The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine’s Forum on Drug Discovery, Development, and Translation and Forum on Neuroscience and Nervous System Disorders hosted a public workshop in December 2023. The workshop convened professionals who typically diagnose attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), drug developers, researchers, people with lived experience, and other participants to discuss the diagnosis and treatment of adults with ADHD, explore the challenges and opportunities for drug development, and consider strategies for assessing the risks and benefits of ADHD medication treatment in adult populations. The workshop was supported, in part, through a grant (PAR-23-072) from the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
Statements and opinions expressed are those of individual workshop presenters and participants.1
ADHD in adults is common, yet its diagnosis is complex. Many adults with ADHD have at least one comorbid psychiatric disorder such as depression, bipolar disorder, anxiety, and/or substance use disorder (SUD) complicating diagnosis. Further complicating the matter are providers’ concerns about patient misuse, risk of SUD, and Drug Enforcement Administration audits that could result in them losing their license. There is a need for clinicians to better understand and diagnose ADHD in adults, including improvements in diagnostic criteria and developing treatment algorithms. In the absence of guidelines and knowledge, treatment and patients suffer. (Califf, Childress, Green, Solanto)
ADHD is more challenging to diagnose in adults than in children as symptoms in adults are heterogeneous, many adults test false-positive on screening tests, and clinicians disagree on the threshold of symptoms needed for a diagnosis. Comorbidities, trauma, adversity, and substance use can also complicate the diagnosis of ADHD in adults. These misdiagnoses can exacerbate health inequities in historically marginalized communities and continue to impact access to resources both for adult patients and their providers. Bias and stigma around an ADHD diagnosis extends across racial, ethnic, and gender lines. Increasing awareness of adult ADHD and openly talking about it can serve to reduce stigma and bias associated with the disorder. (Cheyette, Goodman, Higgins, Obeng, Olfson, Walker, Weisenbach)
Attention is needed on what is most relevant for adults with ADHD, including an awareness of how ADHD interacts with comorbid conditions and what medications, if any, are best suited for the patient. Using a shared decision-making approach, as is done with depression and other mental health issues, patients can work with their providers to figure out what treatment options are right for them. (Barron, Cheyette, Goodman, Higgins, Olfson, Walker, Weisenbach)
Receiving the appropriate diagnosis and treatment for adult ADHD can revitalize self-esteem, function, relationships, and bring a person to a state they never knew was possible. However, this all must be balanced with the tradeoffs that come with an ADHD diagnosis and its subsequent treatment. Following a diagnosis, one might experience stigmatization and shaming from those around them in both personal and professional settings. Additionally, taking some of the medications can impact one’s eligibility for insurance and certain jobs. While medication can help, other challenges associated with managing life require non-medication treatments, like cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and coaching. For many, receiving an official diagnosis and/or following a certain treatment option comes down to risk-benefit assessments. These assessments are different at the population level versus the individual level as individual risks and benefits may vary. (Barron, Gold, Goodman, Gordon, Mahome, Walker, Winterstein)
Bringing a new drug to market is expensive, time-consuming, and risky. However, there are multiple drug options for treating adult ADHD available now. Taken at clinically relevant doses, stimulants improve cognition in people with ADHD. Furthermore, current research into the effects of stimulants on the brain has suggested a strategy for identifying drugs that improve cognition while avoiding the abuse potential of stimulants. Yet, the insurance market drives providers to prescribe inexpensive generic stimulants. As a result, most ADHD drug research is focused on tweaking existing drugs rather than developing new drugs. There are also many types of non-stimulant drugs for ADHD. While these drugs work differently than stimulants, they have been shown to be more helpful for the self-regulation of attention. There is also a need to educate all providers on ADHD diagnosis and treatment options because many adults living with ADHD are initially diagnosed and treated by general practitioners and nurse practitioners. (Arnsten, Berridge, Farchione, Lietzan, Rubin)
ADHD is a public health issue. Allowing ADHD in adults to go untreated leads to lower earnings, lower academic achievement, impulsive and risky actions, and increased risk of numerous negative effects, including an increased risk of death. Taking a public health approach to addressing adult ADHD and centering on the lived experience of those with it, especially those who rely on stimulant medication, is important to better understand how to diagnose and treat adult ADHD. (Childress, El-Sabawi)
Adult ADHD is common, complex, and often difficult to diagnose and treat. Taking a public health approach to adult ADHD will improve the lives of adults with ADHD across populations. This will require up-to-date diagnosis and treatment guidelines along with training and education for providers. Most importantly, the approach will need to embrace inclusivity regarding patients and others with lived experience. (Blanco, Childress, Goodman, Green, Higgins, Robinson, Seliby Perkins, Solanto, Walker)
Disclaimer:
This page is a factual summary of what occurred at the workshop. The statements, recommendations, and opinions expressed are those of individual presenters and participants. These views are not necessarily endorsed or verified by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, and they should not be construed as reflecting any group consensus.