National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Board on Atmospheric Sciences and Climate; Committee on Opportunities to Improve the Representation of Clouds and Aerosols in Climate Models with National Collection Systems: A Workshop; Katie Thomas, Rapporteur
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education; Board on Environmental Change and Society; Committee on Assessing Approaches to Updating the Social Cost of Carbon
National Research Council; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Board on Atmospheric Sciences and Climate; Committee on Challenges in Representing Physical Processes in Coupled Atmosphere-Land-Ocean Models
Earth Sciences | Environment and Environmental Studies
National Research Council; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Board on Life Sciences; Standing Committee on Emerging Science for Environmental Health Decisions; Kellyn Betts and Keegan Sawyer, Rapporteurs
National Research Council; Policy and Global Affairs; Board on Science, Technology, and Economic Policy; Committee on the Effects of Provisions in the Internal Revenue Code on Greenhouse Gas Emissions; William D. Nordhaus, Stephen A. Merrill, and Paul T. Beaton, Editors
Environment and Environmental Studies | Industry and Labor
Proceedings published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine chronicle the presentations and discussions at a workshop, symposium, or other event convened by the National Academies. The statements and opinions contained in proceedings are those of the participants and are not endorsed by other participants, the planning committee, or the National Academies.
Consensus Study Reports:
Consensus Study Reports published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine document the evidence-based consensus on the study’s statement of task by an authoring committee of experts. Reports typically include findings, conclusions, and recommendations based on information gathered by the committee and the committee’s deliberations. Each report has been subjected to a rigorous and independent peer-review process and it represents the position of the National Academies on the statement of task.