National Research Council; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Board on Life Sciences; Standing Committee on Emerging Science for Environmental Health Decisions; Kellyn Betts and Keegan Sawyer, Rapporteurs
Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences; Commission on Engineering and Technical Systems; Panel on Southern California Bight of the Committee on a Systems Assessment of Marine Environmental Monitoring
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Transportation Research Board; National Cooperative Highway Research Program; Anna Lantin; Laura Larsen; Ankita Vyas; Michael Barrett; Marc Leisenring; Kevin Koryto; Linda Pechacek
National Research Council; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Ocean Studies Board; Water Science and Technology Board; Panel on River Basin and Coastal Systems Planning; Committee to Assess the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Methods of Analysis and Peer Review for Water Resources Project Planning
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Board on Life Sciences; Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources; Committee on Assistance to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service on Taxonomic Studies of the Red Wolf: A Review of Applications to Carry Out Research and Development of a Research Strategy
Proceedings published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine chronicle the presentations and discussions at a workshop, symposium, or other event convened by the National Academies. The statements and opinions contained in proceedings are those of the participants and are not endorsed by other participants, the planning committee, or the National Academies.
Consensus Study Reports:
Consensus Study Reports published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine document the evidence-based consensus on the study’s statement of task by an authoring committee of experts. Reports typically include findings, conclusions, and recommendations based on information gathered by the committee and the committee’s deliberations. Each report has been subjected to a rigorous and independent peer-review process and it represents the position of the National Academies on the statement of task.