National Research Council; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Transportation Research Board; Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology; Board on Atmospheric Sciences and Climate; Committee on Carbon Monoxide Episodes in Meteorological and Topographical Problem Areas
Institute of Medicine; Board on Health Care Services; Committee on Rapid Advance Demonstration Projects: Health Care Finance and Delivery Systems; Janet M. Corrigan, Ann Greiner, and Shari M. Erickson, Editors
National Research Council; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Policy and Global Affairs; Board on Radioactive Waste Management; Office for Central Europe and Eurasia; Development, Security, and Cooperation; Committee on End Points for Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste in Russia and the United States
National Research Council; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Board on Earth Sciences and Resources; Board on Atmospheric Sciences and Climate; Computer Science and Telecommunications Board; Committee on Partnerships in Weather and Climate Services; Committee on Geophysical and Environmental Data
National Research Council; Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences; Computer Science and Telecommunications Board; Committee on Authentication Technologies and Their Privacy Implications; Stephen T. Kent and Lynette I. Millett, Editors
Proceedings published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine chronicle the presentations and discussions at a workshop, symposium, or other event convened by the National Academies. The statements and opinions contained in proceedings are those of the participants and are not endorsed by other participants, the planning committee, or the National Academies.
Consensus Study Reports:
Consensus Study Reports published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine document the evidence-based consensus on the study’s statement of task by an authoring committee of experts. Reports typically include findings, conclusions, and recommendations based on information gathered by the committee and the committee’s deliberations. Each report has been subjected to a rigorous and independent peer-review process and it represents the position of the National Academies on the statement of task.