National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences; Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology; Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources; Board on Energy and Environmental Systems; Committee on Current Methods for Life Cycle Analyses of Low-Carbon Transportation Fuels in the United States
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Health and Medicine Division; Board on Health Care Services; Board on Health Sciences Policy; Francis K. Amankwah, Alexandra Andrada, Sharyl J. Nass, and Theresa Wizemann, Rapporteurs
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Transportation Research Board; Airport Cooperative Research Program; Economic Development Research Group Inc; David Gillen; ICF SH&E; Kramer aerotek Inc; Mead & Hunt
National Research Council; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources; Planning Committee for the Workshop on Research to Improve the Evaluation of the Impacts of Genetically Engineered Organisms on Terrestrial and Aquatic Wildlife and Habitats; Paula Tarnapol Whitacre, Rapporteur
Agriculture | Biology and Life Sciences | Environment and Environmental Studies
Proceedings published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine chronicle the presentations and discussions at a workshop, symposium, or other event convened by the National Academies. The statements and opinions contained in proceedings are those of the participants and are not endorsed by other participants, the planning committee, or the National Academies.
Consensus Study Reports:
Consensus Study Reports published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine document the evidence-based consensus on the study’s statement of task by an authoring committee of experts. Reports typically include findings, conclusions, and recommendations based on information gathered by the committee and the committee’s deliberations. Each report has been subjected to a rigorous and independent peer-review process and it represents the position of the National Academies on the statement of task.