 _ 0.0 1 14.8 5 2.8 _ 0.0 9 0.0 7 22.0 A-24

1980 Transit Level of Service : MSA ~ i |7eakfare~ ~ Peak ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~: | ~ vehicles ~1 ~ :' $ 0.50 $ 0.43 $ 0.25 $ 0.50 $ 0.60 $ 0.30 $ 0.40 $ 0.60 $ 0.60 $ 0.25 $ 0.60 $ 0.4( $ 0.5( $ 0.4C $ 0.6~ $ 0.5C $ 0.5C $ 0.5C $ 0.4C $ 0.6C $ 0.6~ $ 0.5C $ 0.6C $ 0.6 $ 0.3~ $ 0.5C $ 0.4C $ 0.6C $ 0.5C $ 0.5C $ 0.5C $ 0.45 ~Atlanta 1 ~Baltimore |Boston Buffalo Chicago Cincinnati Cleveland Columbus Dallas Denver Detroit Houston Indianapolis Kansas City Los Angeles Miami Milwaukee Minneapolis New Orleans New York Philadelphia Phoenix Pittsburgh Portland Providence Sacramento] San Antonio San Diego San Francisco Seattle St. Louis Tampa Washington 1~ ~ ~ . 700 736 _1,066 _ 406 _2,991 303 851 _228 390 531 887 _356 0158 0270 _ 52,392 0428 0499 01,050 0383 _ 9,924 l _1,597 175 0839 5473 5195 0175 _ 0366 0206 0 ~2,624 0831 0765 ~124 5 ~ 1,782 :~:. ~ !~! :! :: :::.: ::.:::::::: :: ::: Vehicle ~:~miles~ . -~ ~::: ::~: :: :~::: ~ ~ :: . ~ ~ . 29,690 24,439 39,399 1 0,498 133,123 11,995 27,479 7,438 1 4,645 20,013 42,218 1 4,239 5,965 9,563 1 1 5,579 21 ,661 21 ,843 1 ,247 13,813 429,695 54,369 7,81 4 36,898 1 9,935 7,180 8,233 1 4,703 1 0,235 119,521 32,674 22,833 5,704 60,71 2 939 1 ,535 2,861 1 ,048 462 701 8,523 1 ,704 1 ,750 65 1 ,351 32,033 5,068 506 2,886 1,31 1 543 539 1 ,034 791 8,320 1 ,671 1,81 3 412 3,974 0.039 0.022 0.025 0.031 0.031 0.02 0.02/ 0.021 0.02¢ 0.02E 0.02E 0.021 0.02C 0.02~ 0.842 0.02E 0.02~ 0.02C 0.022 0.022 0.024 0.027 0.021 0.025 0.020 0.022 0.025 0.034 0.022 0.029 0.423 , 0.339 0.359 0.482 0.376 0.415 0.346 0.310 0.340 0.342 0.385 0.281 0.251 0.285 16.276 0.283 0.310 0.315 0.346 0.291 0.361 0.359 0.325 0.354 0.260 0.315 0.497 0.422 0.301 0.448 21.330 38.870 1 7.559 23.11 5 1 5.472 10.108 25.267 23.231 9.543 10.501 1 5.678 22.615 19.013 30.798 1.254 28.854 63.236 23.747 1 2.054 . 40.921 35.820 14.90 . 1 9.305 33.215 12.23 49.08 34.15 23.09 9.51 39.610 ~. ~Vehicle hours per wor~ker ~ 2.27E 1 .907 . 1 .66~ 1 .94E 2.57E 1.235 1 .486 1.262 0.648 1 .937 1.574 0.702 0.813 1.149 1.668 1.495 2.468 0.065 2.822 4.714 2.214 0.781 3.200 2.355 1.127 1.264 2.336 0.946 3.417 1.747 1.834 0.688 2.593 ~ Peak veh~icles pe ~ ~ ~worker ~ ~:~ ~:~:~ ~ :~ ~:~ ~ ~ 0.74E 0.77t 0.67( 0.82` 0.87~ 0.444 0.71 ~ 0.474 0.26C 0.67C 0.48E 0.23C 0.27E 0.44~ 0.468 0.376 0.704 1.055 0.800 1.460 0.698 0.270 0.930 0.850 0.405 0.410 0.827 0.246 1.078 0.869 0.774 0.207 1.163 A-25

1980 Land Use . ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ La dear ~ ~ ~ A, ~ ~ I. ~ I: it: I: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -aft ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~-~ ~ ~ ~ ~ no ~ feat ~ ~ ~ ~ ,O~ o~.~.~,ous~'ng Hi: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -I ~ ~ ~ ~ I: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~w~nits~with: I: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ At. .:. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ;~ ~:~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ i, i: ~ ~ ~ ~:~ ~ ~ ~ At. ~ .~:~ ~ At: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~-~ ~ ~ I:: ~ USA ~ ~ ~ ~: :~ Aim: Federal maids ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~1 unit mini ~ ~ ~ ~ :: :: :::: : :: : : : : : : : :: ::::: : :: ::::: : ::: : :: :-: ~:~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :~ -I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :: ~ ~ flour aanized~a~rea~ ~ : ~ : :~stru:cture~ ~ ~ ~ Atlanta92964.1 % . Baltimore41169.2% : Boston90949.1 % Buffalo37455.7% Chicago1,89950.5% ~ ICincinnati46662.7% |CIeveland91565.5% |Columbus37967.2% |Dallas89267.7% |Denver41664.7% , Detroit1,08671.4% l Houston1 ,31162.5% Indianapolis42069.9% Kansas City18172.2% . Los Angeles1,72460.1% Miami41147.6% , Milwaukee52159.5% Minneapolis80364.9% New Orleans27561.2% New York3,10838.6% . Philadelphia90270.5% Phoenix55067. 1% Pittsburgh97770.6% i: Portland41570.0% | Providence42853.8%~ Sacramento31868.6% I: San Antonio35072.1%| San Diego61461.0%| 1 San Francisco74861.7%| 1 Seattle64567.5% St. Louis19068.3%| Tampa31762.7%| Washington81757.7% _ . A-26

Next: APPENDIX B - SOURCES FOR CROSS-SECTIONAL DATASET »
Trends in Single Occupant Vehicle and Vehicle Miles of Travel Growth in the United States: Final Report Get This Book
×
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!