References
Beaton, A.E. and R. Zwick 1992 Overview of the National Assessment of Educational Progress. Journal of Educational Statistics. 17(2): 95-109.
Bock, R.D. 1993 Domain-Referenced Reporting in Large-Scale Educational Assessments. Paper commissioned by the National Academy of Education for the Capstone Report of the NAE Technical Review Panel on State/NAEP Assessment.
Bock, R.D. D. Thissen, and M.F. Zimowski 1997 IRT Estimation of Domain Scores. Journal of Educational Measurement 34: 197-211.
Forsyth, F., R. Hambleton, R. Linn, R. Mislevy, and W. Yen, 1996 Design and Feasibility Team: Report to the National Assessment GoverningBoard, Report of July 1.
Hawkes, M., P. Kimmelman, and D. Kroeze 1997 Becoming “First in the World” in Math and Science. Phi Delta Kappan, September.
Johnson, E., S. Lazer, and O'Sullivan 1997 NAEP reconfigured: An integrated redesign of the National Assessment of Educational Progress. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
Lord, Frederick M. 1980 Applications of Item Response Theory to Practical Testing Problems. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Mazzeo, J. 2000 NAEP's Year-2000 Market-Basket Study: What Do We Expect to Learn? Paper prepared for National Research Council Workshop on Market-Basket Reporting.
National Assessment Governing Board 1996 Redesigning the National Assessment of Educational Progress. Policy Statement.
1997 Resolution on Market Basket Reporting, August 2.
1999a Policy Guidance on the NAEP Short Form: Summary of Principles Related to Measurement Issues.
1999b The National Assessment of Educational Progress: Design 2000-2010.
National Education Goals Panel 1994 The National Education Goals Report: Building a Nation of Leaders. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
National Research Council 1999a Embedding Questions: The Pursuit of a Common Measure in Uncommon Tests. Committee on Embedding Common Test Items in State and District Assessments. D.M. Koretz, M.W. Bertenthal, and B.F. Green, eds. Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
1999bGrading the Nation's Report Card: Evaluating NAEP and Transforming the Assessment of Educational Progress. Committee on the Evaluation of National and State Assessments of Progress. J.W. Pellegrino,L.R. Jones, and K.M. Mitchell, eds. Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
1999cReporting District-Level NAEP Data: Summary of a Workshop. Committee on NAEP Reporting Practices: Investigating District-Level and Market-Basket Reporting. P.J. DeVito and J.A. Koenig, eds. Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
1999d Uncommon Measures: Equivalence and Linkage Among Educational Tests. Committee on the Equivalency and Linkage of Educational Tests. M.J. Feuer, P.W. Holland, B.F. Green, M.W. Bertenthal, and F.C. Hemphill, eds. Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
