Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

2. Background and Problem Statement
Pages 8-11

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 8...
... According to Peggy Carr, the resolution and research plan provided "a bridge to the future" in which NAEP would be more inclusive, and "a bridge to the past" in which NAEP would continue to provide meaningful trend information. One of the chief concerns was that new policies and procedures would not interfere with the ability to report trends in the important subjects both for the nation and for the states.
From page 9...
... These students were allowed to take the test with the accommodations that they routinely received in their state or district assessments, as long as the accommodations were approved for use on NAEP. NAEPapproved accommodations for the 1996 administrations included extended time; individual or small group administration; a large-print version of the test; transcription, oral reading, or signing of directions; and use of bilingual dictionaries in mathematics.
From page 10...
... Reading aloud passages or questions on the reading assessment was explicitly prohibited. Alternative language versions and bilingual glossaries were not permitted on the reading or science assessments.
From page 11...
... The change in inclusion policy could mean that results from the pre-1996 assessments are not comparable to results based on the inclusion policy used for S3 (National Institute of Statistical Sciences, 20001. One of NAEP's chief objectives is to provide information about trends in U.S.


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.