National Academies Press: OpenBook

Assessment of Nexrad Coverage and Associated Weather Services (1995)

Chapter: 5 Conclusions and Recommendations

« Previous: 4 Guidelines for Assessing Possible Degradation of Service in Specific Areas
Suggested Citation:"5 Conclusions and Recommendations." National Research Council. 1995. Assessment of Nexrad Coverage and Associated Weather Services. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9056.
Page 51
Suggested Citation:"5 Conclusions and Recommendations." National Research Council. 1995. Assessment of Nexrad Coverage and Associated Weather Services. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9056.
Page 52
Suggested Citation:"5 Conclusions and Recommendations." National Research Council. 1995. Assessment of Nexrad Coverage and Associated Weather Services. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9056.
Page 53

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

5 Conclusions and Recommendations CONCLUSIONS Based on an intensive 6-month study, the NEXRAD Pane} of the NWSMC arrived at a strong overall conclusion that weather services on a national basis will be substantially improved under the currently planned NEXRAD network. The panel's conclusions were as follows: . The NEXRAD radars generally meet or exceed their technical design specifications in all respects relevant to the detection of weather phenomena and are substantially superior to the radars they are replacing. Therefore, there is no degradation of radar- detection coverage, but always improvement, when a NEXRAD is located at or near the site of one of the old radars. Indeed, the introduction of NEXRAD radars will significantly improve overall storm detection and warning performance and will substantially improve weather services on a national basis. Compared to coverage by the old network, the NEXRAD network will provide greater coverage at the 10, 000-ft level over the contiguous United States. For the detection of specific weather phenomena, that is, supercelis, mini-supercelIs, macrobursts, lake-effect snow, and stratiform snow, the NEXRAD coverage is generally much greater than it was for the old system; for hurricanes, the NEXRAD coverage is complete over the area of risk. Digital signal and data processing will permit the production and display of a wide variety of automated weather products which, in turn, will improve the forecasters' ability to rapidly assimilate and use the available data, not only from their NEXRAD but also from neighboring NEXRAD sites. The NEXRAD's Doppler feature and other technical characteristics allow for greatly increased capability for short-term forecasting ("nowcasting") ofthunderstorm initiation; detection of damaging winds, such as macrobursts and wind shear; and detection of the mesocyclones that are often associated with tornadoes and other severe storm hazards. Despite the fact that NEXRAD provides overall network superiority, in areas where the old radar site is relatively distant from the replacement NEXRAD, there may be some degradation in NEXRAD detection coverage. Examples of areas of concern include northern Alabama, northern Indiana, northwestern North Dakota, northwestern Pennsylvania, and southeastern Tennessee. The regions of degraded coverage will increase for most weather phenomena if 15 of the DoD NEXRADs that are currently operating in the network are not operated and maintained as pan of the national network. Operation of any of these radars with stan 51

52 Assessment of NEXRAD Coverage cards and availability less than those of NWS-operated units will effectively degrade coverage. Principal areas of concern include portions of DoD NEXRAD coverage areas in Alabama, Georgia, Mississippi, and Texas. In the national NEXRAD network, there will be four NEXRADs (i.e., Yuma, Arizona; Key West, Florida; Caribou, Maine; and Cedar City, Utah) without a nearby WFO. The reliability of the NEXRAD and the dependability of services derived from it, as well as communications, forecast office staffing, and warning and forecast dissemination, all become even more important when forecasters are remote from the radar site. Weather services are influenced by the full complement of observations and products available to the forecaster, as well as by cooperative spotter networks and the skills of experienced forecasters. The performance of this composite system is the critical element in assessing whether areas that have degraded radar-detection coverage will also have a degraded quality of weather services. Such assessments need to include a much more in-depth technical analysis for these areas and locations where there are radar coverage concerns than has been the case to date. . . following: RECOMMENDATIONS Based on its analyses and on the conclusions derived from them, the pane! recommends the 1. 3. 4. 5. _ Where the pane! has identified specific geographic areas where degradation of radar- detection coverage may occur, the National Weather Service should examine each potentially vulnerable area to determine whether such degradation would result in degradation of associated weather services. 2. The procedures and criteria for decommissioning old radars are specified in existing National Weather Service documentation; these should be rigorously applied, especially in vulnerable areas. Additional criteria/procedures proposed by the pane! (described in Chapter 4, under "Assessment Criteria and Procedures") should be followed in assessing the degradation of service and determining corrective actions. These assessment processes should be incorporated into official National Weather Service guidelines and procedures and used in conjunction with the requirements in P.~. 102-567. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration should take immediate steps to ensure that the 15 NEXRADs under the control of the Department of Defense, which are needed to avoid degraded coverage, function as fully committed elements of the national weather radar network, operating with the same standards, quality, and avail ability as the National Weather Service-operated NEXRADs. The National Weather Service should ensure that maintenance for, operation of, and communication with NEXRADs that are not located near a Weather Forecast Office are in full accordance with network standards. In addition, responsibilities for weather services to the area covered by these NEXRADs should be unambiguously assigned to a specific Weather Forecast Office to ensure high-quality weather services for that area. Staffing and communications capability should be commensurate with each Weather Forecast Off~ce's service area's responsibilities. The storm-detection and warning performance of the composite national weather system, as a function of range from a NEXRAD, should receive an in-depth independent technical assessment that considers region-specific issues. This assessment should evalu

Conclusions and Recommendations 53 6. ate the warnings and reported events on a per-unit-area basis, as well as the traditional National Weather Service verification statistics. The assessment should include further testing in the Modernization and Associated Restructuring Demonstration in addition to tests at diverse geographic locations. The adequacy of NEXRAD coverage with respect to the "no degradation of service" requirement should be reexamined in an independent study after all National Weather Service NEXRADs are commissioned.

Next: References »
Assessment of Nexrad Coverage and Associated Weather Services Get This Book
 Assessment of Nexrad Coverage and Associated Weather Services
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF


  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook,'s online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!