National Research Council; Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education; Center for Social and Economic Studies; Panel on Behavioral, Social, and Institutional Issues; Committee on Science and Technology for Countering Terrorism; Neil J. Smelser and Faith Mitchell, Editors
Behavioral and Social Sciences | Conflict and Security Issues
National Research Council; Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences; Board on Army Science and Technology; Committee on Review and Evaluation of Alternative Technologies for Demilitarization of Assembled Chemical Weapons: Phase II
Environment and Environmental Studies | Math, Chemistry, and Physics
National Research Council; Russian Academy of Sciences; Policy and Global Affairs; Office for Central Europe and Eurasia; Development, Security, and Cooperation; Committee on Confronting Terrorism in Russia
National Research Council; Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences; Board on Energy and Environmental Systems; Committee on Alternatives for Controlling the Release of Solid Materials from Nuclear Regulatory Commission-Licensed Facilities
National Research Council; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Board on Radioactive Waste Management; Committee on the Characterization of Remote-Handled Transuranic Waste for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant
Proceedings published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine chronicle the presentations and discussions at a workshop, symposium, or other event convened by the National Academies. The statements and opinions contained in proceedings are those of the participants and are not endorsed by other participants, the planning committee, or the National Academies.
Consensus Study Reports:
Consensus Study Reports published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine document the evidence-based consensus on the study’s statement of task by an authoring committee of experts. Reports typically include findings, conclusions, and recommendations based on information gathered by the committee and the committee’s deliberations. Each report has been subjected to a rigorous and independent peer-review process and it represents the position of the National Academies on the statement of task.