National Research Council; Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education; Board on Human-Systems Integration; Committee on the External Evaluation of NIDRR and Its Grantees; Jeanne C. Rivard, Mary Ellen O'Connell, and David H. Wegman, Editors
Behavioral and Social Sciences | Health and Medicine
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences; Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board; Space Studies Board; Committee on a Midterm Assessment of Implementation of the Decadal Survey on Life and Physical Sciences Research at NASA
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Institute of Medicine; Board on Health Sciences Policy; Committee to Review NASA's Evidence Reports on Human Health Risks; Carol E. H. Scott-Conner, Daniel R. Masys, and Catharyn T. Liverman, Editors
National Research Council; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Board on Chemical Sciences and Technology; Committee on Full-System Testing and Evaluation of Personal Protection Equipment Ensembles in Simulated Chemical-Warfare Environments
Conflict and Security Issues | Space and Aeronautics
National Research Council; Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences; Space Studies Board; Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board; Committee for the Decadal Survey on Biological and Physical Sciences in Space
Proceedings published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine chronicle the presentations and discussions at a workshop, symposium, or other event convened by the National Academies. The statements and opinions contained in proceedings are those of the participants and are not endorsed by other participants, the planning committee, or the National Academies.
Consensus Study Reports:
Consensus Study Reports published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine document the evidence-based consensus on the study’s statement of task by an authoring committee of experts. Reports typically include findings, conclusions, and recommendations based on information gathered by the committee and the committee’s deliberations. Each report has been subjected to a rigorous and independent peer-review process and it represents the position of the National Academies on the statement of task.