Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

Appendix A: Learning From Cross-National Research
Pages 283-288

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 283...
... varies across countries and time periods, there is little to be gained from cross-country, longitudinal, cross-cohort, or repeated cross-section analyses. Thus, one of the basic hypotheses underlying a call for cross-national longitudinal data collection or cross-national analysis of repeated crosssections is the assumption that basic behavioral responses are stable across countries and time.
From page 284...
... assumes a common response effect across all individuals, i.e., a "homogeneous effects" model. An intermediate specification might allow the response parameters to vary according to observed covariates (the z variables defined above)
From page 285...
... Within-Country Comparisons Suppose all that is available are national samples. Where treatments are global for a particular subpopulation, such as the introduction of national screening (or a universal pension provision)
From page 286...
... ~. Failure to have comparable measures of important variables can severely reduce the possibility of exploiting cross-national variations in policies and other variables to enhance scientific knowledge of behavioral responses.
From page 287...
... An example is the conversion of monetary measures into a common value. Here, observed foreign exchange rates may convert francs into dollars, but this conversion may not conform to a purchasing power parity rate that could be used to equate the true purchasing power of given incomes in France and the United States.


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.