National Research Council; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Board on Earth Sciences and Resources; Committee for the Workshop on Grand Challenges in Earthquake Engineering Research—A Vision for NEES Experimental Facilities and Cyberinfrastructure Tools; Committee on Seismology and Geodynamics
National Research Council; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Board on Earth Sciences and Resources; Committee on National Earthquake Resilience—Research, Implementation, and Outreach; Committee on Seismology and Geodynamics
National Research Council; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Board on Earth Sciences and Resources; Committee on Private-Public Sector Collaboration to Enhance Community Disaster Resilience; Geographical Sciences Committee
Conflict and Security Issues | Earth Sciences | Policy for Science and Technology
Institute of Medicine; Board on Health Sciences Policy; Forum on Medical and Public Health Preparedness for Catastrophic Events; Kristin Viswanathan, Theresa Wizemann, and Bruce M. Altevogt, Rapporteurs
National Research Council; Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences; Computer Science and Telecommunications Board; Committee on Public Response to Alerts and Warnings on Mobile Devices: Current Knowledge and Research Gaps
Computers and Information Technology | Conflict and Security Issues
Proceedings published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine chronicle the presentations and discussions at a workshop, symposium, or other event convened by the National Academies. The statements and opinions contained in proceedings are those of the participants and are not endorsed by other participants, the planning committee, or the National Academies.
Consensus Study Reports:
Consensus Study Reports published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine document the evidence-based consensus on the study’s statement of task by an authoring committee of experts. Reports typically include findings, conclusions, and recommendations based on information gathered by the committee and the committee’s deliberations. Each report has been subjected to a rigorous and independent peer-review process and it represents the position of the National Academies on the statement of task.