Institute of Medicine; Board on Health Care Services; Committee on Standards for Systematic Reviews of Comparative Effectiveness Research; Jill Eden, Laura Levit, Alfred Berg, and Sally Morton, Editors
Russian Academy of Medical Sciences; Institute of Medicine; Board on Health Sciences Policy; Forum on Drug Discovery, Development, and Translation; Steve Olson, Rebecca English, and Anne Claiborne, Rapporteurs
Institute of Medicine; Food and Nutrition Board; Committee to Review Dietary Reference Intakes for Vitamin D and Calcium; A. Catharine Ross, Christine L. Taylor, Ann L. Yaktine, and Heather B. Del Valle, Editors
National Research Council; Institute of Medicine; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Board on Health Sciences Policy; Board on Life Sciences; Committee on the Use of Chimpanzees in Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Bruce M. Altevogt, Diana E. Pankevich, Marilee K. Shelton-Davenport, and Jeffrey P. Kahn, Editors
Agriculture | Biology and Life Sciences | Health and Medicine
National Academy of Sciences; National Academy of Engineering; Policy and Global Affairs; Institute of Medicine; Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy; Committee on Underrepresented Groups and the Expansion of the Science and Engineering Workforce Pipeline
Education | Engineering and Technology | Industry and Labor | Math, Chemistry, and Physics | Policy for Science and Technology
Proceedings published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine chronicle the presentations and discussions at a workshop, symposium, or other event convened by the National Academies. The statements and opinions contained in proceedings are those of the participants and are not endorsed by other participants, the planning committee, or the National Academies.
Consensus Study Reports:
Consensus Study Reports published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine document the evidence-based consensus on the study’s statement of task by an authoring committee of experts. Reports typically include findings, conclusions, and recommendations based on information gathered by the committee and the committee’s deliberations. Each report has been subjected to a rigorous and independent peer-review process and it represents the position of the National Academies on the statement of task.