National Research Council; Institute of Medicine; Board on Children, Youth, and Families; Committee on Law and Justice; Committee on Child Maltreatment Research, Policy, and Practice for the Next Decade: Phase II; Anne C. Petersen, Joshua Joseph, and Monica Feit, Editors
Behavioral and Social Sciences | Health and Medicine
National Research Council; Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education; Committee on Law and Justice; Committee on a Prioritized Plan to Implement a Developmental Approach in Juvenile Justice Reform
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Transportation Research Board; National Cooperative Highway Research Program; Ernest R. Frazier, Sr.; David S. Ekern; Michael C. Smith; Jeffrey L. Western; Patricia G. Bye
Institute of Medicine; Board on the Health of Select Populations; Committee on the Assessment of Resiliency and Prevention Programs for Mental and Behavioral Health in Service Members and Their Families; Laura Aiuppa Denning, Marc Meisnere, and Kenneth E. Warner, Editors
Institute of Medicine; Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice; Roundtable on Population Health Improvement; Roundtable on the Promotion of Health Equity and the Elimination of Health Disparities; Alison Mack, Alina Baciu, and Nirupa Goel, Rapporteurs
Proceedings published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine chronicle the presentations and discussions at a workshop, symposium, or other event convened by the National Academies. The statements and opinions contained in proceedings are those of the participants and are not endorsed by other participants, the planning committee, or the National Academies.
Consensus Study Reports:
Consensus Study Reports published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine document the evidence-based consensus on the study’s statement of task by an authoring committee of experts. Reports typically include findings, conclusions, and recommendations based on information gathered by the committee and the committee’s deliberations. Each report has been subjected to a rigorous and independent peer-review process and it represents the position of the National Academies on the statement of task.