Institute of Medicine; Board on Health Sciences Policy; Committee on the Public Health Dimensions of the Epilepsies; Mary Jane England, Catharyn T. Liverman, Andrea M. Schultz, and Larisa M. Strawbridge, Editors
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Transportation Research Board; National Cooperative Highway Research Program; Cambridge Systematics, Inc.; Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc.; Gallop Corporation; Chandra R. Bhat; Shapiro Transportation Consulting, LLC; Martin/Alexiou/Bryson, PLLC
National Research Council; Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education; Board on Science Education; Committee on the Status, Contributions, and Future Directions of Discipline-Based Education Research; Susan R. Singer, Natalie R. Nielsen, and Heidi A. Schweingruber, Editors
National Research Council; Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education; Committee on National Statistics; Board on Testing and Assessment; Panel on Measuring Higher Education Productivity: Conceptual Framework and Data Needs; Teresa A. Sullivan, Christopher Mackie, William F. Massy, and Esha Sinha, Editors
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Transportation Research Board; Transit Cooperative Research Program; Richard H. Pratt; John E. Evans, IV; Herbert S. Levinson; Shawn M. Turner; Chawn Yaw Jeng; Daniel Nabors; Texas Transportation Institute
Proceedings published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine chronicle the presentations and discussions at a workshop, symposium, or other event convened by the National Academies. The statements and opinions contained in proceedings are those of the participants and are not endorsed by other participants, the planning committee, or the National Academies.
Consensus Study Reports:
Consensus Study Reports published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine document the evidence-based consensus on the study’s statement of task by an authoring committee of experts. Reports typically include findings, conclusions, and recommendations based on information gathered by the committee and the committee’s deliberations. Each report has been subjected to a rigorous and independent peer-review process and it represents the position of the National Academies on the statement of task.