National Research Council; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Board on Earth Sciences and Resources; Committee on Material Flows Accounting of Natural Resources, Products, and Residuals; Committee on Earth Resources
National Research Council; Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education; Panel on Learning and Instruction; Strategic Education Research Partnership; M. Suzanne Donovan and James W. Pellegrino, Editors
National Research Council; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Ocean Studies Board; Water Science and Technology Board; Panel on River Basin and Coastal Systems Planning; Committee to Assess the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Methods of Analysis and Peer Review for Water Resources Project Planning
National Research Council; Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Space Studies Board; Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board; Board on Atmospheric Sciences and Climate; Committee on Environmental Satellite Data Utilization
National Research Council; Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education; Mathematical Sciences Education Board; Center for Education; Committee for a Review of the Evaluation Data on the Effectiveness of NSF-Supported and Commercially Generated Mathematics Curriculum Materials; Jere Confrey and Vicki Stohl, Editors
Proceedings published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine chronicle the presentations and discussions at a workshop, symposium, or other event convened by the National Academies. The statements and opinions contained in proceedings are those of the participants and are not endorsed by other participants, the planning committee, or the National Academies.
Consensus Study Reports:
Consensus Study Reports published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine document the evidence-based consensus on the study’s statement of task by an authoring committee of experts. Reports typically include findings, conclusions, and recommendations based on information gathered by the committee and the committee’s deliberations. Each report has been subjected to a rigorous and independent peer-review process and it represents the position of the National Academies on the statement of task.