National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Health and Medicine Division; National Cancer Policy Forum; Board on Health Care Services; Erin Balogh, Margie Patlak, and Sharyl J. Nass, Rapporteurs
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology; Board on Human-System Integration; Board on Life Sciences; Standing Committee on the Use of Emerging Science for Environmental Health Decisions; Natalie Armstrong, Carol Berkower, and Lyly Luhachack, Rapporteurs
Behavioral and Social Sciences | Environment and Environmental Studies | Health and Medicine
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Health and Medicine Division; Board on Health Sciences Policy; Committee on Preventing Dementia and Cognitive Impairment; Alan I. Leshner, Story Landis, Clare Stroud, and Autumn Downey, Editors
Institute of Medicine; Food and Nutrition Board; Panel on Macronutrients; Panel on the Definition of Dietary Fiber; Subcommittee on Upper Reference Levels of Nutrients; Subcommittee on Interpretation and Uses of Dietary Reference Intakes; Standing Committee on the Scientific Evaluation of Dietary Reference Intakes
Proceedings published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine chronicle the presentations and discussions at a workshop, symposium, or other event convened by the National Academies. The statements and opinions contained in proceedings are those of the participants and are not endorsed by other participants, the planning committee, or the National Academies.
Consensus Study Reports:
Consensus Study Reports published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine document the evidence-based consensus on the study’s statement of task by an authoring committee of experts. Reports typically include findings, conclusions, and recommendations based on information gathered by the committee and the committee’s deliberations. Each report has been subjected to a rigorous and independent peer-review process and it represents the position of the National Academies on the statement of task.