National Research Council; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Board on Earth Sciences and Resources; Committee on Underground Engineering for Sustainable Development; Committee on Geological and Geotechnical Engineering
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Policy and Global Affairs; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Science and Technology for Sustainability Program; Board on Atmospheric Sciences and Climate; Committee on Transition Toward Sustainability After 15 Years: Where Do We Stand in Advancing the Scientific Foundation; Dominic Brose, Yasmin Romitti, Ryan Anderson, and Alison Macalady, Rapporteurs
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Transportation Research Board; Airport Cooperative Research Program; Landrum and Brown, Inc.; Environmental Consulting Group, Inc.; Primera Engineers, Ltd.; Muller and Muller, Ltd.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Policy and Global Affairs; Science and Technology for Sustainability Program; Committee on Pathways to Urban Sustainability: Challenges and Opportunities
National Research Council; Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences; Board on Infrastructure and the Constructed Environment; Toward Sustainable Critical Infrastructure Systems: Framing the Challenges Workshop Committee
Proceedings published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine chronicle the presentations and discussions at a workshop, symposium, or other event convened by the National Academies. The statements and opinions contained in proceedings are those of the participants and are not endorsed by other participants, the planning committee, or the National Academies.
Consensus Study Reports:
Consensus Study Reports published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine document the evidence-based consensus on the study’s statement of task by an authoring committee of experts. Reports typically include findings, conclusions, and recommendations based on information gathered by the committee and the committee’s deliberations. Each report has been subjected to a rigorous and independent peer-review process and it represents the position of the National Academies on the statement of task.