The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine Forum on Neuroscience and Nervous System Disorders provides an important venue for candid discussions about emerging and critical issues among key stakeholders, including federal, private, academic, and nonprofit organizations. As part of its ongoing work to advance neuroscience training, the Forum’s Action Collaborative on Neuroscience Training: Developing a Nimble and Versatile Workforce initiated a series of virtual workshops to illuminate critical issues in the field and provide a venue for stakeholders to discuss ways to move forward. The workshop series featured invited discussions that explored the following topics:

These virtual workshops engaged a wide range of perspectives in the neuroscience training ecosystem, such as neuroscience department chairs, graduate program directors, and other faculty; graduate students and postdoctoral researchers; scientists in industry and the non-profit sector; research funders and policymakers; and other interested stakeholders.

           

WORKSHOP 1

Racial Justice, Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Neuroscience Training

Racial justice, diversity, equity, and inclusion are critical issues that cross all aspects of neuroscience training and have tremendous implications for trainees, mentors, and the future of the field. This virtual workshop, the first in the series, provided personal experiences on the training process and explored how institutions are approaching these areas to bring about positive change. The workshop included two panel discussions.

Click here to download proceedings-in-brief from the workshop
photo of diverse students

Barriers and Successes from the Field

The first panel explored personal experiences with racism, racial justice, diversity, equity, and inclusion in neuroscience and academia at-large. Panelists discussed their own experiences and opportunities for improvement.

Check out key quotes and four clips from the panel discussion below.

Meeting this Moment to Drive Real Change in Neuroscience Training

The second panel offered perspectives on programs and changes from academic, professional, corporate, and government institutions that can increase racial justice, diversity, equity, and inclusion in neuroscience.

Check out key quotes and three clips from the panel discussion below.

WORKSHOP 2

Neuroscience Training in Challenging Times

The COVID-19 pandemic has introduced tremendous challenges for neuroscience training, including those related to lab closings, class disruptions, and reduced job postings, in addition to the challenges currently faced by everyone in society. The past year has also seen a collective awakening around issues related to race, diversity and inclusion, with the crisis also putting a spotlight on systemic issues that predated the pandemic. This virtual workshop—the second in the series—laid out a broad framework and highlighted some of the specific dimensions contributing to the current time of uncertainty, disruption, and stress for many neuroscience trainees, postdoctoral researchers, and their mentors, and consider changes needed across the ecosystem. The workshop included two panel discussions.

Click here to download proceedings-in-brief from the workshop
photo of diverse students

Personal Perspectives on Neuroscience Training in Challenging Times – A Conversation

The first panel included personal experiences with neuroscience training from a variety of career stages during the COVID-19 pandemic and a national reckoning with racial injustice.

Check out key quotes and clips from the panel below.

Institutional Perspectives on Potential Changes Needed in Neuroscience Training

The second panel included perspectives from government, nonprofit, and academic settings on institutional changes needed in neuroscience training.

Check out key quotes and clips from the panel below.

WORKSHOP 3

Fostering Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Neuroscience Training: A Virtual Workshop

Fostering a diverse neuroscience workforce, as well as an environment that is inclusive for all, are critical to the advancement of science and the future of the field. This virtual workshop—the third in the series— tackled the broad topic of inclusion and diversity in neuroscience training and included discussions on racial equity (expanding on themes from the first workshop in the series), supporting a global workforce, institutional and geographic diversity, unique challenges for women in science, understanding how the goals of inclusion intersect with the goals around changing the culture of science. The workshop included two panel discussions in which participants also considered the changes need to move the field forward in this space.

Click here to download proceedings-in-brief from the workshop
photo of diverse students

PERSPECTIVES TO BROADEN INCLUSION AND DIVERSITY

The first panel explored personal experiences on the need for broader diversity, equity, and inclusion in neuroscience training.

Check out key quotes and five clips from the panel discussion below.

CREATING CHANGE TO FOSTER DIVERSITY, EQUITY, AND INCLUSION

The second panel offered perspectives from academic and industry settings on changes needed to foster diversity, equity, and inclusion in neuroscience training to move the field forward.

Check out key quotes and clips from the panel below.

WORKSHOP 4

Re-envisioning Postdoctoral Training in Neuroscience

The vision and approach for postdoctoral training has evolved over the years. Originally viewed as a few years of apprenticeship and an opportunity to establish skills and develop ideas in preparation for an independent research career, postdoctoral training has progressed to a state of limbo for some postdoctoral researchers, with longer training durations; uncertain career prospects; and variability in the training, mentoring, and professional status across the neuroscience ecosystem. These challenges have been further exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic (e.g., challenges securing funding, job seeking, and managing relationships with their mentors), resulting in a high-level of uncertainty and stress for postdoctoral researchers. This workshop—the fourth in a series— explored the current postdoctoral training models in neuroscience and considered opportunities for modernization to meet the evolving needs in the field. The workshop included two panel discussions.

Click here to download proceedings-in-brief from the workshop
photo of diverse students

PERSONAL PERSPECTIVES ON POSTDOCTORAL NEUROSCIENCE TRAINING

The first panel offered perspectives on postdoctoral training in neuroscience. Current, former, and soon-to-be postdoctoral researchers reflected on their experiences, describing successes and opportunities to address problems with the current training model.

Check out key quotes and five clips from the panel discussion below.

EXPLORING CHANGES NEEDED IN POSTDOCTORAL NEUROSCIENCE TRAINING AT INSTITUTIONS

The second panel offered institutional perspectives on opportunities to modernize postdoctoral training in neuroscience to meet the evolving needs in the field.

Check out key quotes and five clips from the panel discussion below.

WORKSHOP 5

Evolving the Culture of Science and Training in Neuroscience to Meet a Changing World

Recent events, including the COVID-19 pandemic, have underscored the importance of science and of scientific training, but also the challenges and needed cultural shifts. This virtual workshop—the fifth and final in a series—brought together the themes discussed in preceding workshops and considered how the culture of science and scientific training can become more inclusive, balanced, and adaptive to changing times. Topics discussed include redefining the metrics of success in science; the need for training that supports collaboration, interdisciplinary research, and team science; training for varied career paths; and models of training and career structures that allow for commitments in one’s personal life and that support mental health and well-being. The workshop included two panel discussions.

Click here to download proceedings-in-brief from the workshop
photo of diverse students

PERSPECTIVES ON THE CULTURE OF SCIENCE IN CHANGING TIMES

The first panel provided personal perspectives on how the culture of science and scientific training in neuroscience can become more inclusive, balanced, and adaptive to changing times.

Check out key quotes and five clips from the panel discussion below.

SHIFTING THE CULTURE OF NEUROSCIENCE TRAINING THROUGH TEAM SCIENCE

The second panel offered perspectives on institutional changes needed to evolve neuroscience training to meet the growing diversity of the scientific enterprise, with a focus on using team science as one way to drive this transformation.

Check out key quotes and five clips from the panel discussion below.

Action Collaborative on Neuroscience Training: Developing a Nimble and Versatile Workforce

The Action Collaborative on Neuroscience Training was established under the auspices of the Forum on Neuroscience and Nervous System Disorders to examine current and future workforce needs within and outside of academia and explore how these should inform neuroscience training programs. The Collaborative membership is diverse, including representatives from different sectors, early career principal investigators (PIs), post-docs, a number of younger scientists from data science and computational organizations, and representatives from neuroscience adjacent areas such as engineering. The collaborative is an ad hoc activity convened under the auspices of the Forum on Neuroscience and Nervous System Disorders at the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (the National Academies). The work it produces does not necessarily represent the views of any one organization, the Forum, or the National Academies, and is not subjected to the review procedures of, nor is it a report or product of, the National Academies.

photo of diverse students

Collaborative Members


Rita Balice-Gordon (Co-Chair), Muna Therapeutics
Katja Brose (Co-Chair), The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative
Rosalind Segal (Co-Chair), Harvard University
Huda Akil, University of Michigan
David Cox, IBM Research AI
Sara Fenstermacher, New York University
Ayana Jordan, Yale School of Medicine
Stephen Korn, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
Walter Koroshetz, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
John Krystal, Yale School of Medicine
Alan Leshner, American Association for the Advancement of Science (CEO Emeritus)
Peter MacLeish, Morehouse School of Medicine
Carol Mason, Columbia University
Gentry Patrick, University of California, San Diego
Mark Rasenick, The University of Illinois at Chicago
Todd Sherer, The Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson’s Research
Kaela S. Singleton, Emory University
M. Morgan Taylor, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard
Ashlee Van’t Veer, National Institute of Mental Health
Cristin Welle, University of Colorado, Denver
Andrew Welchman, Wellcome Trust

Forum on Neuroscience and Nervous System Disorders

The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine’s Forum on Neuroscience and Nervous System Disorders provides an important venue for candid discussions about emerging and critical issues among key stakeholders, including federal agencies that serve as research sponsors and regulators; the private sector; the academic community; and the nonprofit sector, including foundations and disease advocacy groups. The Forum’s activities serve to inspire new ideas and shape the field, foster relationships and collaboration, develop an improved understanding of each other’s perspectives and priorities, and influence policies and programs.

Visit the Forum Website
Contact Us

photo of diverse students

Select Publications from the National Academies Relevant to Diversity and Graduate Education in STEM



cover

Developing a 21st Century Neuroscience Workforce: Workshop Summary (2015)
Developing a 21st Century Neuroscience Workforce summarizes a workshop convened by the Forum on Neuroscience and Nervous System Disorders to explore future workforce needs and how these needs should inform training programs. Workshop participants considered what new subdisciplines and collaborations might be needed, including an examination of opportunities for cross-training of neuroscience research programs with other areas.

cover

Impact of COVID-19 on the Careers of Women in Academic Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2021)
The spring of 2020 marked a change in how almost everyone conducted their personal and professional lives, both within science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and medicine (STEMM) and beyond. The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted global scientific conferences and individual laboratories and required people to find space in their homes from which to work. It blurred the boundaries between work and non-work, infusing ambiguity into everyday activities. While adaptations that allowed people to connect became more common, the evidence available at the end of 2020 suggests that the disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic endangered the engagement, experience, and retention of women in academic STEMM, and may roll back some of the achievement gains made by women in the academy to date.

cover

Minority Serving Institutions: America's Underutilized Resource for Strengthening the STEM Workforce (2019)
Minority Serving Institutions examines the nation’s MSIs and identifies promising programs and effective strategies that have the highest potential return on investment for the nation by increasing the quantity and quality MSI STEM graduates. This report also provides critical information and perspective about the importance of MSIs to other stakeholders in the nation’s system of higher education and the organizations that support them.

cover

The Next Generation of Biomedical and Behavioral Sciences Researchers: Breaking Through (2019)
The Next Generation of Biomedical and Behavioral Sciences Researchers: Breaking Through evaluates the factors that influence transitions into independent research careers in the biomedical and behavioral sciences and offers recommendations to improve those transitions. These recommendations chart a path to a biomedical research enterprise that is competitive, rigorous, fair, dynamic, and can attract the best minds from across the country.

cover

Graduate STEM Education for the 21st Century (2018)
Graduate STEM Education for the 21st Century examines the current state of U.S. graduate STEM education. This report explores how the system might best respond to ongoing developments in the conduct of research on evidence-based teaching practices and in the needs and interests of its students and the broader society it seeks to serve.

cover

The Science of Effective Mentorship in STEMM (2019)
Mentorship is a catalyst capable of unleashing one's potential for discovery, curiosity, and participation in STEMM and subsequently improving the training environment in which that STEMM potential is fostered. The Science of Effective Mentorship in STEMM explores the importance of mentorship, the science of mentoring relationships, mentorship of underrepresented students in STEMM, mentorship structures and behaviors, and institutional cultures that support mentorship.

cover

The Science of Effective Mentorship in STEMM Online Guide v1.0
Mentorship is essential in developing science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and medicine (STEMM) professionals. It is a set of skills that can and should be learned, practiced, and improved upon with self-reflection and feedback. If you are a mentor or mentee yourself, or if you are a leader in your organization responsible for ensuring that your faculty and their mentees have the skills to engage in the most effective mentoring relationships, this website is for you.

cover

Promising Practices for Addressing the Underrepresentation of Women in Science, Engineering and Medicine: Opening Doors (2020)
Many women do not pursue or persist in careers science, engineering, and medicine careers, or advance to leadership positions—not because they lack the talent or aspirations, but because they face barriers, including implicit and explicit bias; sexual harassment; unequal access to funding and resources; pay inequity; and higher teaching and advising load, among others. This Promising Practices for Addressing the Underrepresentation of Women in Science, Engineering, and Medicine reviews and synthesizes existing research on policies, practices, programs, and other interventions for improving the recruitment, retention, and sustained advancement into leadership roles of women in these disciplines.

cover

Evidence-Based Interventions for Addressing the Underrepresentation of Women in Science, Engineering, Mathematics, and Medicine: Proceedings of a Symposium—in Brief (2020)
The scientific, engineering, and medical communities have worked for decades to improve the representation of women in science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and medicine (STEMM). While there has been significant progress, women—and particularly women of color—remain underrepresented in many scientific fields and at many levels in education and career stages. This publication summarizes a symposium held to examine policies, practices, and strategies that have effectively improved the representation of women in STEMM.

cover

Mental Health, Substance Use, and Wellbeing in Higher Education: Supporting the Whole Student (2021)
Student wellbeing is foundational to academic success. One recent survey of postsecondary educators found that nearly 80 percent believed emotional wellbeing is a "very" or "extremely" important factor in student success. Studies have found the dropout rates for students with a diagnosed mental health problem range from 43 percent to as high as 86 percent. While dealing with stress is a normal part of life, for some students, stress can adversely affect their physical, emotional, and psychological health, particularly given that adolescence and early adulthood are when most mental illnesses are first manifested. In addition to students who may develop mental health challenges during their time in postsecondary education, many students arrive on campus with a mental health problem or having experienced significant trauma in their lives, which can also negatively affect physical, emotional, and psychological wellbeing.

cover

Enhancing the Effectiveness of Team Science (2015)
The past half-century has witnessed a dramatic increase in the scale and complexity of scientific research. The growing scale of science has been accompanied by a shift toward collaborative research, referred to as "team science." Scientific research is increasingly conducted by small teams and larger groups rather than individual investigators, but the challenges of collaboration can slow these teams' progress in achieving their scientific goals. How does a team-based approach work, and how can universities and research institutions support teams?