While organ transplantation has helped many individuals in the United States, the current transplantation system is inefficient and inequitable. At the request of the U.S. Congress, the National Institutes of Health sponsored a study by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine to review the fairness, equity, transparency, and cost-effectiveness in the system of procuring, allocating, and distributing deceased donor organs. The committee’s recommendations are described below in the context of a patient’s journey through the transplant system—from disease onset to post-transplant outcomes.
The current organ transplant system is unduly fragmented and inefficient. Its components operate largely independently of one another, and there is no organization or entity responsible for overseeing the performance of the organ transplant system as a whole. If the different entities in the organ transplant system operated in a more coordinated fashion with common goals and unified policies and processes, it could save additional lives and be more equitable. The organ transplant system is overseen by several government agencies such as CMS and HHS, which are ideally positioned to take actions that will increase the coordination, efficiency, and equity of the transplantation system.
The behavior of organ procurement organizations, transplant centers, and other actors in the transplant space is determined largely by CMS’ reimbursement policies. CMS can alter these reimbursement policies to incentivize behavior that improves the number of organs transplanted and promotes equity in the transplant system.
CMS should adopt payment policies that incentivize all providers – from primary and specialty care of patients with organ failure to referral for transplant, care while awaiting a transplant, and long-term posttransplant care – to improve the number of transplants performed, equity in access to care, and outcomes for patients. These could include: