Dietary Reference Intakes for Vitamin A, Vitamin K, Arsenic, Boron, Chromium, Copper, Iodine, Iron, Manganese, Molybdenum, Nickel, Silicon, Vanadium, and Zinc (2001) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:
Appendix C Dietary Intake Data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III), 1988-1994
Appendix C Dietary Intake Data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III), 1988-1994
Pages 594-643
The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.
From page 594... ...
Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES IlI) , ~ 988 ~ 994 TABLE C-1 Mean and Percentiles for One-Day Intake of oc-Carotene (llg/day)
|
From page 595... ...
APPENDIX C 595 10th 25th 50th 75th 90th 95th 99th 0 3 210 1,107 2,066 3,894 6 91 638 1,596 3,194 5,417 6 17 56 655 1,376 3,443 9 22 58 366 1,190 3,443 8 25 68 291 1,202 5,846 8 29 76 257 1,638 4,476 9 39 128 1,386 2,355 7,207 10 51 191 1,457 2,464 6,620 13 58 308 2,028 3,174 6,053 13 51 262 1,681 3,135 5,758 7 19 60 400 1,719 5,171 4 21 58 295 1,348 2,927 7 29 97 567 1,327 3,718 10 44 208 1,460 2,712 6,960 15 59 354 1,823 3,240 7,427 14 58 488 2,250 3,266 4,966 9 41 166 1,175 1,836 6,735 10 43 111 483 2,132 6,735 9 36 144 1,184 2,416 5,689 9 36 144 1,184 2,389 5,689 continued
|
From page 596... ...
All sample weights greater than 40,000 were truncated to 40,000 to reduce the influence of extreme intake patterns. Food composition data are from the NDS-R Food and Nutrient Database, Version 30, 1999, Nutrition Coordinating Center, University of Minnesota.
|
From page 597... ...
SOURCE: ENVIRON International Corporation and Iowa State University Department of Statistics, 2000, Revised.
|
From page 598... ...
For all other groups, data were adjusted using the Iowa State University method. Mean, standard errors, and percentiles were obtained using CSide.
|
From page 599... ...
SOURCE: ENVIRON International Corporation and Iowa State University Department of Statistics, 2000.
|
From page 600... ...
Estimates represent the unadjusted distribution of the intake reported per individual (the distribution of the data does not meet the assumptions of the Iowa State University method, i.e., the C-Side program)
|
From page 601... ...
SOURCE: ENVIRON International Corporation and Iowa State University Department of Statistics, 2000, Revised.
|
From page 602... ...
For all other groups, data were adjusted using the Iowa State University method. Mean, standard errors, and percentiles were obtained using CSide.
|
From page 603... ...
SOURCE: ENVIRON International Corporation and Iowa State University Department of Statistics, 2000.
|
From page 604... ...
Estimates represent the unadjusted distribution of the intake reported per individual (the distribution of the data does not meet the assumptions of the Iowa State University method, i.e., the C-Side program)
|
From page 605... ...
SOURCE: ENVIRON International Corporation and Iowa State University Department of Statistics, 2000, Revised.
|
From page 606... ...
For all other groups, data were adjusted using the Iowa State University method. Mean, standard errors, and percentiles were obtained using CSide.
|
From page 607... ...
SOURCE: ENVIRON International Corporation and Iowa State University Department of Statistics, 2000.
|
From page 608... ...
For all other groups, data were adjusted using the Iowa State University method. Mean, standard errors, and percentiles were obtained using CSide.
|
From page 609... ...
SOURCE: ENVIRON International Corporation and Iowa State University Department of Statistics, 2000.
|
From page 610... ...
For all other groups, data were adjusted using the Iowa State University method. Mean, standard errors, and percentiles were obtained using CSide.
|
From page 611... ...
SOURCE: ENVIRON International Corporation and Iowa State University Department of Statistics, 2000.
|
From page 612... ...
Children fed human milk and females who had "blank but applicable" pregnancy and lactating status data or who responded "I don't know" to questions on pregnancy and lactating status were excluded from all analyses. a RAE = retinal activity equivalents.
|
From page 613... ...
d These values are potentially unreliable in a statistical sense based on an insufficient sample size as recommended in statistical reporting standards (Life Sciences Research Off~ce/Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.
|
From page 614... ...
Means and percentiles for these groups were computed using SAS PROC UNIVARIATE. For all other groups, data were adjusted using the Iowa State University method.
|
From page 615... ...
SOURCE: ENVIRON International Corporation and Iowa State University Department of Statistics, 2000.
|
From page 616... ...
For all other groups, data were adjusted using the Iowa State University method. Mean, standard errors, and percentiles were obtained using CSide.
|
From page 617... ...
SOURCE: ENVIRON International Corporation and Iowa State University Department of Statistics, 2000.
|
From page 618... ...
he Al Individuals 6+ 21,931 5 0 80 Standard error 0 01 o 60O3 O O723 0 02 Starldard error 22,279 1 15 o 60O3 0 02 0 02 NOTE: Estimates were obtained using C-SIDE v1.02 (C-SIDE courtesy of Iowa State University Statistical Laboratory)
|
From page 620... ...
1,858 28.8 1.1 3.3 6.4 NOTE: Means, standard errors, and percentiles were calculated with WesVar Complex Samples 3.0. Children fed human milk and females who had "blank but applicable" pregnancy and lactating status data or who responded "I don't know" to questions on pregnancy and lactating status were excluded from all analyses.
|
From page 621... ...
centile 10th 25th 50th 75th 90th 95th 99th 1c 1o.lc 14.7 17.6 22.1 4o.2c 57.9c 97.1c 6c 1.2C 4.3 14.3 23.2 26.oc 45.9c 122.8C 2 6.3 13.8 22.7 24.7 48.5 100.0 204.1 C 4 7.7 14.8 23.1 24.6 49.3 126.8 202.3C oc l4.3c 18.4c 2o.7c 23.oc 24.4c 24.9c 29.4c 3 6.4 14.7 23.0 24.6 48.7 100.0 200.9 3 6.4 14.7 23.0 24.6 48.5 100.0 200.4 c These values are potentially unreliable in a statistical sense based on an insufficient sample size as recommended in statistical reporting standards (Life Sciences Research Off~ce/Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.
|
From page 622... ...
For all other groups, data were adjusted using the Iowa State University method. Mean, standard errors, and percentiles were obtained using CSide.
|
From page 623... ...
SOURCE: ENVIRON International Corporation and Iowa State University Department of Statistics, 2000.
|
From page 624... ...
The intake distributions for 2-6 months, 7-12 months, and 1-3 years of age are unadjusted; the total nutrient intake is the sum of the unadjusted food intake and the daily supplement intake. For all other groups, individual total nutrient intakes were obtained as the sum of the adjusted individual usual intake from food alone and the daily supplement intake.
|
From page 625... ...
SOURCE: ENVIRON International Corporation and Iowa State University Department of Statistics, 2000.
|
From page 626... ...
Children fed human milk and females who had "blank but applicable" pregnancy and lactating status data or who responded "I don't know" to questions on pregnancy and lactating status were excluded from all analyses. a M = male, F = female, P/L = pregnant and lactating.
|
From page 627... ...
1995. Third Report on Nutrition Monitoring in the United States.
|
From page 628... ...
For all other groups, data were adjusted using the Iowa State University method. Mean, standard errors, and percentiles were obtained using CSide.
|
From page 629... ...
SOURCE: ENVIRON International Corporation and Iowa State University Department of Statistics, 2000.
|
From page 630... ...
The intake distributions for infants 2-6 months, 7-12 months, and 1-3 years of age are unadjusted; the total nutrient intake is the sum of the unadjusted food intake and the daily supplement intake. For all other groups, individual total nutrient intakes were obtained as the sum of the adjusted individual usual intake from food alone and the daily supplement intake.
|
From page 631... ...
SOURCE: ENVIRON International Corporation and Iowa State University Department of Statistics, 2000.
|
From page 632... ...
1,787 28.5 1.2 3.2 6.5 NOTE: Means, standard errors, and percentiles were calculated with WesVar Complex Samples 3.0. Children fed human milk and females who had "blank but applicable" pregnancy and lactating status data or who responded "I don't know" to questions on pregnancy and lactating status were excluded from all analyses.
|
From page 633... ...
Gentile 10th 25th 50th 75th 90th 95th 99th 1c 9.2c 14.5 17.4 21.1 44.9c 66.lc l20.9c 5c 2 oc 3 9 14.4 22.9 31.7c 50.4c l45.9C 4 6.4 14.0 22.7 24.6 36.4 79.6 159.3C 6 7.4 14.7 23.9 24.7 37.7 83.7 161.0C oc l4.3C 2l.9C 23.oc 24.1 c 24.7c 24.9c 3l.5C 2 6.5 14.5 23.9 24.7 38.3 79.1 160.3 2 6.5 14.7 23.9 24.7 33.7 78.9 160.2 c These values are potentially unreliable in a statistical sense based on an insufficient sample size as recommended in statistical reporting standards (Life Sciences Research Off~ce/Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.
|
From page 634... ...
1,400 5.85 0.72 0.24 0.58 NOTE: Means, standard errors, and percentiles were calculated with WesVar Complex Samples 3.0. Children fed human milk and females who had "blank but applicable" pregnancy and lactating status data or who responded "I don't know" to questions on pregnancy and lactating status were excluded from all analyses.
|
From page 635... ...
centile 10th 25th 50th 75th 90th 95th 99th oc 0.71 c 0.94c 1.24C l.69C l.96C 2.01 c 2.oSc 7c o.o9c 0.29 1.26 1.75 l.96c 2.63C 44.36C 9 0.54 1.40 1.78 1.91 1.99 8.48 65.22C 6 0.66 1.75 1.85 1.95 4.35 73.08 78.69C 4c o.79c l.83c 3l.32C 63.83C 96.31 c 128.15C 153.63C 4 0.58 1.58 1.84 1.94 2.03 32.10 78.19C 4 0.58 1.61 1.84 1.94 2.48 33.09 78.33c c These values are potentially unreliable in a statistical sense based on an insufficient sample size as recommended in statistical reporting standards (Life Sciences Research Off~ce/Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.
|
From page 636... ...
Children fed human milk and females who had "blank but applicable" pregnancy and lactating status data or who responded "I don't know" to questions on pregnancy and lactating status were excluded from all analyses. a M = male, F = female, P/L = pregnant and lactating.
|
From page 637... ...
1995. Third Report on Nutrition Monitoring in the United States.
|
From page 638... ...
For all other groups, data were adjusted using the Iowa State University method. Mean, standard errors, and percentiles were obtained using CSide.
|
From page 639... ...
SOURCE: ENVIRON International Corporation and Iowa State University Department of Statistics, 2000.
|
From page 640... ...
The intake distributions for 2-6 months, 7-12 months, and 1-3 years of age are unadjusted; the total nutrient intake is the sum of the unadjusted food intake and the daily supplement intake. For all other groups, individual total nutrient intakes were obtained as the sum of the adjusted individual usual intake from food alone and the daily supplement intake.
|
From page 641... ...
SOURCE: ENVIRON International Corporation and Iowa State University Department of Statistics, 2000.
|
From page 642... ...
28,178 1,149 13 0 100 NOTE: Means, standard errors, and percentiles were calculated with WesVar Complex Samples 3.0. Children fed human milk and females who had "blank but applicable" pregnancy and lactating status data or who responded "I don't know" to questions on pregnancy and lactating status were excluded from all analyses.
|
From page 643... ...
1995. Third Report on Nutrition Monitoring in the United States.
|
Key Terms
This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More
information on Chapter Skim is available.