Institute of Medicine; Board on Health Sciences Policy; Committee on Ethical Considerations for Revisions to DHHS Regulations for Protection of Prisoners Involved in Research; Lawrence O. Gostin, Cori Vanchieri, and Andrew Pope, Editors
National Research Council; Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education; Committee on National Statistics; Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education; Stephen E. Fienberg, Margaret E. Martin, and Miron L. Straf, Editors
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Policy and Global Affairs; Board on Science, Technology, and Economic Policy; Committee on the Assessment of the SBIR and STTR Programs at NIH
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Policy and Global Affairs; Development, Security, and Cooperation; Committee on the Review of Science, Technology, Innovation, and Partnerships (STIP) for Development and Implications for the Future of USAID
Proceedings published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine chronicle the presentations and discussions at a workshop, symposium, or other event convened by the National Academies. The statements and opinions contained in proceedings are those of the participants and are not endorsed by other participants, the planning committee, or the National Academies.
Consensus Study Reports:
Consensus Study Reports published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine document the evidence-based consensus on the study’s statement of task by an authoring committee of experts. Reports typically include findings, conclusions, and recommendations based on information gathered by the committee and the committee’s deliberations. Each report has been subjected to a rigorous and independent peer-review process and it represents the position of the National Academies on the statement of task.